Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #1256
| From | Scott Hemphill <hemphill@hemphills.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: Is this a bridging scenario? |
| References | (4 earlier) <e5b024d8-e2c6-4d7d-8969-70a983604ccd@x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com> <jls7ac$2pq5$1@saria.nerim.net> <4989b111-42a3-4ff4-994c-814c858c7689@qg3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <jlssko$39$1@saria.nerim.net> <ae19d8e4-3a63-4590-bd08-67f643df1b8c@w6g2000pbp.googlegroups.com> |
| Date | 2012-04-09 12:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m3lim4j1rz.fsf@hemphills.net> (permalink) |
Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> writes: > On Apr 9, 8:32 am, Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-s...@plouf.fr.eu.org> > wrote: >> Al a écrit : >> >> >> >> > So what do you think the rules should look like? >> >> For a start, only the ones I mentionned in my previous reply. > > Something is still screwy. > > I have eth0 on; > > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > auto eth0 > iface eth0 inet static > address 192.168.70.121 > netmask 255.0.0.0 > network 192.168.70.0 > broadcast 192.168.70.255 > #gateway 192.168.2.254 > > #auto wlan0 > #iface wlan0 inet static > #address 192.168.1.120 > #netmask 255.255.255.0 > #network 192.168.1.0 > #broadcast 192.168.1.255 > #gateway 192.168.1.254 > > And the camera should have a static of 192.168.70.140 - but for some > reason when I ssh into the linux box from the net via wlan0 I cant > ping the camera. > > Any thoughts? Your netmask is wrong. It should be: netmask 255.255.255.0 Scott -- Scott Hemphill hemphill@alumni.caltech.edu "This isn't flying. This is falling, with style." -- Buzz Lightyear
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 15:55 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 15:57 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2012-03-25 09:26 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-03-25 10:56 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2012-03-25 12:19 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-08 05:00 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-08 14:20 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-08 06:10 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-08 16:28 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-08 12:39 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-08 22:32 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Scott Hemphill <hemphill@hemphills.net> - 2012-04-09 12:41 -0400
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-09 11:52 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-09 21:09 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 01:56 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-10 20:30 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 16:30 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 19:23 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 22:54 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-11 09:33 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Scott Hemphill <hemphill@hemphills.net> - 2012-04-09 18:19 -0400
csiph-web