Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #1259
| From | Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: Is this a bridging scenario? |
| Date | 2012-04-09 21:09 +0200 |
| Organization | Plouf ! |
| Message-ID | <jlvc4f$u73$1@saria.nerim.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <4989b111-42a3-4ff4-994c-814c858c7689@qg3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <jlssko$39$1@saria.nerim.net> <ae19d8e4-3a63-4590-bd08-67f643df1b8c@w6g2000pbp.googlegroups.com> <m3lim4j1rz.fsf@hemphills.net> <41cda2ac-704c-407d-9716-fdd9ddba0011@s10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> |
Al a écrit : >>> auto eth0 >>> iface eth0 inet static >>> address 192.168.70.121 >>> netmask 255.0.0.0 >>> network 192.168.70.0 >>> broadcast 192.168.70.255 [...] >>> And the camera should have a static of 192.168.70.140 "Should" ? Does it actually ? How is it supposed to be configured ? Did you check it, e.g. with arping ? >> Your netmask is wrong. It should be: >> >> netmask 255.255.255.0 > > I made that mask rather liberal in attempt to get into the camera. 255.0.0.0 is much too liberal. The private range in that block is only 192.168.0.0/16 (mask 255.255.0.0). The rest of 192.0.0.0/8 is public or reserved space.
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 15:55 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 15:57 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2012-03-25 09:26 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-03-25 10:56 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2012-03-25 12:19 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-08 05:00 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-08 14:20 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-08 06:10 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-08 16:28 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-08 12:39 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-08 22:32 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Scott Hemphill <hemphill@hemphills.net> - 2012-04-09 12:41 -0400
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-09 11:52 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-09 21:09 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 01:56 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-10 20:30 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 16:30 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 19:23 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 22:54 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-11 09:33 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Scott Hemphill <hemphill@hemphills.net> - 2012-04-09 18:19 -0400
csiph-web