Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #1239
| From | Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: Is this a bridging scenario? |
| Date | 2012-04-08 16:28 +0200 |
| Organization | Plouf ! |
| Message-ID | <jls7ac$2pq5$1@saria.nerim.net> (permalink) |
| References | <b5b53ca6-9141-4105-b701-4b8935268f02@vy8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <jkmhbp$em6$1@dont-email.me> <2f8acba3-b55f-42c3-b7ff-c7de7bf22649@qg3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <jlrvq6$2muf$1@saria.nerim.net> <e5b024d8-e2c6-4d7d-8969-70a983604ccd@x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com> |
Al a écrit : > > How does this look: > > http://i.imgur.com/1wqFf.jpg The -o option cannot be used in a PREROUTING chain, because the output interface is not known yet : it is selected at the routing decision. Why do you need the rule in the FORWARD chain ? If you need it because packets are dropped by default, then you'll probably need extra rules to accept reply packets in the other direction and packets belonging to other types of communication (you mentionned SIP and mail below). "forward WAN port 12345 to LAN 12345" is not detailed enough. You must indicate to which address. > But do I still need to add something else for the camera to make > outbound connections for SIP and email notifications etc? SIP is a special protocol, a bit like FTP. If the Linux box does stateful filtering or masquerading, you may need to load the conntrack (for stateful filtering) or NAT (for masquerading) helper modules for that protocol, nf_conntrack_sip and nf_nat_ftp.
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 15:55 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 15:57 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2012-03-25 09:26 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-03-25 10:56 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2012-03-25 12:19 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-08 05:00 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-08 14:20 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-08 06:10 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-08 16:28 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-08 12:39 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-08 22:32 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Scott Hemphill <hemphill@hemphills.net> - 2012-04-09 12:41 -0400
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-09 11:52 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-09 21:09 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 01:56 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-10 20:30 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 16:30 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 19:23 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Al <bigal.nz@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 22:54 -0700
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-04-11 09:33 +0200
Re: Is this a bridging scenario? Scott Hemphill <hemphill@hemphills.net> - 2012-04-09 18:19 -0400
csiph-web