Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #17181 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-06 08:43 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-07 02:42 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: None Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> - 2016-04-06 08:43 +0200
[OT] Re: None Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2016-04-07 02:42 +0000
| From | Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 08:43 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: None |
| Message-ID | <11fe7944bbf3c128cfe14d74720341fb@anemone.mooo.com> |
In article <8dc31f54b3021c8ac29d6df163500ef6@remailer.cpunk.us> Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> wrote: > > Subject: Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester > > It would appear that the issue here is the key lengths associated > with assymetric RSA key lengths (mix keys) and symmetric block cipher > algos such as AES 3DES etc.. > > The original poster does not seem to understand the inherent differences. > > The system implementations are not under discussion here, only the key > lengths and security implications of depreciated 1024 RSA keys. That's niether hear nore their.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 02:42 +0000 |
| Subject | [OT] Re: None |
| Message-ID | <slrnngbi7u.se8.spamtrap42@one.localnet> |
| In reply to | #17181 |
On 2016-04-06, Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> wrote: > In article <8dc31f54b3021c8ac29d6df163500ef6@remailer.cpunk.us> > Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> wrote: >> >> Subject: Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester >> >> It would appear that the issue here is the key lengths associated >> with assymetric RSA key lengths (mix keys) and symmetric block cipher >> algos such as AES 3DES etc.. >> >> The original poster does not seem to understand the inherent differences. >> >> The system implementations are not under discussion here, only the key >> lengths and security implications of depreciated 1024 RSA keys. > > That's niether hear nore their. Jeremy, please tell me those four spelling errors or typos were intentional. -- Robert Riches spamtrap42@jacob21819.net (Yes, that is one of my email addresses.)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web