Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.privacy.anon-server > #50306
| From | Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> |
|---|---|
| References | <e985b5e010d234a53f9c06b819e4f2dc@remailer.paranoici.org> <8dc31f54b3021c8ac29d6df163500ef6@remailer.cpunk.us> |
| Subject | Re: None |
| Message-ID | <11fe7944bbf3c128cfe14d74720341fb@anemone.mooo.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-04-06 08:43 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
In article <8dc31f54b3021c8ac29d6df163500ef6@remailer.cpunk.us> Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> wrote: > > Subject: Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester > > It would appear that the issue here is the key lengths associated > with assymetric RSA key lengths (mix keys) and symmetric block cipher > algos such as AES 3DES etc.. > > The original poster does not seem to understand the inherent differences. > > The system implementations are not under discussion here, only the key > lengths and security implications of depreciated 1024 RSA keys. That's niether hear nore their.
Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RE: Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-04-05 07:25 +0000
RE: Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-05 21:30 +0200
Re: RE: Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2016-04-06 00:46 +0200
RE: Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester Cornelis Tromp <nobody@holland.remailer.nl> - 2016-04-06 08:46 +0100
RE: Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-06 11:34 +0200
RE: Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-07 03:45 +0100
RE: Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 05:02 -0400
None Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-05 17:21 -0400
Re: None Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> - 2016-04-06 08:43 +0200
csiph-web