[OT] Re: None

From	Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	[OT] Re: None
Date	2016-04-07 02:42 +0000
Organization	none-at-all
Message-ID	<slrnngbi7u.se8.spamtrap42@one.localnet> (permalink)
References	<e985b5e010d234a53f9c06b819e4f2dc@remailer.paranoici.org> <8dc31f54b3021c8ac29d6df163500ef6@remailer.cpunk.us> <11fe7944bbf3c128cfe14d74720341fb@anemone.mooo.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2016-04-06, Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> wrote:
> In article <8dc31f54b3021c8ac29d6df163500ef6@remailer.cpunk.us>
> Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> wrote:
>>
>> Subject: Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester
>>
>> It would appear that the issue here is the key lengths associated
>> with assymetric RSA key lengths (mix keys) and symmetric block cipher
>> algos such as AES 3DES etc..
>>
>> The original poster does not seem to understand the inherent differences.
>>
>> The system implementations are not under discussion here, only the key
>> lengths and security implications of depreciated 1024 RSA keys.
>
> That's niether hear nore their.

Jeremy, please tell me those four spelling errors or typos were
intentional.

-- 
Robert Riches
spamtrap42@jacob21819.net
(Yes, that is one of my email addresses.)

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: None Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> - 2016-04-06 08:43 +0200
  [OT] Re: None Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2016-04-07 02:42 +0000

csiph-web