Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #90034 > unrolled thread
| Started by | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-18 01:44 -0400 |
| Last post | 2026-08-19 22:21 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 201 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 01:44 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 01:59 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-18 06:05 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-18 08:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-18 11:33 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 22:16 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 03:32 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:05 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-19 13:23 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:15 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 21:53 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-19 22:54 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-08-20 10:31 -0300
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-21 13:10 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-08-20 10:30 -0300
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-20 18:04 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:01 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:24 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 22:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-22 04:02 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-22 06:48 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-22 16:15 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-23 21:52 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-24 01:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-24 11:15 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-24 19:26 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:45 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 18:39 +0000
Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-25 06:48 -0700
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 15:10 +0100
Re: Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-26 18:04 -0700
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 03:23 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 12:09 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:15 -0400
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 03:21 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-28 02:42 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:15 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:40 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:37 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:13 +0000
Re: Power lines "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-08-29 21:28 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:23 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 22:47 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:20 +0100
Re: Power lines "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 13:43 +0200
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-30 15:49 +0000
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:40 +0000
Re: Power lines "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:23 +0200
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 19:36 +0000
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-31 15:50 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:55 -0400
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 07:41 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 03:49 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:17 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:24 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:33 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:15 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:12 +0100
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:14 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:22 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:06 +0000
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:40 +0000
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:40 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:28 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:04 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:09 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:06 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-27 14:19 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 15:25 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:24 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:18 +0100
Re: Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-28 05:56 -0700
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 15:33 +0100
Re: Power lines Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-28 16:06 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:30 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:51 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:39 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:26 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:25 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 01:46 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:50 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 18:43 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 04:07 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-27 10:54 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 19:11 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-27 12:57 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 12:55 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:25 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 00:27 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-28 00:45 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:02 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-28 16:13 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:32 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 19:38 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:57 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:55 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 23:34 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-26 04:27 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 08:57 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-27 06:30 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-27 13:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:22 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:16 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:36 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-28 19:42 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:28 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:04 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:18 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 22:50 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 18:03 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 00:43 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 02:21 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:33 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 09:22 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 13:01 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 03:00 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:47 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:36 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:09 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 07:11 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 03:47 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:56 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:00 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:11 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:17 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:19 +0000
[OT] Finland, and Russia (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:49 +0100
Re: [OT] Finland, and Russia (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-02 02:53 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 02:46 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:54 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:17 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:23 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-01 21:23 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:18 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 02:00 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:43 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:12 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 07:55 +0500
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-30 02:08 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:30 +0000
[OT] Russian Federation, wars (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 10:04 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-30 10:22 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 16:13 +0500
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 18:12 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 16:47 +0500
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-29 13:58 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-29 10:11 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:20 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 23:06 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-30 02:14 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 19:28 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 02:15 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:55 +0100
Salmonella (Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-30 09:28 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 19:27 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:31 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:30 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 19:43 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:57 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 02:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 02:50 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:29 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 01:52 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:47 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:37 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-31 15:50 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:41 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:37 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-09-01 06:26 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:05 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:19 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-31 17:07 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 01:20 -0400
[OT] Personal safety in the USA (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 10:27 +0100
[OT] Personal safety in the USA (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 08:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Personal safety in the USA Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-09-01 10:24 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:04 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-09-01 11:00 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:23 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:49 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-27 16:32 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:44 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-19 12:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:03 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 22:24 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 22:07 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 03:42 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 02:14 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:13 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:14 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:27 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-19 16:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:02 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 13:54 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 22:21 -0400
Page 9 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-30 18:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfjb7gFprcuU72@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90914 |
On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 19:27:32 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-08-29 23:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 29/08/2026 18:11, Lars Poulsen wrote: >>> As I understand the issue at hand (please correct me where I am >>> wrong): >>> >>> Ukraine (like UK) is outside the EU and has looser rules. Normally, EU >>> would keep out food not produced to EU standards, but they gave a >>> waiver to Ukraine in order to support her in the war. >> >> EU rules are already looser than UK ones. >> >>> When this led to problems, he waiver was rescinded in the EU, but not >>> yet so in the UK. >> >> No, the salmonella outbreak is not confined to the UK, We merely have >> tougher medical reporting processes so we have identified more cases, >> but there are cases in many EU countries too. >> >> And no, it is not about permitting or not permitting salmonella on >> fowl, >> ALL chickens have filthy bottoms and all eggs have salmonella, BUT the >> shells are microbial tight EXCEPT in the USA where they wash them with >> disinfectant. And therefore need to be refrigerated thereafter. > > What disinfectant do they use? https://www.eggcartons.com/products/egg-wash-powder-8lbs The detailed government list requires an advanced chemistry degree to translate it into English or Spanish. It's mostly ammonia, chlorine, or iodine compounds. Backyard chicken farmers use dish washing liquid, vinegar, bleach (chlorine) or similar cleaning products. Aside: keeping chickens in the city requires a $30 license that's good for three years.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-30 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nfjelvF3giU10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90916 |
On 2026-08-30 20:31, rbowman wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 19:27:32 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>
>> On 2026-08-29 23:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 29/08/2026 18:11, Lars Poulsen wrote:
>>>> As I understand the issue at hand (please correct me where I am
>>>> wrong):
>>>>
>>>> Ukraine (like UK) is outside the EU and has looser rules. Normally, EU
>>>> would keep out food not produced to EU standards, but they gave a
>>>> waiver to Ukraine in order to support her in the war.
>>>
>>> EU rules are already looser than UK ones.
>>>
>>>> When this led to problems, he waiver was rescinded in the EU, but not
>>>> yet so in the UK.
>>>
>>> No, the salmonella outbreak is not confined to the UK, We merely have
>>> tougher medical reporting processes so we have identified more cases,
>>> but there are cases in many EU countries too.
>>>
>>> And no, it is not about permitting or not permitting salmonella on
>>> fowl,
>>> ALL chickens have filthy bottoms and all eggs have salmonella, BUT the
>>> shells are microbial tight EXCEPT in the USA where they wash them with
>>> disinfectant. And therefore need to be refrigerated thereafter.
>>
>> What disinfectant do they use?
>
> https://www.eggcartons.com/products/egg-wash-powder-8lbs
>
> The detailed government list requires an advanced chemistry degree to
> translate it into English or Spanish. It's mostly ammonia, chlorine, or
> iodine compounds. Backyard chicken farmers use dish washing liquid,
> vinegar, bleach (chlorine) or similar cleaning products.
>
> Aside: keeping chickens in the city requires a $30 license that's good for
> three years.
Heh.
I asked because I wash the eggs at home, with a few drops of bleach in a
water bowl. Then I refrigerate them. My father was doing that, without
bleach, since before I was born. Me, I decided that the procedures
recommended here to store and handle unwashed eggs in the kitchen were
too complicated, so I would wash them.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-30 19:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfjfejFprcuU79@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90923 |
On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 21:30:07 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > I asked because I wash the eggs at home, with a few drops of bleach in a > water bowl. Then I refrigerate them. My father was doing that, without > bleach, since before I was born. Me, I decided that the procedures > recommended here to store and handle unwashed eggs in the kitchen were > too complicated, so I would wash them. My parents kept chickens but they'd wrapped up the operation when I was very young. They came in handy during the war (II) when you could trade eggs for sugar or other rationed items. However they also attracted rats and other vermin. My mother had a thing about rats and mice. A family legend was the day she saw a rat and blew it away with her shotgun. Unfortunately the rat was sitting on a five gallon can of oil, which was another rationed item.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-30 21:57 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nfjg9jF3glU9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90926 |
On 2026-08-30 21:43, rbowman wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 21:30:07 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>
>> I asked because I wash the eggs at home, with a few drops of bleach in a
>> water bowl. Then I refrigerate them. My father was doing that, without
>> bleach, since before I was born. Me, I decided that the procedures
>> recommended here to store and handle unwashed eggs in the kitchen were
>> too complicated, so I would wash them.
>
> My parents kept chickens but they'd wrapped up the operation when I was
> very young. They came in handy during the war (II) when you could trade
> eggs for sugar or other rationed items. However they also attracted rats
> and other vermin. My mother had a thing about rats and mice. A family
> legend was the day she saw a rat and blew it away with her shotgun.
> Unfortunately the rat was sitting on a five gallon can of oil, which was
> another rationed item.
Here, my father went on the queue to get his tobacco ration. He did not
smoke, but he then used the tobacco to barter for something he needed,
like eggs.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-31 02:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfk7kcFprcuU83@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90927 |
On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 21:57:39 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > Here, my father went on the queue to get his tobacco ration. He did not > smoke, but he then used the tobacco to barter for something he needed, > like eggs. That works. US military ration packs included cigarettes up until some time in the '70s. More chocolate for the non-smokers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-31 02:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Z7ycnRKes6ycuQj3nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90916 |
On 8/30/26 14:31, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 19:27:32 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > >> On 2026-08-29 23:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 29/08/2026 18:11, Lars Poulsen wrote: >>>> As I understand the issue at hand (please correct me where I am >>>> wrong): >>>> >>>> Ukraine (like UK) is outside the EU and has looser rules. Normally, EU >>>> would keep out food not produced to EU standards, but they gave a >>>> waiver to Ukraine in order to support her in the war. >>> >>> EU rules are already looser than UK ones. >>> >>>> When this led to problems, he waiver was rescinded in the EU, but not >>>> yet so in the UK. >>> >>> No, the salmonella outbreak is not confined to the UK, We merely have >>> tougher medical reporting processes so we have identified more cases, >>> but there are cases in many EU countries too. >>> >>> And no, it is not about permitting or not permitting salmonella on >>> fowl, >>> ALL chickens have filthy bottoms and all eggs have salmonella, BUT the >>> shells are microbial tight EXCEPT in the USA where they wash them with >>> disinfectant. And therefore need to be refrigerated thereafter. >> >> What disinfectant do they use? > > https://www.eggcartons.com/products/egg-wash-powder-8lbs > > The detailed government list requires an advanced chemistry degree to > translate it into English or Spanish. It's mostly ammonia, chlorine, or > iodine compounds. Backyard chicken farmers use dish washing liquid, > vinegar, bleach (chlorine) or similar cleaning products. Those ARE good - but only for the Short Term. LONGER term - more aggressive methods are needed. BEST bet, pre-boiled eggs, then dipped in sodium silicate solution to 'seal the pores'. But usual consumers aren't gonna find that - it's more the 'survival' clique. From long back I've bought, tested, "preserved" food. Always SOME disaster looming. MREs are good for a few years, maybe 'edible' for seven to ten in best cases. The TASTE falls off badly after just a few years. Dehydrated has kinda poor taste regardless, but will KEEP what it's got for maybe a decade. It's my pref. You can live on it. LAST bought just before COVID, for obvious reasons. WAS a real chance of a supply-chain collapse. Didn't really happen, but COULD have happened. So ... Now ... maybe have to buy for the NEXT ten years. Unknown/undefined issues. At basic, be prepared for three to four weeks of a supply-chain disaster. Going beyond that will likely be a waste, but LESS than that and you may SUFFER. A month's worth of basics is pretty easy and cheap. Some CANNED foods - tuna, corned beef and a few others - are also good investments. "Spam", hate it or hate it, DO keep a few cans ! They last almost forever. Hmmm ... had an uncle, WW-2, who kinda had to LIVE on "Shit On a Shingle" for a long time. Could not STAND to even THINK about it the rest of his life :-) > Aside: keeping chickens in the city requires a $30 license that's good for > three years. Ummmm ... WHICH city ? Not all are so, well, asshole. Note there ARE forces, both 'right' and 'left', who WANT Joe Average to be 101% dependent on govt food supply. Gives them POWER. A LOT of power. LOVE BIG BROTHER - or STARVE !!! No, NOT old literary bullshit anymore. How fuckin' SAD !!! So fuckin' HORRIBLE.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-31 18:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nflvgmFtomiU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90941 |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:50:12 -0400, c186282 wrote: > Hmmm ... had an uncle, WW-2, who kinda had to LIVE on "Shit On a > Shingle" for a long time. Could not STAND to even THINK about it the > rest of his life Somewhere along the line the dried beef got replaced with ground beef. https://partypinching.com/sos-army-hamburger-gravy/ Tasty. My father reminisced about Cream of Wheat. Every morning the mess hall cooks made vats of the stuff which was transferred directly to garbage cans after the mess.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-31 01:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Z7ycnROes6wWiwj3nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90914 |
On 8/30/26 13:27, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-08-29 23:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 29/08/2026 18:11, Lars Poulsen wrote: >>> As I understand the issue at hand (please correct me where I am wrong): >>> >>> Ukraine (like UK) is outside the EU and has looser rules. Normally, >>> EU would keep out food not produced to EU standards, but they gave a >>> waiver to Ukraine in order to support her in the war. >> >> EU rules are already looser than UK ones. >> >>> When this led to problems, he waiver was rescinded in the EU, but not >>> yet so in the UK. >> >> No, the salmonella outbreak is not confined to the UK, We merely have >> tougher medical reporting processes so we have identified more cases, >> but there are cases in many EU countries too. >> >> And no, it is not about permitting or not permitting salmonella on >> fowl, ALL chickens have filthy bottoms and all eggs have salmonella, >> BUT the shells are microbial tight EXCEPT in the USA where they wash >> them with disinfectant. And therefore need to be refrigerated thereafter. > > What disinfectant do they use? USA ... chlorinated water is the primary, and pretty effective. disinfectant. UK seem to say that's just AWFUL, but never really explains WHY. Suspect 'trade' issues, not 'science'. >> >> Eggs covered in salmonella are perfectly safe UNTIL you wash the >> protective covering off them. > > Cracking them open needs following a procedure or it turns out > dangerous, too. Depends. Sodium Silicate sealed eggs - they're gonna be pretty safe for a long time. However the FLAVOR drops off. Eggs 'preserved' by other methods - may NOT last as long. On the whole, I'd rec NEW eggs as much as possible rather than relying on any 'preservation' method. To kill salmonella and such, DO revive said eggs at a kinda high initial temperature method. Boiling, microwave, pressure-cooker. Did take a couple bacteriology classes back in the day ... you don't even WANNA know what nasties are Out There ......... Yes, 'nature' IS Out To Get Us. The germs are THE primary lifeform. Alien probes would report that, saying "single-celled" life - with just a tiny smattering of multi-cellular, dominates this planet. In short we're all GERM FOOD. Did you have any hubris here ? DUMP IT ! "Flavor" aside ... look into freeze-dried food for "survival". TASTE may not be so great but you CAN eat it for a long time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-31 12:47 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <dm2gmmxnbu.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #90939 |
On 2026-08-31 07:52, c186282 wrote: > On 8/30/26 13:27, Carlos E. R. wrote: >> On 2026-08-29 23:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 29/08/2026 18:11, Lars Poulsen wrote: >>>> As I understand the issue at hand (please correct me where I am wrong): >>>> >>>> Ukraine (like UK) is outside the EU and has looser rules. Normally, >>>> EU would keep out food not produced to EU standards, but they gave a >>>> waiver to Ukraine in order to support her in the war. >>> >>> EU rules are already looser than UK ones. >>> >>>> When this led to problems, he waiver was rescinded in the EU, but >>>> not yet so in the UK. >>> >>> No, the salmonella outbreak is not confined to the UK, We merely have >>> tougher medical reporting processes so we have identified more cases, >>> but there are cases in many EU countries too. >>> >>> And no, it is not about permitting or not permitting salmonella on >>> fowl, ALL chickens have filthy bottoms and all eggs have salmonella, >>> BUT the shells are microbial tight EXCEPT in the USA where they wash >>> them with disinfectant. And therefore need to be refrigerated >>> thereafter. >> >> What disinfectant do they use? > >  USA ... chlorinated water is the primary, and >  pretty effective. disinfectant. > >  UK seem to say that's just AWFUL, but never >  really explains WHY. > >  Suspect 'trade' issues, not 'science'. Food Experts here consider washing eggs anatema. > >>> >>> Eggs covered in salmonella are perfectly safe UNTIL you wash the >>> protective covering off them. >> >> Cracking them open needs following a procedure or it turns out >> dangerous, too. > >  Depends. No, I'm talking of unwashed eggs. > >  Sodium Silicate sealed eggs - they're gonna be >  pretty safe for a long time. However the FLAVOR >  drops off. > >  Eggs 'preserved' by other methods - may NOT last >  as long. > >  On the whole, I'd rec NEW eggs as much as possible >  rather than relying on any 'preservation' method. > >  To kill salmonella and such, DO revive said eggs >  at a kinda high initial temperature method. Boiling, >  microwave, pressure-cooker. > >  Did take a couple bacteriology classes back in >  the day ... you don't even WANNA know what nasties >  are Out There ......... > >  Yes, 'nature' IS Out To Get Us. The germs are >  THE primary lifeform. Alien probes would report >  that, saying "single-celled" life - with just >  a tiny smattering of multi-cellular, dominates >  this planet. In short we're all GERM FOOD. > >  Did you have any hubris here ? DUMP IT ! > >  "Flavor" aside ... look into freeze-dried >  food for "survival". TASTE may not be so >  great but you CAN eat it for a long time. > -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-31 12:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1173p1c$s37s$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90939 |
On 31/08/2026 06:52, c186282 wrote: > On 8/30/26 13:27, Carlos E. R. wrote: >> On 2026-08-29 23:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 29/08/2026 18:11, Lars Poulsen wrote: >>>> As I understand the issue at hand (please correct me where I am wrong): >>>> >>>> Ukraine (like UK) is outside the EU and has looser rules. Normally, >>>> EU would keep out food not produced to EU standards, but they gave a >>>> waiver to Ukraine in order to support her in the war. >>> >>> EU rules are already looser than UK ones. >>> >>>> When this led to problems, he waiver was rescinded in the EU, but >>>> not yet so in the UK. >>> >>> No, the salmonella outbreak is not confined to the UK, We merely have >>> tougher medical reporting processes so we have identified more cases, >>> but there are cases in many EU countries too. >>> >>> And no, it is not about permitting or not permitting salmonella on >>> fowl, ALL chickens have filthy bottoms and all eggs have salmonella, >>> BUT the shells are microbial tight EXCEPT in the USA where they wash >>> them with disinfectant. And therefore need to be refrigerated >>> thereafter. >> >> What disinfectant do they use? > > Â USA ... chlorinated water is the primary, and > Â pretty effective. disinfectant. > > Â UK seem to say that's just AWFUL, but never > Â really explains WHY. > Because the UK looks after its fowls so they don't need this/ > Â Suspect 'trade' issues, not 'science'. > In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they are trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their own piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. >>> >>> Eggs covered in salmonella are perfectly safe UNTIL you wash the >>> protective covering off them. >> >> Cracking them open needs following a procedure or it turns out >> dangerous, too. > > Â Depends. > > Â Sodium Silicate sealed eggs - they're gonna be > Â pretty safe for a long time. However the FLAVOR > Â drops off. > > Â Eggs 'preserved' by other methods - may NOT last > Â as long. > > Â On the whole, I'd rec NEW eggs as much as possible > Â rather than relying on any 'preservation' method. > > Â To kill salmonella and such, DO revive said eggs > Â at a kinda high initial temperature method. Boiling, > Â microwave, pressure-cooker. > UK eggs are not washed in anything and are not refrigerated and can be eaten raw. > Â Did take a couple bacteriology classes back in > Â the day ... you don't even WANNA know what nasties > Â are Out There ......... > We all did -- All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is fully understood.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-31 15:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ophlS.21796$I1t6.2557@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #90959 |
On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they are > trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their own > piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. Sounds like typical urban planning. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-31 18:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfm06mFtomiU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90965 |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:50:44 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they >> are trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their >> own piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. > > Sounds like typical urban planning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink The planners used Calhoun's rat utopia design without reading the rest of the study.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 02:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <KomcnSStk4pF7wv3nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90975 |
On 8/31/26 14:41, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:50:44 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they >>> are trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their >>> own piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. >> >> Sounds like typical urban planning. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink > > The planners used Calhoun's rat utopia design without reading the rest of > the study. Hey, almost NOBODY reads beyond the summary paragraph ! :-) Subscribed to a number of top journals back in the day (before they went 'Woke'). They all have a 'summary' paragraph at the top - but it does not get into all the DETAILS. DO still take Sigma-Xi, "American Scientist", however. It's pretty good. CAN find "Archeology" mag on the rack at the supermarket too. Those kind-of resisted "Woke-Ism". Just The Facts, without much socio-political "Woke" BS. Dropped "Scientific American" a long time ago ... became just horrible. Corrupted, biases, politically-serving farce of "science". SA keeps sending me letters pleading for a renewed subscription. NO !!! NEVER !!! It's gone. RUINED itself. 100+ years DOWN THE CRAPPER !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 06:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1176jpl$1ru3g$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90975 |
On 2026-08-31 11:41, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:50:44 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they >>> are trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their >>> own piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. >> >> Sounds like typical urban planning. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink > > The planners used Calhoun's rat utopia design without reading the rest of > the study. It is noteworthy that other groups replicating Calhoun's experiment have failed to get the same results. -- Lars Poulsen - an old geek in Santa Barbara, California
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 19:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <117744s$226dr$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91012 |
On 01/09/2026 14:26, Lars Poulsen wrote: > On 2026-08-31 11:41, rbowman wrote: >> The planners used Calhoun's rat utopia design without reading the rest of >> the study. > > It is noteworthy that other groups replicating Calhoun's experiment have > failed to get the same results. > You can always get the result you want in sociology. -- To ban Christmas, simply give turkeys the vote.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 21:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfot43FtomiU28@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #91017 |
On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 19:05:15 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 01/09/2026 14:26, Lars Poulsen wrote: >> On 2026-08-31 11:41, rbowman wrote: > >>> The planners used Calhoun's rat utopia design without reading the rest >>> of the study. >> >> It is noteworthy that other groups replicating Calhoun's experiment >> have failed to get the same results. >> > You can always get the result you want in sociology. Or pharmacology.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 18:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfoj8jFtomiU20@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #91012 |
On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 06:26:13 -0700, Lars Poulsen wrote: > On 2026-08-31 11:41, rbowman wrote: >> On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:50:44 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they >>>> are trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with >>>> their own piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. >>> >>> Sounds like typical urban planning. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink >> >> The planners used Calhoun's rat utopia design without reading the rest >> of the study. > > It is noteworthy that other groups replicating Calhoun's experiment have > failed to get the same results. The Science!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-31 17:07 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <11751fg$1birh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90965 |
On 8/31/2026 9:50 AM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they are >> trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their own >> piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. > > Sounds like typical urban planning. > This article sort of touches on the subject: First 9 Most Dangerous Cities In The US (The Consequences Of Being In These Places Can be Devastating, If You Don’t Know What to Expect!) This article was created for educational purposes and I suggest you take these tips and information with a good heart because it can help you prevent an unpleasant situation! It’s difficult to believe that a little over 100 years ago not only did people rarely if ever lock their doors in the United States many houses didn’t even have locks on the doors. In today’s world, filled with atrocious headlines and daily murders, that thought is as strange a concept as not having to pay federal taxes. Especially with regard to the large cities that dot the country side of America. The brutal crime rate and their remarkable progress in the 20th century are unparalleled around the world. The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave has also given liberty to many destructive activities. These atrocities encompass every severe offense you can think of, from murder and attempted murder to reckless property crimes such as breaking and entering. Are there neighborhoods in the U.S. that are too dangerous to visit? I’ve driven through all of the 50 most dangerous neighborhoods in America, one of my many unusual travel goals, and very few were uncomfortably unsafe just driving through. I wouldn’t get out of the car and walk around though. To answer the question, there are probably nine neighborhoods of the 70,000 across America that I personally wouldn’t recommend anyone visiting, even merely driving through, unless you’re a local or have family there. Continue reading at link below: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026/08/24/first-9-most-dangerous-cities-in-the-us-the-consequences-of-being-in-these-places-can-be-devastating-if-you-dont-know-what-to-expect/ -- Israel’s Ben Gvir Calls For Nightly Kill Quota In Gaza Ben Gvir: “There are people there who are not alive. They don’t need to live. They are not people. I’m doing them a favor by calling them people.” https://x.com/RyanRozbiani/status/2088695627702002109 https://www.globalgulag.us
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 01:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <KomcnSutk4pZ_Qv3nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90982 |
On 8/31/26 19:07, Enoch Powell wrote: > On 8/31/2026 9:50 AM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> On 2026-08-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In the US, yes. Its cheaper to keep chickens in such density so they are >>> trampled by each other pecked by each other and covered with their own >>> piss and shit,m and then chlorinate them afterwards. >> >> Sounds like typical urban planning. >> > > This article sort of touches on the subject: Oh ... CHICKENS ... about a minus-one IQ. > First 9 Most Dangerous Cities In The US (The Consequences Of Being In > These Places Can be Devastating, If You Don’t Know What to Expect!) > > This article was created for educational purposes and I suggest you take > these tips and information with a good heart because it can help you > prevent an unpleasant situation! Almost NOBODY, NO place, is really set up for a Major Disaster. Being so would be TOO expensive. You could spend an entire national GDP on trying to set THAT up. TOO many ways things can go to crap. So, sorry, sometimes you're just gonna be On Your Own for awhile, maybe a LONG while. Prepared ??? Plan ??? What DO you do ???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 10:27 +0100 |
| Subject | [OT] Personal safety in the USA (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) |
| Message-ID | <11765pk$1leom$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90982 |
On 2026-09-01, Enoch Powell wrote: > Are there neighborhoods in the U.S. that are too dangerous to visit? Besides places where the local law enforcement authorities were already more of high school bullies, I guess that now has to include any place to which ICE has been deployed. When you can be killed by a law enforcement officer "restraining" you way beyond proportional or legal response, or beaten or shot to death merely by existing around high school bullies with ICE badges, you can't really say that's a place that's not dangerous. I'd not be surprised if deaths and violence caused by ICE ended up surpassing non-ICE crimes in a lot of places. -- Nuno Silva
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web