Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #14963
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop |
| Date | 2015-06-17 16:18 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <mls6l301a0u@news3.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mlpalj$5rm$1@solani.org> <mlq2iv$1rt$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m2h9q6ri4l.fsf@therandymon.com> |
On 2015-06-17, RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: > Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> writes: > >>> the brand new Cinnamon 2.6, just released, when delivered later > this year.… > >> Considering how badly KDE screwed the pooch with KDE5/Plasma5, >> it's nice to see that Cinnamon is stepping up to fill the gap. > > Is it as bad as that? I haven't tried it yet since I'm on a > distro where I've now got everything working the way I'd like, and > I don't want to upgrade and have to go through it all again. I'm > used to hearing how they botched the upgrade to KDE4, but I hadn't > heard they'd botched the upgrade to KDE5. > > I was actually thinking, a lot of what they're promoting as new > features are things that KDE4 (at least) had ages ago, like the > ability to have multiple panels, or put the panels where you want > them on the screen. I had Mint/LXDE running on a laptop a while ago when I was trying various distros. It was OK, although I don't recall any "must have" features. Currently I'm running Xfce under Debian. It does everything I want, it's lean and mean, handles dual monitors smoothly, and I can set up panels the way I want them. I tried KDE only briefly - it feels way too bloated to me. Even when I run a KDE app under a leaner window manager it leaves all sorts of processes running in the background that spit out random messages in my console window. I've learned to avoid KDE apps entirely. -- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-06-16 14:08 +0000
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-16 13:57 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-06-17 08:58 +0300
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-17 05:42 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-18 13:46 +0200
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "J.B.Treadstone" <jbt@dev.nul> - 2015-06-18 13:29 +0100
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-18 21:07 +0200
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "J.B.Treadstone" <jbt@dev.nul> - 2015-06-18 23:37 +0100
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-20 21:23 +0200
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-18 06:17 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-06-18 16:34 +0000
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-06-18 13:43 -0400
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-18 21:12 +0200
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-18 13:47 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-18 14:46 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-19 11:20 +0100
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-06-18 23:14 +0000
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-18 16:42 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-19 11:52 +0100
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-06-17 16:18 +0000
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-17 14:18 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2015-06-18 13:56 +0300
csiph-web