Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #14963

Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop

From Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop
Date 2015-06-17 16:18 +0000
Organization NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID <mls6l301a0u@news3.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References <mlpalj$5rm$1@solani.org> <mlq2iv$1rt$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m2h9q6ri4l.fsf@therandymon.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2015-06-17, RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote:

> Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> writes:
>
>>> the brand new Cinnamon 2.6, just released, when delivered later 
>    this year.…
>
>> Considering how badly KDE screwed the pooch with KDE5/Plasma5, 
>> it's nice to see that Cinnamon is stepping up to fill the gap.
>
> Is it as bad as that?  I haven't tried it yet since I'm on a 
> distro where I've now got everything working the way I'd like, and 
> I don't want to upgrade and have to go through it all again.  I'm 
> used to hearing how they botched the upgrade to KDE4, but I hadn't 
> heard they'd botched the upgrade to KDE5.  
>
> I was actually thinking, a lot of what they're promoting as new 
> features are things that KDE4 (at least) had ages ago, like the 
> ability to have multiple panels, or put the panels where you want 
> them on the screen.

I had Mint/LXDE running on a laptop a while ago when I was trying
various distros.  It was OK, although I don't recall any "must have"
features.  Currently I'm running Xfce under Debian.  It does everything
I want, it's lean and mean, handles dual monitors smoothly, and I can
set up panels the way I want them.

I tried KDE only briefly - it feels way too bloated to me.  Even when
I run a KDE app under a leaner window manager it leaves all sorts of
processes running in the background that spit out random messages in
my console window.  I've learned to avoid KDE apps entirely.

-- 
/~\  cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
\ /  I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
 X   Top-posted messages will probably be ignored.  See RFC1855.
/ \  HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored.  Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-06-16 14:08 +0000
  Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-16 13:57 -0700
    Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-06-17 08:58 +0300
      Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-17 05:42 -0700
        Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-18 13:46 +0200
          Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "J.B.Treadstone" <jbt@dev.nul> - 2015-06-18 13:29 +0100
            Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-18 21:07 +0200
              Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "J.B.Treadstone" <jbt@dev.nul> - 2015-06-18 23:37 +0100
                Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-20 21:23 +0200
          Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-18 06:17 -0700
            Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-06-18 16:34 +0000
              Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-06-18 13:43 -0400
            Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-18 21:12 +0200
              Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-18 13:47 -0700
                Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-18 14:46 -0700
          Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-19 11:20 +0100
        Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-06-18 23:14 +0000
          Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-18 16:42 -0700
          Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-19 11:52 +0100
      Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-06-17 16:18 +0000
        Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-17 14:18 -0700
      Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2015-06-18 13:56 +0300

csiph-web