Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop |
| Date | 2015-06-17 08:58 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <m2h9q6ri4l.fsf@therandymon.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mlpalj$5rm$1@solani.org> <mlq2iv$1rt$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> writes: >> the brand new Cinnamon 2.6, just released, when delivered later this year.… > Considering how badly KDE screwed the pooch with KDE5/Plasma5, it's nice > to see that Cinnamon is stepping up to fill the gap. > > Jon Is it as bad as that? I haven't tried it yet since I'm on a distro where I've now got everything working the way I'd like, and I don't want to upgrade and have to go through it all again. I'm used to hearing how they botched the upgrade to KDE4, but I hadn't heard they'd botched the upgrade to KDE5. I was actually thinking, a lot of what they're promoting as new features are things that KDE4 (at least) had ages ago, like the ability to have multiple panels, or put the panels where you want them on the screen.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-06-16 14:08 +0000
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-16 13:57 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-06-17 08:58 +0300
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-17 05:42 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-18 13:46 +0200
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "J.B.Treadstone" <jbt@dev.nul> - 2015-06-18 13:29 +0100
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-18 21:07 +0200
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "J.B.Treadstone" <jbt@dev.nul> - 2015-06-18 23:37 +0100
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-20 21:23 +0200
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-18 06:17 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-06-18 16:34 +0000
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-06-18 13:43 -0400
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2015-06-18 21:12 +0200
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Jon Danniken <jonSPAMdanniken@yaSMPAhoo.com> - 2015-06-18 13:47 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-18 14:46 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-19 11:20 +0100
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-06-18 23:14 +0000
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-18 16:42 -0700
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-19 11:52 +0100
Re: [CM] Favorable review of Cinnamon desktop Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2015-06-18 13:56 +0300
csiph-web