Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #14308

Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering

From Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc, uk.comp.os.linux, uk.d-i-y
Subject Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering
Date 2015-04-02 01:14 +0100
Message-ID <m8euub-ug9.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> (permalink)
References <vh2rub-54e.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> <nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.nm3qja0.pminews@srv1.howhill.co.uk> <t8frub-kpi.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> <nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.nm5y255.pminews@srv1.howhill.co.uk>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 02/04/15 01:03, Dave Liquorice wrote:

> So is this about keeping your (as in you are legally responsible for)
> connection "clean" or about protecting the kids? The former you
> should fall into the "communication provider":
>
> http://aa.net.uk/legal-cp.html

It's neither - it's about configuring my network the way I want it with 
respect to my kids. I cannot protect them from naughty pics in someone 
else's home anymor ethan I can protect them from falling under a bus. I 
however will not allow buses to be driven in my home.

>> Now on the internet they're likely to find some bird with a donkey's
>> knob in their <various orifices) and 3 dudes doing a rape porn job on
>> someone.
>
> Which may slip through your filters anyway so you still need to talk
> to the kids about what they might find out there. Being open upfront
> and frank may mean that if they do come across something that
> disturbs or upset them they might come and talk to you about it,
> rather than be worried about how you are going to react.


Yeah year - I agree with all that - but as mentioned in my last post, 
it's too easy to get an eye full just by mistyping a search term in google.

And I certainly don't want them going onto rotten.com under any 
circumstances, ever!

>> I wouldn't have thought it would be at the block level - I have not
>> studied porn hosting in detail to work out if lots of porno outfits like
>> a certain web host or ISP - maybe....
>
> Porn is *BIG* business, I've not looked into it either but I wouldn't
> be at all surprised if they didn't have their own server farms,
> peering connections etc etc.
>

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 18:36 +0100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Andy Cap <snruwfpgbizo@trashmail.net> - 2015-03-31 18:44 +0100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2015-03-31 19:25 +0000
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 22:13 +0100
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2015-04-02 00:03 +0000
        Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-02 01:14 +0100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 20:14 +0100
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 22:07 +0100
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-03-31 15:18 -0700
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering The Real Doctor <ian.groups@btinternet.com> - 2015-04-01 23:10 +0100
        Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-04-01 17:01 -0700
          Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 11:38 +1100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "john james" <jj9801@nospam.com> - 2015-04-01 06:59 +1100
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 22:13 +0100
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Capitol <spam@wher.eva.co.uk> - 2015-03-31 22:19 +0100
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "john james" <jj9801@nospam.com> - 2015-04-01 09:46 +1100
        Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-01 00:19 +0100
          Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-01 16:30 +0100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> - 2015-04-01 23:50 +0100
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-02 01:10 +0100
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-04-03 17:52 -0700
        Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 09:09 +0100
          Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-04 12:24 +0000
            Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 19:25 +0100
              Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-04 19:29 +0000
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 20:53 +0100
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-04 21:58 +0000
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 23:18 +0100
              Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-04-04 21:28 +0100
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 21:37 +0100
              Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-04-05 02:50 +0100
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-05 10:58 +0100
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-04-05 11:27 +0100
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 13:57 +0100
        Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 19:35 +0100
          Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 21:39 +0100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering usenet@cucumber.me.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2015-04-09 09:29 +0000
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-09 13:35 +0100

csiph-web