Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,uk.comp.os.linux,uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 01:14:46 +0100
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <m8euub-ug9.ln1@squidward.dionic.net>
References: <vh2rub-54e.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> <nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.nm3qja0.pminews@srv1.howhill.co.uk> <t8frub-kpi.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> <nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.nm5y255.pminews@srv1.howhill.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net dC8zLQ9JixIV1idVogix2gt9Epw9Pyhi0ieLG3a2KArlWynhdi
X-Orig-Path: squidward.dionic.net!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BVW9oQ9aCiewghP89vlFgvG87R4=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
In-Reply-To: <nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.nm5y255.pminews@srv1.howhill.co.uk>
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:14308

On 02/04/15 01:03, Dave Liquorice wrote:

> So is this about keeping your (as in you are legally responsible for)
> connection "clean" or about protecting the kids? The former you
> should fall into the "communication provider":
>
> http://aa.net.uk/legal-cp.html

It's neither - it's about configuring my network the way I want it with 
respect to my kids. I cannot protect them from naughty pics in someone 
else's home anymor ethan I can protect them from falling under a bus. I 
however will not allow buses to be driven in my home.

>> Now on the internet they're likely to find some bird with a donkey's
>> knob in their <various orifices) and 3 dudes doing a rape porn job on
>> someone.
>
> Which may slip through your filters anyway so you still need to talk
> to the kids about what they might find out there. Being open upfront
> and frank may mean that if they do come across something that
> disturbs or upset them they might come and talk to you about it,
> rather than be worried about how you are going to react.


Yeah year - I agree with all that - but as mentioned in my last post, 
it's too easy to get an eye full just by mistyping a search term in google.

And I certainly don't want them going onto rotten.com under any 
circumstances, ever!

>> I wouldn't have thought it would be at the block level - I have not
>> studied porn hosting in detail to work out if lots of porno outfits like
>> a certain web host or ISP - maybe....
>
> Porn is *BIG* business, I've not looked into it either but I wouldn't
> be at all surprised if they didn't have their own server farms,
> peering connections etc etc.
>