Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering

From	Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com>
Newsgroups	uk.d-i-y, uk.comp.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering
Date	2015-04-03 17:52 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<mfncic$l7o$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<vh2rub-54e.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> <NKydnSdVs5uo64HInZ2dnUVZ8hqdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <f1euub-ra9.ln1@squidward.dionic.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 04/01/2015 05:10 PM, Tim Watts wrote:
> On 01/04/15 23:50, John Rumm wrote:
>> On 31/03/2015 18:36, Tim Watts wrote:
>>
>>> Please, no debates about the merits of this -
>>>
>>> I'm having trouble trying to find anything that might work.
>>>
>>>
>>> DNS based:
>>> ==========
>>> OpenDNS https://www.opendns.com/home-internet-security/
>>> is going to be tricky trying to make that work alongside Unblock-US
>>> which is also DNS based. I might be able to track down the relevant
>>> Netflix zones and declared them in my local DNS server and refer those
>>> to UnblockUS whilst the default is to OpenDNS. In many ways though this
>>> is the easiest solution, except that it has to work along side
>>> UnblockUS.
>>>
>>> No worries about the kids setting their own DNS servers, I'll deal with
>>> that in the firewall :)
>>
>> Sticking cache: in front of the google search usually does for many DNS
>> blocks ;-)
>
> Indeed - I just discovered a nasty in that google image search embed the
> porn^H^H^H^Hresults as data URIs in the HTML.
>
> So OpenDNS cannot block them.
>
> But there's a little known feature in Google in that if you set your DNS
> to resolve www.google.* to the CNAME forcesafesearch.google.com
> then that does what it says - clever...
>
> As for cache - good point.
>
> I think you cannot get everything - but reducing the volume and ease is
> OK - mostly at this stage I want to remove the "by accident" factor...
>
>>> Proxy
>>> =====
>>> eg Squidguard - It will not work with SSL traffic. Well, it might, but
>>> then all my browsers will throw up man-in-the-middle warnings. Seems
>>> like a non starter.
>>>
>>> Bloody big blacklist of IPs
>>> ===========================
>>> Assuming I can load several million into iptables without blowing up the
>>> router (see below), this could work.
>>>
>>>
>>> Any approaches I've missed? Does not need to be perfect - just good
>>> enough to mostly keep them off rotten.com, jihadist beheading vids and
>>> hard core porn. And if they hack their way around it, good for them - at
>>> least they are working for it - no illusions that they will be defeated
>>> for ever.
>>
>> If you still have the Draytek 2830, you can install (paid for extra) a
>> filter in the router itself - that cuts off most of the available
>> circumventions.
>
> I did try that - and it looked interesting, but I've now dropped the
> Vigor in favour of a linux router as it was too buggy and alien to work
> with.
>

	This Linux Journal article might be of help.
<http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/flexible-access-control-squid-proxy>

	bliss

Thread

Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 18:36 +0100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Andy Cap <snruwfpgbizo@trashmail.net> - 2015-03-31 18:44 +0100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2015-03-31 19:25 +0000
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 22:13 +0100
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2015-04-02 00:03 +0000
        Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-02 01:14 +0100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 20:14 +0100
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 22:07 +0100
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-03-31 15:18 -0700
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering The Real Doctor <ian.groups@btinternet.com> - 2015-04-01 23:10 +0100
        Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-04-01 17:01 -0700
          Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 11:38 +1100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "john james" <jj9801@nospam.com> - 2015-04-01 06:59 +1100
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 22:13 +0100
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Capitol <spam@wher.eva.co.uk> - 2015-03-31 22:19 +0100
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "john james" <jj9801@nospam.com> - 2015-04-01 09:46 +1100
        Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-01 00:19 +0100
          Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-01 16:30 +0100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> - 2015-04-01 23:50 +0100
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-02 01:10 +0100
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-04-03 17:52 -0700
        Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 09:09 +0100
          Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-04 12:24 +0000
            Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 19:25 +0100
              Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-04 19:29 +0000
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 20:53 +0100
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-04 21:58 +0000
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 23:18 +0100
              Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-04-04 21:28 +0100
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 21:37 +0100
              Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-04-05 02:50 +0100
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-05 10:58 +0100
                Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-04-05 11:27 +0100
      Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 13:57 +0100
        Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 19:35 +0100
          Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 21:39 +0100
  Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering usenet@cucumber.me.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2015-04-09 09:29 +0000
    Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-09 13:35 +0100

csiph-web