Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #11864

Re: Is VirtualBox "lame"? (Was: something else...)

From The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Is VirtualBox "lame"? (Was: something else...)
Date 2014-09-01 07:47 +0100
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <lu14q6$ig$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <u6OdnVdcnPaARpzJnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@giganews.com> <pan.2014.08.31.17.13.55@gmail.com> <EKWdnbvNV4_M9Z7JnZ2dnUU7-YednZ2d@giganews.com> <lu007f$trj$1@news.xmission.com> <w7SdnR8PFZFOF57JnZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 31/08/14 21:51, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:23:11 +0000 (UTC) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) wrote:
>
>>
>> In article <EKWdnbvNV4_M9Z7JnZ2dnUU7-YednZ2d@giganews.com>,
>> Robert Heller  <heller@deepsoft.com> wrote:
>> ...
>>> I would just as
>>> soon NOT use something really lame like VirtualBox.
>>
>> What makes you say that VB is lame?
>
> I found it had several 'funcky' aspects: *I* found its GUI had some 'mis
> features'. It did not give the level of control/access to the VMs that, for
> example, virsh does (or even virt-manager). It gave me the impression that it
> was something of a 'toy' system: fine for light duty use for people who need a
> VM for somewhat occassional use. If you want to do more serious work, you
> would be better served by either xen or kvm. There was a poster on the
> original thread that was having trouble with fragmentation working with a DB
> system (Oracle I think) that was using VB. People suggested that he move to
> kvm, but he claimed that he just had a desktop system, and I said I was using
> xen & lvm volumns on a fairly modest (by current standards) desktop system, so
> there really was no reason to be stuck with VB.
>

Horses for courses,

If you are running concurrent servers the last thing to use is virtual 
box. If however you need to run different clients on a desktop., its 
about the fastest way to get them working albeit with some gotchas.

The overall level of integration of the guest screen is far better than 
the opposition for example..


The requirements are different. Desktop clients want decent video speed, 
and simplicity  - many people testing e,g. web browsers or some other 
software want half a dozen operating systems there to ensure their code 
does run against all of them. Virtual box is handy for that. Or its 
handy to run legacy apps on an old OS.

What it ain't suitable for is a remote server room and '100 instances of 
guests on one blade'


>>
>


-- 
Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except for the 
rare story of which you happen to have first-hand knowledge. – Erwin Knoll

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Evgenii Sputnik <esputnik7788@gmail.com> - 2014-07-31 13:35 -0400
  Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-07-31 19:44 +0200
    Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Evgenii Sputnik <esputnik7788@gmail.com> - 2014-08-29 07:45 +0700
      Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-08-29 03:37 +0200
      Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2014-08-28 21:09 -0500
        Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-08-29 21:16 +0200
    Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2014-08-29 02:46 +0000
      Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-08-29 05:14 +0200
        Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-08-29 14:45 +0100
          Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2014-08-29 15:19 +0000
            Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-08-30 14:42 +0200
              Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2014-08-30 09:09 -0500
                Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-08-30 17:41 +0200
                Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-08-30 15:21 -0700
                Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2014-08-31 17:13 +0000
                Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2014-08-31 13:24 -0500
                Is VirtualBox "lame"? (Was: something else...) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-08-31 20:23 +0000
                Re: Is VirtualBox "lame"? (Was: something else...) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2014-08-31 15:51 -0500
                Re: Is VirtualBox "lame"? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-31 23:58 +0000
                Re: Is VirtualBox "lame"? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2014-08-31 21:54 -0500
                Re: Is VirtualBox "lame"? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-09-01 07:54 +0100
                Re: Is VirtualBox "lame"? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2014-09-01 08:53 +0200
                Re: Is VirtualBox "lame"? (Was: something else...) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-09-01 07:47 +0100
                Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2014-08-31 21:00 +0000
                Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-31 18:50 +0000
                Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2014-08-31 21:01 +0000
                Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-01 00:06 +0000
                Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2014-09-01 07:50 +0100
              Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2014-08-31 03:18 +0000
  Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2014-07-31 12:54 -0500
    Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2014-08-14 12:39 +0000
      Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-08-14 08:15 -0700
  Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2014-07-31 19:08 +0100
    Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2014-07-31 14:27 -0500
  Re: External hard drive usage. NTFS or other file system? Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2014-07-31 12:43 -0700

csiph-web