Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #11234

Re: hardware upgrade comment

From lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: hardware upgrade comment
Date 2014-06-09 16:22 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ln4n0k$5ec$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <lmt6i6$ebv$1@dont-email.me> <lmtprp$312$1@dont-email.me> <lmu3qm$hn1$1@dont-email.me> <lmvfeh$uol$1@dont-email.me> <ln45f1$349$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2014-06-09, Jan Pieter <jp@jp.dhs.orig> wrote:
> On 06/07/2014 06:42 PM, lew wrote:
>> On 2014-06-07, sctvguy1<sctvguy1@invalid.net>  wrote:
>>> On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 01:28:25 +0000, lew wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> No idea what/how you did the mb swap&/or new case.  I've just changed
>>>> the mb&  use the same hdd since the 3.1 days thru to win7 now.  Never
>               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> had a problem with booting/running windows;
>>>> did have to re-register/activate because win checks the hardware for
>>>> differences&  the biggest point change is the check for the nic. Didn't
>>>> matter if the cpu was also changed because of the newer mb sine the
>>>> biggest point getter is the nic.
>>>>
>>>> The old windows newsgroups had a "howto" count the hardware points that
>>>> would require a registering with microsoft as how many points is
>>>> supposed to indicate a different set of hardware (m$ thinks that this is
>>>> to prevent "cheating").
>>>>
>>>> Haven't tried doing a mb swap with win8&  probably won't; may not even
>>>> do it with win9 if it is subscription based.
>>>
>>> You are still using a less than 2gig HDD?
>>
>> ?????????  What does the 2gig hdd have to do with it with the mb swap?
>
> You state: 'use the same hdd since the 3.1 days thru to win7 now'
> I/m wondering how you manage win7 on such a small hdd.
>
> Jan Pieter.

Think I should have added "method" where when the mb is swapped,
the hdd remained the same as it was just changing the cable
connections.  The method is quite different than doing a "clone"
method to another hdd which is still a different hdd even if the boot
partition is the "same".

I've noticed tho, that programmers & some people on newsgroups are
quite "nit picking" of others & object to being the object of being the
"nit picked" one when statements are being interpreted literally.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

hardware upgrade comment Todd <Todd@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-06 12:59 -0700
  Re: hardware upgrade comment lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2014-06-07 01:28 +0000
    Re: hardware upgrade comment sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2014-06-07 04:18 +0000
      Re: hardware upgrade comment lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2014-06-07 16:42 +0000
        Re: hardware upgrade comment Jan Pieter <jp@jp.dhs.orig> - 2014-06-09 13:23 +0200
          Re: hardware upgrade comment lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2014-06-09 16:22 +0000
            Re: hardware upgrade comment Jan Pieter <jp@jp.dhs.orig> - 2014-06-09 19:00 +0200
            Re: hardware upgrade comment noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2014-06-09 23:16 +0000
              Re: hardware upgrade comment lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2014-06-10 01:30 +0000
                Re: hardware upgrade comment noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2014-06-10 03:42 +0000
    Re: hardware upgrade comment Todd <Todd@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-07 12:03 -0700
  Re: hardware upgrade comment faeychild <faeychild@noname.afraid.org> - 2014-06-07 11:30 +1000
  Re: hardware upgrade comment Rahul <nospam@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-11 04:21 +0000
    Re: hardware upgrade comment Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-10 21:41 -0700
      Re: hardware upgrade comment Rahul <nospam@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-11 07:36 +0000
        Re: hardware upgrade comment Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-11 07:43 -0700
          Re: hardware upgrade comment Rahul <nospam@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-11 19:32 +0000
            Re: hardware upgrade comment William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-06-11 20:39 +0000
              Re: hardware upgrade comment Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-11 14:28 -0700
            Re: hardware upgrade comment Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-11 14:27 -0700
    Re: hardware upgrade comment William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-06-11 07:44 +0000
      Re: hardware upgrade comment Baho Utot <baho-utot@invalid.com> - 2014-06-11 09:58 -0400
    Re: hardware upgrade comment Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2014-06-11 20:10 +0000

csiph-web