Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #14307
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news1.uni-leipzig.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> |
| Newsgroups | uk.d-i-y, uk.comp.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering |
| Date | Thu, 02 Apr 2015 01:10:55 +0100 |
| Lines | 63 |
| Message-ID | <f1euub-ra9.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> (permalink) |
| References | <vh2rub-54e.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> <NKydnSdVs5uo64HInZ2dnUVZ8hqdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net NTG6Xe8JRD1fEnfgHLucywTwoypvBgN7BvFPzlT3bHMNluq0ln |
| X-Orig-Path | squidward.dionic.net!not-for-mail |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:khOBc4z8yZQgyV5aMKS1JrqCgyg= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <NKydnSdVs5uo64HInZ2dnUVZ8hqdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:14307 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On 01/04/15 23:50, John Rumm wrote: > On 31/03/2015 18:36, Tim Watts wrote: > >> Please, no debates about the merits of this - >> >> I'm having trouble trying to find anything that might work. >> >> >> DNS based: >> ========== >> OpenDNS https://www.opendns.com/home-internet-security/ >> is going to be tricky trying to make that work alongside Unblock-US >> which is also DNS based. I might be able to track down the relevant >> Netflix zones and declared them in my local DNS server and refer those >> to UnblockUS whilst the default is to OpenDNS. In many ways though this >> is the easiest solution, except that it has to work along side UnblockUS. >> >> No worries about the kids setting their own DNS servers, I'll deal with >> that in the firewall :) > > Sticking cache: in front of the google search usually does for many DNS > blocks ;-) Indeed - I just discovered a nasty in that google image search embed the porn^H^H^H^Hresults as data URIs in the HTML. So OpenDNS cannot block them. But there's a little known feature in Google in that if you set your DNS to resolve www.google.* to the CNAME forcesafesearch.google.com then that does what it says - clever... As for cache - good point. I think you cannot get everything - but reducing the volume and ease is OK - mostly at this stage I want to remove the "by accident" factor... >> Proxy >> ===== >> eg Squidguard - It will not work with SSL traffic. Well, it might, but >> then all my browsers will throw up man-in-the-middle warnings. Seems >> like a non starter. >> >> Bloody big blacklist of IPs >> =========================== >> Assuming I can load several million into iptables without blowing up the >> router (see below), this could work. >> >> >> Any approaches I've missed? Does not need to be perfect - just good >> enough to mostly keep them off rotten.com, jihadist beheading vids and >> hard core porn. And if they hack their way around it, good for them - at >> least they are working for it - no illusions that they will be defeated >> for ever. > > If you still have the Draytek 2830, you can install (paid for extra) a > filter in the router itself - that cuts off most of the available > circumventions. I did try that - and it looked interesting, but I've now dropped the Vigor in favour of a linux router as it was too buggy and alien to work with.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 18:36 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Andy Cap <snruwfpgbizo@trashmail.net> - 2015-03-31 18:44 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2015-03-31 19:25 +0000
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 22:13 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2015-04-02 00:03 +0000
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-02 01:14 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 20:14 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 22:07 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-03-31 15:18 -0700
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering The Real Doctor <ian.groups@btinternet.com> - 2015-04-01 23:10 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-04-01 17:01 -0700
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 11:38 +1100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "john james" <jj9801@nospam.com> - 2015-04-01 06:59 +1100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-03-31 22:13 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Capitol <spam@wher.eva.co.uk> - 2015-03-31 22:19 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering "john james" <jj9801@nospam.com> - 2015-04-01 09:46 +1100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-01 00:19 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-01 16:30 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> - 2015-04-01 23:50 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-02 01:10 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-04-03 17:52 -0700
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 09:09 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-04 12:24 +0000
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 19:25 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-04 19:29 +0000
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 20:53 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-04 21:58 +0000
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 23:18 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-04-04 21:28 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 21:37 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-04-05 02:50 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-05 10:58 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-04-05 11:27 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 13:57 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 19:35 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-04 21:39 +0100
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering usenet@cucumber.me.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2015-04-09 09:29 +0000
Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-04-09 13:35 +0100
csiph-web