Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #93066
| Message-ID | <6ac56e50@news.ausics.net> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) |
| Subject | Re: Another ssh quirk... |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| References | <11a05ig$2pnll$1@news.xmission.com> <6ac430ec@news.ausics.net> <niirmuFjb1iU1@mid.individual.net> <6ac4741b@news.ausics.net> <nijskmFppshU2@mid.individual.net> |
| Date | 2026-10-07 07:55 +1000 |
| Organization | Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net |
Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > On 2026-10-06 06:07, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >> Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>> On 2026-10-06 01:21, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>>> Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote: >>>>> Yes, I enjoy writing about these weird quirks that I find in the ssh tools >>>>> (including rsync). I find it amusing that ssh (and friends) - a tool we >>>>> all use daily and rely on heavily - is still stuck, design-wise, in the >>>>> 1980s. >>>> >>>> I just double-down on the 1980s mindset and use Telnet instead of >>>> SSH for talking to things like Raspberry Pis which are on my own >>>> LAN where nobody should be able to listen/connect anyway, unless >>>> they can just walk over and steal its SD card anyway. Makes >>>> everything much simpler, once you've installed the Telnet server. >>> >>> telnet does not send files, AFAIK. >> >> No more than SSH does, on its own. > > cer@Laicolasse:~> wrpm ssh > openssh-clients-10.0p2-160000.7.1.x86_64 > cer@Laicolasse:~> wrpm scp > openssh-clients-10.0p2-160000.7.1.x86_64 > cer@Laicolasse:~> > > scp is part of the ssh package. It's true that the OpenSSH project makes both, but it's not the same program and actually uses the SFTP protocol these days. The Telnet and FTP clients I use are both part of the GNU Inetutils project and sometimes packaged together, so by your logic Telnet is in the same position: it doesn't send files but it's sometimes supplied alongside software that does. Anyway the only way the OP suggested they wanted to move files was with Rsync, which technically doesn't need anything else to do that anyway because the client can act as an Rsync protocol server itself. If they want other ways as well, then no a Telnet itself isn't one of them, but plenty of options exist. -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Another ssh quirk... gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-10-05 12:35 +0000
Re: Another ssh quirk... Philippe <p.naudin+nntp@free.fr> - 2026-10-05 15:26 +0200
Re: Another ssh quirk... gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-10-05 13:41 +0000
Re: Another ssh quirk... John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-05 19:09 +0200
Re: Another ssh quirk... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-05 15:40 +0200
Re: Another ssh quirk... gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-10-05 13:45 +0000
Re: Another ssh quirk... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 20:31 +0100
Re: Another ssh quirk... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-05 21:46 +0200
Re: Another ssh quirk... not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-10-06 09:21 +1000
Re: Another ssh quirk... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-06 01:55 +0200
Re: Another ssh quirk... Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-10-06 14:07 +1000
Re: Another ssh quirk... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-06 11:17 +0200
Re: Another ssh quirk... not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-10-07 07:55 +1000
Re: Another ssh quirk... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 00:41 -0400
Re: Another ssh quirk... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 08:47 +0100
Re: Another ssh quirk... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 12:02 +0200
Re: Another ssh quirk... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 21:32 -0400
Re: Another ssh quirk... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-08 20:08 +0000
Re: Another ssh quirk... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-10-07 15:33 +0000
Re: Another ssh quirk... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-06 08:51 +0100
Re: Another ssh quirk... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-06 08:51 +0100
Re: Another ssh quirk... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-06 11:20 +0200
Re: Another ssh quirk... not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-10-07 08:09 +1000
Re: Another ssh quirk... Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-06 09:27 +0100
Re: Another ssh quirk... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-06 11:08 +0100
Re: Another ssh quirk... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-06 23:53 -0400
Re: Another ssh quirk... gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-10-06 11:09 +0000
Re: Another ssh quirk... Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:08 +0100
csiph-web