Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #1311 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-07-09 18:39 +0700 |
| Last post | 2012-07-14 21:13 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.hardware
free software + OpenCL: supported hardware? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-07-09 18:39 +0700
Re: free software + OpenCL: supported hardware? joe <joe@home.com> - 2012-07-13 18:40 -0500
Re: free software + OpenCL: supported hardware? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-07-14 12:39 +0700
Re: free software + OpenCL: supported hardware? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-14 12:05 +0000
AMD Radeon HD6450 Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-07-15 00:21 +0700
Re: AMD Radeon HD6450 Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2012-07-14 21:13 +0200
| From | Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-09 18:39 +0700 |
| Subject | free software + OpenCL: supported hardware? |
| Message-ID | <8639515fk2.fsf@gray.siamics.net> |
Does anyone have any experience with free software-only OpenCL on AMD Radeon-based boards? I'm primarily interested in using it along with Debian GNU/Linux Wheezy, but I'd appreciate any comments on how well it works in general. I'm looking forward to acquire one of the following boards (both are fan-less, which is a pro, but not a crucial one): • Sapphire AMD Radeon HD6450 1024MB 64bit DDR3 [11190-02-XX]; • PCI-E Asus AMD Radeon HD6670 1024MB 128bit DDR3 [EAH6670 DC SL/DI/1GD3]. As per [1, 2], both should be supported by free software. TIA. [1] http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/GalliumCompute [2] http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature -- FSF associate member #7257
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | joe <joe@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-13 18:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ge2dnekIqvdiLJ3NnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #1311 |
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:39:41 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > Does anyone have any experience with free software-only OpenCL > on AMD Radeon-based boards? I'm primarily interested in using it along > with Debian GNU/Linux Wheezy, but I'd appreciate any comments on how > well it works in general. > > I'm looking forward to acquire one of the following boards (both are > fan-less, which is a pro, but not a crucial one): > > • Sapphire AMD Radeon HD6450 1024MB 64bit DDR3 [11190-02-XX]; > > • PCI-E Asus AMD Radeon HD6670 1024MB 128bit DDR3 [EAH6670 DC > SL/DI/1GD3]. > > As per [1, 2], both should be supported by free software. > > TIA. > > [1] http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/GalliumCompute [2] > http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature I would steer well clear anything that has ATI/AMD graphics, these will cause grief, the drivers are crap and so is the hardware on linux. Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-14 12:39 +0700 |
| Message-ID | <86d33yzys6.fsf@gray.siamics.net> |
| In reply to | #1316 |
>>>>> joe <joe@home.com> writes: >>>>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:39:41 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote: >> Does anyone have any experience with free software-only OpenCL on >> AMD Radeon-based boards? I'm primarily interested in using it along >> with Debian GNU/Linux Wheezy, but I'd appreciate any comments on how >> well it works in general. [...] > I would steer well clear anything that has ATI/AMD graphics, these > will cause grief, Is there an alternative for OpenCL? I'm not that interested in "graphics" per se, BTW. (So far, my ATI Radeon-based card has worked pretty much perfectly for me via the "vesa" X.Org driver.) [...] -- FSF associate member #7257 http://sf-day.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-14 12:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2012Jul14.140524@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> |
| In reply to | #1316 |
joe <joe@home.com> writes: >I would steer well clear anything that has ATI/AMD graphics, these will >cause grief, the drivers are crap and so is the hardware on linux. In my experience the free drivers for ATI cards are far superior to the free drivers for Nvidia cards (reportedly Nouveau is getting there, but that's too recent for my experience). I have used Radeon Cards on Linux on my PC since the Radeon 9600, which I bought almost ten years ago (then 9250, X800, X1650, 4670 and now 5770). No grief for me, but for some chips 3D acceleration was not available on the Debian track I used (mostly stable, sometimes testing) when I bought the card. As for grief, a collegue got a PowerBook in 2004, which had an Nvidia chip. He never could get that Laptop to display on an external screen with Linux. In contrast, I got an iBook (with a Mobile Radeon 9200) at about the same time, and although it was quite a bit of work, I got it to display on an external screen. Another example, we got Zotac Ion-based X-Terminals a few years ago, which have Nvidia graphics. The nv driver does not work for 2560x1600, so we had to go for the proprietary nvidia driver. - anton -- M. Anton Ertl Some things have to be seen to be believed anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at Most things have to be believed to be seen http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-15 00:21 +0700 |
| Subject | AMD Radeon HD6450 |
| Message-ID | <86vchqxnqp.fsf@gray.siamics.net> |
| In reply to | #1311 |
>>>>> Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> writes: > Does anyone have any experience with free software-only OpenCL on AMD > Radeon-based boards? I'm primarily interested in using it along with > Debian GNU/Linux Wheezy, but I'd appreciate any comments on how well > it works in general. > I'm looking forward to acquire one of the following boards (both are > fan-less, which is a pro, but not a crucial one): > • Sapphire AMD Radeon HD6450 1024MB 64bit DDR3 [11190-02-XX]; We've tested the following board based on the same chip today, marked as: Asus AMD Radeon HD6450 1024MB 64bit DDR3 [EAH6450 SILENT/DI/1GD3(LP)]. While I haven't tried OpenCL just yet (may take a couple of weeks to get to that, unfortunately), the basic graphics worked quite well with the ‘radeon’ X.Org driver currently in Debian Wheezy. On the other hand, 3D (we've tried glxgears(1)) seemed a bit flacky. As per the sensors(1) output, the chip easily heats up to 75 °C, which is somewhat worse than I've expected (though I'm not that familiar with modern GPU's.) […] -- FSF associate member #7257 http://sf-day.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-14 21:13 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: AMD Radeon HD6450 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2012.07.14.19.13.55.783418@deadspam.com> |
| In reply to | #1319 |
Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> wrote: > We've tested the following board based on the same chip today, > marked as: Asus AMD Radeon HD6450 1024MB 64bit DDR3 [EAH6450 > SILENT/DI/1GD3(LP)]. > > While I haven't tried OpenCL just yet (may take a couple of > weeks to get to that, unfortunately), the basic graphics worked > quite well with the 'radeon' X.Org driver currently in Debian > Wheezy. On the other hand, 3D (we've tried glxgears(1)) seemed > a bit flacky. Once you get to test OpenGL performance it would be nice if you could add the results to http://www.free3d.org/ regards Henrik -- The address in the header is only to prevent spam. My real address is: hc351(at)poolhem.se Examples of addresses which go to spammers: root@localhost postmaster@localhost
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.hardware
csiph-web