Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #2111 > unrolled thread
| Started by | notbob <notbob@nothome.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-11-02 20:28 +0000 |
| Last post | 2013-11-03 15:36 -0600 |
| Articles | 13 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.hardware
HP2000 AMD laptop notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2013-11-02 20:28 +0000
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-11-03 05:13 -0600
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2013-11-03 11:30 -0500
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2013-11-03 16:57 +0000
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2013-11-03 19:40 +0000
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2013-11-03 20:37 +0000
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> - 2013-11-03 12:43 -0800
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2013-11-03 22:13 +0000
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> - 2013-11-03 16:47 -0800
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2013-11-04 20:18 +0000
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-11-03 15:38 -0600
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> - 2013-11-03 12:41 -0800
Re: HP2000 AMD laptop philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-11-03 15:36 -0600
| From | notbob <notbob@nothome.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-02 20:28 +0000 |
| Subject | HP2000 AMD laptop |
| Message-ID | <slrnl7aoa1.2lh.notbob@nbleet.hcc.net> |
Wallyworld is having an Xmas sale and has a model of the HP2000 laptop on sale, a very limited supply of celeron equipt models. Probably a phase out. Anyway, I convinced 'em to sell me an AMD version. Duocore, 320g HDD, 15.6" screen, etc. BUT! ....looking at the reviews on Amazon shows an almost 20% 1-star rating, most saying this line, and HP in general, is now dogcrap, stay away! ???? Really that bad? And are they linux friendly? I have no intention of running W8, but if HP has gone down the toity, never mind. nb
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | philo <philo@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-03 05:13 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <l55b56$2ng$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2111 |
On 11/02/2013 03:28 PM, notbob wrote: > Wallyworld is having an Xmas sale and has a model of the HP2000 > laptop on sale, a very limited supply of celeron equipt models. > Probably a phase out. Anyway, I convinced 'em to sell me an AMD > version. Duocore, 320g HDD, 15.6" screen, etc. BUT! ....looking at > the reviews on Amazon shows an almost 20% 1-star rating, most saying > this line, and HP in general, is now dogcrap, stay away! ???? > > Really that bad? And are they linux friendly? I have no intention of > running W8, but if HP has gone down the toity, never mind. > > nb > HP is certainly not the company it used to be... but since the machine came with Win8 that might be the reason for the bad rating. -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS85KjUsEm0&feature=youtu.be
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-03 11:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <alpine.LNX.2.02.1311031128530.25510@darkstar.example.org> |
| In reply to | #2112 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013, philo wrote: > On 11/02/2013 03:28 PM, notbob wrote: >> Wallyworld is having an Xmas sale and has a model of the HP2000 >> laptop on sale, a very limited supply of celeron equipt models. >> Probably a phase out. Anyway, I convinced 'em to sell me an AMD >> version. Duocore, 320g HDD, 15.6" screen, etc. BUT! ....looking at >> the reviews on Amazon shows an almost 20% 1-star rating, most saying >> this line, and HP in general, is now dogcrap, stay away! ???? >> >> Really that bad? And are they linux friendly? I have no intention of >> running W8, but if HP has gone down the toity, never mind. >> >> nb >> > > > > HP is certainly not the company it used to be... > but since the machine came with Win8 that might be the reason for the bad > rating. > HP can never be the company it used to be. It was a test equipment and then high end calculator business, then later got into computers, eventually the company split. The computer business keeps the HP name, but the test equipment and the like that were the cornerstone of the business are no longer part of the business. HP basically spun off the consumer computer division, and gave the name away with it. Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | notbob <notbob@nothome.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-03 16:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnl7d044.2tm.notbob@nbleet.hcc.net> |
| In reply to | #2113 |
On 2013-11-03, Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote: > HP can never be the company it used to be. It was a test equipment and=20 > then high end calculator business, then later got into computers,=20 > eventually the company split. The computer business keeps the HP name,=20 > but the test equipment and the like that were the cornerstone of the=20 > business are no longer part of the business. HP basically spun off the=20 > consumer computer division, and gave the name away with it. Well, thanks for the brief history lesson, Michael, but I knew all that, having once worked in the heart of Silly Vlly. What I wanted was some insight to whether or not their products (from the computer side) are worth a damn, anymore. The picture I get from Amazon reviews is one of a company now selling total junk and providing little, if any, real support. Apparently, that's the case. I called WW and told 'em to cancel the hold. I consider support to be a prime factor in the purchase of any product and lack of same will torpedo a purchase in a heartbeat. I figure if the company is willing to stand behind their product, it's bound to be a good product. If not, it's probably junk. This isn't always the case, but it's pretty good measuring stick. Thanks to all who replied. nb
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-03 19:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20131103143804@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2114 |
On 2013-11-03, notbob <notbob@nothome.com> wrote: > Well, thanks for the brief history lesson, Michael, but I knew all > that, having once worked in the heart of Silly Vlly. What I wanted > was some insight to whether or not their products (from the computer > side) are worth a damn, anymore. From what I have seen, HP's consumer line is junk, but they have some decent products in their business line. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Blake (Change "invalid" to "com" for email. Google Groups killfiled.) The NSA by its actions has shredded the 4th Amendment of the Constitution and has essentially declared war on the American people. Put the NSA leaders on trial for treason, and upon being found guilty, publicly execute them to send a strong message. God bless Ed Snowden! Death to NSA thugs! -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | notbob <notbob@nothome.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-03 20:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnl7dd0p.2tm.notbob@nbleet.hcc.net> |
| In reply to | #2115 |
On 2013-11-03, Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> wrote: > From what I have seen, HP's consumer line is junk, but they have some decent > products in their business line. As I suspected. This laptop is definitely in the lower consumer end of their line. I opted out. nb
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-03 12:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5276B589.90802@thadlabs.com> |
| In reply to | #2116 |
On 11/3/2013 12:37 PM, notbob wrote: > On 2013-11-03, Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> wrote: > >> From what I have seen, HP's consumer line is junk, but they have some decent >> products in their business line. > > As I suspected. This laptop is definitely in the lower consumer end > of their line. I opted out. Wise decision. :-) Basically, if something is at Walmart, it's junk constructed from the lowest bottom-of-the-barrel parts to cut costs (and reliability). Thad
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | notbob <notbob@nothome.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-03 22:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnl7dijj.2tm.notbob@nbleet.hcc.net> |
| In reply to | #2118 |
On 2013-11-03, Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> wrote: > Basically, if something is at Walmart, it's junk constructed > from the lowest bottom-of-the-barrel parts to cut costs (and > reliability). Total nonsense. I'm no fan of WallyWorld, but yer claim is absurd. I now live in a remote area or the CO Rockies. I hafta shop at WW if I want some things. Only game in town. I've bought 2 flat panel TVs (Vizio) and one FP computer monitor (Acer). They both work flawlessly. The wool socks I purchased there are US made and 80% wool. Excellent. The gun range bag I bought for peanuts is 10 yrs old and going strong. The two pairs of fleece pants and micro fiber comforters I bought are awesome. Warm as Hell! Bought a Chinese made ranch jacket, those rust red things with the corduroy collar. Twenty bucks and warmer than my $80 Carhartt equivelent. Not everything WW sells is junk. Jes gotta be smarter than the item yer buying. ;) nb
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-03 16:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5276EE94.3040907@thadlabs.com> |
| In reply to | #2121 |
On 11/3/2013 2:13 PM, notbob wrote: > On 2013-11-03, Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> wrote: > >> Basically, if something is at Walmart, it's junk constructed >> from the lowest bottom-of-the-barrel parts to cut costs (and >> reliability). > > Total nonsense. > [...] Wrongo. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wal-Mart:_The_High_Cost_of_Low_Price http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/wal-mart-the-high-cost-of-low-price/ http://movies.tvguide.com/wal-mart-the-high-cost-of-low-price/review/195873 http://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/328033/Wal-Mart-The-High-Cost-Of-Low-Price/overview Plus the Walmarts here in Silicon Valley require one to carry a gun to the store from one's car in the parking lot given the locations in high crime areas. Not worth shopping for junk and not worth risking one's life. Thad
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-04 20:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnl7g097.uh8.knock_yourself_out@vps.jonz.net> |
| In reply to | #2121 |
On 3 Nov 2013 22:13:12 GMT, notbob wrote: > > I now live in a > remote area or the CO Rockies. I hafta shop at WW if I want some > things. Only game in town. Only game in town, for sure. I used to live in Gunnison, Colo. When the Made-In-China store came to town, they killed two drugstores, an independent shoe store, an independent children's store, the Sears and Montgomery Ward catalog stores, the J.C.Penny store, and several more I forget at this time. Many decent, long term families lost their livelihoods. The sense of community was greatly diminished. I have made it my life's goal to never darken the threshold of a Communist Chinese Outlet store.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | philo <philo@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-03 15:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <l56foo$uc2$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2116 |
On 11/03/2013 02:37 PM, notbob wrote: > On 2013-11-03, Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> wrote: > >> From what I have seen, HP's consumer line is junk, but they have some decent >> products in their business line. > > As I suspected. This laptop is definitely in the lower consumer end > of their line. I opted out. > > nb > FWIW: My company provided me with a Lenovo lap top and I found it to be quite good.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-03 12:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5276B4F1.50902@thadlabs.com> |
| In reply to | #2115 |
On 11/3/2013 11:40 AM, Roger Blake wrote: > On 2013-11-03, notbob <notbob@nothome.com> wrote: >> Well, thanks for the brief history lesson, Michael, but I knew all >> that, having once worked in the heart of Silly Vlly. What I wanted >> was some insight to whether or not their products (from the computer >> side) are worth a damn, anymore. > > From what I have seen, HP's consumer line is junk, but they have some decent > products in their business line. That's true for Dell (and very likely others) too. For example, a Dell Inspiron is consumer-class but a Dell Latitude is business-class and there's a big difference in quality and product longevity. My three Dell Latitude C610 circa 2002 are still running perfectly today as is my Dell Latitude D600 circa 2004. HP's consumer-class products are basically junk and generally have flaky motherboards plagued with MLCC (multi-layer ceramic capacitor) problems. Their business product line is a world-apart which is why I have two HP dc5850 and HP dc7900 small-form-factor desktops running CentOS, OpenIndiana (Solaris 11), and FreeBSD. Thad
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | philo <philo@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-03 15:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <l56fll$uc2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2113 |
On 11/03/2013 10:30 AM, Michael Black wrote: <snip> >> >> >> >> HP is certainly not the company it used to be... >> but since the machine came with Win8 that might be the reason for the >> bad rating. >> Yep, back in the vacuum days (and beyond) they were top of the line. I still have one of these in my workshop: http://www.radiomuseum.org/r/hewlett_pa_rack_mount_oscilloscope_1.html (not in use) One of my friends from HS ...the school genius worked for HP writing printer drivers. They released him just before he turned 60 and though with his talents had no trouble getting employment elsewhere...it sure left him quite bitter. He told me that HP used to make equipment that no one else could build...and now they make equipment no one else would bother to build. > HP can never be the company it used to be. It was a test equipment and > then high end calculator business, then later got into computers, > eventually the company split. The computer business keeps the HP name, > but the test equipment and the like that were the cornerstone of the > business are no longer part of the business. HP basically spun off the > consumer computer division, and gave the name away with it. > > Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.hardware
csiph-web