Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard?
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 21:23:58 +0000
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <bi8tfpFbco9U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <bi7sl3F4gk4U1@mid.individual.net> <slrnlbu754.2h60.knock_yourself_out@vps.jonz.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net qtTC0f9GcZNbiQVWMnQkDw88nd7zFj7qSIsZZEhV2TqUf79iw=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vXfd5uF47SSMY88LVAM46kMSpJw=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131204 Thunderbird/17.0.11
In-Reply-To: <slrnlbu754.2h60.knock_yourself_out@vps.jonz.net>
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.hardware:2154

On 12/28/2013 06:47 PM, Allodoxaphobia wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:03:35 +0000, Peter Chant wrote:
>>
>> Epsom scanner works first time on all machines.
>
>    ... and good for relaxing the motherboard bus and drawing
>    toxins from the cache memory.
>

That explains it, whereas a Canon perforates the motherboard and also 
the building it is housed in...