Re: NEC monitor

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	ray <ray@zianet.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.hardware, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: NEC monitor
Date	26 Dec 2011 18:37:08 GMT
Lines	14
Message-ID	<9lrt6kFsmeU15@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<slrnjfchen.3es.notbob@nbleet.hcc.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net puH8AnoqgTym+T2m3GzusAKir3akL9LUQaD8+i4/y8cBN5B7Rw
Cancel-Lock	sha1:mIFY52jDRQLUVDDtpRheKxHnyOU=
User-Agent	Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.hardware:959 comp.os.linux.misc:3427

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 21:36:17 +0000, notbob wrote:

> I need a new monitor, my last CRT be a'dying.  I will cave and buy a new
> LCD.  My question is, how are the NEC LCD monitors.  I know that the
> older NEC CRT monitors were "brighter" than other monitors.  As a geezer
> with marginal eyesight, this is important.  Does that still apply to NEC
> LCD monitors?  I'll probably be going min 20" or larger. I use
> Slackware.  Don't see any compatibility issues.  Should I?  Any other
> suggested choices welcome.  Thank you and Merry Christmas. ;)
> 
> nb

You should have no issues. Find one you like at a decent price and get 
it. If you buy locally, you should be able to have them demo it for you.

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

NEC monitor notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2011-12-24 21:36 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-24 22:34 +0000
    Re: NEC monitor dk3uz@arrl.net (Edmund H. Ramm) - 2011-12-25 17:28 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-24 17:44 -0500
    Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-25 08:50 -0500
    Re: NEC monitor philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-12-25 07:55 -0600
      Re: NEC monitor Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2011-12-25 10:00 -0500
        Re: NEC monitor notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2011-12-25 15:13 +0000
          Re: NEC monitor Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2011-12-25 10:41 -0500
          Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-25 10:41 -0500
          Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-25 19:20 +0000
            Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-25 21:41 +0000
              Re: NEC monitor The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-25 23:07 +0000
                Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-26 02:24 +0000
                Re: NEC monitor Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2011-12-26 21:53 +0000
              Re: NEC monitor Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2011-12-26 11:35 +0000
                Re: NEC monitor anotherpaul <file-box02@no-hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-12-26 17:16 +0000
              Re: NEC monitor TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2011-12-26 12:53 -0500
        Re: NEC monitor philo <philo@invalid.not> - 2011-12-25 09:30 -0600
  Re: NEC monitor J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-12-25 01:26 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor -rw------- <no@no.no> - 2011-12-25 02:09 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-25 02:27 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor Bill Waddington <william.waddington@beezmo.com> - 2011-12-25 07:49 -0800
  Re: NEC monitor david <none@nospam.com> - 2011-12-25 21:03 +0000
  Re: NEC monitor ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-12-26 18:37 +0000

csiph-web