Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #2041

Re: Which netbook?

Path csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject Re: Which netbook?
Date 6 Feb 2011 20:06:18 GMT
Lines 11
Message-ID <8r8d9qFojvU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <ii3iuo$919$1@news.eternal-september.org> <8qlvk6FgrdU1@mid.individual.net> <2f367b10-cc7c-4a88-8d09-975843121d46@m27g2000prj.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net m/l5tm8cHbEUC9cB3ubG7gXDpm8/FH6Hj8jKaRlMPUO3IBPLxl
Cancel-Lock sha1:tYtuBJ/yU1NgfVAGiXIqNxcSJwE=
User-Agent Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.hardware:2041

Show key headers only | View raw


 
> 1366x768 is unusable trash. I have a 13" mac book pro so i'd know might
> be better in linux in terminal mode but with X11 - not so good. i'm
> scrolling in browser constantly. I really hate it. I don't know who
> would buy a 11" or even 10" piece of trash

Not unusable but not for doing any heavy lifting. If you delete the bottom 
panel and just use the top panel you'll have enough room to do e-mail and 
basic web-browsing. There is a quantum difference between 600 and 768. 
There are some unshrinkable control panels that exceed the limits of a 600 
height screen but fit on a 768.

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Which netbook? Mark Pearson <bytebitter@somewhere.invalid> - 2011-01-30 11:44 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? Alan Secker <alan@asandco.co.uk> - 2011-01-30 22:14 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? greymausg@mail.com - 2011-01-31 10:52 +0000
    Re: Which netbook? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-01-31 13:25 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-01-30 15:30 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2011-01-30 07:17 -0600
  Re: Which netbook? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-01-30 13:01 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-02-06 20:06 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-01-30 20:22 +0000
    Re: Which netbook? "Dave {Reply Address In.Sig}" <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2011-01-30 21:11 +0000
    Re: Which netbook? AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2011-02-06 08:58 -0800

csiph-web