Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #2048
| From | "Dave {Reply Address In.Sig}" <noone$$@llondel.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Which netbook? |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| References | <ii3iuo$919$1@news.eternal-september.org> <8qlvk6FgrdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Followup-To | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| Message-ID | <gp0h18-2r2.ln1@llondel.org> (permalink) |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2011-01-30 21:11 +0000 |
Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.hardware
General Schvantzkoph wrote: > > Don't get a netbook if you want to do any real work on it, the screen > resolution is inadequate and Atom processors don't support virtualization. > If you just want something to just walk around with and to do some light > Internet browsing then get one with a 1366x768 screen, most come with a > 1024x600 screen, the extra 168 vertical pixels will make a huge difference > in usability. > I have an Aspire One which has served very well. I certainly wouldn't want to use it as-is for long periods but it is great as a portable machine for light use. A netbook that can talk to a USB keyboard and mouse, and has an external VGA connector can be made into something ergonomic, although the processing power is still limited. The other way I use it is to just set it up next to my work desktop machine (which runs Windows XP), and run X- Windows on the desktop and connect to the Linux netbook that way. All computers are a compromise and we all have different usage patterns and acceptable restrictions. I have had a top-spec laptop before now but it ate batteries and was not something you'd want to carry very far. The netbook is more limited but will run 9+ hours on the extended battery and is very light by comparison. -- Dave da ve@llondel.org (without the space) So many gadgets, so little time.
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Which netbook? Mark Pearson <bytebitter@somewhere.invalid> - 2011-01-30 11:44 +0000
Re: Which netbook? Alan Secker <alan@asandco.co.uk> - 2011-01-30 22:14 +0000
Re: Which netbook? greymausg@mail.com - 2011-01-31 10:52 +0000
Re: Which netbook? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-01-31 13:25 +0000
Re: Which netbook? notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-01-30 15:30 +0000
Re: Which netbook? "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2011-01-30 07:17 -0600
Re: Which netbook? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-01-30 13:01 +0000
Re: Which netbook? General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-02-06 20:06 +0000
Re: Which netbook? General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-01-30 20:22 +0000
Re: Which netbook? "Dave {Reply Address In.Sig}" <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2011-01-30 21:11 +0000
Re: Which netbook? AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2011-02-06 08:58 -0800
csiph-web