Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #2048

Re: Which netbook?

From "Dave {Reply Address In.Sig}" <noone$$@llondel.org>
Subject Re: Which netbook?
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.hardware
References <ii3iuo$919$1@news.eternal-september.org> <8qlvk6FgrdU1@mid.individual.net>
Followup-To comp.os.linux.hardware
Message-ID <gp0h18-2r2.ln1@llondel.org> (permalink)
Organization virginmedia.com
Date 2011-01-30 21:11 +0000

Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.hardware

Show all headers | View raw


General Schvantzkoph wrote:
> 
> Don't get a netbook if you want to do any real work on it, the screen
> resolution is inadequate and Atom processors don't support virtualization.
> If you just want something to just walk around with and to do some light
> Internet browsing then get one with a 1366x768 screen, most come with a
> 1024x600 screen, the extra 168 vertical pixels will make a huge difference
> in usability.
> 
I have an Aspire One which has served very well. I certainly wouldn't want 
to use it as-is for long periods but it is great as a portable machine for 
light use. A netbook that can talk to a USB keyboard and mouse, and has an 
external VGA connector can be made into something ergonomic, although the 
processing power is still limited. The other way I use it is to just set it 
up next to my work desktop machine (which runs Windows XP), and run X-
Windows on the desktop and connect to the Linux netbook that way. 

All computers are a compromise and we all have different usage patterns and 
acceptable restrictions. I have had a top-spec laptop before now but it ate 
batteries and was not something you'd want to carry very far. The netbook is 
more limited but will run 9+ hours on the extended battery and is very light 
by comparison.
-- 
Dave
da ve@llondel.org (without the space)
So many gadgets, so little time.

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Which netbook? Mark Pearson <bytebitter@somewhere.invalid> - 2011-01-30 11:44 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? Alan Secker <alan@asandco.co.uk> - 2011-01-30 22:14 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? greymausg@mail.com - 2011-01-31 10:52 +0000
    Re: Which netbook? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-01-31 13:25 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-01-30 15:30 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2011-01-30 07:17 -0600
  Re: Which netbook? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-01-30 13:01 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-02-06 20:06 +0000
  Re: Which netbook? General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-01-30 20:22 +0000
    Re: Which netbook? "Dave {Reply Address In.Sig}" <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2011-01-30 21:11 +0000
    Re: Which netbook? AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2011-02-06 08:58 -0800

csiph-web