Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #341469 > unrolled thread
| Started by | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-23 15:40 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-01-27 20:46 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 98 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-23 15:40 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-23 16:23 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-23 21:37 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-23 16:49 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-23 22:35 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-23 20:56 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-23 20:25 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-24 01:47 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-24 03:30 +0100
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-24 10:17 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-24 10:56 -0700
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 17:14 -0800
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-27 02:21 +0100
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:57 -0800
Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-27 05:49 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-27 07:25 -0600
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-27 20:35 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 22:26 -0800
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-28 05:43 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-28 07:38 -0600
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-28 09:26 -0600
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-29 12:47 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-29 18:18 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-29 18:38 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-29 23:52 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-30 11:55 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 23:52 -0800
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-28 20:27 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-09 22:02 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-28 09:16 -0600
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-28 10:46 -0500
Re: Anti-Linux trolls: still spectacularly bad fuckwits William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-01-28 23:08 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-27 13:26 -0700
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> - 2016-01-28 02:13 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-28 09:10 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-28 10:40 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-28 09:49 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-22 12:13 -0700
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> - 2016-01-28 17:25 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-28 13:28 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-28 14:22 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad "1 eyed chicken" <chicken@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 22:31 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-01-28 23:07 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-28 20:23 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-29 06:46 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-29 13:16 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-28 20:21 -0500
Linux Liars On Patrol. Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> - 2016-01-29 20:07 +0000
Re: Linux Liars On Patrol. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-29 16:55 -0600
Re: Linux Liars On Patrol. Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> - 2016-01-29 23:13 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-28 12:31 -0700
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-28 14:49 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-28 21:09 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-28 14:17 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-22 12:13 -0700
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:01 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-29 03:07 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-29 12:22 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-29 08:35 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-29 13:05 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-29 19:27 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-29 20:28 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 02:35 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad mike antipasto <pizzadude@mycomputerrox.org> - 2016-01-29 21:42 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-30 03:08 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-30 05:50 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-30 00:13 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-30 06:18 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-30 00:19 -0500
Troll -- nasty, thick-headed know-nothings ranting about Linux Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-30 08:12 -0500
Re: Troll -- nasty, thick-headed know-nothings ranting about Linux chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-01 07:52 -0600
Advantage: Linux chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-01 10:35 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-01 07:24 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-30 00:07 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-29 18:52 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:54 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-28 20:31 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-28 20:44 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-29 03:02 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-29 07:46 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-28 21:07 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-29 07:00 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-09 22:02 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-27 07:47 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-27 13:25 -0700
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-01-27 08:18 -0800
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-27 13:06 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-26 16:03 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-26 19:52 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-27 00:56 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-27 20:49 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-27 13:28 -0700
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-24 10:53 -0700
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-01-27 08:15 -0800
Troll craphead: still spectacularly bad (and incompetent) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-27 12:48 -0500
Re: Troll craphead: still spectacularly bad (and incompetent) and proud of it! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-27 12:35 -0600
Re: Troll craphead: still spectacularly bad (and incompetent) and proud of it! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-27 20:37 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-27 20:46 -0500
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 09:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnnakcpp.931.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #341972 |
On 2016-01-28, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >>> some dumb fsck wrote: >>>> >>>> chrisv wrote: [deletia] >>>> Any reason you don't work for free, turd? There's no good reason that the tools that I have created for myself could not be "gifted" to the community. In some ways they are FAR superior to what commercial options are out there. It would not harm me or my employer to "share" that effort with the world at large. Everyone would benefit. Others would get something useful and my own tools would be improved for my benefit. Collectively, what we might spend in terms of effort would be FAR less that what we would spend buying someone else's relatively limited commercial tools. Software is just one of those areas where "stone soup" is simply the most economic and efficient approach. > > Oh, am I a "hypocrite" because I advocate software Freedom but have a > paying job? Really? > > FOSS doesn't mean "working for free", and only liars like you claim > that it does. > >> Ever heard of volunteerism, you miserable racist bastard? > > Some FOSS is created out of altruism, but mostly people (and > companies) create FOSS because it's simply the best way for them to > obtain their goals. Pretty much. Software is one of those obvious areas where solutions arise and don't need to be recreated again. Yet corporations need a constant revenue stream and try to force everyone into paying for something they already have. So it becomes remarkably more efficient for people to band together and create their own solution or create their own entirely independently. Software is infinitely durable and has a marginal production cost of zero. Old, well solved areas in computer software are like that 60 year old drug that the investment banker tried to jack up the price on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 12:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n8g8fo$j30$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341972 |
On 1/28/2016 8:38 AM, shitv wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >>> some dumb fsck wrote: >>>> >>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Linux would be out of it, were it not for the strong demand for tools >>>>> that are more capable and flexible than those provided by Microsoft. >>>> >>>> Capability and flexibility has NOTHING to do with it. > > You are lying, obviously. It has *everything* to do with it. > > Don't worry, "Ezekiel" won't chastise you for idiocy and your lies. > He's a liar, too. > >>>> Linux would've >>>> died long ago were it not given away for free, with source code. > > Of course. The fact that it's FOSS made it relatively immune from > Micro$oft's monopolizing machinations. M$ routinely used their power > in the market to destroy their conventional, for-profit competition. > > This is not news, you dumb fsck. Apparently it is to you, moron, since you constantly claim Linux succeeded on the merits. Which is pure horseshit. Like most every FOSS pile of shit software, the initial and early releases of the Linux kernel were bogus compared to the proprietary product they were copied from. Linux would've died immediately if it was closed source and had a price tag attached. >> So what? It would have died long ago if either GNU or the Linux kernel >> were not of very good quality, either. >> >> Unlike DOS and Windows, which, for a long time, were absolute crap >> and required monopolistic practices to keep them going. > > Free or not, people wouldn't be using Linux if it did not have *clear* > and *significant* advantages over Windows. With all the advantages of > being part of the herd, no one would leave it without very good > reasons. > > No, "being free" is not a "very good reason". Windows is not > expensive when pre-installed. > >>> Not now when the whole Google and smart phone market are based on it... >>> But let Google pay royalty for using the Kernel code and the company may >>> collapse afterall. > > Brain-damaged dipshit. > >> You mean like the "royalties" some Android-using companies pay to Microsoft >> because of "patents"? >> >> Damn, you are stupid. I snipped the rest of your garbage. > > Well, you're talking to some dumb fsck who has claimed that even on > supercomputers, Linux is only used because it is free. Creepy wasn't talking to me, moron. You know, over and over and over again, turd, you've shown yourself unable to follow a thread. Later on you'll take quotes from this thread and wrongly attribute them to me. What a dumbass. > Yeah, it would really "make sense" for those very expensive machines, > and the expensive people who use them, to not use the best OS for the > job. > > I mean, the idiocy is beyond belief! > >>>> Any reason you don't work for free, turd? > > Oh, am I a "hypocrite" because I advocate software Freedom but have a > paying job? Really? No, shit-for-brains, you're a hypocrite (like Creepy) because you slither around here pretending FOSS is important to you, but the ONLY thing you care about is money. The girlie-man Chris Ahlstrom should've quit his Windows job YEARS ago - seeing as how he thinks "Windows is garbage and MS is evil and a cancer" (his claims). Instead, he's going to spend nearly all his career developing code on/for Windows. You too. What a joke. As I've said before, y'alls GNU principles begin and end at your wallet. > FOSS doesn't mean "working for free", and only liars like you claim > that it does. It almost always does mean exactly that, fool. >> Ever heard of volunteerism, you miserable racist bastard? > > Some FOSS is created out of altruism, but mostly people (and > companies) create FOSS because it's simply the best way for them to > obtain their goals. > > But I'm sure "Ezekiel" approves of his shitty pal's utterly dishonest > "hypocrisy" attack. "Ezekiel" also likes to *lie* to attack FOSS > advocates of "hypocrisy". > > Their mothers must be *so* proud, of the shitty liars they raised. Hey shitv, tell us again how "I would gladly show anyone what I do in here." Here's what you did in here in Jun 2012: ===================================================================== "morons and assholes, fucking moron, puerile assholery, worthless piece of shit, evil bastards, trolling assholes, jackass, dumb bastard, Wintroll circle-jerk, trolls are filthy, lying piece of shit, piece of shit, piece of shit, piece of shit, what an asshole, fucking assholes, shitty and dishonest Linux-haters, prick shit-canned, filthy lying asshole, shit-brained arsehole, stupidity of epic proportions, stupid pile of shit, jackass, too God-damned stupid, trolling shitwits, stupid, assholery, brain-damaged fucktard, piece of shit, drooling retard liar, drooling retard liar, stupid piece of shit wannabe dictators, jackass, clueless and lying idiot, ignorant ass, Stupid fuckwit, You stepped in your own shit, fuckwitted asshole, extremely shitty, lying asshole, trolling fuckwit, you stupid asshole, piece of shit, asshole, shitty dishonesty, piece of shit, asshole, fuckwit, fuckwit, lying fuckwit, you piece of shit, you stupid piece of shit, couple of dishonest little shits, a disease infesting the planet, piece of shit and liar, fucktard trolls, Windows-loving asshole, shitty, filthy Wintroll, bald-faced liar, you piece of shit liar, shitty, useless Linux-haters, you stupid piece of shit, piece of shit, Utterly worthless liar, filthy Win troll, lying pieces of shit, fricken jackass, worthless lying piece of shit jackass, shamelessly lying piece of shit, worthless, shit-brained asshole, piece of shit liar, the filthy liar, evil selfish bastards, fucking idiot, fucking stupid, ignorant, spews garbage, jackass, idiot asshole, piece of shit, stupid piece of shit, trolling fuckwit, piece of shit, lies his ass off, vile thing, shitty, liar, ignorant lying piece of shit, vile bastard asshole liar, fucking liar, worthless, shameless jackass, shitty, piece of shit liar, shameless jackass, filthy lying assholes, jackass, cram it up your ass, asshole, piece of shit, filthy, immoral, dogshit brains, shitty little freedom-hating dictator wannabee, fucking idiot, piece of shit, stupid, ignorant, shameless asshole. Linux-hating pieces of shit, fucking, shit, shitty, shitty, shitty, selfish assholes, shamelessly dishonest piece of shit, vile lying bastards, filthy liar, filthy fucks, fucking assholes, disgusting scumbag, vile filthy mean, fuckwit, filthy fucking, liar, trolling fuckwit, piece of shit, filthy fuckwit, vile pukes, you shit, vile bastards, filthy fuck, mentally-defective bigots disgusting freaks, piece of shit, filthy lying bigot, shitty, filthy bigots, trolling fuckwit and shit, vile bigot, fuckwit piece of shit disgusting freak" ===================================================================== Did you show Momma the truth, turd? Of course you didn't, you lying sack of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 18:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gh39t73.kghi@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #342075 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 1/28/2016 8:38 AM, shitv wrote: > > The girlie-man Chris Ahlstrom should've quit his Windows job YEARS ago - > seeing as how he thinks "Windows is garbage and MS is evil and a cancer" > (his claims). Instead, he's going to spend nearly all his career > developing code on/for Windows. You too. What a joke. > > As I've said before, y'alls GNU principles begin and end at your wallet. > It's spelt "y'all's," boy. Damn, where'd you grow up?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 18:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n8gt1m$870$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #342084 |
On 1/29/2016 1:18 PM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 1/28/2016 8:38 AM, shitv wrote: > >> >> The girlie-man Chris Ahlstrom should've quit his Windows job YEARS ago - >> seeing as how he thinks "Windows is garbage and MS is evil and a cancer" >> (his claims). Instead, he's going to spend nearly all his career >> developing code on/for Windows. You too. What a joke. >> >> As I've said before, y'alls GNU principles begin and end at your wallet. >> > > It's spelt "y'all's," boy. Damn, where'd you grow up? Get it together, son. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talk:y%27all#Possessive_Form http://anotherhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/yalls-or-yalls.html Now explain yourself here: owl: "They be using the default click-and-drool interface and just clicking on filenames." Negroes in the woodpile?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 23:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgje003a.fe@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #342112 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 1/29/2016 1:18 PM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 1/28/2016 8:38 AM, shitv wrote: >> >>> >>> The girlie-man Chris Ahlstrom should've quit his Windows job YEARS ago - >>> seeing as how he thinks "Windows is garbage and MS is evil and a cancer" >>> (his claims). Instead, he's going to spend nearly all his career >>> developing code on/for Windows. You too. What a joke. >>> >>> As I've said before, y'alls GNU principles begin and end at your wallet. >>> >> >> It's spelt "y'all's," boy. Damn, where'd you grow up? > > > Get it together, son. > > https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talk:y%27all#Possessive_Form Wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y%27all <quote> Possessive forms[edit] The existence of the genitive (or possessive) form y'all's indicates that y'all functions as a pronoun as opposed to a phrasal element.[11] The possessive form of y'all has not been standardized; numerous forms can be found, including y'alls, y'all's, y'alls's, you all's, your all's, and all of y'all's.[10] All forms other than y'all's originate in Georgia where they never get anything right. </quote> > http://anotherhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/yalls-or-yalls.html > Wrong. > > > > Now explain yourself here: > > owl: "They be using the default click-and-drool interface and just > clicking on filenames." > Stalking is wrong. > > Negroes in the woodpile? Y'all get to choppin'.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-30 11:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n8ipqa$ekt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #342113 |
On 1/29/2016 6:52 PM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 1/29/2016 1:18 PM, owl wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/28/2016 8:38 AM, shitv wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The girlie-man Chris Ahlstrom should've quit his Windows job YEARS ago - >>>> seeing as how he thinks "Windows is garbage and MS is evil and a cancer" >>>> (his claims). Instead, he's going to spend nearly all his career >>>> developing code on/for Windows. You too. What a joke. >>>> >>>> As I've said before, y'alls GNU principles begin and end at your wallet. >>>> >>> >>> It's spelt "y'all's," boy. Damn, where'd you grow up? >> >> >> Get it together, son. >> >> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talk:y%27all#Possessive_Form > > Wrong. pwned > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y%27all > <quote> > Possessive forms[edit] > The existence of the genitive (or possessive) form y'all's indicates > that y'all functions as a pronoun as opposed to a phrasal element.[11] > The possessive form of y'all has not been standardized; numerous forms > can be found, including y'alls, y'all's, y'alls's, you all's, your all's, > and all of y'all's.[10] All forms other than y'all's originate in > Georgia where they never get anything right. > </quote> > >> http://anotherhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/yalls-or-yalls.html >> > > Wrong. pwned >> Now explain yourself here: >> >> owl: "They be using the default click-and-drool interface and just >> clicking on filenames." >> > > Stalking is wrong. Stalking /be/ wrong. >> Negroes in the woodpile? > > > Y'all get to choppin'. pwned
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 23:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <rr36oc-qbn.ln1@spanky.localhost.net> |
| In reply to | #341972 |
[snips] On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 07:38:39 -0600, chrisv wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>> Any reason you don't work for free, turd? > > Oh, am I a "hypocrite" because I advocate software Freedom but have a > paying job? Really? > > FOSS doesn't mean "working for free", and only liars like you claim that > it does. > >> Ever heard of volunteerism, you miserable racist bastard? > > Some FOSS is created out of altruism, but mostly people (and companies) > create FOSS because it's simply the best way for them to obtain their > goals. Some FOSS is produced simply because a company needs an app, and using existing FOSS libraries makes development faster... but also requires some giving back. Some is produced because a company needs an app, develops it, and has no interest in monetizing the app, so why not let others use it if it might be of value to them? And in return, the company may well get enhancements, bug fixes, whatever. If your goal is to make money off the sales and support of software, FOSS is probably not your best option. If you're *not* in the software sales and support biz, though, releasing any apps you develop as FOSS is a net win for everyone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 20:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n8ef12$116$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341969 |
On 1/28/2016 5:43 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Takuya Saitoh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:36:09 AM UTC+9, DFS wrote: >>> On 1/27/2016 8:25 AM, shitv wrote: >>> >>>> Linux would be out of it, were it not for the strong demand for tools >>>> that are more capable and flexible than those provided by Microsoft. >>> >>> Capability and flexibility has NOTHING to do with it. Linux would've >>> died long ago were it not given away for free, with source code. > > So what? It would have died long ago if either GNU or the Linux kernel > were not of very good quality, either. The Linux kernel DID suck for a long time (by comparison to Unix), but it didn't disappear because it didn't cost anything, and the source was free. > Unlike DOS and Windows, which, for a long time, were absolute crap > and required monopolistic practices to keep them going. > >> Not now when the whole Google and smart phone market are based on it... >> But let Google pay royalty for using the Kernel code and the company may >> collapse afterall. > > You mean like the "royalties" some Android-using companies pay to Microsoft > because of "patents"? > > Damn, you are stupid. I snipped the rest of your garbage. > >>> Any reason you don't work for free, turd? > > Ever heard of volunteerism, you miserable racist bastard? Which 'volunteers' are you talking about, girlie-man? All I see are distros and FOSS projects aggressively begging users for money and other donations. I never heard of a volunteer asking for money afterwards.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 22:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9e93n$td7$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341969 |
On 1/28/2016 5:43 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > DOS and Windows > Microsoft "Marti, we don't care about Microsoft and its products here." Chris "Little Beaver" Ahlstrom, Oct 2013
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 09:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnnakc5m.931.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #341965 |
On 2016-01-28, Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:36:09 AM UTC+9, DFS wrote: >> On 1/27/2016 8:25 AM, shitv wrote: >> >> > Linux would be out of it, were it not for the strong demand for tools >> > that are more capable and flexible than those provided by Microsoft. >> >> >> Capability and flexibility has NOTHING to do with it. Linux would've >> died long ago were it not given away for free, with source code. > > Not now when the whole Google and smart phone market are based on it... But l et Google pay royalty for using the Kernel code and the company may collapse afterall. All those nut companies driving the stock market novadays like Google, F Google would have no problems paying royalties. Nor would anyone else that gets Linux for free. What such a thing would actually mean in the big picture is a single entity that Microsoft could attack, undermine, and run out of business. THAT is far more important than whether or not people pay Linus. [deletia] Linux survives because it's not like Atari, or Be, or IBM, or Sun, or Apple, or any of the other platforms/companies that Win/DOS juggernaut killed. A single entity to pay royalties to is also also an easy target for corporate destruction.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 10:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n8dcue$u90$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341979 |
On 2016-01-28 10:16 AM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2016-01-28, Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:36:09 AM UTC+9, DFS wrote: >>> On 1/27/2016 8:25 AM, shitv wrote: >>> >>>> Linux would be out of it, were it not for the strong demand for tools >>>> that are more capable and flexible than those provided by Microsoft. >>> >>> >>> Capability and flexibility has NOTHING to do with it. Linux would've >>> died long ago were it not given away for free, with source code. >> >> Not now when the whole Google and smart phone market are based on it... But l > et Google pay royalty for using the Kernel code and the company may collapse afterall. All those nut companies driving the stock market novadays like Google, F > > Google would have no problems paying royalties. > > Nor would anyone else that gets Linux for free. > > What such a thing would actually mean in the big picture is a single entity > that Microsoft could attack, undermine, and run out of business. THAT is far > more important than whether or not people pay Linus. > > [deletia] > > Linux survives because it's not like Atari, or Be, or IBM, or Sun, or Apple, > or any of the other platforms/companies that Win/DOS juggernaut killed. How did Microsoft kill Atari? Was it Microsoft's fault that they didn't bother to keep up with technological changes and made few significant improvements to the platform? At a time when the PC could format disks at 1.44MB, Atari will still at 720KB. Twice the amount of disks for no reason. Its platform also lacked quality third-party software as a result of the company doing nothing to counter rampant piracy. How is this Microsoft's fault JEDIDIAH? As for Be, it's not Microsoft's fault that the owner of the company was too much of a moron to accept Apple's large offer and insisted on getting double at the last minute. Whether you like to admit it or not, Be was already dead when it ported the operating system to x86. IBM died of its own incompetence as Microsoft backed away from OS/2 in 1990 when Windows hadn't yet become so powerful. IBM had more resources and a great amount of time to fix the upcoming situation and they did little to nothing, still not Microsoft's fault. As for Apple, I would love for you to explain how Microsoft killed Apple in the 1990s when it fact it saved the company when they were about to die of insignificance by vowing to port Office to the platform in addition to injecting capital into the company when they needed it most. Besides, it's not Microsoft's fault that Apple took so long to come up with a decent operating system to replace the aging Classic system. < snip > -- Slimer EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Conservative Party of Canada, Mozilla & PETA supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 23:08 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Anti-Linux trolls: still spectacularly bad fuckwits |
| Message-ID | <bljqnc-nfe.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #341979 |
It was reported that JEDIDIAH posted: > On 2016-01-28, Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:36:09 AM UTC+9, DFS wrote: >>> On 1/27/2016 8:25 AM, shitv wrote: >>> >>> > Linux would be out of it, were it not for the strong demand for tools >>> > that are more capable and flexible than those provided by Microsoft. >>> >>> >>> Capability and flexibility has NOTHING to do with it. Linux would've >>> died long ago were it not given away for free, with source code. >> >> Not now when the whole Google and smart phone market are based on it... But l > et Google pay royalty for using the Kernel code and the company may collapse afterall. All those nut companies driving the stock market novadays like Google, F > > Google would have no problems paying royalties. > > Nor would anyone else that gets Linux for free. > > What such a thing would actually mean in the big picture is a single entity > that Microsoft could attack, undermine, and run out of business. THAT is far > more important than whether or not people pay Linus. > > [deletia] > > Linux survives because it's not like Atari, or Be, or IBM, or Sun, or Apple, > or any of the other platforms/companies that Win/DOS juggernaut killed. > > A single entity to pay royalties to is also also an easy target for > corporate destruction. Changed the subject to reflect reality. :-) -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.9 Kernel: 4.2.2-1.gb3ecf72-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Sep 29 18:51:15 UTC 2015 (b3ecf72) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This message is virus free, as absolutely NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation. "If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to delete is Windows." http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 13:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad |
| Message-ID | <n8b90s$tgp$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341859 |
On 01/27/16 03:49, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Takuya Saitoh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 10:21:43 AM UTC+9, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>> <troll droppings swept up> >>> >>> That is why I'll switch to AMD as they are open sourcing their >>> GPU hardware... >> >> Being open source doesn't guarantee that the geeks won't be reluctant to >> work on the Linux drivers in their spare time... If Windoze support is on >> the list of the manufacturer, then expect Linux lagging behind it. > > It's not as bad as you think, troll. Linux support for hardware is > far better than you think. Where it lags, that's simply an effect > of a market. A market, dominated by one software vendor and a gaggle > of co-dependents, that Linux should be totally out of, you'd think. > > And yet Linux has a significant presence in that market. And not just > because of "hobbyists". Even some vendors directly support it. > > Only trolls and idiots would have you believe that millions of people > use Linux on the desktop while its hardware support is poor. > Crazy. Who pays you idiots? > Uh... you do? Not much paid out since you only get $20 weekly allowance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 02:13 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad |
| Message-ID | <n8btgl$7ub$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341859 |
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 05:49:04 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Takuya Saitoh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 10:21:43 AM UTC+9, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>> <troll droppings swept up> >>> >>> That is why I'll switch to AMD as they are open sourcing their GPU >>> hardware... >> >> Being open source doesn't guarantee that the geeks won't be reluctant >> to work on the Linux drivers in their spare time... If Windoze support >> is on the list of the manufacturer, then expect Linux lagging behind >> it. > > It's not as bad as you think, troll. Linux support for hardware is far > better than you think. Where it lags, that's simply an effect of a > market. A market, dominated by one software vendor and a gaggle of > co-dependents, that Linux should be totally out of, you'd think. > > And yet Linux has a significant presence in that market. And not just > because of "hobbyists". Even some vendors directly support it. > > Only trolls and idiots would have you believe that millions of people > use Linux on the desktop while its hardware support is poor. > Crazy. Who pays you idiots? You can't be serious? Can you? Just about everything I see from the false Linux advocates in this group is either a lie, silence when another herd member lies or a half truth. You and your ilk are a complete embarrassment to honest Linux users. You really are exactly what Linus Torvalds claims you are, mentally ill. So let's see how honest you and your buddy Ron is. You screwed the pooch with your false claim regarding the NFL and MS Surface tablets. So where is your retraction? It will never come. You just want your false statements to stand for the search engines. Why do you try to explain an idiot like 7 by calling him creative and zany? Why? Because again, you want his 100 percent bullshit posts to stand unchallenged so the search engines pick them up as is. That is as bad as lying directly. And then there is the ultimate liar/idiot Peter Kohlmann. Why don't any of you false Linux advocates challenge his false claims? Same reasons as above and also because you fear upsetting your fellow herd members. I see the Windows/Apple side disagreeing with each other all the time. The Linux side? The best you loons will come up with is a half assed one liner making a lukewarm attempt at disagreeing. Like I said, you and your herd of false advocates are truly an embarrassment to real Linux users. Shit, some of the loudest and foulest voices here don't even use Linux. Chrisv that's you. All of you false Linux advocates would be better moving on to some other hobby because you certainly aren't helping the Linux/FOSS/GNU cause.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 09:10 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad |
| Message-ID | <slrnnakbqr.931.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #341962 |
On 2016-01-28, Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 05:49:04 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> Takuya Saitoh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 10:21:43 AM UTC+9, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>> >>>> <troll droppings swept up> >>>> >>>> That is why I'll switch to AMD as they are open sourcing their GPU >>>> hardware... >>> >>> Being open source doesn't guarantee that the geeks won't be reluctant >>> to work on the Linux drivers in their spare time... If Windoze support >>> is on the list of the manufacturer, then expect Linux lagging behind >>> it. >> >> It's not as bad as you think, troll. Linux support for hardware is far >> better than you think. Where it lags, that's simply an effect of a >> market. A market, dominated by one software vendor and a gaggle of >> co-dependents, that Linux should be totally out of, you'd think. >> >> And yet Linux has a significant presence in that market. And not just >> because of "hobbyists". Even some vendors directly support it. >> >> Only trolls and idiots would have you believe that millions of people >> use Linux on the desktop while its hardware support is poor. >> Crazy. Who pays you idiots? > > You can't be serious? > Can you? > > Just about everything I see from the false Linux advocates in this group > is either a lie, silence when another herd member lies or a half truth. Of course. Any happy Linux user MUST be a lie... [deletia]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 10:40 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad |
| Message-ID | <n8dcjm$sdl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341980 |
On 2016-01-28 10:10 AM, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2016-01-28, Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 05:49:04 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >>> Takuya Saitoh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 10:21:43 AM UTC+9, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <troll droppings swept up> >>>>> >>>>> That is why I'll switch to AMD as they are open sourcing their GPU >>>>> hardware... >>>> >>>> Being open source doesn't guarantee that the geeks won't be reluctant >>>> to work on the Linux drivers in their spare time... If Windoze support >>>> is on the list of the manufacturer, then expect Linux lagging behind >>>> it. >>> >>> It's not as bad as you think, troll. Linux support for hardware is far >>> better than you think. Where it lags, that's simply an effect of a >>> market. A market, dominated by one software vendor and a gaggle of >>> co-dependents, that Linux should be totally out of, you'd think. >>> >>> And yet Linux has a significant presence in that market. And not just >>> because of "hobbyists". Even some vendors directly support it. >>> >>> Only trolls and idiots would have you believe that millions of people >>> use Linux on the desktop while its hardware support is poor. >>> Crazy. Who pays you idiots? >> >> You can't be serious? >> Can you? >> >> Just about everything I see from the false Linux advocates in this group >> is either a lie, silence when another herd member lies or a half truth. > > Of course. Any happy Linux user MUST be a lie... Has anyone said that? No. In reality, there are happy GNU/Linux users (people with low expectations and standards) and there are losers in denial. I doubt anyone is actually ENTIRELY happy with the GNU/Linux experience though. -- Slimer EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Conservative Party of Canada, Mozilla & PETA supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 09:49 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad |
| Message-ID | <0edkabh0qidup1siltbnr9htm7lcg90654@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #341980 |
JEDIDIAH wrote: > troll wrote: >> >> Just about everything I see from the false Linux advocates in this group >> is either a lie, silence when another herd member lies or a half truth. Trolling 101: Accuse others of exactly what you are guilty of. > Of course. Any happy Linux user MUST be a lie... Or they are using it only because it doesn't cost anything, or (insert lie here)... -- "Why do you dislike Snit?" - "Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 12:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad |
| Message-ID | <D316E757.6E5CE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #341985 |
On 1/28/16, 8:49 AM, in article 0edkabh0qidup1siltbnr9htm7lcg90654@4ax.com, "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> troll wrote: >>> >>> Just about everything I see from the false Linux advocates in this group >>> is either a lie, silence when another herd member lies or a half truth. > > Trolling 101: Accuse others of exactly what you are guilty of. Hence the reason you and your herd accuse me of lying... all my horrid unquotable lies. >> Of course. Any happy Linux user MUST be a lie... > > Or they are using it only because it doesn't cost anything, or (insert > lie here)... Hey, why not rise above this and show how you use it and what you like about it. That would be great advocacy! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 17:25 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad |
| Message-ID | <n8diu5$loh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341980 |
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:10:19 -0600, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2016-01-28, Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 05:49:04 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >>> Takuya Saitoh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 10:21:43 AM UTC+9, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <troll droppings swept up> >>>>> >>>>> That is why I'll switch to AMD as they are open sourcing their GPU >>>>> hardware... >>>> >>>> Being open source doesn't guarantee that the geeks won't be reluctant >>>> to work on the Linux drivers in their spare time... If Windoze >>>> support is on the list of the manufacturer, then expect Linux lagging >>>> behind it. >>> >>> It's not as bad as you think, troll. Linux support for hardware is >>> far better than you think. Where it lags, that's simply an effect of >>> a market. A market, dominated by one software vendor and a gaggle of >>> co-dependents, that Linux should be totally out of, you'd think. >>> >>> And yet Linux has a significant presence in that market. And not just >>> because of "hobbyists". Even some vendors directly support it. >>> >>> Only trolls and idiots would have you believe that millions of people >>> use Linux on the desktop while its hardware support is poor. >>> Crazy. Who pays you idiots? >> >> You can't be serious? >> Can you? >> >> Just about everything I see from the false Linux advocates in this >> group is either a lie, silence when another herd member lies or a half >> truth. > > Of course. Any happy Linux user MUST be a lie... > > [deletia] So you snip my post thereby ignoring the points I made regarding Chris Ahlstrom and Ron not retracting their incorrect statements about the Surface and NFL and then you move the goal posts by inserting a comment regarding "happy Linux users" which has absolutely NOTHING to do with what I said. Thank you because you have just given the group yet another example of the dishonest Linux user and the depths to which they will sink in order to defend Linux. I notice that little foul mouthed worm chrisv jumped right on top of your deceptive reply. What I don't understand is why you and others support such a poor Linux advocate? Apparently he is incapable of installing Linux as he posts from Windows and if that wasn't enough he is a foul mouthed individual. Another embarrassment to the Linux community IMHO.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 13:28 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad |
| Message-ID | <slrnnakqv1.cmt.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #341993 |
On 2016-01-28, Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:10:19 -0600, JEDIDIAH wrote: > >> On 2016-01-28, Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 05:49:04 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> >>>> Takuya Saitoh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 10:21:43 AM UTC+9, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <troll droppings swept up> >>>>>> >>>>>> That is why I'll switch to AMD as they are open sourcing their GPU >>>>>> hardware... >>>>> >>>>> Being open source doesn't guarantee that the geeks won't be reluctant >>>>> to work on the Linux drivers in their spare time... If Windoze >>>>> support is on the list of the manufacturer, then expect Linux lagging >>>>> behind it. >>>> >>>> It's not as bad as you think, troll. Linux support for hardware is >>>> far better than you think. Where it lags, that's simply an effect of >>>> a market. A market, dominated by one software vendor and a gaggle of >>>> co-dependents, that Linux should be totally out of, you'd think. >>>> >>>> And yet Linux has a significant presence in that market. And not just >>>> because of "hobbyists". Even some vendors directly support it. >>>> >>>> Only trolls and idiots would have you believe that millions of people >>>> use Linux on the desktop while its hardware support is poor. >>>> Crazy. Who pays you idiots? >>> >>> You can't be serious? >>> Can you? >>> >>> Just about everything I see from the false Linux advocates in this >>> group is either a lie, silence when another herd member lies or a half >>> truth. >> >> Of course. Any happy Linux user MUST be a lie... >> >> [deletia] > > So you snip my post thereby ignoring the points I made regarding Chris > Ahlstrom and Ron not retracting their incorrect statements about the The rest of your garbage was not relevant. You DENY any positive Linux experience ALWAYS and without fail. [deletia]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web