Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #683276 > unrolled thread

Linux is the sex doll of OSes

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Linux is the sex doll of OSes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-07 12:06 -0500
    Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 12:57 -0500
      Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 08:44 +0000
    Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-07 22:32 +0000
    Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 20:05 -0500
      Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-07 20:39 -0500
        Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 21:02 -0500
          Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-07 21:20 -0500
        Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-07 21:43 -0500
          Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:16 -0500
            Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:13 -0500
              Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:18 -0500
          Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:00 -0500
            Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 08:53 +0000
              Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 18:33 +0000
                Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 13:44 -0500
                Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 09:27 +0000
        Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 08:45 +0000
          Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:21 -0500
            Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 08:52 +0000
              Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:17 -0500
                Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 09:17 +0000
                  Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 09:19 -0500

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#683276 — Linux is the sex doll of OSes

while Windows is the real thing

https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back


bwa!

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#683277

On 2025-01-07 12:06, DFS wrote:
> while Windows is the real thing
> 
> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/ 
> sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
> 
> 
> bwa!

So now we know that despite speaking endlessly about Excel, the reason 
you use Windows is because it provides you the quickest access to free 
pornography which is also likely to serve you malware.

-- 
Andrzej (Andre) Matuch
Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch
Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41
KDE supporting member

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683333

On 2025-01-07, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
> On 2025-01-07 12:06, DFS wrote:
>> while Windows is the real thing
>> 
>> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/ 
>> sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>> 
>> 
>> bwa!
>
> So now we know that despite speaking endlessly about Excel, the reason 
> you use Windows is because it provides you the quickest access to free 
> pornography which is also likely to serve you malware.

You can sure see where DuFuS's "brain" is at, can't you.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683290

On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:06:17 -0500, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
wrote in <vljmu3$2a0f7$1@dont-email.me>:

> while Windows is the real thing

Windows includes Linux as a subsystem.

Windows can't be trusted to run Azure -- that is a
job for Linux.  Microsoft even has their own Linux
distribution for such things.

You're stuck in the 90's.  Get real.

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.12.8 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
   "If you don't like the news, go out and make some of your own."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683298

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:

>while Windows is the real thing
>
>https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>
>
>bwa!


Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
still be fine).

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683300

On 2025-01-07 20:05, Joel wrote:
> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
> 
>> while Windows is the real thing
>>
>> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>>
>>
>> bwa!
> 
> 
> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
> still be fine).

Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive 
running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's 
operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no 
fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact, 
the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm 
rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683303

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
>> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
>> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
>> still be fine).
>
>Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive 
>running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's 
>operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no 
>fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact, 
>the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm 
>rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.


I would get an ARM laptop and just delete Win11, instead of paying for
Apple's shit.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683305

On 2025-01-07 21:02, Joel wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> 
>>> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
>>> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
>>> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
>>> still be fine).
>>
>> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive
>> running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's
>> operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no
>> fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact,
>> the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm
>> rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.
> 
> 
> I would get an ARM laptop and just delete Win11, instead of paying for
> Apple's shit.

Yeah, I agree with that move. I mostly just want the excellent power 
consumption. The excellent integration between Apple devices is neat, 
but I can live without it.


-- 
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683312

On 1/7/2025 8:39 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
> On 2025-01-07 20:05, Joel wrote:
>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>
>>> while Windows is the real thing
>>>
>>> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>>>
>>>
>>> bwa!
>>
>>
>> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
>> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
>> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
>> still be fine).
> 
> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive 
> running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's 
> operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no 
> fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact, 
> the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm 
> rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.


You're running the most woke, DEI-infested distro there is.  The distro 
of MSNBC and Kamala Harris and RuPaul.

gag

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683321

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>On 1/7/2025 8:39 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>> 
>> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive 
>> running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's 
>> operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no 
>> fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact, 
>> the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm 
>> rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.
>
>You're running the most woke, DEI-infested distro there is.  The distro 
>of MSNBC and Kamala Harris and RuPaul.
>
>gag


How would that matter in just using the distro?  Chick-fil-A tastes
fine to me despite their politics.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683358

On 2025-01-07 22:16, Joel wrote:
> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>> On 1/7/2025 8:39 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>
>>> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive
>>> running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's
>>> operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no
>>> fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact,
>>> the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm
>>> rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.
>>
>> You're running the most woke, DEI-infested distro there is.  The distro
>> of MSNBC and Kamala Harris and RuPaul.
>>
>> gag
> 
> 
> How would that matter in just using the distro?  Chick-fil-A tastes
> fine to me despite their politics.

Yeah, I'm starting to get to that same point. I don't give a dollar to 
the Fedora team despite using their distribution. I prefer to help out 
KDE since they make the desktop environment which makes transitioning 
from Windows fun. If Fedora were to die tomorrow, I wouldn't look for 
the best Fedora alternative as much as the best KDE distribution.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683385

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>On 2025-01-07 22:16, Joel wrote:
>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>> On 1/7/2025 8:39 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive
>>>> running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's
>>>> operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no
>>>> fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact,
>>>> the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm
>>>> rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.
>>>
>>> You're running the most woke, DEI-infested distro there is.  The distro
>>> of MSNBC and Kamala Harris and RuPaul.
>>>
>>> gag
>> 
>> How would that matter in just using the distro?  Chick-fil-A tastes
>> fine to me despite their politics.
>
>Yeah, I'm starting to get to that same point. I don't give a dollar to 
>the Fedora team despite using their distribution. I prefer to help out 
>KDE since they make the desktop environment which makes transitioning 
>from Windows fun. If Fedora were to die tomorrow, I wouldn't look for 
>the best Fedora alternative as much as the best KDE distribution.


Well put.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683353

On 2025-01-07 21:43, DFS wrote:
> On 1/7/2025 8:39 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>> On 2025-01-07 20:05, Joel wrote:
>>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> while Windows is the real thing
>>>>
>>>> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/ 
>>>> sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bwa!
>>>
>>>
>>> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
>>> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
>>> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
>>> still be fine).
>>
>> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more 
>> responsive running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on 
>> Microsoft's operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional 
>> slowdown and no fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it 
>> by now). In fact, the Linux experience has been so stellar this time 
>> around that I'm rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.
> 
> 
> You're running the most woke, DEI-infested distro there is.  The distro 
> of MSNBC and Kamala Harris and RuPaul.
> 
> gag

Once I have evidence that OpenMandrive works correctly, I plan to 
switch. However, there is no shortage of terrible distributions that 
don't work as they should, so I am not in any hurry. Fedora works great.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683455

On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-01-07 21:43, DFS wrote:
>> On 1/7/2025 8:39 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-07 20:05, Joel wrote:
>>>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> while Windows is the real thing
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/ 
>>>>> sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bwa!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
>>>> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
>>>> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
>>>> still be fine).
>>>
>>> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more 
>>> responsive running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on 
>>> Microsoft's operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional 
>>> slowdown and no fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it 
>>> by now). In fact, the Linux experience has been so stellar this time 
>>> around that I'm rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.
>> 
>> 
>> You're running the most woke, DEI-infested distro there is.  The distro 
>> of MSNBC and Kamala Harris and RuPaul.
>> 
>> gag
>
> Once I have evidence that OpenMandrive works correctly, I plan to 
> switch. However, there is no shortage of terrible distributions that 
> don't work as they should, so I am not in any hurry. Fedora works great.

At one point I used Mandrake (I think it was Mandrake, maybe Mandrake's 
predecessor (?), can't remember).

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683529

On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 08:53:30 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:


> At one point I used Mandrake (I think it was Mandrake, maybe Mandrake's
> predecessor (?), can't remember).

There wasn't a predecessor. It was originally based on Red Hat but moved 
away. It must have been 25 years ago but I remember it as a smooth 
installation on an old Compaq. 

Speaking of smooth I upgraded to Ubuntu 24.04 last night. It's not a 
problem for me but it's still the 6.8.0 kernel. The Fedora box is up to 
6.12.8.

It wasn't particularly smooth. I had to manually kill and purge postgres 
before it would continue, then it failed on Thunderbird when trying to 
move to a snap. I was able to install it manually afterwards. 

The strangest part was the cleanup where it spent 25 minutes 'searching 
for obsolete software'. I have no idea what part of darkest Africa it was 
searching.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683532

On 2025-01-09 13:33, rbowman wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 08:53:30 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
> 
> 
>> At one point I used Mandrake (I think it was Mandrake, maybe Mandrake's
>> predecessor (?), can't remember).
> 
> There wasn't a predecessor. It was originally based on Red Hat but moved
> away. It must have been 25 years ago but I remember it as a smooth
> installation on an old Compaq.
> 
> Speaking of smooth I upgraded to Ubuntu 24.04 last night. It's not a
> problem for me but it's still the 6.8.0 kernel. The Fedora box is up to
> 6.12.8.
> 
> It wasn't particularly smooth. I had to manually kill and purge postgres
> before it would continue, then it failed on Thunderbird when trying to
> move to a snap. I was able to install it manually afterwards.
> 
> The strangest part was the cleanup where it spent 25 minutes 'searching
> for obsolete software'. I have no idea what part of darkest Africa it was
> searching.

Admittedly, after installing the 6.12.8 in Fedora today and getting to 
100%, it refused to restart. After I forced it, it worked fine though.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683583

On 2025-01-09, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 08:53:30 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>
>
>> At one point I used Mandrake (I think it was Mandrake, maybe Mandrake's
>> predecessor (?), can't remember).
>
> There wasn't a predecessor. It was originally based on Red Hat but moved 
> away. It must have been 25 years ago but I remember it as a smooth 
> installation on an old Compaq. 

You're right. I guess I confused myself by thinking about what happened 
_after_ Mandrake and Conectiva merged into Mandriva... and then went belly 
up resulting in Mageia and, later, OpenMandriva. But it was definitely 
Mandrake that I installed.

> Speaking of smooth I upgraded to Ubuntu 24.04 last night. It's not a 
> problem for me but it's still the 6.8.0 kernel. The Fedora box is up to 
> 6.12.8.
>
> It wasn't particularly smooth. I had to manually kill and purge postgres 
> before it would continue, then it failed on Thunderbird when trying to 
> move to a snap. I was able to install it manually afterwards. 
>
> The strangest part was the cleanup where it spent 25 minutes 'searching 
> for obsolete software'. I have no idea what part of darkest Africa it was 
> searching.

My problem with Ubuntu (besides not liking the desktop) is use of Snaps. I 
like to customize Firefox a little and it's easy with a userChrome.css file 
in the chrome directory of your profile directory. But I couldn't figure out 
where to do this on a Snap package. I figured out FlatPaks okay, but Snaps 
seem to be a whole different creature. And I don't like Snaps showing up as 
"partitions" when I do a "df -h" command.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683334

On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-01-07 20:05, Joel wrote:
>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>> 
>>> while Windows is the real thing
>>>
>>> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>>>
>>>
>>> bwa!
>> 
>> 
>> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
>> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
>> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
>> still be fine).
>
> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive 
> running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's 
> operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no 
> fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact, 
> the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm 
> rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.

I think Macs can run Linux also. (Although I think you're choices are 
limited with the ARM CPU — not sure, though.)

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683364

On 2025-01-08 03:45, RonB wrote:
> On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-01-07 20:05, Joel wrote:
>>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> while Windows is the real thing
>>>>
>>>> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bwa!
>>>
>>>
>>> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
>>> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
>>> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
>>> still be fine).
>>
>> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive
>> running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's
>> operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no
>> fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact,
>> the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm
>> rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.
> 
> I think Macs can run Linux also. (Although I think you're choices are
> limited with the ARM CPU — not sure, though.)

I think that there is a distribution being made for the Mx line of 
chips, but I have yet to see a Mac running it. Considering the issue 
that existed with Yellow Dog Linux back in the PowerPC days, I'm not 
surprised that some Mac owners would be reluctant to try it out.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683454

On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-01-08 03:45, RonB wrote:
>> On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-07 20:05, Joel wrote:
>>>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> while Windows is the real thing
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bwa!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
>>>> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
>>>> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
>>>> still be fine).
>>>
>>> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive
>>> running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's
>>> operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no
>>> fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact,
>>> the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm
>>> rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.
>> 
>> I think Macs can run Linux also. (Although I think you're choices are
>> limited with the ARM CPU — not sure, though.)
>
> I think that there is a distribution being made for the Mx line of 
> chips, but I have yet to see a Mac running it. Considering the issue 
> that existed with Yellow Dog Linux back in the PowerPC days, I'm not 
> surprised that some Mac owners would be reluctant to try it out.

Quite a few Mac users are installing Linux on their Intel machines, but 
that's because Apple doesn't support them any more. I would imagine that 
that time will come with the first ARM Macs at some point. Until then there 
probably aren't going to be too many Linux distributions catering to the ARM 
Macs.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web