Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #683303
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes |
| Message-ID | <92nrnjpva90vmk76r8larnfj0vv0kirgk8@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vljmu3$2a0f7$1@dont-email.me> <gmjrnj5nsn509ep14sclvu15r0osrvuopa@4ax.com> <hHkfP.289353$aTp4.117643@fx09.iad> |
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Date | 2025-01-07 21:02 -0500 |
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing. Linux >> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's >> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would >> still be fine). > >Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive >running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's >operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no >fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact, >the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm >rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac. I would get an ARM laptop and just delete Win11, instead of paying for Apple's shit. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux is the sex doll of OSes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-07 12:06 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 12:57 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 08:44 +0000
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-07 22:32 +0000
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 20:05 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-07 20:39 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 21:02 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-07 21:20 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-07 21:43 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:16 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:13 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:18 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:00 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 08:53 +0000
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 18:33 +0000
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 13:44 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 09:27 +0000
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 08:45 +0000
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:21 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 08:52 +0000
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:17 -0500
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 09:17 +0000
Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 09:19 -0500
csiph-web