Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #683276 > unrolled thread

Linux is the sex doll of OSes

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Linux is the sex doll of OSes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-07 12:06 -0500
    Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 12:57 -0500
      Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 08:44 +0000
    Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-07 22:32 +0000
    Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 20:05 -0500
      Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-07 20:39 -0500
        Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 21:02 -0500
          Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-07 21:20 -0500
        Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-07 21:43 -0500
          Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:16 -0500
            Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:13 -0500
              Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:18 -0500
          Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:00 -0500
            Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 08:53 +0000
              Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 18:33 +0000
                Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 13:44 -0500
                Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 09:27 +0000
        Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 08:45 +0000
          Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:21 -0500
            Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 08:52 +0000
              Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:17 -0500
                Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 09:17 +0000
                  Re: Linux is the sex doll of OSes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 09:19 -0500

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#683483

On 2025-01-09 03:52, RonB wrote:
> On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-01-08 03:45, RonB wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-01-07 20:05, Joel wrote:
>>>>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> while Windows is the real thing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bwa!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
>>>>> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
>>>>> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
>>>>> still be fine).
>>>>
>>>> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive
>>>> running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's
>>>> operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no
>>>> fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact,
>>>> the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm
>>>> rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.
>>>
>>> I think Macs can run Linux also. (Although I think you're choices are
>>> limited with the ARM CPU — not sure, though.)
>>
>> I think that there is a distribution being made for the Mx line of
>> chips, but I have yet to see a Mac running it. Considering the issue
>> that existed with Yellow Dog Linux back in the PowerPC days, I'm not
>> surprised that some Mac owners would be reluctant to try it out.
> 
> Quite a few Mac users are installing Linux on their Intel machines, but
> that's because Apple doesn't support them any more. I would imagine that
> that time will come with the first ARM Macs at some point. Until then there
> probably aren't going to be too many Linux distributions catering to the ARM
> Macs.

It truly will be sad when the people who own an M1 Mac lose support from 
the company. That is a wonderful machine using the first processor that 
allowed the company to differentiate itself from the PC line in this 
decade. It is fast, it is energy-efficient and it is relatively 
inexpensive for anyone interested in owning a computer from them. That 
computer should not be thrown into a bin because it's too old; it should 
continue to be supported by open-source. At the same time, Apple made it 
nearly impossible to change the storage or upgrade the RAM on those 
machines, giving the world the impression that they want those machines 
to either be thrown out or recycled after half a decade.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683581

On 2025-01-09, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-01-09 03:52, RonB wrote:
>> On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-08 03:45, RonB wrote:
>>>> On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-01-07 20:05, Joel wrote:
>>>>>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> while Windows is the real thing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bwa!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
>>>>>> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
>>>>>> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
>>>>>> still be fine).
>>>>>
>>>>> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive
>>>>> running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's
>>>>> operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no
>>>>> fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact,
>>>>> the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm
>>>>> rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.
>>>>
>>>> I think Macs can run Linux also. (Although I think you're choices are
>>>> limited with the ARM CPU — not sure, though.)
>>>
>>> I think that there is a distribution being made for the Mx line of
>>> chips, but I have yet to see a Mac running it. Considering the issue
>>> that existed with Yellow Dog Linux back in the PowerPC days, I'm not
>>> surprised that some Mac owners would be reluctant to try it out.
>> 
>> Quite a few Mac users are installing Linux on their Intel machines, but
>> that's because Apple doesn't support them any more. I would imagine that
>> that time will come with the first ARM Macs at some point. Until then there
>> probably aren't going to be too many Linux distributions catering to the ARM
>> Macs.
>
> It truly will be sad when the people who own an M1 Mac lose support from 
> the company. That is a wonderful machine using the first processor that 
> allowed the company to differentiate itself from the PC line in this 
> decade. It is fast, it is energy-efficient and it is relatively 
> inexpensive for anyone interested in owning a computer from them. That 
> computer should not be thrown into a bin because it's too old; it should 
> continue to be supported by open-source. At the same time, Apple made it 
> nearly impossible to change the storage or upgrade the RAM on those 
> machines, giving the world the impression that they want those machines 
> to either be thrown out or recycled after half a decade.

It seems like I remember seeing that the newest ARM Macs are reverting back 
to upgradeable RAM and SSDs. But I may have misread that. 

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683601

On 2025-01-10 04:17, RonB wrote:
> On 2025-01-09, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-01-09 03:52, RonB wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-01-08 03:45, RonB wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-01-07 20:05, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> while Windows is the real thing
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.xvideos.com/video.uekbcub2253/sneaky_big_tits_stepsis_swapped_with_my_sex_doll_tantaly_behind_my_back
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> bwa!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Winblows is fun on suitable hardware, but that's ever-changing.  Linux
>>>>>>> will run well on aging hardware, even mine is nicer with it and it's
>>>>>>> less than four years old (referring to running Win11, Win10 would
>>>>>>> still be fine).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even though this laptop ran Windows 11 well, it is a lot more responsive
>>>>>> running Fedora (or even Ubuntu) than it ever was on Microsoft's
>>>>>> operating system. There is no inexplicable, occasional slowdown and no
>>>>>> fTPM stuttering whatsover (I would have experienced it by now). In fact,
>>>>>> the Linux experience has been so stellar this time around that I'm
>>>>>> rethinking an eventual purchase of a Mac.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think Macs can run Linux also. (Although I think you're choices are
>>>>> limited with the ARM CPU — not sure, though.)
>>>>
>>>> I think that there is a distribution being made for the Mx line of
>>>> chips, but I have yet to see a Mac running it. Considering the issue
>>>> that existed with Yellow Dog Linux back in the PowerPC days, I'm not
>>>> surprised that some Mac owners would be reluctant to try it out.
>>>
>>> Quite a few Mac users are installing Linux on their Intel machines, but
>>> that's because Apple doesn't support them any more. I would imagine that
>>> that time will come with the first ARM Macs at some point. Until then there
>>> probably aren't going to be too many Linux distributions catering to the ARM
>>> Macs.
>>
>> It truly will be sad when the people who own an M1 Mac lose support from
>> the company. That is a wonderful machine using the first processor that
>> allowed the company to differentiate itself from the PC line in this
>> decade. It is fast, it is energy-efficient and it is relatively
>> inexpensive for anyone interested in owning a computer from them. That
>> computer should not be thrown into a bin because it's too old; it should
>> continue to be supported by open-source. At the same time, Apple made it
>> nearly impossible to change the storage or upgrade the RAM on those
>> machines, giving the world the impression that they want those machines
>> to either be thrown out or recycled after half a decade.
> 
> It seems like I remember seeing that the newest ARM Macs are reverting back
> to upgradeable RAM and SSDs. But I may have misread that.

If that is the case, I'll probably end up getting one next. At the very 
least, I want my next laptop not to have NVIDIA anything inside of it. 
Using it in Linux is dreadful, and I have to reinstall a kernel and the 
NVIDIA drivers every so often because something decided to break.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web