Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243342 > unrolled thread

OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people?

Started bySnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
First post2014-05-12 21:53 -0700
Last post2014-05-14 09:18 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 106 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 21:53 -0700
    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 12:47 +0000
      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 09:18 -0700
        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 18:36 +0000
          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 14:41 -0400
            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 12:01 -0700
            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-13 17:30 -0400
              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 15:00 -0700
              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:23 -0400
                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 01:30 +0200
                  Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 16:39 -0700
                  Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 20:26 -0400
                    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 17:43 -0700
                    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-05-14 15:08 -0500
                      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 13:44 -0700
                      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-14 20:44 -0400
                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 23:14 -0400
                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 16:31 -0700
                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:07 -0400
                  Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:37 -0700
              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 23:38 +0000
                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 16:55 -0700
                  Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-14 00:30 +0000
                    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 17:46 -0700
                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 09:09 -0400
                  Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:36 -0700
                    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:41 +0200
                      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 08:49 -0700
                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 14:32 -0700
                  Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-14 23:00 +0000
                    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-15 01:10 +0200
                      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 16:51 -0700
                    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:11 -0400
                      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-14 23:24 +0000
                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-14 19:34 -0400
                          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 16:54 -0700
                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 16:51 -0700
                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 20:04 -0400
                          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:15 -0700
                          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 20:30 -0400
                            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 17:35 -0700
                              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-15 01:07 +0000
                                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 18:16 -0700
                                  Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-15 01:41 +0000
                                    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-14 21:48 -0400
                                      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 18:52 -0700
                                      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 23:09 -0400
                                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 20:17 -0700
                                      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-15 12:31 +0000
                                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-15 14:51 +0200
                                          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 09:15 -0400
                                            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:55 -0700
                                          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-15 13:25 +0000
                                            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:55 -0700
                                          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:53 -0700
                                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 09:13 -0400
                                          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-15 13:32 +0000
                                            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 10:46 -0400
                                              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 08:27 -0700
                                            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:57 -0700
                                          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 16:55 -0700
                                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:01 -0700
                                    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 18:49 -0700
                            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-14 23:07 -0400
                              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 20:27 -0700
                              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-15 08:53 -0400
                                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-15 17:14 -0700
                    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-14 16:52 -0700
          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 11:42 -0700
            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 19:01 +0000
              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 12:12 -0700
                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 19:27 +0000
                  Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 12:42 -0700
                    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 19:48 +0000
                      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:05 -0700
                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 20:15 +0000
                          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:28 -0700
                            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 20:43 +0000
                              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:57 -0700
                                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 21:09 +0000
                                  Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 14:12 -0700
                                    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 21:17 +0000
                                      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 14:22 -0700
                                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 23:45 +0000
                                          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 16:54 -0700
                                            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-14 00:03 +0000
                                              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 17:10 -0700
                                                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-14 00:20 +0000
                                                  Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 17:29 -0700
                                          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 20:30 -0400
                                            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 17:44 -0700
                      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 17:55 -0400
                        Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 15:05 -0700
          Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 22:03 +0200
            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:06 -0700
              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 20:14 +0000
                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:27 -0700
                Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 18:01 -0400
                  Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 15:02 -0700
            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-05-13 20:10 +0000
              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 13:27 -0700
            Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 17:59 -0400
              Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 15:03 -0700
      Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 09:17 -0700
    Re: OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-14 09:18 -0700

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

#243342 — OT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people?

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-12 21:53 -0700
SubjectOT: Sandy Hook "Truther" - what is wrong with people?
Message-ID<CF96F368.37238%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
<http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>

Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never even
existed. 

Really. These people are just insane scum.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#243359

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2014-05-13 12:47 +0000
Message-ID<hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#243342
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
> 
> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never even
> existed. 
> 
> Really. These people are just insane scum.
> 

Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243388

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Message-ID<CF978433.37275%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243359
On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
>> 
>> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never even
>> existed. 
>> 
>> Really. These people are just insane scum.
>> 
> 
> Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.

Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed that their
child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they are not
really a parent of this child that did not exist.

You are utter scum as well.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243414

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2014-05-13 09:18 -0700
Message-ID<c34b9b19-8c59-4b7e-a32c-4b0b825ee2c8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#243388
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 3:11:31 PM UTC, Snit wrote:
> On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> 
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
> >> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never even
> 
> >> existed. 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> Really. These people are just insane scum.
> 
> >> 
> 
> > 
> 
> > Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.
> 
> 
> 
> Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed that their
> 
> child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they are not
> 
> really a parent of this child that did not exist.
> 
> 
> 
> You are utter scum as well.
> 
You call him utter scum because he does not buy into the Obama lies. That makes you utter scum.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
> 
> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
> 
> * Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
> 
> * Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
> 
> * Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
> 
> * Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
> 
> * Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
> 
> * Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
> 
> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

Another forum ruined by 
Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 
http://prescottcomputerguy.com 
The best website design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his own site 
http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243449

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2014-05-13 18:36 +0000
Message-ID<tu39.a34pp@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#243388
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
>>> 
>>> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never even
>>> existed. 
>>> 
>>> Really. These people are just insane scum.
>>> 
>> 
>> Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.
> 
> Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed that their
> child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they are not
> really a parent of this child that did not exist.
> 
> You are utter scum as well.
> 

Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston Cherry
Bombing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243451

FromSilver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c>
Date2014-05-13 14:41 -0400
Message-ID<lktp0u$aoh$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243449
On 14-05-13 02:36 PM, owl wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
>>>>
>>>> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never even
>>>> existed. 
>>>>
>>>> Really. These people are just insane scum.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.
>>
>> Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed that their
>> child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they are not
>> really a parent of this child that did not exist.
>>
>> You are utter scum as well.
>>
> 
> Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston Cherry
> Bombing.

Agreed.


-- 
Silver Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243463

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 12:01 -0700
Message-ID<CF97BA16.372F6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243451
On 5/13/14, 11:41 AM, in article lktp0u$aoh$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:

> On 14-05-13 02:36 PM, owl wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never even
>>>>> existed. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Really. These people are just insane scum.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.
>>> 
>>> Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed that their
>>> child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they are not
>>> really a parent of this child that did not exist.
>>> 
>>> You are utter scum as well.
>>> 
>> 
>> Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston Cherry
>> Bombing.
> 
> Agreed.

At least you admit you accept idiotic, unsupported, irrational conspiracy
theories. 


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243503

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2014-05-13 17:30 -0400
Message-ID<lku2u8$qf1$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243451
On 5/13/2014 2:41 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
> On 14-05-13 02:36 PM, owl wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
>>>>>
>>>>> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never even
>>>>> existed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Really. These people are just insane scum.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.
>>>
>>> Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed that their
>>> child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they are not
>>> really a parent of this child that did not exist.
>>>
>>> You are utter scum as well.
>>>
>>
>> Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston Cherry
>> Bombing.
>
> Agreed.


Both of you are loser scumbags for saying this.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243511

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 15:00 -0700
Message-ID<CF97E41A.3734E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243503
On 5/13/14, 2:30 PM, in article lku2u8$qf1$1@dont-email.me, "DFS"
<nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

> On 5/13/2014 2:41 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>> On 14-05-13 02:36 PM, owl wrote:
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never even
>>>>>> existed.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Really. These people are just insane scum.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.
>>>> 
>>>> Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed that
>>>> their
>>>> child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they are not
>>>> really a parent of this child that did not exist.
>>>> 
>>>> You are utter scum as well.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston Cherry
>>> Bombing.
>> 
>> Agreed.
> 
> 
> Both of you are loser scumbags for saying this.
> 
> 
> 
Absolutely correct.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243523

FromSilver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c>
Date2014-05-13 18:23 -0400
Message-ID<lku61a$h7h$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243503
On 14-05-13 05:30 PM, DFS wrote:
> On 5/13/2014 2:41 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>> On 14-05-13 02:36 PM, owl wrote:
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never
>>>>>> even
>>>>>> existed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really. These people are just insane scum.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.
>>>>
>>>> Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed
>>>> that their
>>>> child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they
>>>> are not
>>>> really a parent of this child that did not exist.
>>>>
>>>> You are utter scum as well.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston
>>> Cherry
>>> Bombing.
>>
>> Agreed.
> 
> 
> Both of you are loser scumbags for saying this.

Provide evidence that the American government's version of what happened
is accurate and I will apologize.

-- 
Silver Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243534

FromHadron<hadronquark@gmail.com>
Date2014-05-14 01:30 +0200
Message-ID<87d2fhtfxx.fsf@gmail.com>
In reply to#243523
Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> writes:

> On 14-05-13 05:30 PM, DFS wrote:
>> On 5/13/2014 2:41 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>> On 14-05-13 02:36 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never
>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>> existed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really. These people are just insane scum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed
>>>>> that their
>>>>> child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they
>>>>> are not
>>>>> really a parent of this child that did not exist.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are utter scum as well.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston
>>>> Cherry
>>>> Bombing.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>> 
>> 
>> Both of you are loser scumbags for saying this.
>
> Provide evidence that the American government's version of what happened
> is accurate and I will apologize.

You really are a twat. Why dont you prove it was a hoax? All those
people were lying? You should be ashamed of yourself.


-- 
"I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." 
The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree.
PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243540

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 16:39 -0700
Message-ID<CF97FB32.37387%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243534
On 5/13/14, 4:30 PM, in article 87d2fhtfxx.fsf@gmail.com, "Hadron"
<hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>> Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston
>>>>> Cherry
>>>>> Bombing.
>>>> 
>>>> Agreed.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Both of you are loser scumbags for saying this.
>> 
>> Provide evidence that the American government's version of what happened
>> is accurate and I will apologize.
> 
> You really are a twat. Why dont you prove it was a hoax? All those
> people were lying? You should be ashamed of yourself.

Thousands upon thousands of people lying all to allow Silver Slimer to feel
better about himself "knowing" the truth that nobody else does.

Good grief... 


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243554

FromSilver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c>
Date2014-05-13 20:26 -0400
Message-ID<lkud7h$qea$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243534
On 14-05-13 07:30 PM, Hadron wrote:
> Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> writes:
> 
>> On 14-05-13 05:30 PM, DFS wrote:
>>> On 5/13/2014 2:41 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>> On 14-05-13 02:36 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never
>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>> existed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Really. These people are just insane scum.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed
>>>>>> that their
>>>>>> child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they
>>>>>> are not
>>>>>> really a parent of this child that did not exist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are utter scum as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston
>>>>> Cherry
>>>>> Bombing.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Both of you are loser scumbags for saying this.
>>
>> Provide evidence that the American government's version of what happened
>> is accurate and I will apologize.
> 
> You really are a twat. Why dont you prove it was a hoax? All those
> people were lying? You should be ashamed of yourself.

Whenever Obama wants to promote an agenda, a story like the one of Sandy
Hook comes along to drive the point forward. Since you've already
demonstrated that you don't read the news, I'll alert you to the fact
that several days before the shooting, Obama was already actively
working to promote stricter gun control. Here's an article from before
the shooting that you might enjoy:
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/11/21875-obama-endorses-un-arms-trade-treaty-massive-gun-control-effort-underway/
. Obama just needed SOMETHING to push the citizens over the edge and
have them DEMAND gun bans. Sandy Hook could have been it. Here's another
on the same topic,
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/8/gun-ban-back-on-obamas-agenda/
. In fact, Sandy Hook was most likely a response to this:
http://business.time.com/2012/11/09/elections-over-time-to-buy-a-gun/
(the fact that gun sales INCREASED during Obama's second term, a
consequence of citizen mistrust of the Smiling Black Man).

The fact that you, a person who claims to have intelligence, don't
question the coincidences in this affair speaks volumes about your
supposed intellect.

-- 
Silver Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243561

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 17:43 -0700
Message-ID<CF980A3B.373B4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243554
On 5/13/14, 5:26 PM, in article lkud7h$qea$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:

>>> Provide evidence that the American government's version of what happened
>>> is accurate and I will apologize.
>> 
>> You really are a twat. Why dont you prove it was a hoax? All those
>> people were lying? You should be ashamed of yourself.
> 
> Whenever Obama wants to promote an agenda, a story like the one of Sandy
> Hook comes along to drive the point forward.

Baseless accusation. Utter nonsense, really.

> Since you've already demonstrated that you don't read the news,

Absurd claim... not in any way true and frankly just a sign of you wanting
to put others down.

You have a deep need to *feel* special. You want to be "in the know", even
if what you know is to believe utter BS from a crackpot such as Wolfgang
Halbig and the morons at Infowars... a crackpot organization.

> I'll alert you to the fact that several days before the shooting, Obama was
> already actively working to promote stricter gun control.

Ah, so the shooter decided to kill a bunch of kids just to help promote
Obama. That is insane... really, just idiotic.

> Here's an article from before the shooting that you might enjoy:
> http://www.ijreview.com/2012/11/21875-obama-endorses-un-arms-trade-treaty-mass
> ive-gun-control-effort-underway/ . Obama just needed SOMETHING to push the
> citizens over the edge and have them DEMAND gun bans. Sandy Hook could have
> been it. 

Ban guns? Another insane conspiracy theory. Amazing... this conspiracy
theory is tied to another one of your insane claims.

> Here's another on the same topic,
> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/8/gun-ban-back-on-obamas-agenda/
> . In fact, Sandy Hook was most likely a response to this:

The shooter decided to kill the people based on a story in Time! You are
truly insane!
 
> http://business.time.com/2012/11/09/elections-over-time-to-buy-a-gun/ (the
> fact that gun sales INCREASED during Obama's second term, a consequence of
> citizen mistrust of the Smiling Black Man).

And proof he is not banning guns, you idiot.

> The fact that you, a person who claims to have intelligence, don't question
> the coincidences in this affair speaks volumes about your supposed intellect.

Conspiracy theorists, such as yourself, connect unrelated dots to form
idiotic and unsupported claims to make yourself feel special and safe from
the unknown.

And that is *exactly* what you are doing.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243683

FromJEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet>
Date2014-05-14 15:08 -0500
Message-ID<slrnln7ja0.40d.jedi@nomad.mishnet>
In reply to#243554
On 2014-05-14, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:
> On 14-05-13 07:30 PM, Hadron wrote:
>> Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> writes:
>> 
>>> On 14-05-13 05:30 PM, DFS wrote:
>>>> On 5/13/2014 2:41 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>>> On 14-05-13 02:36 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never
>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>> existed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Really. These people are just insane scum.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed
>>>>>>> that their
>>>>>>> child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they
>>>>>>> are not
>>>>>>> really a parent of this child that did not exist.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are utter scum as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston
>>>>>> Cherry
>>>>>> Bombing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Both of you are loser scumbags for saying this.
>>>
>>> Provide evidence that the American government's version of what happened
>>> is accurate and I will apologize.
>> 
>> You really are a twat. Why dont you prove it was a hoax? All those
>> people were lying? You should be ashamed of yourself.
>
> Whenever Obama wants to promote an agenda, a story like the one of Sandy
> Hook comes along to drive the point forward. Since you've already
> demonstrated that you don't read the news, I'll alert you to the fact
> that several days before the shooting, Obama was already actively
> working to promote stricter gun control. Here's an article from before

    Given a big enough population, there will always be a readily
available supply of suitable "narratives" if you bother to go looking.
Also, you have to consider the fact that "gun control" is one of the 
pet projects of liberals. So they are always interested in pushing it
or exploiting any suitable news item.

    So it's no great coincidence that they were interested in pushing this
issue just prior to some tragedy. They're always on the lookout anyways.

    Once something like this is the flavor of the month, there's a period
in time where similar stuff comes like a deluge and then it dies down again
as the media gets distracted by something else.

[deletia]

    No conspiracy is necessary really.

-- 
    Apple: Because the individual is not statistically meaningful.   |||
    	   	       		     	 	       		    / | \

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243688

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-14 13:44 -0700
Message-ID<CF9923CA.37495%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243683
On 5/14/14, 1:08 PM, in article slrnln7ja0.40d.jedi@nomad.mishnet,
"JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote:

>>> You really are a twat. Why dont you prove it was a hoax? All those people
>>> were lying? You should be ashamed of yourself.
>>> 
>> Whenever Obama wants to promote an agenda, a story like the one of Sandy Hook
>> comes along to drive the point forward. Since you've already demonstrated
>> that you don't read the news, I'll alert you to the fact that several days
>> before the shooting, Obama was already actively working to promote stricter
>> gun control. Here's an article from before
>> 
> Given a big enough population, there will always be a readily available supply
> of suitable "narratives" if you bother to go looking. Also, you have to
> consider the fact that "gun control" is one of the pet projects of liberals.
> So they are always interested in pushing it or exploiting any suitable news
> item.

It is not really exploiting news stories to point out how often we see
essentially the same story play out over and over and over. People die by
guns - soon it is likely to be more people dying by guns in the US than
dying by cars... and cars are used a *lot* more. The idea of having
reasonable laws to deal with this massive problem makes sense... and many
reasonable gun owners accept this. Most of the general concepts are already
on the books and have been deemed constitutional: background checks, limits
as to what types of arms people can use (though sensible ones, not based on
looks which is what "assault weapons" usually mean), holding people
accountable for the weapons they own, etc. Not taking away the right to bear
arms like the right-wing Christian terrorists were demanding as they
defended the trespassing, thieving rancher in Nevada.

> So it's no great coincidence that they were interested in pushing this issue
> just prior to some tragedy. They're always on the lookout anyways.

Right: when there is a tragedy such as this it is a great reminder why we
need to handle things better.

> Once something like this is the flavor of the month, there's a period in time
> where similar stuff comes like a deluge and then it dies down again as the
> media gets distracted by something else.
> 
> [deletia]
> 
> No conspiracy is necessary really.

Exactly. 


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243761

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2014-05-14 20:44 -0400
Message-ID<ll12lb$3rt$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243683
JEDIDIAH wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2014-05-14, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:
>> On 14-05-13 07:30 PM, Hadron wrote:
>>> Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> writes:
>>>> On 14-05-13 05:30 PM, DFS wrote:
>>>>> On 5/13/2014 2:41 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>>>> On 14-05-13 02:36 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

What a concatenation of vile idiots.

>     No conspiracy is necessary really.

You really care what those creeps think?

-- 
Absentee, n.:
	A person with an income who has had the forethought to remove
	himself from the sphere of exaction.
		-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243781

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2014-05-14 23:14 -0400
Message-ID<ll1be2$h54$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243761
On 5/14/2014 8:44 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> JEDIDIAH wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2014-05-14, Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:
>>> On 14-05-13 07:30 PM, Hadron wrote:
>>>> Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> writes:
>>>>> On 14-05-13 05:30 PM, DFS wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/13/2014 2:41 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>>>>> On 14-05-13 02:36 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
> What a concatenation of vile idiots.


Feeling left out, Creepy?

Reminds you of work, when the coders don't invite you to their meetings.



>>      No conspiracy is necessary really.
>
> You really care what those creeps think?

It's all he cares about.  He doesn't talk to you or turd or any of the 
"advocates".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243535

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2014-05-13 16:31 -0700
Message-ID<CF97F970.3737F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#243523
On 5/13/14, 3:23 PM, in article lku61a$h7h$5@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<ndr@slvrlps.c> wrote:

>>>> Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston
>>>> Cherry
>>>> Bombing.
>>> 
>>> Agreed.
>> 
>> 
>> Both of you are loser scumbags for saying this.
> 
> Provide evidence that the American government's version of what happened
> is accurate and I will apologize.

Why not just apologize to the parents of the dead children for pushing an
insane conspiracy theory that serves no value except to make you feel like
you are special and know the "truth". Really, you are just sick.


-- 
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu:    <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice:               <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013:                <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243597

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2014-05-14 09:07 -0400
Message-ID<lkvpq4$not$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#243523
On 5/13/2014 6:23 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
> On 14-05-13 05:30 PM, DFS wrote:
>> On 5/13/2014 2:41 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>> On 14-05-13 02:36 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/13/14, 5:47 AM, in article hgue0.r34a@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/?p=620326>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Telling a parent of a child who was killed that their child never
>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>> existed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really. These people are just insane scum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fake parent.  Fake child.  No problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, so you support the telling of a parent whose child was killed
>>>>> that their
>>>>> child did not even exist - using the baseless accusation that they
>>>>> are not
>>>>> really a parent of this child that did not exist.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are utter scum as well.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sandy Hook was a complete hoax, you dumbass.  And so was the Boston
>>>> Cherry
>>>> Bombing.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>
>>
>> Both of you are loser scumbags for saying this.
>
> Provide evidence that the American government's version of what happened
> is accurate and I will apologize.


You (and that other shithead, owl) don't have to apologize to me.

You (and that other shithead, owl) have to apologize to the grieving 
families who lost their young children.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web