Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366369 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-23 17:51 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 14:00 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 113 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:18 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 18:32 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:43 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:13 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 12:29 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:53 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:07 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 20:33 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:41 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 21:01 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 14:14 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:01 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:12 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:43 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:50 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:26 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:57 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:41 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 18:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:16 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:23 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:40 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:46 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:10 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:29 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:44 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:45 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:49 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:15 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:42 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:50 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 17:58 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:12 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:54 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:25 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:41 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:55 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:13 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:29 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:34 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:59 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:09 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:14 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:27 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:32 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:47 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 23:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:00 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:32 -0700
An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for 5 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:38 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:59 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 15:04 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 00:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:03 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:33 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:52 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:01 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 02:49 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:27 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:24 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:21 -0600
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:23 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:04 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:56 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:03 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:19 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:32 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:25 -0700
An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for 6 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:39 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
An example Owl asked for 4 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
An example Owl asked for 3 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
An example Owl asked for 2 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:29 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:33 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:40 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:45 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:07 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:09 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:30 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:38 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:28 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:33 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:44 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:19 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:16 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:31 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:42 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 13:05 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:17 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 11:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:51 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:54 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:00 -0700
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 17:51 +0000 |
| Subject | future Democrat voters |
| Message-ID | <hjgsu93.fagie8@perch.invalid> |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC35FAJDFpY Go Bernie!
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 11:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E1E196.79E1B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366369 |
On 8/23/16, 10:51 AM, in article hjgsu93.fagie8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC35FAJDFpY > Go Bernie! > The video has literally NOTHING to do with the subject line, nor Sanders. But, sure, the US would be much better off with Sanders or someone like him as president. Not gonna happen this round, though. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 18:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgndakfu8.3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366381 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 10:51 AM, in article hjgsu93.fagie8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC35FAJDFpY >> Go Bernie! >> > > The video has literally NOTHING to do with the subject line, nor Sanders. > Of course it does. It's millennials, AKA Democrats. The stupidest generation that ever lived. Raised on communism participation trophies, and safe spaces. I'm actually suprised that opening the can didn't offend some of them. > But, sure, the US would be much better off with Sanders or someone like him > as president. Not gonna happen this round, though. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 11:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E1E75E.79E25%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366385 |
On 8/23/16, 11:32 AM, in article hgndakfu8.3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 10:51 AM, in article hjgsu93.fagie8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC35FAJDFpY >>> Go Bernie! >>> >> >> The video has literally NOTHING to do with the subject line, nor Sanders. > > Of course it does. It's millennials, AKA Democrats. > The stupidest generation that ever lived. Raised on communism > participation trophies, and safe spaces. I'm actually suprised > that opening the can didn't offend some of them. Ah, more of your baseless assumptions and grouping of people in irrational ways. OK. >> But, sure, the US would be much better off with Sanders or someone like him >> as president. Not gonna happen this round, though. >> > > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 19:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahjfeuas893.afji@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366386 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 11:32 AM, in article hgndakfu8.3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 10:51 AM, in article hjgsu93.fagie8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC35FAJDFpY >>>> Go Bernie! >>>> >>> >>> The video has literally NOTHING to do with the subject line, nor Sanders. >> >> Of course it does. It's millennials, AKA Democrats. >> The stupidest generation that ever lived. Raised on communism >> participation trophies, and safe spaces. I'm actually suprised >> that opening the can didn't offend some of them. > > Ah, more of your baseless assumptions and grouping of people in irrational > ways. OK. > Groups exist, Snit. Millennials exist, and they are morons. Fact. If there's not an "app for that" they are lost. You can blame their stupidity -- and complete lack of experience with most things that exist in the real world -- on today's educational system. Dumbass liberal teachers. They are the source of the problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 12:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E1F22B.79E39%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366387 |
On 8/23/16, 12:13 PM, in article ahjfeuas893.afji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 11:32 AM, in article hgndakfu8.3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/16, 10:51 AM, in article hjgsu93.fagie8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC35FAJDFpY >>>>> Go Bernie! >>>>> >>>> >>>> The video has literally NOTHING to do with the subject line, nor Sanders. >>> >>> Of course it does. It's millennials, AKA Democrats. >>> The stupidest generation that ever lived. Raised on communism >>> participation trophies, and safe spaces. I'm actually suprised >>> that opening the can didn't offend some of them. >> >> Ah, more of your baseless assumptions and grouping of people in irrational >> ways. OK. > > Groups exist, Snit. Which does not in any way imply that all people from any one group are the same... nor that your grouping is in any way reasonable or accurate. > Millennials exist, and they are morons. Fact. Bigoted nonsense. > If there's not an "app for that" they are lost. Bigoted nonsense. > You can blame their stupidity -- and complete lack of experience with > most things that exist in the real world -- on today's educational system. Of which, I bet, you know nothing about. > Dumbass liberal teachers. They are the source of the problem. Another topic I bet you know nothing about. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 19:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhja0gae.83@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366389 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 12:13 PM, in article ahjfeuas893.afji@perch.invalid, "Octavian > W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > >> You can blame their stupidity -- and complete lack of experience with >> most things that exist in the real world -- on today's educational system. > > Of which, I bet, you know nothing about. > So I know "nothing about of" that? Like I said, you retarded "teachers" are the source of the problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 13:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E1FB2E.79E48%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366391 |
On 8/23/16, 12:53 PM, in article fhja0gae.83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 12:13 PM, in article ahjfeuas893.afji@perch.invalid, "Octavian >> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >> >>> You can blame their stupidity -- and complete lack of experience with >>> most things that exist in the real world -- on today's educational system. >> >> Of which, I bet, you know nothing about. >> > > So I know "nothing about of" that? Like I said, you retarded "teachers" > are the source of the problem. > But yet you show NO evidence of teachers being less qualified now than they were 10, 20, or 50 years ago. I will say one issue with being a teacher is they keep adding to what they are expected to teach as they remove time, create special programs which pull kids out of class, and increase reporting criteria... putting them in an impossible situation. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 20:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjgsaud930.adfj@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366394 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 12:53 PM, in article fhja0gae.83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 12:13 PM, in article ahjfeuas893.afji@perch.invalid, "Octavian >>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> You can blame their stupidity -- and complete lack of experience with >>>> most things that exist in the real world -- on today's educational system. >>> >>> Of which, I bet, you know nothing about. >>> >> >> So I know "nothing about of" that? Like I said, you retarded "teachers" >> are the source of the problem. >> > But yet you show NO evidence of teachers being less qualified now than they > were 10, 20, or 50 years ago. > I just showed you an example, in your own words, of someone not qualified to teach. > I will say one issue with being a teacher is they keep adding to what they > are expected to teach as they remove time, create special programs which > pull kids out of class, and increase reporting criteria... putting them in > an impossible situation. > I haven't heard a word from you about the assaults on freedom of speech and on free expression of ideas which have become the norm on college campuses and are now spreading a tsunami of violent ignorance to society at large. Tranny bathrooms. Safe spaces. Trigger warnings. Love the murderous jihadis. Cops bad. Military bad. Whites bad. Oh, yes. Very bad. The worst. Check your privilege. Thugs good. Criminal equals Victim. Victim equals racist. Border? What border? You liberal fucktards in the educational system are directly responsible for the nosedive our society is experiencing. And when it crashes, guess what. Party time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 13:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E202F0.79E55%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366395 |
On 8/23/16, 1:33 PM, in article hjgsaud930.adfj@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 12:53 PM, in article fhja0gae.83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/16, 12:13 PM, in article ahjfeuas893.afji@perch.invalid, "Octavian >>>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> You can blame their stupidity -- and complete lack of experience with >>>>> most things that exist in the real world -- on today's educational system. >>>> >>>> Of which, I bet, you know nothing about. >>> >>> So I know "nothing about of" that? Like I said, you retarded "teachers" >>> are the source of the problem. >>> >> But yet you show NO evidence of teachers being less qualified now than they >> were 10, 20, or 50 years ago. > > I just showed you an example, in your own words, of someone not qualified > to teach. I said no such thing. We have no idea what is going on in that video or if it is even a class or if so what kind. What type class do you even imagine it is... with college age (?) people opening a can. >> I will say one issue with being a teacher is they keep adding to what they >> are expected to teach as they remove time, create special programs which >> pull kids out of class, and increase reporting criteria... putting them in >> an impossible situation. > > I haven't heard a word from you about the assaults on freedom of speech > and on free expression of ideas which have become the norm on college > campuses and are now spreading a tsunami of violent ignorance to society > at large. Can you show this is any more than in the past? > Tranny bathrooms. OH MY GOD! People have to pee! Wow... they never did that in the past! Really... your issue is people have to PEE! Oh, and sometimes poop. THAT is your example of education going downhill? > Safe spaces. Trigger warnings. There may be times this goes overboard... examples? > Love the murderous jihadis. Other than being based on you grouping all Muslims based on your bigotry what are you even talking about? > Cops bad. Based on??? > Military bad. Whites bad. Oh, yes. Very bad. The worst. Check your > privilege. Thugs good. Criminal equals Victim. Victim equals racist. > Border? What border? And you have gone into la-la land. Not that there are not isolated cases of stupidity, but there have always been. > You liberal fucktards in the educational system are directly responsible > for the nosedive our society is experiencing. And when it crashes, > guess what. Party time. And more gibberish from you. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 21:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahjfi30.aae71@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366396 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 1:33 PM, in article hjgsaud930.adfj@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 12:53 PM, in article fhja0gae.83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/23/16, 12:13 PM, in article ahjfeuas893.afji@perch.invalid, "Octavian >>>>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> You can blame their stupidity -- and complete lack of experience with >>>>>> most things that exist in the real world -- on today's educational system. >>>>> >>>>> Of which, I bet, you know nothing about. >>>> >>>> So I know "nothing about of" that? Like I said, you retarded "teachers" >>>> are the source of the problem. >>>> >>> But yet you show NO evidence of teachers being less qualified now than they >>> were 10, 20, or 50 years ago. >> >> I just showed you an example, in your own words, of someone not qualified >> to teach. > > I said no such thing. You said: "Of which, I bet, you know nothing about." Gibberish. Could you translate what "knowing nothing about of something" means? > We have no idea what is going on in that video or if > it is even a class or if so what kind. What type class do you even imagine > it is... with college age (?) people opening a can. > Apparently it's a hands-on can opening class for millennials. >>> I will say one issue with being a teacher is they keep adding to what they >>> are expected to teach as they remove time, create special programs which >>> pull kids out of class, and increase reporting criteria... putting them in >>> an impossible situation. >> >> I haven't heard a word from you about the assaults on freedom of speech >> and on free expression of ideas which have become the norm on college >> campuses and are now spreading a tsunami of violent ignorance to society >> at large. > > Can you show this is any more than in the past? > In the past, free speech was a cornerstone of higher education. Not to mention it being a Constitutional Right. >> Tranny bathrooms. > > OH MY GOD! People have to pee! Wow... they never did that in the past! > Trannies have always found a way to pee in the past. Why now do they insist on choosing a bathroom based to some pyschobabble concept of "gender identity"? > Really... your issue is people have to PEE! Oh, and sometimes poop. THAT is > your example of education going downhill? > Yep. >> Safe spaces. Trigger warnings. > > There may be times this goes overboard... examples? > Find your own examples. They are rampant. >> Love the murderous jihadis. > > Other than being based on you grouping all Muslims based on your bigotry > what are you even talking about? > I say "jihadis" and you hear "Muslim." Who's the bigot here again? >> Cops bad. > > Based on??? > You have got to be kidding. >> Military bad. Whites bad. Oh, yes. Very bad. The worst. Check your >> privilege. Thugs good. Criminal equals Victim. Victim equals racist. >> Border? What border? > > And you have gone into la-la land. Not that there are not isolated cases of > stupidity, but there have always been. > The whole fucking country is la-la land now. That's the point. Thank you so much, libtards, for expanding the California border all the way to the east coast. >> You liberal fucktards in the educational system are directly responsible >> for the nosedive our society is experiencing. And when it crashes, >> guess what. Party time. > > And more gibberish from you. > Gibberish to the fool. Word to the wise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 14:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E20ABC.79E5F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366397 |
On 8/23/16, 2:01 PM, in article ahjfi30.aae71@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 1:33 PM, in article hjgsaud930.adfj@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/16, 12:53 PM, in article fhja0gae.83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/23/16, 12:13 PM, in article ahjfeuas893.afji@perch.invalid, >>>>>> "Octavian >>>>>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> You can blame their stupidity -- and complete lack of experience with >>>>>>> most things that exist in the real world -- on today's educational >>>>>>> system. >>>>>> >>>>>> Of which, I bet, you know nothing about. >>>>> >>>>> So I know "nothing about of" that? Like I said, you retarded "teachers" >>>>> are the source of the problem. >>>>> >>>> But yet you show NO evidence of teachers being less qualified now than they >>>> were 10, 20, or 50 years ago. >>> >>> I just showed you an example, in your own words, of someone not qualified >>> to teach. >> >> I said no such thing. > > You said: > > "Of which, I bet, you know nothing about." > > Gibberish. Could you translate what "knowing nothing about of something" > means? So my noting you know nothing about a topic means, to you, that someone in a video is not qualified to teach. WTF?!?!? >> We have no idea what is going on in that video or if >> it is even a class or if so what kind. What type class do you even imagine >> it is... with college age (?) people opening a can. > > Apparently it's a hands-on can opening class for millennials. But you cannot support this in any way. I have no idea what the hell the context is for that video. >>>> I will say one issue with being a teacher is they keep adding to what they >>>> are expected to teach as they remove time, create special programs which >>>> pull kids out of class, and increase reporting criteria... putting them in >>>> an impossible situation. >>> >>> I haven't heard a word from you about the assaults on freedom of speech >>> and on free expression of ideas which have become the norm on college >>> campuses and are now spreading a tsunami of violent ignorance to society >>> at large. >> >> Can you show this is any more than in the past? > > In the past, free speech was a cornerstone of higher education. > Not to mention it being a Constitutional Right. In other words: no, you cannot show this you can just make claims you cannot back. OK. >>> Tranny bathrooms. >> >> OH MY GOD! People have to pee! Wow... they never did that in the past! > > Trannies have always found a way to pee in the past. Why now do they > insist on choosing a bathroom based to some pyschobabble concept of > "gender identity"? You mean people have to pick a bathroom to pee in or, if available, use one that anyone can use. THE HORROR! Really... what is your complaint here? People pee and poop. It happens. >> Really... your issue is people have to PEE! Oh, and sometimes poop. THAT is >> your example of education going downhill? >> > Yep. Hint: in the past people pooped, too. It is a non-issue. >>> Safe spaces. Trigger warnings. >> >> There may be times this goes overboard... examples? > > Find your own examples. They are rampant. So you have none. OK. >>> Love the murderous jihadis. >> >> Other than being based on you grouping all Muslims based on your bigotry >> what are you even talking about? > > I say "jihadis" and you hear "Muslim." Who's the bigot here again? Who the hell are you talking about then? As far as responding to your bigotry: this is not our first conversation! Still, if you say I am wrong and you are not grouping Muslims in general as being dangerous or the like then I will happily rescind my comment. >>> Cops bad. >> >> Based on??? > > You have got to be kidding. Of note: no support from you. Cops do good and bad things... for their safety and the safety of others they should wear chest cams. Not the end of the world for anyone. > >>> Military bad. Whites bad. Oh, yes. Very bad. The worst. Check your >>> privilege. Thugs good. Criminal equals Victim. Victim equals racist. >>> Border? What border? >> >> And you have gone into la-la land. Not that there are not isolated cases of >> stupidity, but there have always been. > > The whole fucking country is la-la land now. That's the point. > Thank you so much, libtards, for expanding the California border > all the way to the east coast. So far lots of whining from you but the only specific is people have to eliminate wastes from their body... as if this is noteworthy. >>> You liberal fucktards in the educational system are directly responsible >>> for the nosedive our society is experiencing. And when it crashes, >>> guess what. Party time. >> >> And more gibberish from you. > > Gibberish to the fool. Word to the wise. Comes down to you have no point to make but can whine a lot. OK. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 22:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgoo9a8f.jai8@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366398 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 2:01 PM, in article ahjfi30.aae71@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 1:33 PM, in article hjgsaud930.adfj@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/23/16, 12:53 PM, in article fhja0gae.83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/23/16, 12:13 PM, in article ahjfeuas893.afji@perch.invalid, >>>>>>> "Octavian >>>>>>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can blame their stupidity -- and complete lack of experience with >>>>>>>> most things that exist in the real world -- on today's educational >>>>>>>> system. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of which, I bet, you know nothing about. >>>>>> >>>>>> So I know "nothing about of" that? Like I said, you retarded "teachers" >>>>>> are the source of the problem. >>>>>> >>>>> But yet you show NO evidence of teachers being less qualified now than they >>>>> were 10, 20, or 50 years ago. >>>> >>>> I just showed you an example, in your own words, of someone not qualified >>>> to teach. >>> >>> I said no such thing. >> >> You said: >> >> "Of which, I bet, you know nothing about." >> >> Gibberish. Could you translate what "knowing nothing about of something" >> means? > > So my noting you know nothing about a topic means, to you, that someone in a > video is not qualified to teach. WTF?!?!? > Damn, you are an idiot. You still don't even see what the problem is about of. Moron! >>> We have no idea what is going on in that video or if >>> it is even a class or if so what kind. What type class do you even imagine >>> it is... with college age (?) people opening a can. >> >> Apparently it's a hands-on can opening class for millennials. > > But you cannot support this in any way. I have no idea what the hell the > context is for that video. > The video speaks for itself. Millennials. A can opener. A standing ovation. >>>>> I will say one issue with being a teacher is they keep adding to what they >>>>> are expected to teach as they remove time, create special programs which >>>>> pull kids out of class, and increase reporting criteria... putting them in >>>>> an impossible situation. >>>> >>>> I haven't heard a word from you about the assaults on freedom of speech >>>> and on free expression of ideas which have become the norm on college >>>> campuses and are now spreading a tsunami of violent ignorance to society >>>> at large. >>> >>> Can you show this is any more than in the past? >> >> In the past, free speech was a cornerstone of higher education. >> Not to mention it being a Constitutional Right. > > In other words: no, you cannot show this you can just make claims you cannot > back. OK. Seriously? http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/ Numerous articles and books have been written on this subject. > >>>> Tranny bathrooms. >>> >>> OH MY GOD! People have to pee! Wow... they never did that in the past! >> >> Trannies have always found a way to pee in the past. Why now do they >> insist on choosing a bathroom based to some pyschobabble concept of >> "gender identity"? > > You mean people have to pick a bathroom to pee in or, if available, use one > that anyone can use. THE HORROR! > > Really... what is your complaint here? People pee and poop. It happens. > Man has dick. Woman has cooter. No need to "decide" which bathroom to go to. If you don't know whether you're a man or a woman, look down. Society at large has no obligation to coddle and adapt to your personal mental health illness issues. If you are too far gone to adapt yourelf to societal norms, take up residence in an institution and leave the rest of us alone. >>> Really... your issue is people have to PEE! Oh, and sometimes poop. THAT is >>> your example of education going downhill? >>> >> Yep. > > Hint: in the past people pooped, too. It is a non-issue. > Trannies always found a way before. What happened? >>>> Safe spaces. Trigger warnings. >>> >>> There may be times this goes overboard... examples? >> >> Find your own examples. They are rampant. > > So you have none. OK. > Google has plenty. >>>> Love the murderous jihadis. >>> >>> Other than being based on you grouping all Muslims based on your bigotry >>> what are you even talking about? >> >> I say "jihadis" and you hear "Muslim." Who's the bigot here again? > > Who the hell are you talking about then? That's right. Double-down on that bigotry. > >>>> Cops bad. >>> >>> Based on??? >> >> You have got to be kidding. > > Of note: no support from you. No support? Have you even seen the news in the last two years? The "cops bad" message is constantly spouted by practically everyone on the left so that they can pander to BLM. Hillary Clinton cannot even speak to crime issues without having to qualify her statements with something to the effect that well, you know, we have some bad cops.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 15:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E21842.79E6E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366404 |
On 8/23/16, 3:01 PM, in article hgoo9a8f.jai8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: ... >> So my noting you know nothing about a topic means, to you, that someone in a >> video is not qualified to teach. WTF?!?!? > > Damn, you are an idiot. You still don't even see what the problem is > about of. Moron! The problem is you are making a bunch of baseless assumptions about a video we know essentially nothing about. Add to that you keep talking about teaching but show no expertise on the topic. That and people have to pee. That is your big issue. Wow. Tied to you think you get to define how others see THEMSELVES. All about YOU having control of the world. Then you whine about others having the audacity to think THEY should be able to think for themselves. The nerve! Oh, and you are offended that some people are easily offended... which is ironic in a way you show no understanding of. :) ... >>>>> Love the murderous jihadis. >>>> >>>> Other than being based on you grouping all Muslims based on your bigotry >>>> what are you even talking about? >>> >>> I say "jihadis" and you hear "Muslim." Who's the bigot here again? >> >> Who the hell are you talking about then? > > That's right. Double-down on that bigotry. You snipped... and refuse to say what you were talking about. Again: if you are willing to say you did NOT mean Muslims as a whole and do not think Islam is an issue I am happy to take back my comment and apologize. Just say you do not have the bigoted worldview I think you do. I shan't dig through past posts to try to "prove" otherwise and will just take your word. >>>>> Cops bad. >>>> >>>> Based on??? >>> >>> You have got to be kidding. >> >> Of note: no support from you. > > No support? Have you even seen the news in the last two years? > The "cops bad" message is constantly spouted by practically everyone > on the left so that they can pander to BLM. Hillary Clinton cannot > even speak to crime issues without having to qualify her statements > with something to the effect that well, you know, we have some bad > cops. Ah, so you do not understand the issues involving police. Got it. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 22:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjfua9383.agji@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366407 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 3:01 PM, in article hgoo9a8f.jai8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>> So my noting you know nothing about a topic means, to you, that someone in a >>> video is not qualified to teach. WTF?!?!? >> >> Damn, you are an idiot. You still don't even see what the problem is >> about of. Moron! > > The problem is you are making a bunch of baseless assumptions about a video > we know essentially nothing about. Add to that you keep talking about > teaching but show no expertise on the topic. > > That and people have to pee. That is your big issue. Wow. Tied to you think > you get to define how others see THEMSELVES. That's the gist of it. You don't get to "define" yourself as a man or a woman. You either are one, or you are not. (deformities excepted). Here's how a bathroom trip should go. You walk up to the two doors. One says "Men" or has a man icon. The other says "Women" or has a woman icon. If you have ever seen your pecker/hoohoo, then you know which door to open. > All about YOU having control of > the world. Then you whine about others having the audacity to think THEY > should be able to think for themselves. The nerve! > > Oh, and you are offended that some people are easily offended... which is > ironic in a way you show no understanding of. :) > I love it when people are easily offended. > ... >>>>>> Love the murderous jihadis. >>>>> >>>>> Other than being based on you grouping all Muslims based on your bigotry >>>>> what are you even talking about? >>>> >>>> I say "jihadis" and you hear "Muslim." Who's the bigot here again? >>> >>> Who the hell are you talking about then? >> >> That's right. Double-down on that bigotry. > > You snipped... and refuse to say what you were talking about. Again: if you > are willing to say you did NOT mean Muslims as a whole and do not think > Islam is an issue I am happy to take back my comment and apologize. > Why apologize to me? I'm not a moslem. Maybe you should volunteer for some community service. Or just accept the sharia punishment for insulting the prophet (piss be upon him). > Just say you do not have the bigoted worldview I think you do. I shan't dig > through past posts to try to "prove" otherwise and will just take your word. > >>>>>> Cops bad. >>>>> >>>>> Based on??? >>>> >>>> You have got to be kidding. >>> >>> Of note: no support from you. >> >> No support? Have you even seen the news in the last two years? >> The "cops bad" message is constantly spouted by practically everyone >> on the left so that they can pander to BLM. Hillary Clinton cannot >> even speak to crime issues without having to qualify her statements >> with something to the effect that well, you know, we have some bad >> cops. > > Ah, so you do not understand the issues involving police. Got it. > I understand that whites are killed by police at a higher rate than blacks. Where's the WLM? Oh, right, that would be racist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 15:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E22163.79E8A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366415 |
On 8/23/16, 3:43 PM, in article hjfua9383.agji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 3:01 PM, in article hgoo9a8f.jai8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>> So my noting you know nothing about a topic means, to you, that someone in >>>> a >>>> video is not qualified to teach. WTF?!?!? >>> >>> Damn, you are an idiot. You still don't even see what the problem is >>> about of. Moron! >> >> The problem is you are making a bunch of baseless assumptions about a video >> we know essentially nothing about. Add to that you keep talking about >> teaching but show no expertise on the topic. >> >> That and people have to pee. That is your big issue. Wow. Tied to you think >> you get to define how others see THEMSELVES. > > That's the gist of it. You don't get to "define" yourself as a man or > a woman. You either are one, or you are not. (deformities excepted). You mean YOU get to define people as YOU wish, but others do not get the same rights. This is about YOU. YOU want to control others. What gives you the right? What harm does it cause for someone else to pee in the same bathroom as you? Why is this even an issue? ... >> All about YOU having control of >> the world. Then you whine about others having the audacity to think THEY >> should be able to think for themselves. The nerve! >> >> Oh, and you are offended that some people are easily offended... which is >> ironic in a way you show no understanding of. :) > > I love it when people are easily offended. Like when they are offended that THEY cannot insist what bathrooms OTHERS use. Yeah, it is amazing how easily offended someone is. Keep in mind someone using a toilet does NO harm to you. It is not about you or in any way harmful to you, in word or action. It does not suggest or insinuate violence against you in any way, nor that you are not an equal. But it still offends you. Meanwhile you whine about others being offended easily. Ah, the irony. >> ... >>>>>>> Love the murderous jihadis. >>>>>> >>>>>> Other than being based on you grouping all Muslims based on your bigotry >>>>>> what are you even talking about? >>>>> >>>>> I say "jihadis" and you hear "Muslim." Who's the bigot here again? >>>> >>>> Who the hell are you talking about then? >>> >>> That's right. Double-down on that bigotry. >> >> You snipped... and refuse to say what you were talking about. Again: if you >> are willing to say you did NOT mean Muslims as a whole and do not think >> Islam is an issue I am happy to take back my comment and apologize. > > Why apologize to me? I'm not a moslem. Maybe you should volunteer > for some community service. Or just accept the sharia punishment > for insulting the prophet (piss be upon him). > >> Just say you do not have the bigoted worldview I think you do. I shan't dig >> through past posts to try to "prove" otherwise and will just take your word. Of note: you refuse. Yeah, my assumption about you is (again) being proved correct. >>>>>>> Cops bad. >>>>>> >>>>>> Based on??? >>>>> >>>>> You have got to be kidding. >>>> >>>> Of note: no support from you. >>> >>> No support? Have you even seen the news in the last two years? >>> The "cops bad" message is constantly spouted by practically everyone >>> on the left so that they can pander to BLM. Hillary Clinton cannot >>> even speak to crime issues without having to qualify her statements >>> with something to the effect that well, you know, we have some bad >>> cops. >> >> Ah, so you do not understand the issues involving police. Got it. > > I understand that whites are killed by police at a higher rate > than blacks. Where's the WLM? Oh, right, that would be racist. If you want to pretend that being white in this country comes with as many challenges as being black you are being absurd. But you cannot see past your own nose... and want to control others. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 23:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hje79rr3fkh.p@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366417 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 3:43 PM, in article hjfua9383.agji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 3:01 PM, in article hgoo9a8f.jai8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>> So my noting you know nothing about a topic means, to you, that someone in >>>>> a >>>>> video is not qualified to teach. WTF?!?!? >>>> >>>> Damn, you are an idiot. You still don't even see what the problem is >>>> about of. Moron! >>> >>> The problem is you are making a bunch of baseless assumptions about a video >>> we know essentially nothing about. Add to that you keep talking about >>> teaching but show no expertise on the topic. >>> >>> That and people have to pee. That is your big issue. Wow. Tied to you think >>> you get to define how others see THEMSELVES. >> >> That's the gist of it. You don't get to "define" yourself as a man or >> a woman. You either are one, or you are not. (deformities excepted). > > You mean YOU get to define people as YOU wish, but others do not get the > same rights. This is about YOU. YOU want to control others. > The doctor who delivered me correctly observed me to be male. > What gives you the right? It has nothing to do with "rights". You are either a man or a woman. Period. (again, excepting deformities). It doesn't matter what you "identify" as in some mentally ill state of mind. No doubt there are trannies. They are of course mentally ill. > What harm does it cause for someone else to pee in > the same bathroom as you? Why is this even an issue? > I don't personally care who comes in the bathroom I'm in. I am able to defend myself. But little girls and most women are not able to defend themselves from predators who would take advantage of such an open-door policy. > ... >>> All about YOU having control of >>> the world. Then you whine about others having the audacity to think THEY >>> should be able to think for themselves. The nerve! >>> >>> Oh, and you are offended that some people are easily offended... which is >>> ironic in a way you show no understanding of. :) >> >> I love it when people are easily offended. > > Like when they are offended that THEY cannot insist what bathrooms OTHERS > use. Yeah, it is amazing how easily offended someone is. > Look down. Are you a man? If so, I don't care if you pull on a dress. You should not be allowed to go into the women's bathroom and shower areas (as has recently been dictated by the feds for homeless shelters). > Keep in mind someone using a toilet does NO harm to you. It is not about you > or in any way harmful to you, in word or action. It does not suggest or > insinuate violence against you in any way, nor that you are not an equal. > Not me. I'm a man. I spell M - A - N > But it still offends you. > It's a matter of public safety. > Meanwhile you whine about others being offended easily. Ah, the irony. > It's not a matter of being offended. >>> >>> Ah, so you do not understand the issues involving police. Got it. >> >> I understand that whites are killed by police at a higher rate >> than blacks. Where's the WLM? Oh, right, that would be racist. > > If you want to pretend that being white in this country comes with as many > challenges as being black you are being absurd. You have got to be kidding me. Blacks are handed more than any other race from cradle to grave, yet most continue to choose ghetto failure over opportunity. You can only throw money at a problem for so long before you have to finally admit that some people just flat out hate society and are never going to get the chip off their shoulder. If you are white, blacks hate you. If you are not moslem, moslems hate you. You might not believe me, but it's easy to prove: Put yourself in a minority position and watch how long it takes before you are running for your life. > But you cannot see past your > own nose... and want to control others. > There is currently a government-sanctioned war on whites. If you don't see it, you are blind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 16:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E2310E.79E98%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366421 |
On 8/23/16, 4:26 PM, in article hje79rr3fkh.p@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 3:43 PM, in article hjfua9383.agji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/16, 3:01 PM, in article hgoo9a8f.jai8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>> So my noting you know nothing about a topic means, to you, that someone >>>>>> in >>>>>> a >>>>>> video is not qualified to teach. WTF?!?!? >>>>> >>>>> Damn, you are an idiot. You still don't even see what the problem is >>>>> about of. Moron! >>>> >>>> The problem is you are making a bunch of baseless assumptions about a video >>>> we know essentially nothing about. Add to that you keep talking about >>>> teaching but show no expertise on the topic. >>>> >>>> That and people have to pee. That is your big issue. Wow. Tied to you think >>>> you get to define how others see THEMSELVES. >>> >>> That's the gist of it. You don't get to "define" yourself as a man or >>> a woman. You either are one, or you are not. (deformities excepted). >> >> You mean YOU get to define people as YOU wish, but others do not get the >> same rights. This is about YOU. YOU want to control others. > > The doctor who delivered me correctly observed me to be male. Irrelevant to the discussion. >> What gives you the right? > > It has nothing to do with "rights". You insisting that YOU get to make choices for other sure as hell deals with rights! What gives you the right? Keep in mind we are talking about someone merely using a restroom... not asking ANYTHING of you. Not inconveniencing you in ANY way. Not harming you by word or deed. And you think YOUR view, right or wrong, should matter. How arrogant of you! > You are either a man or a woman. Period. (again, excepting deformities). It > doesn't matter what you "identify" as in some mentally ill state of mind. No > doubt there are trannies. They are of course mentally ill. And then you deem someone "ill" for DISAGREEING with you. No sign of any lack of functioning on their part or actual disability of any sort. Amazing how easily offended you are by others. >> What harm does it cause for someone else to pee in >> the same bathroom as you? Why is this even an issue? > > I don't personally care who comes in the bathroom I'm in. You are the one who brought up this issue. > I am able to defend myself. But little girls and most women are not able to > defend themselves from predators who would take advantage of such an open-door > policy. Why change the topic to predators? But if we can somehow judge someone as a predator do you think it is OK for them to attack boys and not girls? WTF? Your issue is someone disagrees with you. >> ... >>>> All about YOU having control of >>>> the world. Then you whine about others having the audacity to think THEY >>>> should be able to think for themselves. The nerve! >>>> >>>> Oh, and you are offended that some people are easily offended... which is >>>> ironic in a way you show no understanding of. :) >>> >>> I love it when people are easily offended. >> >> Like when they are offended that THEY cannot insist what bathrooms OTHERS >> use. Yeah, it is amazing how easily offended someone is. > > Look down. Are you a man? If so, I don't care if you pull on a dress. > You should not be allowed to go into the women's bathroom and shower areas > (as has recently been dictated by the feds for homeless shelters). So your view should supersede others based on you being offended by completely non-harmful actions (not harmful in word or deed). Wow. >> Keep in mind someone using a toilet does NO harm to you. It is not about you >> or in any way harmful to you, in word or action. It does not suggest or >> insinuate violence against you in any way, nor that you are not an equal. > > Not me. I'm a man. I spell M - A - N > >> But it still offends you. > > It's a matter of public safety. Peeing in a toilet is a matter of public safety in that people should not pee in the street. Sure. But that is not what you are talking about. You mentioned NO issue that involves safety. Nothing that leads to harm or insult. >> Meanwhile you whine about others being offended easily. Ah, the irony. > > It's not a matter of being offended. What issue about being offended does not use the reason (or excuse) of safety? >>>> Ah, so you do not understand the issues involving police. Got it. >>> >>> I understand that whites are killed by police at a higher rate >>> than blacks. Where's the WLM? Oh, right, that would be racist. >> >> If you want to pretend that being white in this country comes with as many >> challenges as being black you are being absurd. > > You have got to be kidding me. Blacks are handed more than any other > race from cradle to grave, yet most continue to choose ghetto failure > over opportunity. You can only throw money at a problem for so long > before you have to finally admit that some people just flat out hate > society and are never going to get the chip off their shoulder. So you have no clue about race issues in the country. OK. > If you are white, blacks hate you. More bigoted nonsense from you. > If you are not moslem, moslems hate you. More bigoted nonsense from you. > You might not believe me, but it's easy to prove: Put yourself > in a minority position and watch how long it takes before you > are running for your life. You assume I have not been in a minority situation. Odd. >> But you cannot see past your >> own nose... and want to control others. > > There is currently a government-sanctioned war on whites. If you don't > see it, you are blind. War on whites. Sigh. Are you a white supremist. You are offended by others wanting equality. You want special rights. Boo hoo for you. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 01:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjvadyu93.fak9@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366422 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 4:26 PM, in article hje79rr3fkh.p@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> There is currently a government-sanctioned war on whites. If you don't >> see it, you are blind. > > War on whites. Sigh. Are you a white supremist. You are offended by others > wanting equality. You want special rights. Boo hoo for you. > Yep, every other race gets special treatment, but whites are "bigots" if they point that out. The only "privilege" operating out there is wealth. Race hasn't had anything to do with opportunity in this country in decades. But keep chanting that leftist hate and make sure the country becomes more and more divided.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 18:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E24CEA.79EAD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366438 |
On 8/23/16, 6:41 PM, in article hjvadyu93.fak9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 4:26 PM, in article hje79rr3fkh.p@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> > >>> There is currently a government-sanctioned war on whites. If you don't >>> see it, you are blind. >> >> War on whites. Sigh. Are you a white supremist. You are offended by others >> wanting equality. You want special rights. Boo hoo for you. > > Yep, every other race gets special treatment, but whites are "bigots" > if they point that out. I am not a big fan of the word "privilege," but you have NO clue about the history and societal challenges of blacks and native Americans. That is crystal clear. You cannot see past your own nose. Then you claim offense at things being made more equal. Boo hoo for you. > The only "privilege" operating out there is wealth. Support? And keep in mind the MASSIVE wealth disadvantage blacks in the US are at. MASSIVE. > Race hasn't had anything to do with opportunity in > this country in decades. Again you ignore science. > But keep chanting that leftist hate > and make sure the country becomes more and more divided. You fight against equality and then whine when others seek to be treated as equals. Sickening. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web