Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366404
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: future Democrat voters |
| Date | 2016-08-23 22:01 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <hgoo9a8f.jai8@perch.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <D3E1FB2E.79E48%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <hjgsaud930.adfj@perch.invalid> <D3E202F0.79E55%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <ahjfi30.aae71@perch.invalid> <D3E20ABC.79E5F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 2:01 PM, in article ahjfi30.aae71@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 1:33 PM, in article hjgsaud930.adfj@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/23/16, 12:53 PM, in article fhja0gae.83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/23/16, 12:13 PM, in article ahjfeuas893.afji@perch.invalid, >>>>>>> "Octavian >>>>>>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can blame their stupidity -- and complete lack of experience with >>>>>>>> most things that exist in the real world -- on today's educational >>>>>>>> system. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of which, I bet, you know nothing about. >>>>>> >>>>>> So I know "nothing about of" that? Like I said, you retarded "teachers" >>>>>> are the source of the problem. >>>>>> >>>>> But yet you show NO evidence of teachers being less qualified now than they >>>>> were 10, 20, or 50 years ago. >>>> >>>> I just showed you an example, in your own words, of someone not qualified >>>> to teach. >>> >>> I said no such thing. >> >> You said: >> >> "Of which, I bet, you know nothing about." >> >> Gibberish. Could you translate what "knowing nothing about of something" >> means? > > So my noting you know nothing about a topic means, to you, that someone in a > video is not qualified to teach. WTF?!?!? > Damn, you are an idiot. You still don't even see what the problem is about of. Moron! >>> We have no idea what is going on in that video or if >>> it is even a class or if so what kind. What type class do you even imagine >>> it is... with college age (?) people opening a can. >> >> Apparently it's a hands-on can opening class for millennials. > > But you cannot support this in any way. I have no idea what the hell the > context is for that video. > The video speaks for itself. Millennials. A can opener. A standing ovation. >>>>> I will say one issue with being a teacher is they keep adding to what they >>>>> are expected to teach as they remove time, create special programs which >>>>> pull kids out of class, and increase reporting criteria... putting them in >>>>> an impossible situation. >>>> >>>> I haven't heard a word from you about the assaults on freedom of speech >>>> and on free expression of ideas which have become the norm on college >>>> campuses and are now spreading a tsunami of violent ignorance to society >>>> at large. >>> >>> Can you show this is any more than in the past? >> >> In the past, free speech was a cornerstone of higher education. >> Not to mention it being a Constitutional Right. > > In other words: no, you cannot show this you can just make claims you cannot > back. OK. Seriously? http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/ Numerous articles and books have been written on this subject. > >>>> Tranny bathrooms. >>> >>> OH MY GOD! People have to pee! Wow... they never did that in the past! >> >> Trannies have always found a way to pee in the past. Why now do they >> insist on choosing a bathroom based to some pyschobabble concept of >> "gender identity"? > > You mean people have to pick a bathroom to pee in or, if available, use one > that anyone can use. THE HORROR! > > Really... what is your complaint here? People pee and poop. It happens. > Man has dick. Woman has cooter. No need to "decide" which bathroom to go to. If you don't know whether you're a man or a woman, look down. Society at large has no obligation to coddle and adapt to your personal mental health illness issues. If you are too far gone to adapt yourelf to societal norms, take up residence in an institution and leave the rest of us alone. >>> Really... your issue is people have to PEE! Oh, and sometimes poop. THAT is >>> your example of education going downhill? >>> >> Yep. > > Hint: in the past people pooped, too. It is a non-issue. > Trannies always found a way before. What happened? >>>> Safe spaces. Trigger warnings. >>> >>> There may be times this goes overboard... examples? >> >> Find your own examples. They are rampant. > > So you have none. OK. > Google has plenty. >>>> Love the murderous jihadis. >>> >>> Other than being based on you grouping all Muslims based on your bigotry >>> what are you even talking about? >> >> I say "jihadis" and you hear "Muslim." Who's the bigot here again? > > Who the hell are you talking about then? That's right. Double-down on that bigotry. > >>>> Cops bad. >>> >>> Based on??? >> >> You have got to be kidding. > > Of note: no support from you. No support? Have you even seen the news in the last two years? The "cops bad" message is constantly spouted by practically everyone on the left so that they can pander to BLM. Hillary Clinton cannot even speak to crime issues without having to qualify her statements with something to the effect that well, you know, we have some bad cops.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:18 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 18:32 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:43 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:13 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 12:29 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:53 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:07 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 20:33 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:41 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 21:01 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 14:14 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:01 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:12 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:43 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:50 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:26 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:57 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:41 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 18:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:16 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:23 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:40 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:46 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:10 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:29 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:44 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:45 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:49 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:15 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:42 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:50 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 17:58 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:12 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:54 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:25 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:41 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:55 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:13 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:29 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:34 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:59 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:09 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:14 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:27 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:32 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:47 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 23:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:00 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:32 -0700
An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for 5 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:38 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:59 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 15:04 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 00:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:03 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:33 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:52 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:01 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 02:49 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:27 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:24 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:21 -0600
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:23 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:04 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:56 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:03 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:19 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:32 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:25 -0700
An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for 6 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:39 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
An example Owl asked for 4 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
An example Owl asked for 3 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
An example Owl asked for 2 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:29 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:33 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:40 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:45 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:07 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:09 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:30 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:38 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:28 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:33 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:44 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:19 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:16 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:31 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:42 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 13:05 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:17 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 11:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:51 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:54 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:00 -0700
csiph-web