Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366422

Re: future Democrat voters

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: future Democrat voters
Date 2016-08-23 16:57 -0700
Message-ID <D3E2310E.79E98%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <hgoo9a8f.jai8@perch.invalid> <D3E21842.79E6E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <hjfua9383.agji@perch.invalid> <D3E22163.79E8A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <hje79rr3fkh.p@perch.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/23/16, 4:26 PM, in article hje79rr3fkh.p@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/23/16, 3:43 PM, in article hjfua9383.agji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/23/16, 3:01 PM, in article hgoo9a8f.jai8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> ... 
>>>>>> So my noting you know nothing about a topic means, to you, that someone
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> video is not qualified to teach. WTF?!?!?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Damn, you are an idiot.  You still don't even see what the problem is
>>>>> about of.  Moron!
>>>> 
>>>> The problem is you are making a bunch of baseless assumptions about a video
>>>> we know essentially nothing about. Add to that you keep talking about
>>>> teaching but show no expertise on the topic.
>>>> 
>>>> That and people have to pee. That is your big issue. Wow. Tied to you think
>>>> you get to define how others see THEMSELVES.
>>> 
>>> That's the gist of it.  You don't get to "define" yourself as a man or
>>> a woman.  You either are one, or you are not. (deformities excepted).
>> 
>> You mean YOU get to define people as YOU wish, but others do not get the
>> same rights. This is about YOU. YOU want to control others.
> 
> The doctor who delivered me correctly observed me to be male.

Irrelevant to the discussion.
 
>> What gives you the right?
> 
> It has nothing to do with "rights".

You insisting that YOU get to make choices for other sure as hell deals with
rights! What gives you the right? Keep in mind we are talking about someone
merely using a restroom... not asking ANYTHING of you. Not inconveniencing
you in ANY way. Not harming you by word or deed.

And you think YOUR view, right or wrong, should matter. How arrogant of you!

> You are either a man or a woman. Period.  (again, excepting deformities).  It
> doesn't matter what you "identify" as in some mentally ill state of mind.  No
> doubt there are trannies.  They are of course mentally ill.

And then you deem someone "ill" for DISAGREEING with you. No sign of any
lack of functioning on their part or actual disability of any sort.

Amazing how easily offended you are by others.

>> What harm does it cause for someone else to pee in
>> the same bathroom as you? Why is this even an issue?
> 
> I don't personally care who comes in the bathroom I'm in.

You are the one who brought up this issue.

> I am able to defend myself.  But little girls and most women are not able to
> defend themselves from predators who would take advantage of such an open-door
> policy.

Why change the topic to predators? But if we can somehow judge someone as a
predator do you think it is OK for them to attack boys and not girls? WTF?
Your issue is someone disagrees with you.

>> ...
>>>> All about YOU having control of
>>>> the world. Then you whine about others having the audacity to think THEY
>>>> should be able to think for themselves. The nerve!
>>>> 
>>>> Oh, and you are offended that some people are easily offended... which is
>>>> ironic in a way you show no understanding of. :)
>>> 
>>> I love it when people are easily offended.
>> 
>> Like when they are offended that THEY cannot insist what bathrooms OTHERS
>> use. Yeah, it is amazing how easily offended someone is.
> 
> Look down.  Are you a man?  If so, I don't care if you pull on a dress.
> You should not be allowed to go into the women's bathroom and shower areas
> (as has recently been dictated by the feds for homeless shelters).

So your view should supersede others based on you being offended by
completely non-harmful actions (not harmful in word or deed). Wow.

>> Keep in mind someone using a toilet does NO harm to you. It is not about you
>> or in any way harmful to you, in word or action. It does not suggest or
>> insinuate violence against you in any way, nor that you are not an equal.
> 
> Not me.  I'm a man.   I spell M - A - N
> 
>> But it still offends you.
> 
> It's a matter of public safety.

Peeing in a toilet is a matter of public safety in that people should not
pee in the street. Sure. But that is not what you are talking about. You
mentioned NO issue that involves safety. Nothing that leads to harm or
insult.

>> Meanwhile you whine about others being offended easily. Ah, the irony.
> 
> It's not a matter of being offended.

What issue about being offended does not use the reason (or excuse) of
safety? 

>>>> Ah, so you do not understand the issues involving police. Got it.
>>> 
>>> I understand that whites are killed by police at a higher rate
>>> than blacks.  Where's the WLM?  Oh, right, that would be racist.
>> 
>> If you want to pretend that being white in this country comes with as many
>> challenges as being black you are being absurd.
> 
> You have got to be kidding me.  Blacks are handed more than any other
> race from cradle to grave, yet most continue to choose ghetto failure
> over opportunity.  You can only throw money at a problem for so long
> before you have to finally admit that some people just flat out hate
> society and are never going to get the chip off their shoulder.

So you have no clue about race issues in the country. OK.

> If you are white, blacks hate you.

More bigoted nonsense from you.

> If you are not moslem, moslems hate you.

More bigoted nonsense from you.
 
> You might not believe me, but it's easy to prove:  Put yourself
> in a minority position and watch how long it takes before you
> are running for your life.

You assume I have not been in a minority situation. Odd.

>> But you cannot see past your
>> own nose... and want to control others.
> 
> There is currently a government-sanctioned war on whites.  If you don't
> see it, you are blind.

War on whites. Sigh. Are you a white supremist. You are offended by others
wanting equality. You want special rights. Boo hoo for you.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:51 +0000
  Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:18 -0700
    Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 18:32 +0000
      Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:43 -0700
        Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:13 +0000
          Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 12:29 -0700
            Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:53 +0000
              Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:07 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 20:33 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:41 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 21:01 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 14:14 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:01 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:12 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:43 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:50 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:26 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:57 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:41 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 18:56 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:16 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:23 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:40 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:46 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:10 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:29 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:44 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:45 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:49 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:00 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:15 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:42 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:50 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 17:58 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:12 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:54 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:06 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:25 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:41 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:55 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:13 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:29 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:34 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:59 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:09 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:14 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:27 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:32 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:47 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:56 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 23:51 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:00 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:32 -0700
                An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
                Re: An example Owl asked for 5 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:38 +0000
                Re: An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:59 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 15:04 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 00:00 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:03 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:33 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:52 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:01 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 02:49 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:06 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:27 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:24 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:21 -0600
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:51 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:23 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:04 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:56 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:03 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:00 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:19 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:32 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:25 -0700
                An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
                Re: An example Owl asked for 6 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:39 +0000
                Re: An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
                An example Owl asked for 4 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
                An example Owl asked for 3 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
                An example Owl asked for 2 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
                An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:29 -0700
                Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:33 +0000
                Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:40 -0700
                Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:45 +0000
                Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
                Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:07 +0000
                Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:09 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:30 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:38 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:28 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:33 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:44 -0700
              Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:19 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0700
          Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:16 -0400
            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:31 -0700
              Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:42 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 13:05 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:17 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 11:06 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:51 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:56 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:54 -0400
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:00 -0700

csiph-web