Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #466667 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-10 17:18 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-09-14 07:34 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 100 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 17:18 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 10:34 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-10 23:26 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 19:51 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-11 21:48 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 22:11 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-12 00:29 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 17:48 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 13:20 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-12 08:38 -0500
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-12 11:05 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 08:39 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 18:49 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-12 14:52 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-12 14:28 -0500
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 00:19 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-13 11:00 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 03:32 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 07:35 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 10:27 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 00:18 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-13 11:06 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-13 11:37 -0500
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 03:34 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-14 06:58 -0500
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-14 12:49 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 21:17 -0700
You're biased, like a used car salesman, not a scientist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-15 00:11 -0700
Re: You're biased, like a used car salesman, not a scientist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 00:50 -0700
Hillary is a racist FemiNazi; Trump is a disruptor. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-15 01:54 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 03:33 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 09:52 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 10:27 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 11:49 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 18:46 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-12 14:14 -0500
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-12 17:04 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 00:21 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-13 01:12 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 10:29 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-13 07:06 -0500
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-13 14:59 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-13 12:58 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 03:29 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-12 14:57 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 00:22 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-13 01:17 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-13 11:17 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-13 16:49 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-14 07:26 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-14 07:29 -0500
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-13 11:13 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-13 11:39 -0500
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 03:35 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 03:34 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 10:29 -0700
You're a used car salesman, not a scientist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-13 14:11 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-13 12:53 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 12:50 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 03:23 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-14 12:31 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-14 14:59 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-15 15:49 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 09:12 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 07:33 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 18:48 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-12 14:59 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 00:23 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-13 11:20 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 13:20 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 10:30 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-13 07:42 -0500
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 03:18 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-14 07:34 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 09:57 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 07:30 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-12 17:03 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-13 04:26 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-13 18:17 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-13 18:12 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 03:38 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-14 03:36 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 09:54 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-14 07:30 -0400
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-14 06:00 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 09:56 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-14 12:42 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 21:16 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 09:53 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 21:46 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 12:46 -0700
You end up robbing the poor. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-13 14:19 -0700
Re: You end up robbing the poor. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 21:47 -0700
If you order it, then _ you pay for it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-13 21:51 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-13 12:56 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 13:02 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 03:28 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-14 12:33 +0000
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 21:15 -0700
Re: OT: Assad has "given the order" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 07:34 -0700
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-14 12:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ASNmD.12465$um3.8217@fx32.iad> |
| In reply to | #467107 |
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 03:23:05 +0000, RonB wrote:
> On 2018-09-13, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 18:46:12 +0000, RonB wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-09-12, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> RonB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> As for Trump, he's just another sleazy politician who kisses the
>>>>>>> asses of those who yank his chain.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to hope that he is going to go down as mostly good with a
>>>>>> few errors along the way but if he is going to war in the Middle
>>>>>> East, it sounds to me like it's more of the same.
>>>>>
>>>>>What's mostly good about a man who runs around on his wives and uses
>>>>>the bankruptcy laws to enrich himself while harming small businesses?
>>>>>He sounds "mostly sleazy" to me.
>>>>
>>>> And there's stuff like this:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-climate-change-
>> golf-course-223436
>>>>
>>>> Really, it just goes on and on, with Trump.
>>>
>>> Man-made global warming is bullshit. Shifting tides, sinking land and
>>> coastal erosion has been with us for centuries. Lying libtard Ben
>>> Schreckinger of Politico knows this — but truth doesn't get in the way
>>> of his lying agenda.
>>>
>>> Nuff said.
>>
>> I know that I don't know when it comes to climate change, but I also
>> know that the science behind it, so far, is clearly not objective. They
>> seem to have asked hundreds of scientists their opinion and only kept
>> the testimonials of the Snits among them to state that 97%, or whatever
>> the number was, agree with the consensus that we're destroying the
>> environment.
>>
>> I DO believe that CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere is bad, but
>> mostly for our lungs. I'm not personally sure how much it does to
>> actually warm the world.
>
> It's what they always do when pushing their bullshit propaganda. They
> claim the "scientific consensus" is 100% is in their favor — which, of
> course it is, if you throw out all the opinions of those who disagree
> with you and declare them "non-scientists." It's group"think" ("think"
> in quotes because it's really just mass stupidity).
And no one can reasonably claim that the opinions of dissidents were not
deleted considering how the establishment is behaving in suppressing
conservative opinions in general. Just two days ago, the founder of the
#walkaway movement on Twitter was banned for thirty days on Facebook for
saying the following:
"I will be on Infowars in 15 minutes."
No opinion shared whatsoever. No hate, no racism, no sexism, nothing. If
that is enough to silence a person on a social medium which regularly
collaborates with the government against the right, you can imagine that
a scientific opinion which dismisses a leftist agenda will cause the
opinion to be erased from history and the scientist's career itself to be
destroyed.
People will say that I'm exaggerating, but I too was essentially turned
into a second-class citizen at my previous workplace the moment it was
revealed that I don't lean left. These people truly are vicious.
--
SilverSlimer
FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-14 14:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pnh1kj$tdl$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #467131 |
SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > And no one can reasonably claim that the opinions of dissidents were not > deleted considering how the establishment is behaving in suppressing The term "dissidents" really does not apply to science, nor should it apply. One scientist may disagree with another scientists hypothesis, but it is up to each scientist to defend his point of view with observations, correct deductions, and sound mathematics. Those scientists that might be called dissidents are mostly (not always, even conventional science can be wrong on occasion) those who push outlier observations, incorrect deductions, or no mathematical support. > conservative opinions in general. Just two days ago, the founder of the > #walkaway movement on Twitter was banned for thirty days on Facebook for > saying the following: > > "I will be on Infowars in 15 minutes." Irrelevant to a discussion of science. > No opinion shared whatsoever. No hate, no racism, no sexism, nothing. Not quite true. Infowars is well-known to float nasty views or unsupported conspiracty theories. > If > that is enough to silence a person on a social medium which regularly > collaborates with the government against the right, you can imagine that > a scientific opinion which dismisses a leftist agenda will cause the > opinion to be erased from history and the scientist's career itself to be > destroyed. Any scientist worth his/her salt won't give a rat's ass about "leftist vs rightist agendas". > People will say that I'm exaggerating, but I too was essentially turned > into a second-class citizen at my previous workplace the moment it was > revealed that I don't lean left. These people truly are vicious. Weird. Where I work, the vast majority of the people would be considered "right". But, rightfully, we do not discuss right-vs-left issues, since they really don't have a place in the work we do. -- You could live a better life, if you had a better mind and a better body.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-15 15:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <%R9nD.19885$mJ1.17068@fx24.iad> |
| In reply to | #467159 |
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:59:49 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> And no one can reasonably claim that the opinions of dissidents were >> not deleted considering how the establishment is behaving in >> suppressing > > The term "dissidents" really does not apply to science, nor should it > apply. > > One scientist may disagree with another scientists hypothesis, but it is > up to each scientist to defend his point of view with observations, > correct deductions, and sound mathematics. > > Those scientists that might be called dissidents are mostly (not always, > even conventional science can be wrong on occasion) those who push > outlier observations, incorrect deductions, or no mathematical support. > >> conservative opinions in general. Just two days ago, the founder of the >> #walkaway movement on Twitter was banned for thirty days on Facebook >> for saying the following: >> >> "I will be on Infowars in 15 minutes." > > Irrelevant to a discussion of science. > >> No opinion shared whatsoever. No hate, no racism, no sexism, nothing. > > Not quite true. Infowars is well-known to float nasty views or > unsupported conspiracty theories. Except that the man mentioned that he would _be_ on Infowars, not that he agrees or disagrees with whatever Alex Jones, David Knight, Owen Shroyer or Roger Stone says. In other words, he did not express any kind of view; he simply informed his supporters of his whereabouts. For that, he was banned. >> If that is enough to silence a person on a social medium which >> regularly collaborates with the government against the right, you can >> imagine that a scientific opinion which dismisses a leftist agenda will >> cause the opinion to be erased from history and the scientist's career >> itself to be destroyed. > > Any scientist worth his/her salt won't give a rat's ass about "leftist > vs rightist agendas". Agreed. However, the modal here shouldn't be "won't" as much as it should be "should." If they are true scientists, their political beliefs will be discarded from any results and they routinely aren't. >> People will say that I'm exaggerating, but I too was essentially turned >> into a second-class citizen at my previous workplace the moment it was >> revealed that I don't lean left. These people truly are vicious. > > Weird. Where I work, the vast majority of the people would be > considered "right". > > But, rightfully, we do not discuss right-vs-left issues, since they > really don't have a place in the work we do. Agreed, but they also shouldn't have a place at Google, Apple and the other companies which punish employees from the right. Even Jack Dorsey of Twitter had to admit that the conservatives in his workplace are afraid of speaking because of the consequences of "wrongthink." I, identifying myself as a conservative (even though I'm truly centrist), was also treated _very_ differently in the workplace. It was so bad that I had to leave. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-15 09:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g04pasFbhkU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #467234 |
On 9/15/18 8:49 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:59:49 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> And no one can reasonably claim that the opinions of dissidents were >>> not deleted considering how the establishment is behaving in >>> suppressing >> >> The term "dissidents" really does not apply to science, nor should it >> apply. >> >> One scientist may disagree with another scientists hypothesis, but it is >> up to each scientist to defend his point of view with observations, >> correct deductions, and sound mathematics. >> >> Those scientists that might be called dissidents are mostly (not always, >> even conventional science can be wrong on occasion) those who push >> outlier observations, incorrect deductions, or no mathematical support. >> >>> conservative opinions in general. Just two days ago, the founder of the >>> #walkaway movement on Twitter was banned for thirty days on Facebook >>> for saying the following: >>> >>> "I will be on Infowars in 15 minutes." >> >> Irrelevant to a discussion of science. >> >>> No opinion shared whatsoever. No hate, no racism, no sexism, nothing. >> >> Not quite true. Infowars is well-known to float nasty views or >> unsupported conspiracty theories. > > Except that the man mentioned that he would _be_ on Infowars, not that he > agrees or disagrees with whatever Alex Jones, David Knight, Owen Shroyer > or Roger Stone says. In other words, he did not express any kind of view; > he simply informed his supporters of his whereabouts. For that, he was > banned. > >>> If that is enough to silence a person on a social medium which >>> regularly collaborates with the government against the right, you can >>> imagine that a scientific opinion which dismisses a leftist agenda will >>> cause the opinion to be erased from history and the scientist's career >>> itself to be destroyed. >> >> Any scientist worth his/her salt won't give a rat's ass about "leftist >> vs rightist agendas". > > Agreed. However, the modal here shouldn't be "won't" as much as it should > be "should." If they are true scientists, their political beliefs will be > discarded from any results and they routinely aren't. > >>> People will say that I'm exaggerating, but I too was essentially turned >>> into a second-class citizen at my previous workplace the moment it was >>> revealed that I don't lean left. These people truly are vicious. >> >> Weird. Where I work, the vast majority of the people would be >> considered "right". >> >> But, rightfully, we do not discuss right-vs-left issues, since they >> really don't have a place in the work we do. > > Agreed, but they also shouldn't have a place at Google, Apple and the > other companies which punish employees from the right. Even Jack Dorsey > of Twitter had to admit that the conservatives in his workplace are > afraid of speaking because of the consequences of "wrongthink." > > I, identifying myself as a conservative (even though I'm truly centrist), > was also treated _very_ differently in the workplace. It was so bad that > I had to leave. > By "wrongthink" do you mean open bigotry? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-14 07:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g01v66FdbhsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #467107 |
On 9/13/18 8:23 PM, RonB wrote:
> On 2018-09-13, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 18:46:12 +0000, RonB wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-09-12, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> RonB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> As for Trump, he's just another sleazy politician who kisses the
>>>>>>> asses of those who yank his chain.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to hope that he is going to go down as mostly good with a
>>>>>> few errors along the way but if he is going to war in the Middle
>>>>>> East, it sounds to me like it's more of the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's mostly good about a man who runs around on his wives and uses
>>>>> the bankruptcy laws to enrich himself while harming small businesses?
>>>>> He sounds "mostly sleazy" to me.
>>>>
>>>> And there's stuff like this:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-climate-change-
>> golf-course-223436
>>>>
>>>> Really, it just goes on and on, with Trump.
>>>
>>> Man-made global warming is bullshit. Shifting tides, sinking land and
>>> coastal erosion has been with us for centuries. Lying libtard Ben
>>> Schreckinger of Politico knows this — but truth doesn't get in the way
>>> of his lying agenda.
>>>
>>> Nuff said.
>>
>> I know that I don't know when it comes to climate change, but I also know
>> that the science behind it, so far, is clearly not objective. They seem
>> to have asked hundreds of scientists their opinion and only kept the
>> testimonials of the Snits among them to state that 97%, or whatever the
>> number was, agree with the consensus that we're destroying the
>> environment.
>>
>> I DO believe that CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere is bad, but mostly
>> for our lungs. I'm not personally sure how much it does to actually warm
>> the world.
>
> It's what they always do when pushing their bullshit propaganda. They claim
> the "scientific consensus" is 100% is in their favor — which, of course it
> is, if you throw out all the opinions of those who disagree with you and
> declare them "non-scientists." It's group"think" ("think" in quotes because
> it's really just mass stupidity).
>
Nobody is throwing out such opinions of relevant scientists. There are
just very few if any relevant scientists who deny the evidence. If you
can find a small number good for you, I guess, you are able to hand-pick
extreme outliers to back your denial.
If you want to learn about science go to ANY scientific page where they
discuss the topic. Stop being willfully ignorant.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 18:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pnbn1f$oj9$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #466954 |
On 2018-09-12, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > RonB wrote: > >>>> As for Trump, he's just another sleazy politician who kisses the asses >>>> of those who yank his chain. >>> >>> I'd like to hope that he is going to go down as mostly good with a few >>> errors along the way but if he is going to war in the Middle East, it >>> sounds to me like it's more of the same. >> >>What's mostly good about a man who runs around on his wives and uses the >>bankruptcy laws to enrich himself while harming small businesses? He sounds >>"mostly sleazy" to me. > > And there's stuff like this: > > https://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-climate-change-golf-course-223436 > > Really, it just goes on and on, with Trump. If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere — not just on select beaches. I'll have to explain to these "armchair" scientists how water flow works some day. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 14:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pnbort$b1e$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #466996 |
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2018-09-12, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> RonB wrote: >> >>>>> As for Trump, he's just another sleazy politician who kisses the asses >>>>> of those who yank his chain. >>>> >>>> I'd like to hope that he is going to go down as mostly good with a few >>>> errors along the way but if he is going to war in the Middle East, it >>>> sounds to me like it's more of the same. >>> >>>What's mostly good about a man who runs around on his wives and uses the >>>bankruptcy laws to enrich himself while harming small businesses? He sounds >>>"mostly sleazy" to me. >> >> And there's stuff like this: >> >> https://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-climate-change-golf-course-223436 >> >> Really, it just goes on and on, with Trump. > > If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere — not just on select > beaches. I'll have to explain to these "armchair" scientists how water flow > works some day. Yeah, once you learn about it. For example, the fast flow of the Gulf Stream means that, if you could walk on water, you would actually *descend* a few feet. Don't fall asleep in that armchair. -- You will inherit millions of dollars.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-13 00:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pncame$641$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #467005 |
On 2018-09-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 2018-09-12, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> RonB wrote: >>> >>>>>> As for Trump, he's just another sleazy politician who kisses the asses >>>>>> of those who yank his chain. >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to hope that he is going to go down as mostly good with a few >>>>> errors along the way but if he is going to war in the Middle East, it >>>>> sounds to me like it's more of the same. >>>> >>>>What's mostly good about a man who runs around on his wives and uses the >>>>bankruptcy laws to enrich himself while harming small businesses? He sounds >>>>"mostly sleazy" to me. >>> >>> And there's stuff like this: >>> >>> https://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-climate-change-golf-course-223436 >>> >>> Really, it just goes on and on, with Trump. >> >> If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere — not just on select >> beaches. I'll have to explain to these "armchair" scientists how water flow >> works some day. > > Yeah, once you learn about it. For example, the fast flow of the Gulf > Stream means that, if you could walk on water, you would actually *descend* > a few feet. > > Don't fall asleep in that armchair. If global warming was causing water to rise, it would rise WORLDWIDE. But let facts get in the way of the bullshit agenda. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-13 11:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pne0d9$itb$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #467028 |
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2018-09-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>> If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere — not just on select >>> beaches. I'll have to explain to these "armchair" scientists how water flow >>> works some day. >> >> Yeah, once you learn about it. For example, the fast flow of the Gulf >> Stream means that, if you could walk on water, you would actually *descend* >> a few feet. >> >> Don't fall asleep in that armchair. > > If global warming was causing water to rise, it would rise WORLDWIDE. But > let facts get in the way of the bullshit agenda. Dude, that was just one fact, and it is true. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/globalsl.html Most people are surprised to learn that, just as the surface of the Earth is not flat, the surface of the ocean is not flat, and that the surface of the sea changes at different rates around the globe. For instance, the absolute water level height is higher along the West Coast of the United States than the East Coast. -- The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and a seal. -- Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-13 13:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fvvv3iFr7hU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #467055 |
On 9/13/18 8:20 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 2018-09-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>> >>>> If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere — not just on select >>>> beaches. I'll have to explain to these "armchair" scientists how water flow >>>> works some day. >>> >>> Yeah, once you learn about it. For example, the fast flow of the Gulf >>> Stream means that, if you could walk on water, you would actually *descend* >>> a few feet. >>> >>> Don't fall asleep in that armchair. >> >> If global warming was causing water to rise, it would rise WORLDWIDE. But >> let facts get in the way of the bullshit agenda. > > Dude, that was just one fact, and it is true. > > https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/globalsl.html > > Most people are surprised to learn that, just as the surface of the Earth > is not flat, the surface of the ocean is not flat, and that the surface > of the sea changes at different rates around the globe. For instance, the > absolute water level height is higher along the West Coast of the United > States than the East Coast. > But... but... the water in my pool looks flat! LOL! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-13 10:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fvvl5dFtbl8U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #467028 |
On 9/12/18 5:23 PM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-09-12, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On 2018-09-12, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> RonB wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> As for Trump, he's just another sleazy politician who kisses the asses >>>>>>> of those who yank his chain. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to hope that he is going to go down as mostly good with a few >>>>>> errors along the way but if he is going to war in the Middle East, it >>>>>> sounds to me like it's more of the same. >>>>> >>>>> What's mostly good about a man who runs around on his wives and uses the >>>>> bankruptcy laws to enrich himself while harming small businesses? He sounds >>>>> "mostly sleazy" to me. >>>> >>>> And there's stuff like this: >>>> >>>> https://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-climate-change-golf-course-223436 >>>> >>>> Really, it just goes on and on, with Trump. >>> >>> If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere — not just on select >>> beaches. I'll have to explain to these "armchair" scientists how water flow >>> works some day. >> >> Yeah, once you learn about it. For example, the fast flow of the Gulf >> Stream means that, if you could walk on water, you would actually *descend* >> a few feet. >> >> Don't fall asleep in that armchair. > > If global warming was causing water to rise, it would rise WORLDWIDE. But > let facts get in the way of the bullshit agenda. > As you have been shown it is rising worldwide. You deny it to push your agenda. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-13 07:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <98mkpdh63553dujru34n9javvaqjbfhnv1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #467005 |
Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >Yeah, once you learn about it. For example, the fast flow of the Gulf >Stream means that, if you could walk on water, you would actually *descend* >a few feet. > >Don't fall asleep in that armchair. It's difficult to fall asleep, when foaming at the mouth. "Lying bullshit! Lying bullshit!" Don't all those scientists realize that they are *easily* proven wrong? If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere! Oh, and we get "global warming" every night! (Hint: It's got something to do with the Sun.) Err... But what about the other side of the planet, don't they have days, while we have nights, and Summers, when we have Winters? And maybe the Oceans are quite dynamic, not flat? Huh! Right-wing responses will be deleted, unread. -- "By definition, the busiest site in the world is MSN, because it's the default home page for most people with Internet explorer as their browser." - Erik Funkenbusch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-14 03:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pnf9a4$5ck$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #467037 |
On 2018-09-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >>Yeah, once you learn about it. For example, the fast flow of the Gulf >>Stream means that, if you could walk on water, you would actually *descend* >>a few feet. >> >>Don't fall asleep in that armchair. > > It's difficult to fall asleep, when foaming at the mouth. "Lying > bullshit! Lying bullshit!" > > Don't all those scientists realize that they are *easily* proven > wrong? If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere! > > Oh, and we get "global warming" every night! (Hint: It's got > something to do with the Sun.) > > Err... But what about the other side of the planet, don't they have > days, while we have nights, and Summers, when we have Winters? And > maybe the Oceans are quite dynamic, not flat? > > Huh! > > Right-wing responses will be deleted, unread. Man made global warming bullshit doesn't deserve the effort to rebut it. It's lying bullshit. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-14 07:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <png7ic$i2h$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #467106 |
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2018-09-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >>>Yeah, once you learn about it. For example, the fast flow of the Gulf >>>Stream means that, if you could walk on water, you would actually *descend* >>>a few feet. >>> >>>Don't fall asleep in that armchair. >> >> It's difficult to fall asleep, when foaming at the mouth. "Lying >> bullshit! Lying bullshit!" >> >> Don't all those scientists realize that they are *easily* proven >> wrong? If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere! >> >> Oh, and we get "global warming" every night! (Hint: It's got >> something to do with the Sun.) >> >> Err... But what about the other side of the planet, don't they have >> days, while we have nights, and Summers, when we have Winters? And >> maybe the Oceans are quite dynamic, not flat? >> >> Huh! >> >> Right-wing responses will be deleted, unread. > > Man made global warming bullshit doesn't deserve the effort to rebut it. > It's lying bullshit. Yeah, that's why the scientific consensus that man's activities are contributing to the undeniable global warming trend is 97% or so. They're all liars. Here's a list of "lying bullshit organizations with an agenda": https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ -- Be careful! UGLY strikes 9 out of 10!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-14 09:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g027jcFf007U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #467127 |
On 9/14/18 4:34 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 2018-09-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah, once you learn about it. For example, the fast flow of the Gulf >>>> Stream means that, if you could walk on water, you would actually *descend* >>>> a few feet. >>>> >>>> Don't fall asleep in that armchair. >>> >>> It's difficult to fall asleep, when foaming at the mouth. "Lying >>> bullshit! Lying bullshit!" >>> >>> Don't all those scientists realize that they are *easily* proven >>> wrong? If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere! >>> >>> Oh, and we get "global warming" every night! (Hint: It's got >>> something to do with the Sun.) >>> >>> Err... But what about the other side of the planet, don't they have >>> days, while we have nights, and Summers, when we have Winters? And >>> maybe the Oceans are quite dynamic, not flat? >>> >>> Huh! >>> >>> Right-wing responses will be deleted, unread. >> >> Man made global warming bullshit doesn't deserve the effort to rebut it. >> It's lying bullshit. > > Yeah, that's why the scientific consensus that man's activities are > contributing to the undeniable global warming trend is 97% or so. They're > all liars. The 97% figure was for a number of years ago, and it was for PAPERS, not people. If you look at papers now it is over 99%, and for relevant scientists it is around that 97% figure. > Here's a list of "lying bullshit organizations with an agenda": > > https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-14 07:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g01uvpFdagnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #467106 |
On 9/13/18 8:18 PM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-09-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >>> Yeah, once you learn about it. For example, the fast flow of the Gulf >>> Stream means that, if you could walk on water, you would actually *descend* >>> a few feet. >>> >>> Don't fall asleep in that armchair. >> >> It's difficult to fall asleep, when foaming at the mouth. "Lying >> bullshit! Lying bullshit!" >> >> Don't all those scientists realize that they are *easily* proven >> wrong? If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere! >> >> Oh, and we get "global warming" every night! (Hint: It's got >> something to do with the Sun.) >> >> Err... But what about the other side of the planet, don't they have >> days, while we have nights, and Summers, when we have Winters? And >> maybe the Oceans are quite dynamic, not flat? >> >> Huh! >> >> Right-wing responses will be deleted, unread. > > Man made global warming bullshit doesn't deserve the effort to rebut it. > It's lying bullshit. > By all means point to the scientific site which speaks of it and denounces it. Or just keep rejecting science. But let us not pretend that if you cannot do the first you are not doing the second. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 17:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fvtnqqFhcd2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #466996 |
On 9/12/18 11:48 AM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-09-12, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> RonB wrote: >> >>>>> As for Trump, he's just another sleazy politician who kisses the asses >>>>> of those who yank his chain. >>>> >>>> I'd like to hope that he is going to go down as mostly good with a few >>>> errors along the way but if he is going to war in the Middle East, it >>>> sounds to me like it's more of the same. >>> >>> What's mostly good about a man who runs around on his wives and uses the >>> bankruptcy laws to enrich himself while harming small businesses? He sounds >>> "mostly sleazy" to me. >> >> And there's stuff like this: >> >> https://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-climate-change-golf-course-223436 >> >> Really, it just goes on and on, with Trump. > > If the ocean was rising, It is. > it would be rising everywhere — not just on select > beaches. Local and global sea levels are not the same. > I'll have to explain to these "armchair" scientists how water flow > works some day. Here is a decent source if you want to learn: <https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevel.html> ----- In 2014, global sea level was 2.6 inches above the 1993 average—the highest annual average in the satellite record (1993-present). Sea level continues to rise at a rate of about one-eighth of an inch per year. ... Sea level rise at specific locations may be more or less than the global average due to local factors such as land subsidence from natural processes and withdrawal of groundwater and fossil fuels, changes in regional ocean currents, and whether the land is still rebounding from the compressive weight of Ice Age glaciers. ----- -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-13 04:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6f98688e-5e02-4bf5-be05-770a7a6379f1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466996 |
RonB wrote: > If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere — not just on select > beaches. I'll have to explain to these "armchair" scientists how water flow > works some day. It works that way because you’re assuming that the land datum is constant, but it isn’t. In Greenland for example, that as global warming has melted their glaciers, measures of absolute land elevation have gone up. The reason why is because the glaciers’ weight pressing down on the land had compressed the local land elevations, but with that mass now being reduced, the land has uncompressed, causing it to rebound, rising up relative to its prior elevation reference datum. This gives the appearance that locally, the sea level is going down...but it’s not. The land is rising locally because of glacial melt. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-13 18:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9h000q4qg.j3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #467034 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > RonB wrote: >> If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere — not just on select >> beaches. I'll have to explain to these "armchair" scientists how water flow >> works some day. > > It works that way because you’re assuming that the land datum is constant, but it isn’t. > > In Greenland for example, that as global warming has melted their glaciers, measures > of absolute land elevation have gone up. The reason why is because the glaciers’ > weight pressing down on the land had compressed the local land elevations, but with that > mass now being reduced, the land has uncompressed, causing it to rebound, rising up > relative to its prior elevation reference datum. > > This gives the appearance that locally, the sea level is going down...but it’s not. > The land is rising locally because of glacial melt. > > -hh Are they taking into account the corresponding sinking of the ocean floor due to the added weight of the new water? :) (See, I can pull "science" out of my ass too).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-13 18:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <44829813-9f71-48cd-945e-ea2401108d4b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467072 |
owl wrote: > -hh wrote: >> RonB wrote: >>> If the ocean was rising, it would be rising everywhere — not just on select >>> beaches. I'll have to explain to these "armchair" scientists how water flow >>> works some day. >> >> It works that way because you’re assuming that the land datum is constant, but it isn’t. >> >> In Greenland for example, that as global warming has melted their glaciers, measures >> of absolute land elevation have gone up. The reason why is because the glaciers’ >> weight pressing down on the land had compressed the local land elevations, but with that >> mass now being reduced, the land has uncompressed, causing it to rebound, rising up >> relative to its prior elevation reference datum. >> >> This gives the appearance that locally, the sea level is going down...but it’s not. >> The land is rising locally because of glacial melt. > > Are they taking into account the corresponding sinking of the ocean > floor due to the added weight of the new water? :) (See, I can pull > "science" out of my ass too). No, you actually did make a correct observation: there should be a corresponding compression effect within the oceans. The trick is if it is significant enough to capture the data on, since the rising of Greenland in its postglacial rebound was found only relatively recently despite it being a pretty big magnitude change, but that’s because it is highly localized, whereas it’s ice melt going into the oceans gets dispersed worldwide, so the compression is dispersed too. Plus there’s also inertial lag. TLDR: yes, it has to be exist, but it may be still too small to effectively measure. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web