Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #452860 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 703 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Slaughtering concert goers. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Snit's family hates him" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 05:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 12:06 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 15:49 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 20:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit took things out of COLA and called the cops <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 13:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 16:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 19:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 21:38 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 08:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 22:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 01:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-05-31 19:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-31 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 03:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 03:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 05:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 08:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 11:59 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Slaughtering concert goers. ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 14:07 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 18:50 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:00 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:29 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:47 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:18 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 09:14 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:48 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:28 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:14 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 00:18 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 00:18 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:20 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:03 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:26 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:54 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-02 08:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 12:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 04:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 04:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:12 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 23:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:14 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 20:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:19 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 21:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit wants to repeal the 2A <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 10:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:35 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:39 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:30 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:28 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:27 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:38 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:53 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:54 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:33 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:11 -0700
The Supreme Court got it wrong. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:51 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 07:47 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:23 -0700
The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 08:45 -0700
Re: The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:05 -0700
Re: The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:17 -0700
Re: The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:36 -0700
Re: The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:42 -0700
Re: The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:08 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:50 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:59 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:25 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:28 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:08 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 23:24 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:12 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:48 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:00 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:32 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:49 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:45 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:17 -0700
Permission to breath ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:13 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:53 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 21:30 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 23:33 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:42 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:57 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 06:31 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:08 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:58 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Clarity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-03 08:52 -0700
Re: Clarity. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 09:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 13:33 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:46 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:53 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 22:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 23:19 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 09:10 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 00:31 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:31 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:12 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:26 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:10 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 22:19 -0500
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 00:24 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 05:43 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 10:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 10:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 07:17 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 16:07 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:30 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 01:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:34 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:50 -0700
"Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 19:02 -0700
Re: "Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 19:14 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 19:17 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:06 -0700
Depressed Losers, slaughtering consert goers, is "natural" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 03:52 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 02:18 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 01:41 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:25 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:45 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:16 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 10:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 11:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 19:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 00:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:30 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 17:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 15:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-04 23:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:51 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:51 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 04:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:27 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 17:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 19:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 08:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:32 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:17 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 05:15 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:07 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 21:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 19:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 06:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 06:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:28 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:19 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:23 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 22:09 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:44 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-04 02:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 20:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:00 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:39 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 23:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 05:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 06:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 15:20 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-05 22:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 20:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:29 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 22:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:16 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 05:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:30 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 20:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:13 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:41 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 02:29 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 03:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:50 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:38 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 12:55 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 11:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-05 14:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 12:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 14:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:46 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:55 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-09 02:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 23:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 06:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 07:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:50 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 09:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 10:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-10 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 12:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 13:42 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 14:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 17:31 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 23:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 00:21 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 21:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 04:59 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 22:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 05:52 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-06-10 06:07 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 00:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 08:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 16:04 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 09:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 09:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 11:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 05:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 05:52 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-10 01:39 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 01:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-10 15:46 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 15:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Truth Avoidance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Truth Avoidance. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 21:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 18:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 17:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-07 05:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 22:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 11:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 23:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 09:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:17 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 22:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:36 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 06:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:29 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 11:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit wants to repeal the 2A <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 11:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 14:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:12 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:59 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 20:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:58 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500
Page 29 of 36 — ← Prev page 1 … 27 28 [29] 30 31 … 36 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 08:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2fce8686-b498-4c76-a8ee-7d71381277a7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454668 |
On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 2:36:24 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: > > On 2018-06-10, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> > >> I would say your bot broke there but that is as coherent as you often are. > >> :) > > > > Fair enough ;) > >> > >> > > > > > > It is a bit of a masterpiece. Said Snit of his over-medicated "masterpiece". > ——- > Given how regularly it is clear that The 'The Moron' Thing's signature is > some twist of a remark Jonas Eklundh shared which had been a thrashing on > The 'The Moron' Thing for something he did which was > ill-considered/wrong/etc... its clearly a repeated sign of The 'The Moron' > Thing's lingering distress for having been so frequently defeated. > ——- Do you ever do anything that's actually constructive or useful? Ever?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 16:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fo50h2F5iihU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454678 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 2:36:24 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>> On 2018-06-10, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I would say your bot broke there but that is as coherent as you often are. >>>> :) >>> >>> Fair enough ;) >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> It is a bit of a masterpiece. > > Said Snit of his over-medicated "masterpiece". I am not flattered by your dedication of your work to me. > >> ——- >> Given how regularly it is clear that The 'The Moron' Thing's signature is >> some twist of a remark Jonas Eklundh shared which had been a thrashing on >> The 'The Moron' Thing for something he did which was >> ill-considered/wrong/etc... its clearly a repeated sign of The 'The Moron' >> Thing's lingering distress for having been so frequently defeated. >> ——- > > Do you ever do anything that's actually constructive or useful? Ever? > > > Everything I say is more useful than your masterpiece. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 09:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <533470f6-d2c9-4e86-95bf-cf7a0ae96aec@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454682 |
On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 10:04:53 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 2:36:24 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: > >>> On 2018-06-10, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I would say your bot broke there but that is as coherent as you often are. > >>>> :) > >>> > >>> Fair enough ;) > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> It is a bit of a masterpiece. > > > > Said Snit of his over-medicated "masterpiece". > > I am not flattered by your dedication of your work to me. Said the loon who knows he can't prove his repeated delusion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 09:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fo52dhF5ujmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454685 |
On 6/10/18 9:22 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 10:04:53 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 2:36:24 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2018-06-10, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I would say your bot broke there but that is as coherent as you often are. >>>>>> :) >>>>> >>>>> Fair enough ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> It is a bit of a masterpiece. >>> >>> Said Snit of his over-medicated "masterpiece". >> >> I am not flattered by your dedication of your work to me. > > Said the loon who knows he can't prove his repeated delusion. Repeated or not, I am STILL not flattered by your dedication to me. But let us talk about tech instead. Or not talk at all. Your games are not gonna keep my interest like they used to. You are just too predictable... even with my noting how you would whine about me "running" when I stopped playing you could not stop yourself... though you were careful to not use that word. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 09:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1984af0e-ef09-400f-ac7a-f18615550ce2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454686 |
On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 10:37:08 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/10/18 9:22 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 10:04:53 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 2:36:24 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: > >>>>> On 2018-06-10, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I would say your bot broke there but that is as coherent as you often are. > >>>>>> :) > >>>>> > >>>>> Fair enough ;) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> It is a bit of a masterpiece. > >>> > >>> Said Snit of his over-medicated "masterpiece". > >> > >> I am not flattered by your dedication of your work to me. > > > > Said the loon who knows he can't prove his repeated delusion. > > Repeated ... never proven. > But let us talk about tech instead. Or not talk at all. Your games are > not gonna keep my interest like they used to. You just said this crap as you pretended to bin me within the last day or so. Get a grip, Snit. You've also repeated how you want to talk tech and then you don't. No one falls for it anymore, they haven't for *years*.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 11:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fo5876F72i7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454689 |
On 6/10/18 9:43 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 10:37:08 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/10/18 9:22 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 10:04:53 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 2:36:24 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-06-10, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would say your bot broke there but that is as coherent as you often are. >>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fair enough ;) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It is a bit of a masterpiece. >>>>> >>>>> Said Snit of his over-medicated "masterpiece". >>>> >>>> I am not flattered by your dedication of your work to me. >>> >>> Said the loon who knows he can't prove his repeated delusion. >> >> Repeated > > ... never proven. > >> But let us talk about tech instead. Or not talk at all. Your games are >> not gonna keep my interest like they used to. > > You just said this crap as you pretended to bin me within the last day or > so. Get a grip, Snit. You've also repeated how you want to talk tech and > then you don't. No one falls for it anymore, they haven't for *years*. > I never said I was going to KF you. I noted I was going to ignore you because you were in your snip snip tantrum mode and you would claim I was "running". You did not use that word but I was, of course, right. You are right now containing yourself a bit better... though slipping. So, tech. Why not talk about that? How about describing how your flood bot picks posts to respond to? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 11:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7115a77a-8746-4166-ae51-02b8810d2906@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454685 |
On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 9:22:47 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 10:04:53 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 2:36:24 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: > > >>> On 2018-06-10, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> I would say your bot broke there but that is as coherent as you often are. > > >>>> :) > > >>> > > >>> Fair enough ;) > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> It is a bit of a masterpiece. > > > > > > Said Snit of his over-medicated "masterpiece". > > > > I am not flattered by your dedication of your work to me. > > Said the loon who knows he can't prove his repeated delusion. Jonas Eklundh reported him years ago. As expected, it did squat to attenuate the dunce. Flooder Carroll has toned down the hundreds of self-serving, BS attacks he used to write but he's certainly unchanged in the morality department. He simple uses sock puppets more now to spawn those posts. I'm not fuming, in fact I am in stitches because Flooder Carroll's nonsense is so transparent. He actively didn't speak of all the tasks that he would later mock... and we all know why, Flooder Carroll is too stupid to see why. At least he has other trolls to back him ;) Time to blame Flooder Carroll! Jonas Eklundh owns Flooder Carroll in every way possible. What is the group coming to when a Flooder Carroll flood post fails to get any traction? And you _do_ realize that it isn't impossible for Flooder Carroll to be doing this, or paying others to do so. It was Flooder Carroll who forged me (and Jonas Eklundh) and did not even try to hide it. -- E-commerce Simplified! http://www.5z8.info/boobs_j0v3qo_dont-just-drizzle http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM https://youtu.be/dNhvVfD4zu4 Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 05:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454640 |
On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: >> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history >>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982 >>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate >>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown >>>>>>>>>>> in 2008. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. >>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem >>>>>>>> to think it means. Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a >>>>>>>> case of judicial activism. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the >>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as >>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second >>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch >>>>>> >>>>>> Heller didn't do that. >>>>> >>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. >>>>> >>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. >>>>>> >>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second >>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. >>>>> >>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure >>>>> as hell should not be writing laws. >>>> >>>> >>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? >>>> >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law >>>> >>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the >>> words used... sorta my point. >> >> Nice evasion. >> >> You wrote: >> >> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws." >> >> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? >> >> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common >> law? >> >> Or...? >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc >> > The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the > law. So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to teach you anything about it. "Fair enough." -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 05:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fo3sk8FtabgU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454652 |
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: >>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history >>>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982 >>>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate >>>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown >>>>>>>>>>>> in 2008. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. >>>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem >>>>>>>>> to think it means. Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a >>>>>>>>> case of judicial activism. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the >>>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as >>>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second >>>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Heller didn't do that. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second >>>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. >>>>>> >>>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure >>>>>> as hell should not be writing laws. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law >>>>> >>>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the >>>> words used... sorta my point. >>> >>> Nice evasion. >>> >>> You wrote: >>> >>> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws." >>> >>> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? >>> >>> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common >>> law? >>> >>> Or...? >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc >>> >> The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the >> law. > > > So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to > teach you anything about it. > > "Fair enough." > > Do you think common law excuses the courts for altering the meaning of language?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 23:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35866a3df3162a0e993d03@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #454652 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says... > > On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: > >> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> > >>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: > >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history > >>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982 > >>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate > >>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown > >>>>>>>>>>> in 2008. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. > >>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem > >>>>>>>> to think it means. Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a > >>>>>>>> case of judicial activism. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the > >>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as > >>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second > >>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Heller didn't do that. > >>>>> > >>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. > >>>>> > >>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second > >>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. > >>>>> > >>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure > >>>>> as hell should not be writing laws. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law > >>>> > >>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the > >>> words used... sorta my point. > >> > >> Nice evasion. > >> > >> You wrote: > >> > >> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws." > >> > >> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? > >> > >> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common > >> law? > >> > >> Or...? > >> > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc > >> > > The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the > > law. > > > So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to > teach you anything about it. > > "Fair enough." I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a damned thing, because they already know it all. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fo4684FhreU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454658 |
Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net>, > vallor@cultnix.org says... > > >> >> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown >>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2008. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. >>>>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem >>>>>>>>>> to think it means. Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a >>>>>>>>>> case of judicial activism. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the >>>>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as >>>>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second >>>>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Heller didn't do that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second >>>>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure >>>>>>> as hell should not be writing laws. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law >>>>>> >>>>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the >>>>> words used... sorta my point. >>>> >>>> Nice evasion. >>>> >>>> You wrote: >>>> >>>> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws." >>>> >>>> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? >>>> >>>> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common >>>> law? >>>> >>>> Or...? >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc >>>> >>> The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the >>> law. >> >> >> So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to >> teach you anything about it. >> >> "Fair enough." > > I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a > damned thing, because they already know it all. > That is far too true. What have you learned?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 11:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbghpb.9qe.19.10@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454658 |
On 2018-06-09 11:51 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net>, > vallor@cultnix.org says... > > >> >> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown >>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2008. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. >>>>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem >>>>>>>>>> to think it means. Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a >>>>>>>>>> case of judicial activism. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the >>>>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as >>>>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second >>>>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Heller didn't do that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second >>>>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure >>>>>>> as hell should not be writing laws. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law >>>>>> >>>>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the >>>>> words used... sorta my point. >>>> >>>> Nice evasion. >>>> >>>> You wrote: >>>> >>>> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws." >>>> >>>> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? >>>> >>>> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common >>>> law? >>>> >>>> Or...? >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc >>>> >>> The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the >>> law. >> >> >> So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to >> teach you anything about it. >> >> "Fair enough." > > I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a > damned thing, because they already know it all. > and the biggest know it all is pissed because he has no one to teach , no one to show off his super intelligence to but the people realize fast he don't know shit and he lies about it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 12:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35871c6372dd70b8993d1e@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #454705 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bbghpb.9qe.19.10@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-06-09 11:51 PM, Checkmate wrote: > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net>, > > vallor@cultnix.org says... > > > > > >> > >> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> > >>> On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: > >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: > >>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2008. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. > >>>>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem > >>>>>>>>>> to think it means. Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a > >>>>>>>>>> case of judicial activism. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the > >>>>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as > >>>>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second > >>>>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Heller didn't do that. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second > >>>>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure > >>>>>>> as hell should not be writing laws. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law > >>>>>> > >>>>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the > >>>>> words used... sorta my point. > >>>> > >>>> Nice evasion. > >>>> > >>>> You wrote: > >>>> > >>>> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws." > >>>> > >>>> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? > >>>> > >>>> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common > >>>> law? > >>>> > >>>> Or...? > >>>> > >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc > >>>> > >>> The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the > >>> law. > >> > >> > >> So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to > >> teach you anything about it. > >> > >> "Fair enough." > > > > I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a > > damned thing, because they already know it all. > > > and the biggest know it all is pissed because he has no one to teach , > no one to show off his super intelligence to but the people realize fast > he don't know shit and he lies about it Try to control your jealousy, just because you were born a dummy. It's not your fault. Work on not saying stupid shit so often, and maybe you can fool some of the people. Nearly everyone in this group is smarter than you, but you have to play the cards life dealt you. Compare yourself to Rachael, for instance. She's got more mental issues than you, but she can compose long and mostly coherent sentences, even though they tend to ramble all over the place. What gives away your stupidity, is the lame little immature babble-bits you post, that clearly indicate an inability to articulate anything of substance, along with your rudimentary spelling and grammar skills, and obvious lack of even a high school education. It all comes out when someone (like me) gets you rattled. You're always going to come up short in a battle of wits, because you have none. You're probably better off playing in the support groups with the other mentally crippled individuals. Perhaps some of them could even help you. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 12:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbgk1d.ru6.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454713 |
On 2018-06-10 12:31 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bbghpb.9qe.19.10@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-06-09 11:51 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net>, >>> vallor@cultnix.org says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2008. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. >>>>>>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem >>>>>>>>>>>> to think it means. Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a >>>>>>>>>>>> case of judicial activism. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the >>>>>>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as >>>>>>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second >>>>>>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Heller didn't do that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second >>>>>>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure >>>>>>>>> as hell should not be writing laws. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the >>>>>>> words used... sorta my point. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nice evasion. >>>>>> >>>>>> You wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws." >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? >>>>>> >>>>>> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common >>>>>> law? >>>>>> >>>>>> Or...? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc >>>>>> >>>>> The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the >>>>> law. >>>> >>>> >>>> So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to >>>> teach you anything about it. >>>> >>>> "Fair enough." >>> >>> I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a >>> damned thing, because they already know it all. >>> >> and the biggest know it all is pissed because he has no one to teach , >> no one to show off his super intelligence to but the people realize fast >> he don't know shit and he lies about it > > Try to control your jealousy, just because you were born a dummy. It's > not your fault. Work on not saying stupid shit so often, and maybe you > can fool some of the people. Nearly everyone in this group is smarter > than you, but you have to play the cards life dealt you. Compare > yourself to Rachael, for instance. She's got more mental issues than > you, but she can compose long and mostly coherent sentences, even though > they tend to ramble all over the place. What gives away your stupidity, > is the lame little immature babble-bits you post, that clearly indicate > an inability to articulate anything of substance, along with your > rudimentary spelling and grammar skills, and obvious lack of even a high > school education. It all comes out when someone (like me) gets you > rattled. You're always going to come up short in a battle of wits, > because you have none. You're probably better off playing in the support > groups with the other mentally crippled individuals. Perhaps some of > them could even help you. > holy shit look at him go , if anyone reads this . gimme a break down of what it said , so i can pick out the lies
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 15:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.358744b7c9a9c9f6993d26@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #454714 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bbgk1d.ru6.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-06-10 12:31 PM, Checkmate wrote: > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <bbghpb.9qe.19.10@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > > says... > > > > > >> > >> On 2018-06-09 11:51 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >>> Checkmate! In article <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net>, > >>> vallor@cultnix.org says... > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: > >>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2008. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. > >>>>>>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem > >>>>>>>>>>>> to think it means. Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a > >>>>>>>>>>>> case of judicial activism. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the > >>>>>>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as > >>>>>>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second > >>>>>>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Heller didn't do that. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second > >>>>>>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure > >>>>>>>>> as hell should not be writing laws. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the > >>>>>>> words used... sorta my point. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Nice evasion. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws." > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common > >>>>>> law? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Or...? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc > >>>>>> > >>>>> The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the > >>>>> law. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to > >>>> teach you anything about it. > >>>> > >>>> "Fair enough." > >>> > >>> I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a > >>> damned thing, because they already know it all. > >>> > >> and the biggest know it all is pissed because he has no one to teach , > >> no one to show off his super intelligence to but the people realize fast > >> he don't know shit and he lies about it > > > > Try to control your jealousy, just because you were born a dummy. It's > > not your fault. Work on not saying stupid shit so often, and maybe you > > can fool some of the people. Nearly everyone in this group is smarter > > than you, but you have to play the cards life dealt you. Compare > > yourself to Rachael, for instance. She's got more mental issues than > > you, but she can compose long and mostly coherent sentences, even though > > they tend to ramble all over the place. What gives away your stupidity, > > is the lame little immature babble-bits you post, that clearly indicate > > an inability to articulate anything of substance, along with your > > rudimentary spelling and grammar skills, and obvious lack of even a high > > school education. It all comes out when someone (like me) gets you > > rattled. You're always going to come up short in a battle of wits, > > because you have none. You're probably better off playing in the support > > groups with the other mentally crippled individuals. Perhaps some of > > them could even help you. > > > holy shit look at him go , > if anyone reads this . > gimme a break down of what it said , > so i can pick out the lies I knew it would be way over your head. Thanks for proving my point. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 15:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbgug4.nq4.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454742 |
On 2018-06-10 3:23 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bbgk1d.ru6.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-06-10 12:31 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <bbghpb.9qe.19.10@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>> says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 2018-06-09 11:51 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> vallor@cultnix.org says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2008. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to think it means. Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> case of judicial activism. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the >>>>>>>>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as >>>>>>>>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second >>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Heller didn't do that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second >>>>>>>>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure >>>>>>>>>>> as hell should not be writing laws. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the >>>>>>>>> words used... sorta my point. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nice evasion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common >>>>>>>> law? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or...? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the >>>>>>> law. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to >>>>>> teach you anything about it. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Fair enough." >>>>> >>>>> I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a >>>>> damned thing, because they already know it all. >>>>> >>>> and the biggest know it all is pissed because he has no one to teach , >>>> no one to show off his super intelligence to but the people realize fast >>>> he don't know shit and he lies about it >>> >>> Try to control your jealousy, just because you were born a dummy. It's >>> not your fault. Work on not saying stupid shit so often, and maybe you >>> can fool some of the people. Nearly everyone in this group is smarter >>> than you, but you have to play the cards life dealt you. Compare >>> yourself to Rachael, for instance. She's got more mental issues than >>> you, but she can compose long and mostly coherent sentences, even though >>> they tend to ramble all over the place. What gives away your stupidity, >>> is the lame little immature babble-bits you post, that clearly indicate >>> an inability to articulate anything of substance, along with your >>> rudimentary spelling and grammar skills, and obvious lack of even a high >>> school education. It all comes out when someone (like me) gets you >>> rattled. You're always going to come up short in a battle of wits, >>> because you have none. You're probably better off playing in the support >>> groups with the other mentally crippled individuals. Perhaps some of >>> them could even help you. >>> >> holy shit look at him go , >> if anyone reads this . >> gimme a break down of what it said , >> so i can pick out the lies > > I knew it would be way over your head. Thanks for proving my point. > i never read it i don't know if it went over anything so that's a lie
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 11:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bf1qlf.4tl.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454742 |
On 2018-06-10 3:23 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bbgk1d.ru6.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-06-10 12:31 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <bbghpb.9qe.19.10@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>> says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 2018-06-09 11:51 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net>, >>>>> vallor@cultnix.org says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2008. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to think it means. Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> case of judicial activism. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the >>>>>>>>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as >>>>>>>>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second >>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Heller didn't do that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second >>>>>>>>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure >>>>>>>>>>> as hell should not be writing laws. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the >>>>>>>>> words used... sorta my point. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nice evasion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common >>>>>>>> law? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or...? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the >>>>>>> law. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to >>>>>> teach you anything about it. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Fair enough." >>>>> >>>>> I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a >>>>> damned thing, because they already know it all. >>>>> >>>> and the biggest know it all is pissed because he has no one to teach , >>>> no one to show off his super intelligence to but the people realize fast >>>> he don't know shit and he lies about it >>> >>> Try to control your jealousy, just because you were born a dummy. It's >>> not your fault. Work on not saying stupid shit so often, and maybe you >>> can fool some of the people. Nearly everyone in this group is smarter >>> than you, but you have to play the cards life dealt you. Compare >>> yourself to Rachael, for instance. She's got more mental issues than >>> you, but she can compose long and mostly coherent sentences, even though >>> they tend to ramble all over the place. What gives away your stupidity, >>> is the lame little immature babble-bits you post, that clearly indicate >>> an inability to articulate anything of substance, along with your >>> rudimentary spelling and grammar skills, and obvious lack of even a high >>> school education. It all comes out when someone (like me) gets you >>> rattled. You're always going to come up short in a battle of wits, >>> because you have none. You're probably better off playing in the support >>> groups with the other mentally crippled individuals. Perhaps some of >>> them could even help you. >>> >> holy shit look at him go , >> if anyone reads this . >> gimme a break down of what it said , >> so i can pick out the lies > > I knew it would be way over your head. Thanks for proving my point. > liar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 11:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bf1qkk.4tl.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454713 |
On 2018-06-10 12:31 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bbghpb.9qe.19.10@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-06-09 11:51 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net>, >>> vallor@cultnix.org says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2008. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter. >>>>>>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem >>>>>>>>>>>> to think it means. Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a >>>>>>>>>>>> case of judicial activism. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the >>>>>>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as >>>>>>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second >>>>>>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Heller didn't do that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second >>>>>>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure >>>>>>>>> as hell should not be writing laws. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the >>>>>>> words used... sorta my point. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nice evasion. >>>>>> >>>>>> You wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws." >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record? >>>>>> >>>>>> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common >>>>>> law? >>>>>> >>>>>> Or...? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc >>>>>> >>>>> The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the >>>>> law. >>>> >>>> >>>> So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to >>>> teach you anything about it. >>>> >>>> "Fair enough." >>> >>> I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a >>> damned thing, because they already know it all. >>> >> and the biggest know it all is pissed because he has no one to teach , >> no one to show off his super intelligence to but the people realize fast >> he don't know shit and he lies about it > > Try to control your jealousy, just because you were born a dummy. It's > not your fault. Work on not saying stupid shit so often, and maybe you > can fool some of the people. Nearly everyone in this group is smarter > than you, but you have to play the cards life dealt you. Compare > yourself to Rachael, for instance. She's got more mental issues than > you, but she can compose long and mostly coherent sentences, even though > they tend to ramble all over the place. What gives away your stupidity, > is the lame little immature babble-bits you post, that clearly indicate > an inability to articulate anything of substance, along with your > rudimentary spelling and grammar skills, and obvious lack of even a high > school education. It all comes out when someone (like me) gets you > rattled. You're always going to come up short in a battle of wits, > because you have none. You're probably better off playing in the support > groups with the other mentally crippled individuals. Perhaps some of > them could even help you. > check this with the same comments from yesterday , rerun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 01:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <LA4TC.308717$yc1.305356@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #454640 |
On 6/9/2018 9:33 PM, Snit wrote: > > The legislative branch writes laws. > The judicial branch interprets the law. The judicial branch decides cases by applying the law to the facts. Outside the resolution of cases, it does not interpret the law.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fo4683FhreU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454662 |
Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: > On 6/9/2018 9:33 PM, Snit wrote: >> >> The legislative branch writes laws. >> The judicial branch interprets the law. > > The judicial branch decides cases by applying the > law to the facts. Outside the resolution of cases, > it does not interpret the law. > > Where else would it outside of cases?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 29 of 36 — ← Prev page 1 … 27 28 [29] 30 31 … 36 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web