Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #186848

Re: Slaughtering concert goers.

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2018-06-10 12:31 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <bbghpb.9qe.19.10@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
> says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On 2018-06-09 11:51 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!  In article <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net>,
>>> vallor@cultnix.org says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2008.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem
>>>>>>>>>>>> to think it means.  Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a
>>>>>>>>>>>> case of judicial activism.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the
>>>>>>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as
>>>>>>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second
>>>>>>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Heller didn't do that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second
>>>>>>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure
>>>>>>>>> as hell should not be writing laws.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the
>>>>>>> words used... sorta my point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nice evasion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common
>>>>>> law?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or...?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc
>>>>>>
>>>>> The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the
>>>>> law.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to
>>>> teach you anything about it.
>>>>
>>>> "Fair enough."
>>>
>>> I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a
>>> damned thing, because they already know it all.
>>>
>> and the biggest know it all is pissed because he has no one to teach ,
>> no one to show off his super intelligence to but the people realize fast
>> he don't know shit and he lies about it
> 
> Try to control your jealousy, just because you were born a dummy.  It's
> not your fault.  Work on not saying stupid shit so often, and maybe you
> can fool some of the people.  Nearly everyone in this group is smarter
> than you, but you have to play the cards life dealt you.  Compare
> yourself to Rachael, for instance.  She's got more mental issues than
> you, but she can compose long and mostly coherent sentences, even though
> they tend to ramble all over the place.  What gives away your stupidity,
> is the lame little immature babble-bits you post, that clearly indicate
> an inability to articulate anything of substance, along with your
> rudimentary spelling and grammar skills, and obvious lack of even a high
> school education.  It all comes out when someone (like me) gets you
> rattled.  You're always going to come up short in a battle of wits,
> because you have none.  You're probably better off playing in the support
> groups with the other mentally crippled individuals.  Perhaps some of
> them could even help you.
> 
check this with the same comments from yesterday , rerun

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:00 -0700

csiph-web