Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #186850

Re: Slaughtering concert goers.

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2018-06-10 3:23 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <bbgk1d.ru6.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
> says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On 2018-06-10 12:31 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!  In article <bbghpb.9qe.19.10@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
>>> says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2018-06-09 11:51 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>> Checkmate!  In article <fo3r39Fr1ppU2@mid.individual.net>,
>>>>> vallor@cultnix.org says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 20:33:55 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 5:21 PM, vallor wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:57:14 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:47 PM, vallor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:42:04 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 4:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 4:34 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 3:32 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/18 12:42 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/9/2018 9:50 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ignore the Supreme Court's analysis of the history
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the Miller decision and the Heller decision, and the 1982
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution to the Senate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judiciary Committee?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have talked in some depth about the judicial activism shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2008.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Humor to try to hide your lack of counter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your lack of humor leads you to miss the counter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To be more plain, "judicial activism" does not mean what you seem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to think it means.  Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller was not a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case of judicial activism.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bottom line: you prefer to push humor and insults and not the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> controversial judicial activism of that 2008 decision. As far as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the meaning, I am talking about the redefining of the second
>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment by the Judicial branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Heller didn't do that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have shown the evidence to the contrary.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not the Legislative branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The legislative branch does not have power to redefine the Second
>>>>>>>>>>>> Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fair enough.. the states do that. The judicial branch, though, sure
>>>>>>>>>>> as hell should not be writing laws.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You're a regular Perry Mason, aren't ya?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This was not based on past precedence nor even the meaning of the
>>>>>>>>> words used... sorta my point.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nice evasion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "The judicial branch, though, sure as hell should not be writing laws."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you wish to review and modify your statements for the record?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or...will you be moving to a country that isn't based on English common
>>>>>>>> law?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or...?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT4wkkkaFTc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The legislative branch writes laws. The judicial branch interprets the
>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you still don't understand English Common Law, and it is impossible to
>>>>>> teach you anything about it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Fair enough."
>>>>>
>>>>> I've come to the conclusion that you can't teach anybody on Usenet a
>>>>> damned thing, because they already know it all.
>>>>>
>>>> and the biggest know it all is pissed because he has no one to teach ,
>>>> no one to show off his super intelligence to but the people realize fast
>>>> he don't know shit and he lies about it
>>>
>>> Try to control your jealousy, just because you were born a dummy.  It's
>>> not your fault.  Work on not saying stupid shit so often, and maybe you
>>> can fool some of the people.  Nearly everyone in this group is smarter
>>> than you, but you have to play the cards life dealt you.  Compare
>>> yourself to Rachael, for instance.  She's got more mental issues than
>>> you, but she can compose long and mostly coherent sentences, even though
>>> they tend to ramble all over the place.  What gives away your stupidity,
>>> is the lame little immature babble-bits you post, that clearly indicate
>>> an inability to articulate anything of substance, along with your
>>> rudimentary spelling and grammar skills, and obvious lack of even a high
>>> school education.  It all comes out when someone (like me) gets you
>>> rattled.  You're always going to come up short in a battle of wits,
>>> because you have none.  You're probably better off playing in the support
>>> groups with the other mentally crippled individuals.  Perhaps some of
>>> them could even help you.
>>>
>> holy shit look at him go ,
>> if anyone reads this .
>> gimme a break down of what it said ,
>> so i can pick out the lies
> 
> I knew it would be way over your head.  Thanks for proving my point.
> 
liar

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:00 -0700

csiph-web