Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #452872 > unrolled thread

Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia?

Started by"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
First post2018-05-31 13:10 +0000
Last post2018-06-01 05:25 -0700
Articles 17 on this page of 37 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-31 13:10 +0000
    Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-31 16:37 +0000
      Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-31 20:00 +0000
        Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-31 21:38 +0000
    Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-31 20:20 +0000
      Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-31 20:57 +0000
        Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-31 22:32 +0000
          Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-31 22:36 +0000
            Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-31 22:40 +0000
              Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Snit took things out of COLA and called the cops <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 16:10 -0700
          Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-31 22:41 +0000
            Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-31 22:59 +0000
              Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-31 23:39 +0000
            Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-06-01 00:00 +0000
              Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? [Solved -- Partially] "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-06-01 00:21 +0000
          Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Snit took things out of COLA and called the cops <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 16:25 -0700
      Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 21:09 +0000
        Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-31 21:39 +0000
        Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-31 21:46 +0000
          Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 15:02 -0700
            Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-31 22:39 +0000
              Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 16:10 -0700
              Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 16:59 -0700
            Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 23:11 +0000
              Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-31 23:27 +0000
                Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:02 -0700
                Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:16 -0700
              Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 17:09 -0700
            Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 16:54 -0700
            Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-06-01 00:40 +0000
              Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 17:42 -0700
                Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-06-01 00:48 +0000
                Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 02:16 -0700
        Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-06-01 00:22 +0000
          Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-06-01 08:14 +0000
            Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 01:45 -0700
            Re: Need Help -- Who's Got Nvidia? Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#452928

From"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Date2018-05-31 22:39 +0000
Message-ID<peptjo1g0k@news2.newsguy.com>
In reply to#452921
On Thu, 31 May 2018 15:02:57 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:

> 
>  you might be something other
>

You certainly are consistently showing yourself to be
the idiotic, inferior, and insufferable twit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452932

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-31 16:10 -0700
Message-ID<fa7e87b9-9713-4ffa-b4ae-5bb1dbb71e83@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#452928
On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 4:40:45 PM UTC-6, F. Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2018 15:02:57 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > 
> >  you might be something other
> >
> 
> You 

Me? My results similar were similar to Melzzzzz. 

Continue trolling...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452945

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-05-31 16:59 -0700
Message-ID<fnbgioFafd0U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#452928
On 5/31/18 3:39 PM, F. Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2018 15:02:57 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
>>
>>   you might be something other
>>
> 
> You certainly are consistently showing yourself to be
> the idiotic, inferior, and insufferable twit.
> 
The sad thing is he has skills and is not stupid... he is just so 
focused on his victim mentality that he cannot actually show ANYTHING in 
his life but a broken family and his flooding of COLA.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452934

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-05-31 23:11 +0000
Message-ID<fnbdp6F9vo5U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#452921
On Thu, 31 May 2018 15:02:57 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:

> On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 3:46:26 PM UTC-6, F. Russell wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 May 2018 21:09:53 +0000, vallor wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> > p.p.s. I also have it as an encoding option with OBS...
>> >
>> >
>> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Yet another crippled idiot!
>> 
>> One does not require OBS.  FFmpeg has the x11grab device which does the
>> same fucking thing far more efficiently.
>> 
>> Learn the fundamentals of video rather than rely on a software crutch.
> 
> Congrats, Feeb... you *finally* drew them into another of your 'show
> your superiority' trolling episodes. They were so hungry for a real post
> they thought you might be something other than what you've shown
> yourself to be over and over.

Joke's on him -- OBS is a lot faster to change parameters than trying to 
script things with ffmpeg.  It also has multiple capture options, not 
just "this rectangle on the screen".

I know...I used to script my streaming and recording with ffmpeg. ;)

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452936

From"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Date2018-05-31 23:27 +0000
Message-ID<peq0d001i6h@news3.newsguy.com>
In reply to#452934
On Thu, 31 May 2018 23:11:35 +0000, vallor wrote:

> 
> OBS ... has multiple capture options, not 
> just "this rectangle on the screen".
> 

What more could one desire other than a "rectangle on the screen?"

I have never seen a circular video.  I believe that all videos
are rectangular.

But ffmpeg also has lots and lots of capture options, and ultimately
both ffmpeg and OBS use X to get the data so there is no difference.
In fact, OBS is just a frontend to ffmpeg, i.e. a crutch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452948

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-05-31 17:02 -0700
Message-ID<fnbgotFafd0U4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#452936
On 5/31/18 4:27 PM, F. Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2018 23:11:35 +0000, vallor wrote:
> 
>>
>> OBS ... has multiple capture options, not
>> just "this rectangle on the screen".
>>
> 
> What more could one desire other than a "rectangle on the screen?"

A "rectangle on the screen" implies an arbitrary one. There are some 
which can capture a specific window. Yes, the windows is a rectangle, 
but it is a specific object.

> I have never seen a circular video.  I believe that all videos
> are rectangular.
> 
> But ffmpeg also has lots and lots of capture options, and ultimately
> both ffmpeg and OBS use X to get the data so there is no difference.
> In fact, OBS is just a frontend to ffmpeg, i.e. a crutch.
> 
> 


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452951

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-05-31 17:16 -0700
Message-ID<fnbhihFajjtU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#452936
On 5/31/18 4:27 PM, F. Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2018 23:11:35 +0000, vallor wrote:
> 
>>
>> OBS ... has multiple capture options, not
>> just "this rectangle on the screen".
>>
> 
> What more could one desire other than a "rectangle on the screen?"

There are MANY other options than that. Compression, frames per second, 
to capture or not capture the mouse (and with some tools you can alter 
that in post-processing and have it show or not show), audio levels, and 
more.

...


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452949

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-31 17:09 -0700
Message-ID<3028206e-d71f-4bd2-b6b4-23f3853d3481@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#452934
On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 5:11:38 PM UTC-6, vallor wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2018 15:02:57 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 3:46:26 PM UTC-6, F. Russell wrote:
> >> On Thu, 31 May 2018 21:09:53 +0000, vallor wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > p.p.s. I also have it as an encoding option with OBS...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Yet another crippled idiot!
> >> 
> >> One does not require OBS.  FFmpeg has the x11grab device which does the
> >> same fucking thing far more efficiently.
> >> 
> >> Learn the fundamentals of video rather than rely on a software crutch.
> > 
> > Congrats, Feeb... you *finally* drew them into another of your 'show
> > your superiority' trolling episodes. They were so hungry for a real post
> > they thought you might be something other than what you've shown
> > yourself to be over and over.
> 
> Joke's on him -- OBS is a lot faster to change parameters than trying to 
> script things with ffmpeg.  It also has multiple capture options, not 
> just "this rectangle on the screen".
> 
> I know...I used to script my streaming and recording with ffmpeg. ;)

I vaguely recall you posting about it (then again, that could've been
someone else). In any event, he clearly didn't understand your post
(option ≠ requirement).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452942

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-05-31 16:54 -0700
Message-ID<fnbg9gFadvuU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#452921
On 5/31/18 3:02 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 3:46:26 PM UTC-6, F. Russell wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 May 2018 21:09:53 +0000, vallor wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> p.p.s. I also have it as an encoding option with OBS...
>>>
>>
>> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Yet another crippled idiot!
>>
>> One does not require OBS.  FFmpeg has the x11grab device
>> which does the same fucking thing far more efficiently.
>>
>> Learn the fundamentals of video rather than rely on
>> a software crutch.
> 
> Congrats, Feeb... you *finally* drew them into another of your
> 'show your superiority' trolling episodes.

Like you with your web skills... but the ONLY actual thing you showed 
with that was your ability to flood Usenet.

> They were so hungry
> for a real post they thought you might be something other than
> what you've shown yourself to be over and over.
> 


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452954

From"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Date2018-06-01 00:40 +0000
Message-ID<peq4lb110tv@news1.newsguy.com>
In reply to#452921
On Thu, 31 May 2018 15:02:57 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:

> 
> Congrats, Feeb... [snip the remarks of an insufferable twit]
>

I solved the problem.

To celebrate I have transcoded a simple video entirely using
hardware acceleration via the ffmpeg cuvid and nvenc coders:

ffmpeg -c:v h264_cuvid -i input.mp4 -c:v h264_nvenc output.mkv

The video is entitled "Carroll Response" and serves as an
adequate rebuttal to your inane comments.

The video is posted to alt.binaries.multimedia.transformation

For full effect, playback with an infinite loop.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452956

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-31 17:42 -0700
Message-ID<2ccdd389-23b8-4e1a-a8dc-cbc45db650c1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#452954
On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 6:40:25 PM UTC-6, F. Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2018 15:02:57 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Congrats, Feeb... [snip the remarks of an insufferable twit]
> >
> 
> I solved the problem.

Was it related to the nvidia driver (I didn't have the issue)?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452958

From"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Date2018-06-01 00:48 +0000
Message-ID<peq558210tv@news1.newsguy.com>
In reply to#452956
On Thu, 31 May 2018 17:42:05 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:

> 
> Was it related to the nvidia driver (I didn't have the issue)?
>

Of course it's the nvidia driver (see my other post).

What can one expect from a pack of exorbitantly overpaid corporate
flunkies?

If Nvidia would release their specs then the volunteer open source
community would supply an infallible product.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452992

FromSnit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-01 02:16 -0700
Message-ID<e7369142-5481-44dd-ab8d-f4e40f5b41d7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#452956
On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 5:42:08 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 6:40:25 PM UTC-6, F. Russell wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 May 2018 15:02:57 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Congrats, Feeb... [snip the remarks of an insufferable twit]
> > >
> > 
> > I solved the problem.
> 
> Was it related to the nvidia driver (I didn't have the issue)?



Being self-governed as it is, the listserv concept will never go away but it'll never be well known. 

Linux offers the least choice. 

That's what Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis does when he gets mad. He quickly creates a sock, starts a thread so he can claim it was Snit. Hey it was my left hand... and then Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis talks to his own post with his right hand. Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis suffers from senile fantasies so, to him, everything, even responses to his idiocy, are "insults". Who *doesn't* know this? If you have 'b.doc' open in a program such as Atom and you want to change its name to 'd.doc' via a bash script, that might be useful. I know we have different perspectives for a good reason. I'm guessing, after kill filtering all the sock puppets from Steve Carroll-Petruzzellis, it's essentially just two flooders producing 95% of the bombardment. It is blatant. And both completely unbalanced nut cases. 

I have a little script I use as well, but it's better than yours. 

--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened
https://youtu.be/OffkiSAsYo8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452952

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2018-06-01 00:22 +0000
Message-ID<970ba.auj304@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#452908
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2018 20:20:31 +0000, owl wrote:
> 
>> F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote:
>>> On my system, ffmpeg fails with Nvidia nvenc:
>>> 
>>> [h264_nvenc @ 0xf0cf00] Cannot init CUDA
>>> 
>>> Is this ffmpeg?
>> 
>> The message is from ffmpeg's nvenc.c
> 
> I wonder if he has to install the CUDA sdk in addition to a CUDA-capable 
> driver?
> 
> p.s. works here, too, but I made sure of that a while ago by building my 
> own ffmpeg.  Do distro version support nvenc now?
> 

Don't know.  I don't have nvidia.  (Well, this machine has one
onboard, but I'm not using it).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452988

From"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Date2018-06-01 08:14 +0000
Message-ID<peqv8l022sj@news3.newsguy.com>
In reply to#452952
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:22:13 +0000, owl wrote:

> 
> I don't have nvidia.  (Well, this machine has one
> onboard, but I'm not using it).
>

Nvenc/cuvid require a KEPLER or greater GPU.  You can
discover the GPU with lspci | grep -i nvidia.

For example, my card is:

NVIDIA Corporation GK208B [GeForce GT 730] (rev a1)

The "K" stands for "Kepler."

The problem is that most OEMs will not include the
actual GPU in their marketing specs.  For example,
GT 730 cards come in three different models: GF108,
GK108, and GK208.  The "F" represents a Fermi GPU
that does NOT support nvenc/cuvid.  An uninformed
buyer may be attracted to the low price of the GT 730
and inadvertently acquire a GF108.

Online sellers ALWAYS withhold detailed specs.  It
becomes impossible to make an informed decision.
That's why I no longer buy shirts from on-line 
merchants.  The fabric weight is NEVER specified.
I have bought what I thought would be a cheap and
warm (i.e. thick) winter shirt only to open the box
and find essentially a piece of ultra-thin tissue
paper.

It also seems to be an American phenomenon.  British
online merchants usually include far more detailed specs.

American shopping sites are designed by the spiritual brethren
of Steve ("Dummy") Carroll.  They are all javascript/css
dazzle and no substance.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452990

FromSnit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-01 01:45 -0700
Message-ID<f2822ebd-b8a6-46e3-a758-34ffa5bd27b5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#452988
On Friday, June 1, 2018 at 1:15:02 AM UTC-7, F. Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:22:13 +0000, owl wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I don't have nvidia.  (Well, this machine has one
> > onboard, but I'm not using it).
> >
> 
> Nvenc/cuvid require a KEPLER or greater GPU.  You can
> discover the GPU with lspci | grep -i nvidia.
> 
> For example, my card is:
> 
> NVIDIA Corporation GK208B [GeForce GT 730] (rev a1)
> 
> The "K" stands for "Kepler."
> 
> The problem is that most OEMs will not include the
> actual GPU in their marketing specs.  For example,
> GT 730 cards come in three different models: GF108,
> GK108, and GK208.  The "F" represents a Fermi GPU
> that does NOT support nvenc/cuvid.  An uninformed
> buyer may be attracted to the low price of the GT 730
> and inadvertently acquire a GF108.
> 
> Online sellers ALWAYS withhold detailed specs.  It
> becomes impossible to make an informed decision.
> That's why I no longer buy shirts from on-line 
> merchants.  The fabric weight is NEVER specified.
> I have bought what I thought would be a cheap and
> warm (i.e. thick) winter shirt only to open the box
> and find essentially a piece of ultra-thin tissue
> paper.
> 
> It also seems to be an American phenomenon.  British
> online merchants usually include far more detailed specs.
> 
> American shopping sites are designed by the spiritual brethren
> of Steve ("Dummy") Carroll.  They are all javascript/css
> dazzle and no substance.



  Snit:
    -----
    I would love to see the group become that! I would love to see
    people, for example, pick tasks they do with Desktop Linux which
    they believe are handled better than the competition. I have
    encouraged that for a long time. But so far few if any such tasks
    have been shown.
    -----

  Marek Novotny:
    -----
    Linux is a Server, A Cloud, A service, A mobile Platform, A
    developers dream come true, A super cluster, a Main frame and a
    DESKTOP. It's not JUST a desktop. You're a two-bit bullshit coward
    who refuses to face what Linux actually is. It's too much for you,
    obviously. 
    -----

  Snit (referencing to the above quote):
    ----
    But it is not all of those things. Not even close. It is USED by
    those things but it is NOT those things.
    -----

  Marek Novotny (some time later):
    -----
    Android isn't Linux. Android makes "use" of the Linux kernel.
    Android is indeed open source, but it is not community driven open
    source. Those that know the difference likely won't cry over Android
    ditching the Linux kernel and adopting their own kernel. It simply
    never mattered for all the reasons I stated above. Now the fact that
    I have to articulate this in writing so these clueless tards like
    DFS and Snit can gain some insights because they LACK their
    own insights is what I find troubling. They both have no business
    arguing in here. They are simply too stupid to have a conversation
    about that which they just don't fundamentally understand in the
    first place.
    -----
    
Notice Marek uses the concepts I taught him (about how Linux is "USED" by the things he listed) then fantasizes about how I did not know the information HE got wrong and I corrected him with (and did so with no name calling or insults).

  flatfish+++:
    -----
    I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I,I and if that wasn't enough, I,I,I,I,I,I. 
    Talk about a narcissistic fool.
    -----

  Snit:
    -----
    You left out his I, I, I, I. AM. BETTER. THAN. Snit AND DFS!
    He is clearly feeling very insecure these days.
    -----

  Marek Novotny: 
    -----
    Well, if he wants to play this game with me he'll find pictures of
    his wife on imgur with dildos all over her and I can cross post
    those too. Keep fucking around Snit. I can play this game too. 
    -----

--
Puppy Videos!!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.development.apps/G2-ZXYAEyIM
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#453002

FromSnit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-01 05:25 -0700
Message-ID<a5657459-6e4c-4e21-82cd-8cb7260e5cb8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#452988
On Friday, June 1, 2018 at 1:15:02 AM UTC-7, F. Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:22:13 +0000, owl wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I don't have nvidia.  (Well, this machine has one
> > onboard, but I'm not using it).
> >
> 
> Nvenc/cuvid require a KEPLER or greater GPU.  You can
> discover the GPU with lspci | grep -i nvidia.
> 
> For example, my card is:
> 
> NVIDIA Corporation GK208B [GeForce GT 730] (rev a1)
> 
> The "K" stands for "Kepler."
> 
> The problem is that most OEMs will not include the
> actual GPU in their marketing specs.  For example,
> GT 730 cards come in three different models: GF108,
> GK108, and GK208.  The "F" represents a Fermi GPU
> that does NOT support nvenc/cuvid.  An uninformed
> buyer may be attracted to the low price of the GT 730
> and inadvertently acquire a GF108.
> 
> Online sellers ALWAYS withhold detailed specs.  It
> becomes impossible to make an informed decision.
> That's why I no longer buy shirts from on-line 
> merchants.  The fabric weight is NEVER specified.
> I have bought what I thought would be a cheap and
> warm (i.e. thick) winter shirt only to open the box
> and find essentially a piece of ultra-thin tissue
> paper.
> 
> It also seems to be an American phenomenon.  British
> online merchants usually include far more detailed specs.
> 
> American shopping sites are designed by the spiritual brethren
> of Steve ("Dummy") Carroll.  They are all javascript/css
> dazzle and no substance.



Protected code is being built into GnuPG. 

His desire is to see Steve Carroll irritated by having me get blamed for his actions. And hey, that could or could not... you know what I mean. 

I have known turnips who argue better than you do. You can say I am a monkey wrench for all I care. BTW, I've already pointed out that his use of "herd" to describe Steve Carroll is insulting, since he's likening them to lower life forms. Turns out Jeremy's persistent referencing of Steve Carroll met that definition, so he abandoned that, too. Can emoticons be concatenated into a string with a logical connection to the "real" world; that is the question posed recently by those astonished at the fire-hose of nonsense from assorted google-posters and neck beard freaks. 

- 
Eight things to never feed your cat!
http://www.5z8.info/mydick_x6g9hr_nakedgrandmas.jpg
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web