Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #365837 > unrolled thread

GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-17 23:09 +0000
    Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 23:50 +0000
    Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 22:19 -0600
    Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-18 09:22 +0100
      Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-18 15:02 +0000
        Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-18 17:09 +0100
          Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-18 23:01 +0000
            Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-19 14:59 +0100
              Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 10:21 -0700
              Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 10:34 -0700
                Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-19 15:39 -0400
                  Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-19 22:36 +0000
                    Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-20 09:59 -0400
                      Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-20 12:58 -0600
        Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 19:57 -0400
    re: GNU/Linux "Creams" MS Windows Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-08-18 13:05 +0000

#365837 — GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows

I just downloaded 25 gigabytes of video material from
Usenet using GNU/Linux Pan.

Are the files OK?  After all, 25 Gigabytes is a whopper.

No problem.  On GNU/Linux just execute the following simple
command sequence:

par2repair File.par2 && unrar File.part001.rar

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

There were a few corrupted blocks (the posting is about
700 days old), but the above utilities corrected all errors
and produced a perfect video source in no time at all.

Try THAT with Microshit Windows!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

GNU/Linux.  The ONLY choice for REAL men.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#365842

Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> wrote:
> I just downloaded 25 gigabytes of video material from
> Usenet using GNU/Linux Pan.
> 
> Are the files OK?  After all, 25 Gigabytes is a whopper.
> 
> No problem.  On GNU/Linux just execute the following simple
> command sequence:
> 
> par2repair File.par2 && unrar File.part001.rar
> 
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
> 
> There were a few corrupted blocks (the posting is about
> 700 days old), but the above utilities corrected all errors
> and produced a perfect video source in no time at all.
> 
> Try THAT with Microshit Windows!
> 
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
> 
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
> 
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
> 
> GNU/Linux.  The ONLY choice for REAL men.
> 

What kind of pron is it?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#365873

On 08/17/16 17:09, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
> I just downloaded 25 gigabytes of video material from
> Usenet using GNU/Linux Pan.
>
> Are the files OK?  After all, 25 Gigabytes is a whopper.
>
> No problem.  On GNU/Linux just execute the following simple
> command sequence:
>
> par2repair File.par2&&  unrar File.part001.rar
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> There were a few corrupted blocks (the posting is about
> 700 days old), but the above utilities corrected all errors
> and produced a perfect video source in no time at all.
>
> Try THAT with Microshit Windows!
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> GNU/Linux.  The ONLY choice for REAL men.
>
Guffaw!!!  So, you measure your member to see if it is up to par with 
other men?

LOL!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#365882

On 18/08/2016 00:09, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
> I just downloaded 25 gigabytes of video material from
> Usenet using GNU/Linux Pan.
>
> Are the files OK?  After all, 25 Gigabytes is a whopper.

All the "Debbie does" series is quite large I guess.

>
> No problem.  On GNU/Linux just execute the following simple
> command sequence:
>
> par2repair File.par2 && unrar File.part001.rar
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> There were a few corrupted blocks (the posting is about
> 700 days old), but the above utilities corrected all errors

Linux rots data over time does it?

> and produced a perfect video source in no time at all.
>
> Try THAT with Microshit Windows!

Using the Windows version of the utility:
http://www.quickpar.org.uk/

Or this one if you want it integrated into the GUI so you can just point 
and click rather than fuck about with a command line
https://multipar.eu/

> GNU/Linux.  The ONLY choice for people who have time to waste.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#365901

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:22:23 +0100, Desk Rabbit wrote:

> 
>> The ONLY choice for people who have time to waste.
>

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

If you use Microshit Windows par2 utilities, you'd better
have LOTS AND LOTS of time to waste because those tools are as
slow as molasses (if not slower).

It's a typical Microshit strategy to cover up poor software
design with good hardware capabilities, but with the enormous
processing required for par2 creation/verification, that
strategy fails miserably.

GNU/Linux offers the par2tbb with full multicore parallelization
to beat the pants off Microshit Windows.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#365913

On 18/08/2016 16:02, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:22:23 +0100, Desk Rabbit wrote:
>
>>
>>> The ONLY choice for people who have time to waste.
>>
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> If you use Microshit Windows par2 utilities, you'd better
> have LOTS AND LOTS of time to waste because those tools are as
> slow as molasses (if not slower).

Idiot, those tools are not Microsoft tools. Multipar is open source and 
licensed in the same way as Linux tools. It's also used by at least one 
company as a benchmarking tool so hardly "slow as molasses"


> It's a typical Microshit strategy to cover up poor software
> design with good hardware capabilities, but with the enormous
> processing required for par2 creation/verification, that
> strategy fails miserably.

Unfounded, unverified and unsubstantiated nonsense.

>
> GNU/Linux offers the par2tbb with full multicore parallelization
So why do you use the less efficient one, is your hardware too weak?
Besides which, par2tbb hasn't been touched in 3 years, Multipar was 
updated last month so par2tbb is yet another shining example of Linux 
abandonware.....

> to beat the pants off Microshit Windows.
>

Yet more of your nonsense kicked into touch:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parchive#Windows

"MultiPar (freeware)  — Builds upon QuickPar's features and GUI, and 
Yutaka Sawada's fork of par2cmdline as the PAR2 backend. It has support 
for Par3, multithreading, multiple processors"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366000

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:09:22 +0100, Desk Rabbit wrote:

>
> par2tbb hasn't been touched in 3 years, so par2tbb is yet another
> shining example of Linux abandonware.....
>

We can use your very own words to rebut this idiotic comment:

>
> Unfounded, unverified and unsubstantiated nonsense.
>

Let me introduce you to the facts of reality.

A C/C++ command-line program DOES NOT have to be maintained.
This is especially true for the Linux environment where
the kernel interface is guaranteed NOT to change -- EVER.
Consequently, three-year-old source code is, from a functional
point of view, essentially brand spanking new.

But of course, a brain-dead server administrator like you would
not be aware of such basic facts.  Obviously, all you ever have
known are the superficialities of the Microshit Winforms GUI,
and THAT bloated monstrosity is subject to very frequent -- and
necessary -- overhauls.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366045

On 19/08/2016 00:01, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:09:22 +0100, Desk Rabbit wrote:
>
>>
>> par2tbb hasn't been touched in 3 years, so par2tbb is yet another
>> shining example of Linux abandonware.....
>>
>
> We can use your very own words to rebut this idiotic comment:
>
>>
>> Unfounded, unverified and unsubstantiated nonsense.

Let me rub your nose in that little puddle you made.
https://github.com/chrsigg/par2tbb

3 years since the last update.

>>
>
> Let me introduce you to the facts of reality.
>
> A C/C++ command-line program DOES NOT have to be maintained.
> This is especially true for the Linux environment where
> the kernel interface is guaranteed NOT to change -- EVER.
> Consequently, three-year-old source code is, from a functional
> point of view, essentially brand spanking new.

Unless of course there is some security hole, so yet more nonsense being 
spouted by you.

>
> But of course, a brain-dead server administrator like you would
> not be aware of such basic facts.  Obviously, all you ever have
> known are the superficialities of the Microshit Winforms GUI,
> and THAT bloated monstrosity is subject to very frequent -- and
> necessary -- overhauls.
>

I'm a Linux server admin as well as Windows admin and a Mac user. I use 
the right tool for the job whilst you are still trying to use a hammer 
to force a screw to join two pieces of wood.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366057

On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 9:59:29 AM UTC-4, Desk Rabbit wrote:

> 
> Unless of course there is some security hole,
>

Security hole?

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

To a general application program executing on a single-user,
stand-alone workstation -- and this scenario is the common
essence of personal computing -- security is a total non-issue.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366058

On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 9:59:29 AM UTC-4, Desk Rabbit wrote:

> 
> I use the right tool for the job 
>

My, my.  Aren't you the wise little lackey?

But GNU/Linux is not about fulfilling jobs.  GNU/Linux
is a philosophy, or Weltanschauung, of computing that engenders
true exploration and creativity.

GNU/Linux is a return to the roots of computing that had
become lost in the chaotic and obfuscating commercialism of
the 1980's.

Only those who deeply comprehend the essence of the digital machine
can appreciate GNU/Linux.

You do not and therefore you cannot.

Like a hollow spectator you can only criticize, from afar, a grand
and glorious undertaking that is forever beyond your meager understanding.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366068

On 8/19/2016 1:34 PM, fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 9:59:29 AM UTC-4, Desk Rabbit wrote:
>
>>
>> I use the right tool for the job
>>
>
> My, my.  Aren't you the wise little lackey?
>
> But GNU/Linux is not about fulfilling jobs.  GNU/Linux
> is a philosophy, or Weltanschauung, of computing that engenders
> true exploration and creativity.
>
> GNU/Linux is a return to the roots of computing that had
> become lost in the chaotic and obfuscating commercialism of
> the 1980's.

ie Linux is hobby software.  I could've told you that.


> Only those who deeply comprehend the essence of the digital machine
> can appreciate GNU/Linux.

Horseshit.

Even I can appreciate parts of GNU/Linux: the decoupled architecture, 
the scalability, the free cost, the source code.



> You do not and therefore you cannot.
>
> Like a hollow spectator you can only criticize, from afar, a grand
> and glorious undertaking that is forever beyond your meager understanding.


My daily shits are also grand and glorious undertakings.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366089

On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:39:41 -0400, DFS wrote:

> 
> Even I ... [snip outrageous lunacy]
>

Hey!  I told you to butt out.  I'm not soliciting your
crippled opinions.  Beat it, loser.  You are as stimulating
as twenty miles of bad road. 


> 
> My daily shits are also grand and glorious undertakings.
>

I certainly do believe it.

When one has lost the ability to develop a penile erection,
one can only obtain pleasure from ones asshole.

I highly recommend inserting a 10-inch vibrating dildo
way up your fucking ass.

Bon appetit, fucking Microshit loser.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366114

On 8/19/2016 6:36 PM, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:

> When one has lost the ability to develop a penile erection,
> one can only obtain pleasure from ones asshole.
  >
> I highly recommend inserting a 10-inch vibrating dildo
> way up your fucking ass.


You have 'pathetic virgin' written all over your posts, Feeb.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366127

On 08/20/16 07:59, DFS wrote:
> On 8/19/2016 6:36 PM, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
>
>> When one has lost the ability to develop a penile erection,
>> one can only obtain pleasure from ones asshole.
>  >
>> I highly recommend inserting a 10-inch vibrating dildo
>> way up your fucking ass.
>
>
> You have 'pathetic virgin' written all over your posts, Feeb.
>
You mean he hasn't been laid yet?  Must be pretty butt ugly.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366015

On 8/18/2016 11:02 AM, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:22:23 +0100, Desk Rabbit wrote:
>
>>
>>> The ONLY choice for people who have time to waste.
>>
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> If you use Microshit Windows par2 utilities, you'd better
> have LOTS AND LOTS of time to waste because those tools are as
> slow as molasses (if not slower).
>
> It's a typical Microshit strategy to cover up poor software
> design with good hardware capabilities, but with the enormous
> processing required for par2 creation/verification, that
> strategy fails miserably.
>
> GNU/Linux offers the par2tbb with full multicore parallelization
> to beat the pants off Microshit Windows.



More Feeb ignorance

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://github.com/chrsigg/par2tbb

par2tbb with a command line switch to specify the number of threads

This is a concurrent (multithreaded) version of par2cmdline 0.4, a 
utility to create and repair data files using Reed Solomon coding.


--- About the NVIDIA CUDA version ---

Limitations:

[1] only available as a 32-bit executable for Windows XP and later, and 
Intel Mac OS X 10.5.2 and later. Due to time constraints, other systems 
such as GNU/Linux are not available at this time. You are most welcome 
to modify/build/test it for other systems if you feel up to the challenge :)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

There you go, Feeb.  Another programming challenge you're not up to.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#366100 — re: GNU/Linux "Creams" MS Windows

Fabian Russell wrote:
>
> GNU/Linux.  The ONLY choice for REAL men. 
>

So your burly boyfriend runs Linux.

What OS does a dick chugging butt boy like you use?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web