Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366045
| From | Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows |
| Date | 2016-08-19 14:59 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <np73bt$6d6$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> (permalink) |
| References | <np2qqe01dvm@news3.newsguy.com> <np3r80$qjg$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> <np4im112bqc@news3.newsguy.com> <np4mjj$kq7$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> <np5eok0cmf@news4.newsguy.com> |
On 19/08/2016 00:01, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:09:22 +0100, Desk Rabbit wrote: > >> >> par2tbb hasn't been touched in 3 years, so par2tbb is yet another >> shining example of Linux abandonware..... >> > > We can use your very own words to rebut this idiotic comment: > >> >> Unfounded, unverified and unsubstantiated nonsense. Let me rub your nose in that little puddle you made. https://github.com/chrsigg/par2tbb 3 years since the last update. >> > > Let me introduce you to the facts of reality. > > A C/C++ command-line program DOES NOT have to be maintained. > This is especially true for the Linux environment where > the kernel interface is guaranteed NOT to change -- EVER. > Consequently, three-year-old source code is, from a functional > point of view, essentially brand spanking new. Unless of course there is some security hole, so yet more nonsense being spouted by you. > > But of course, a brain-dead server administrator like you would > not be aware of such basic facts. Obviously, all you ever have > known are the superficialities of the Microshit Winforms GUI, > and THAT bloated monstrosity is subject to very frequent -- and > necessary -- overhauls. > I'm a Linux server admin as well as Windows admin and a Mac user. I use the right tool for the job whilst you are still trying to use a hammer to force a screw to join two pieces of wood.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-17 23:09 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 23:50 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 22:19 -0600
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-18 09:22 +0100
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-18 15:02 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-18 17:09 +0100
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-18 23:01 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-19 14:59 +0100
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 10:21 -0700
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 10:34 -0700
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-19 15:39 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-19 22:36 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-20 09:59 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-20 12:58 -0600
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 19:57 -0400
re: GNU/Linux "Creams" MS Windows Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-08-18 13:05 +0000
csiph-web