Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366000

Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows

From Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows
Date 2016-08-18 23:01 +0000
Organization NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID <np5eok0cmf@news4.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References <np2qqe01dvm@news3.newsguy.com> <np3r80$qjg$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> <np4im112bqc@news3.newsguy.com> <np4mjj$kq7$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:09:22 +0100, Desk Rabbit wrote:

>
> par2tbb hasn't been touched in 3 years, so par2tbb is yet another
> shining example of Linux abandonware.....
>

We can use your very own words to rebut this idiotic comment:

>
> Unfounded, unverified and unsubstantiated nonsense.
>

Let me introduce you to the facts of reality.

A C/C++ command-line program DOES NOT have to be maintained.
This is especially true for the Linux environment where
the kernel interface is guaranteed NOT to change -- EVER.
Consequently, three-year-old source code is, from a functional
point of view, essentially brand spanking new.

But of course, a brain-dead server administrator like you would
not be aware of such basic facts.  Obviously, all you ever have
known are the superficialities of the Microshit Winforms GUI,
and THAT bloated monstrosity is subject to very frequent -- and
necessary -- overhauls.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-17 23:09 +0000
  Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 23:50 +0000
  Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 22:19 -0600
  Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-18 09:22 +0100
    Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-18 15:02 +0000
      Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-18 17:09 +0100
        Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-18 23:01 +0000
          Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-19 14:59 +0100
            Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 10:21 -0700
            Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 10:34 -0700
              Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-19 15:39 -0400
                Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-19 22:36 +0000
                Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-20 09:59 -0400
                Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-20 12:58 -0600
      Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 19:57 -0400
  re: GNU/Linux "Creams" MS Windows Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-08-18 13:05 +0000

csiph-web