Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366000
| From | Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows |
| Date | 2016-08-18 23:01 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <np5eok0cmf@news4.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <np2qqe01dvm@news3.newsguy.com> <np3r80$qjg$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> <np4im112bqc@news3.newsguy.com> <np4mjj$kq7$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> |
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:09:22 +0100, Desk Rabbit wrote: > > par2tbb hasn't been touched in 3 years, so par2tbb is yet another > shining example of Linux abandonware..... > We can use your very own words to rebut this idiotic comment: > > Unfounded, unverified and unsubstantiated nonsense. > Let me introduce you to the facts of reality. A C/C++ command-line program DOES NOT have to be maintained. This is especially true for the Linux environment where the kernel interface is guaranteed NOT to change -- EVER. Consequently, three-year-old source code is, from a functional point of view, essentially brand spanking new. But of course, a brain-dead server administrator like you would not be aware of such basic facts. Obviously, all you ever have known are the superficialities of the Microshit Winforms GUI, and THAT bloated monstrosity is subject to very frequent -- and necessary -- overhauls.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-17 23:09 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 23:50 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 22:19 -0600
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-18 09:22 +0100
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-18 15:02 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-18 17:09 +0100
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-18 23:01 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-08-19 14:59 +0100
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 10:21 -0700
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 10:34 -0700
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-19 15:39 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-19 22:36 +0000
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-20 09:59 -0400
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-20 12:58 -0600
Re: GNU/Linux Creams MS Windows DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 19:57 -0400
re: GNU/Linux "Creams" MS Windows Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-08-18 13:05 +0000
csiph-web