Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #352744 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-29 22:13 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-04-30 07:33 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 116 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-29 22:13 +0000
Re: done John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 15:43 -0700
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 19:26 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:50 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 05:51 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:55 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 05:57 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:04 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:07 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 06:08 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 14:35 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 17:20 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:40 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 18:11 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 16:17 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 17:23 +0000
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-01 00:56 +0200
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-01 01:30 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 23:11 +0000
Re: done Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-01 08:38 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 15:58 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 11:59 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 12:00 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 19:48 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:02 -0700
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-05-01 22:04 +0200
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:41 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 13:47 -0700
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-05-02 02:21 +0200
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:34 -0700
Re: done chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-02 08:27 -0500
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 15:54 +0200
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 20:16 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:38 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 20:55 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 14:17 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 21:35 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 14:47 -0700
Re: done Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-05-01 14:56 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-01 22:37 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:59 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:10 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-01 23:09 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:11 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:27 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 00:31 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:52 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:04 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:47 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:51 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:44 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:41 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 19:43 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 03:36 +0000
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:14 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:43 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 22:25 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 22:27 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 17:45 +0000
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 20:16 +0200
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 20:46 +0200
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:43 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 20:55 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:32 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:38 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:48 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:49 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:18 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 01:02 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:10 +0000
Re: done chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-02 08:31 -0500
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-02 07:27 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 09:10 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 10:45 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 14:51 +0000
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 11:18 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 19:13 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:12 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:27 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:53 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:42 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:50 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:17 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:40 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:49 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:16 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 01:02 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:08 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:33 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:43 -0700
Re: done William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-05-02 09:30 +0100
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 16:02 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 20:36 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 03:40 +0000
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:14 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 21:58 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:32 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 22:37 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:55 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:00 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:33 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:13 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 12:01 -0700
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 23:58 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:08 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 13:12 +0200
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 14:09 +0200
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 10:02 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:05 +0000
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 11:19 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:41 +0000
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 13:19 -0400
Re: done Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-30 13:54 -0400
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 19:36 -0400
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 07:33 -0700
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 15:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #352992 |
Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > In article <ghnvmfj939a.afju@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote: > >> > > > Sandman: >> > > > I got you beat: >> > > >> > > > Applications/Shell>time ./ipdecode.sh >> > > > c5fd5ec5996a00946001a1952cc5e09b >> > > > c5fd5ec5996a00946001a1952cc5e09b:109.72.51.248 >> > > >> > > > real 0m51.322s >> > > > user 13m11.226s >> > > > sys 0m2.687s >> > > >> > > owl: >> > > That's impressive. Can you do these? >> > >> > > 73bc0032541f55c8e8b7366f126961f0 >> > > 1ab71f9efbdd66785a8ee9e31cf301e5 >> > >> > > One of them I know is an ipv4 address. The other I don't know. >> > >> > Sandman: >> > 73bc0032541f55c8e8b7366f126961f0 = 10.0.128.33 >> >> > 1ab71f9efbdd66785a8ee9e31cf301e5 ≈ 199.48.241.55, known TOR >> > proxy by Snit. >> >> What was the original string on that one? It's not a hash >> of just "199.48.241.55" > > No, hence the "≈". > > The host "1ab71f9efbdd66785a8ee9e31cf301e5" has been used by: > > - Edward Stansfield > - Big Fish in a Small Crotch > - Barry H > - anonymous > - mike antipasto > - Nobody > - Omar > - Richard King > - Richard Bone > That is why I was interested in it. I wanted to see if it was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to mimic flatfish. But the IPs I check with one exception seem to be from NY, so I'd say that's flatfish. I see 3 ips in this range: 199.48.240.0/21 and 7 ips in this range: 128.90.0.0/16 BTW, check these: e7bf437cfa09cdd792a3c3d89b745b28 899e353b8d35885fa3e36ce5e19fd017 same "From:", but we have crossover between the above two network ranges. > And going through them, "Barry H" has also used the host > "a90b6fea5f35669a90d5f0ef20a40366", which is 199.48.241.55. > > You can use this page to search a bit: > > <http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/eternal.php>? Nice. How far back does your data go? I only have access back to late Nov 2014. > hash=1ab71f9efbdd66785a8ee9e31cf301e5> > > <http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/eternal.php?name=Barry+H> > > It's not so much about what the actual host is, we all know all the gym's above > are Snit sock puppets. :) > Nah, I think it's flatfish.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 11:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D34BA014.718C7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #353046 |
On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > I wanted to see if it > was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to > mimic flatfish. Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me: 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. * 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see if someone is forging me. * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in CSMA, years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and admitted it as soon as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a while in response to some heavy trolling, and even used a couple other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when I foolishly accepted the word of you and Carroll and others trolling me that if I did so and admitted it you would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish of me to accept the word of you and Carroll and the like, but whatever. Years ago. Move the hell on. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 12:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D34BA044.718CC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #353046 |
On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > I wanted to see if it > was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to > mimic flatfish. Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me: 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. * 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see if someone is forging me. * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in CSMA, years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and admitted it as soon as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a while in response to some heavy trolling, and even used a couple other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when I foolishly accepted the word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me that if I did so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish of me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the like, but whatever. Years ago. Move the hell on. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 19:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #353064 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> I wanted to see if it >> was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to >> mimic flatfish. > > Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me: > > 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. * > 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see > if someone is forging me. > > > * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in CSMA, > years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and admitted it as soon > as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a while in response to some heavy > trolling, and even used a couple other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when I > foolishly accepted the word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me > that if I did so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish > of me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the like, but whatever. > Years ago. Move the hell on. > If you don't like people accusing you of using sock puppets, you should stop using them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 13:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D34BAED7.718E5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #353072 |
On 5/1/16, 12:48 PM, in article fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> I wanted to see if it >>> was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to >>> mimic flatfish. >> >> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me: >> >> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. * >> 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see >> if someone is forging me. >> >> >> * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in CSMA, >> years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and admitted it as soon >> as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a while in response to some heavy >> trolling, and even used a couple other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when I >> foolishly accepted the word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me >> that if I did so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish >> of me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the like, but whatever. >> Years ago. Move the hell on. >> > > If you don't like people accusing you of using sock puppets, you should > stop using them. Your assumption that I use them is incorrect. Remember: I have NEVER posted to COLA with any name other than Snit. But the accusations are made over and over and over and over by those who want to put me on the defensive to avoid speaking of Linux and technology... and people who assume others do as they do - use socks and otherwise act poorly. My refusal to sink to their level - and the level you often go - leads you and others to make such unsupported accusations. Of note, you will NEVER show anything from ME showing where I have posted to COLA with any name other than Snit. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 22:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20160501220424.3b33fc4c@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #353075 |
On Sun, 01 May 2016 13:02:15 -0700 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/1/16, 12:48 PM, in article fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> I wanted to see if it > >>> was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to > >>> mimic flatfish. > >> > >> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from > >> me: > >> > >> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not > >> from me. * 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to > >> check headers to see if someone is forging me. > >> > >> > >> * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in > >> CSMA, years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and > >> admitted it as soon as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a > >> while in response to some heavy trolling, and even used a couple > >> other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when I foolishly accepted the > >> word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me that if I did > >> so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish of > >> me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the like, but > >> whatever. Years ago. Move the hell on. > > > > If you don't like people accusing you of using sock puppets, you > > should stop using them. > > Your assumption that I use them is incorrect. Remember: I have NEVER > posted to COLA with any name other than Snit. Liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 13:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D34BB7FE.718F2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #353076 |
On 5/1/16, 1:04 PM, in article 20160501220424.3b33fc4c@maxa-pc, "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: > On Sun, 01 May 2016 13:02:15 -0700 > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 5/1/16, 12:48 PM, in article fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I wanted to see if it >>>>> was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to >>>>> mimic flatfish. >>>> >>>> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from >>>> me: >>>> >>>> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not >>>> from me. * 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to >>>> check headers to see if someone is forging me. >>>> >>>> >>>> * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in >>>> CSMA, years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and >>>> admitted it as soon as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a >>>> while in response to some heavy trolling, and even used a couple >>>> other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when I foolishly accepted the >>>> word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me that if I did >>>> so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish of >>>> me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the like, but >>>> whatever. Years ago. Move the hell on. >>> >>> If you don't like people accusing you of using sock puppets, you >>> should stop using them. >> >> Your assumption that I use them is incorrect. Remember: I have NEVER >> posted to COLA with any name other than Snit. > > Liar. > See: the idiotic joke about how everyone is Snit. Nope. I do not believe you are stupid enough to think I really use socks. Does not mean you know I do not - how could you... but you know there is no real reason to think I do. Unless you are insisting you are truly stupid enough to think I do in the complete lack of any evidence that I have ever posted to COLA with any name other than Snit. To be clear: your claim is you are stupid enough to think I use socks, and I am defending you and noting you likely are not. I cannot prove you are not, just as neither you nor I can prove I do not use socks - but there is no good reason to think you are THAT stupid, just as their is no reason to think I use socks. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 13:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3398bfa8-3b59-496e-894b-07ea2f871b6d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #353085 |
On Sunday, May 1, 2016 at 2:41:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/1/16, 1:04 PM, in article 20160501220424.3b33fc4c@maxa-pc, "Melzzzzz" > <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 01 May 2016 13:02:15 -0700 > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > > >> On 5/1/16, 12:48 PM, in article fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I wanted to see if it > >>>>> was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to > >>>>> mimic flatfish. > >>>> > >>>> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from > >>>> me: > >>>> > >>>> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not > >>>> from me. * 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to > >>>> check headers to see if someone is forging me. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in > >>>> CSMA, years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and > >>>> admitted it as soon as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a > >>>> while in response to some heavy trolling, and even used a couple > >>>> other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when I foolishly accepted the > >>>> word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me that if I did > >>>> so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish of > >>>> me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the like, but > >>>> whatever. Years ago. Move the hell on. > >>> > >>> If you don't like people accusing you of using sock puppets, you > >>> should stop using them. > >> > >> Your assumption that I use them is incorrect. Remember: I have NEVER > >> posted to COLA with any name other than Snit. > > > > Liar. > > > > See: the idiotic joke about how everyone is Snit. Nope. I do not believe you > are stupid enough to think I really use socks. Does not mean you know I do > not - how could you... but you know there is no real reason to think I do. > > Unless you are insisting you are truly stupid enough to think I do in the > complete lack of any evidence that I have ever posted to COLA with any name > other than Snit. > > To be clear: your claim is you are stupid enough to think I use socks, and I > am defending you and noting you likely are not. I cannot prove you are not, > just as neither you nor I can prove I do not use socks - but there is no > good reason to think you are THAT stupid, just as their is no reason to > think I use socks. Snit... trying to use his "psych degree" again ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-02 02:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20160502022101.5f99ad0d@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #353085 |
On Sun, 01 May 2016 13:41:18 -0700 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/1/16, 1:04 PM, in article 20160501220424.3b33fc4c@maxa-pc, > "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 01 May 2016 13:02:15 -0700 > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > > >> On 5/1/16, 12:48 PM, in article fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid, > >> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, > >>>> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I wanted to see if it > >>>>> was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to > >>>>> mimic flatfish. > >>>> > >>>> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is > >>>> from me: > >>>> > >>>> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not > >>>> from me. * 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to > >>>> check headers to see if someone is forging me. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in > >>>> CSMA, years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and > >>>> admitted it as soon as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a > >>>> while in response to some heavy trolling, and even used a couple > >>>> other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when I foolishly accepted > >>>> the word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me that if I > >>>> did so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, > >>>> foolish of me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the > >>>> like, but whatever. Years ago. Move the hell on. > >>> > >>> If you don't like people accusing you of using sock puppets, you > >>> should stop using them. > >> > >> Your assumption that I use them is incorrect. Remember: I have > >> NEVER posted to COLA with any name other than Snit. > > > > Liar. > > > > See: the idiotic joke about how everyone is Snit. Nope. I do not > believe you are stupid enough to think I really use socks. Does not > mean you know I do not - how could you... but you know there is no > real reason to think I do. When socks disappear I would know you are no longer using socks, until then... > > Unless you are insisting you are truly stupid enough to think I do in > the complete lack of any evidence that I have ever posted to COLA > with any name other than Snit. Lack of evidence? ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 18:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D34BFCA5.71964%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #353133 |
On 5/1/16, 5:21 PM, in article 20160502022101.5f99ad0d@maxa-pc, "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>> Your assumption that I use them is incorrect. Remember: I have >>>> NEVER posted to COLA with any name other than Snit. >>> >>> Liar. >>> >> >> See: the idiotic joke about how everyone is Snit. Nope. I do not >> believe you are stupid enough to think I really use socks. Does not >> mean you know I do not - how could you... but you know there is no >> real reason to think I do. > > When socks disappear I would know you are no longer using socks, until > then... > >> >> Unless you are insisting you are truly stupid enough to think I do in >> the complete lack of any evidence that I have ever posted to COLA >> with any name other than Snit. > > Lack of evidence? ;) Of course. It is a running gag which nobody with a brain takes seriously. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-02 08:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <baleib19essc8p47qcikd8p7ft7gvtap1h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #353076 |
Melzzzzz wrote: > some thing wrote: >> >> Remember: I have NEVER posted to COLA with any name other than Snit. > > Liar. Ask the pathological liar who "Herd Watch" was. -- "For some reason the mindless droids here equate anything open source with somehow being technically superior." - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-02 15:54 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ng7lvk$e4n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #353214 |
chrisv wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote: > >> some thing wrote: >>> >>> Remember: I have NEVER posted to COLA with any name other than Snit. >> >> Liar. > > Ask the pathological liar who "Herd Watch" was. > Brock McNugget naturally. And Larry Washington. And Jeremy from Walmart And dozens, if not hundreds other nyms. After all, that lying imbecile does not just permeat COLA with his incredible shite
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <311b8972-d04a-4f00-869e-5270098601ec@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #353075 |
On Sunday, May 1, 2016 at 2:02:22 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/1/16, 12:48 PM, in article fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> I wanted to see if it > >>> was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to > >>> mimic flatfish. > >> > >> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me: > >> > >> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. * > >> 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see > >> if someone is forging me. > >> > >> > >> * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in CSMA, > >> years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and admitted it as soon > >> as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a while in response to some heavy > >> trolling, and even used a couple other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when I > >> foolishly accepted the word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me > >> that if I did so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish > >> of me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the like, but whatever. > >> Years ago. Move the hell on. > >> > > > > If you don't like people accusing you of using sock puppets, you should > > stop using them. > > Your assumption that I use them is incorrect. Remember: I have NEVER posted > to COLA with any name other than Snit. > > But the accusations are made over and over and over and over by those who > want to put me on the defensive to avoid speaking of Linux and technology... > and people who assume others do as they do - use socks and otherwise act > poorly. My refusal to sink to their level - and the level you often go - > leads you and others to make such unsupported accusations. Of note, you will > NEVER show anything from ME showing where I have posted to COLA with any > name other than Snit. Your problem, of course, is that it's been proven beyond reasonable doubt that you have. Here's the problem with lying so often and people spotting it: People don't believe you. Funny how it works, huh? Worse, even when you have one of those rare instances of telling the the truth, the likelihood is that you won't be believed anyway. That's the by-product of lying that you completely overlook.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 20:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjd0a3a.efgh@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #353075 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 5/1/16, 12:48 PM, in article fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I wanted to see if it
>>>> was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to
>>>> mimic flatfish.
>>>
>>> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me:
>>>
>>> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. *
>>> 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see
>>> if someone is forging me.
>>>
>>>
>>> * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in CSMA,
>>> years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and admitted it as soon
>>> as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a while in response to some heavy
>>> trolling, and even used a couple other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when I
>>> foolishly accepted the word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me
>>> that if I did so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish
>>> of me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the like, but whatever.
>>> Years ago. Move the hell on.
>>>
>>
>> If you don't like people accusing you of using sock puppets, you should
>> stop using them.
>
> Your assumption that I use them is incorrect. Remember: I have NEVER posted
> to COLA with any name other than Snit.
>
> But the accusations are made over and over and over and over by those who
> want to put me on the defensive to avoid speaking of Linux and technology...
> and people who assume others do as they do - use socks and otherwise act
> poorly. My refusal to sink to their level - and the level you often go -
> leads you and others to make such unsupported accusations. Of note, you will
> NEVER show anything from ME showing where I have posted to COLA with any
> name other than Snit.
>
Cry me a river. I've seen this often enough:
-> Sock A makes a post
--> Somebody B replies to that sock.
---> You respond to Somebody B, as Snit, but with language making
it seem as if you were Sock A continuing the discussion.
(IOW, you forgot to switch to the sock when replying).
Invariably somebody busts you on it, but it's all crickets from
you at that point, unless later downthread you make one of your
pathetic "Everybody's Snit har har orange you glad i didn't say
banana" whines.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 13:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D34BB769.718F0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #353079 |
On 5/1/16, 1:16 PM, in article ghjd0a3a.efgh@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/1/16, 12:48 PM, in article fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I wanted to see if it >>>>> was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to >>>>> mimic flatfish. >>>> >>>> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me: >>>> >>>> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. * >>>> 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see >>>> if someone is forging me. >>>> >>>> >>>> * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in CSMA, >>>> years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and admitted it as soon >>>> as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a while in response to some heavy >>>> trolling, and even used a couple other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when >>>> I >>>> foolishly accepted the word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me >>>> that if I did so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish >>>> of me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the like, but whatever. >>>> Years ago. Move the hell on. >>>> >>> >>> If you don't like people accusing you of using sock puppets, you should >>> stop using them. >> >> Your assumption that I use them is incorrect. Remember: I have NEVER posted >> to COLA with any name other than Snit. >> >> But the accusations are made over and over and over and over by those who >> want to put me on the defensive to avoid speaking of Linux and technology... >> and people who assume others do as they do - use socks and otherwise act >> poorly. My refusal to sink to their level - and the level you often go - >> leads you and others to make such unsupported accusations. Of note, you will >> NEVER show anything from ME showing where I have posted to COLA with any >> name other than Snit. > > Cry me a river. I've seen this often enough: > > -> Sock A makes a post > --> Somebody B replies to that sock. > ---> You respond to Somebody B, as Snit, but with language making > it seem as if you were Sock A continuing the discussion. > > (IOW, you forgot to switch to the sock when replying). > Invariably somebody busts you on it, but it's all crickets from > you at that point, unless later downthread you make one of your > pathetic "Everybody's Snit har har orange you glad i didn't say > banana" whines. > One word: bullshit. Your claim is utter and complete bullshit. The ongoing joke of COLA is everyone is Snit. This is just a fact. I do not think you or others are stupid enough to really believe it. The fact is I do not use socks and as such there is no evidence I do. There are idiots who post about screencasting and consistency and pretend to be me to fool idiots... and then those who troll pretend to be stupid enough to fall for it. I am giving you a compliment here: I do not think you are so stupid as to actually fall for it. Are you saying you are? If so, well, I suppose I will accept your word you are THAT stupid. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 20:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjdoaefa@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #353083 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/1/16, 1:16 PM, in article ghjd0a3a.efgh@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 5/1/16, 12:48 PM, in article fhjgle903.af3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 5/1/16, 8:58 AM, in article fhjd0tka.f311@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I wanted to see if it >>>>>> was from NY or AZ. I thought it might be Snit trying to >>>>>> mimic flatfish. >>>>> >>>>> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me: >>>>> >>>>> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. * >>>>> 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see >>>>> if someone is forging me. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * I have never posted to COLA with any name other than "Snit", in CSMA, >>>>> years ago, I posted as "Brock McNuggets" as a joke and admitted it as soon >>>>> as asked, and used things like "Şท¡ϯ" for a while in response to some heavy >>>>> trolling, and even used a couple other names in a COMPLETELY OPEN WAY when >>>>> I >>>>> foolishly accepted the word of Sandman and Carroll and others trolling me >>>>> that if I did so and admitted it they would stop trolling me. Yeah, foolish >>>>> of me to accept the word of Sandman and Carroll and the like, but whatever. >>>>> Years ago. Move the hell on. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you don't like people accusing you of using sock puppets, you should >>>> stop using them. >>> >>> Your assumption that I use them is incorrect. Remember: I have NEVER posted >>> to COLA with any name other than Snit. >>> >>> But the accusations are made over and over and over and over by those who >>> want to put me on the defensive to avoid speaking of Linux and technology... >>> and people who assume others do as they do - use socks and otherwise act >>> poorly. My refusal to sink to their level - and the level you often go - >>> leads you and others to make such unsupported accusations. Of note, you will >>> NEVER show anything from ME showing where I have posted to COLA with any >>> name other than Snit. >> >> Cry me a river. I've seen this often enough: >> >> -> Sock A makes a post >> --> Somebody B replies to that sock. >> ---> You respond to Somebody B, as Snit, but with language making >> it seem as if you were Sock A continuing the discussion. >> >> (IOW, you forgot to switch to the sock when replying). >> Invariably somebody busts you on it, but it's all crickets from >> you at that point, unless later downthread you make one of your >> pathetic "Everybody's Snit har har orange you glad i didn't say >> banana" whines. >> > One word: bullshit. > Are you bad at math or just lying? I mean, that sentence alone was a lie even before it was finished. Then what about all this... > Your claim is utter and complete bullshit. The ongoing joke of COLA is > everyone is Snit. This is just a fact. I do not think you or others are > stupid enough to really believe it. > > The fact is I do not use socks and as such there is no evidence I do. There > are idiots who post about screencasting and consistency and pretend to be me > to fool idiots... and then those who troll pretend to be stupid enough to > fall for it. > > I am giving you a compliment here: I do not think you are so stupid as to > actually fall for it. Are you saying you are? If so, well, I suppose I will > accept your word you are THAT stupid. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 14:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D34BC05D.71903%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #353091 |
On 5/1/16, 1:55 PM, in article fhjdoaefa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... >>>>>> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. * >>>>>> 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see >>>>>> if someone is forging me. ... >>> Cry me a river. I've seen this often enough: >>> >>> -> Sock A makes a post >>> --> Somebody B replies to that sock. >>> ---> You respond to Somebody B, as Snit, but with language making >>> it seem as if you were Sock A continuing the discussion. >>> >>> (IOW, you forgot to switch to the sock when replying). >>> Invariably somebody busts you on it, but it's all crickets from >>> you at that point, unless later downthread you make one of your >>> pathetic "Everybody's Snit har har orange you glad i didn't say >>> banana" whines. >>> >> One word: bullshit. > > Are you bad at math or just lying? I am noting you have NEVER seen what you claim to have seen. Maybe you think you have... but no reason to think even that. In short: you are full of shit. You are lying. It really is that simple. > I mean, that sentence alone was a lie even before it was finished. > Then what about all this... >> Your claim is utter and complete bullshit. The ongoing joke of COLA is >> everyone is Snit. This is just a fact. I do not think you or others are >> stupid enough to really believe it. >> >> The fact is I do not use socks and as such there is no evidence I do. There >> are idiots who post about screencasting and consistency and pretend to be me >> to fool idiots... and then those who troll pretend to be stupid enough to >> fall for it. >> >> I am giving you a compliment here: I do not think you are so stupid as to >> actually fall for it. Are you saying you are? If so, well, I suppose I will >> accept your word you are THAT stupid. Remember when you set up a task dealing with recipes and saving them as a PDF. You accused me of cheating on that - OS X handled the task so well you literally could not believe it was true. Peter Köhlmann joined you in that. You both made false and unsupported accusations against ME, ones you could not in any way support, based on your inability to believe OS X could handle your hand-picked task as well as it did (not only doing what you asked for but a LOT more in terms of speed, having smaller file sizes, allowing me to select text and do searches, etc.). You both assumed wrong doing based on your own ignorance. In that case I was able to prove your attack false and you did finally admit to it. Of course I would not cheat... what would the purpose even be? My goal is not to try to convince someone of something that is not true but to educate them about how things can be done. To falsify it would be to go directly against my own goals! Your accusation did not even make sense... yet you and Peter both were insistent that I must prove to you that your accusation was false... neither of you thought for one second about how the burden of proof was on you to back why I would go against my own self interest and do as you accused. Think of that: you assumed others would go against their own best interest and do wrong... and you not only failed to show any evidence they would you gave no reason they would. And you failed to back your claims. You insisted and whined how others should prove you wrong. Completely backward of you and absurd... and even then I was kind enough to help educate you, even as you accused me of things that would be against my own interests. In this case, of course, you are doing the same thing: pushing an accusations - but this time one which cannot be proved false. You have no evidence. You have no reason why I would act against my own self interest and do such as thing. You have no examples. But you insist it is true. Just silly. Anyway, the gag is mostly about pushing me on the defensive to avoid speaking about technology. And it is old. Why not drop the gag and come up with another task - maybe one that is a bit more sensible than downloading ALL recipes from a home page of a recipe site. Never did quite understand the value of it... though I did admit it was fun to do. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 21:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjgd003.afa3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #353094 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/1/16, 1:55 PM, in article fhjdoaefa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>>>>>> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. * >>>>>>> 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to see >>>>>>> if someone is forging me. > > ... >>>> Cry me a river. I've seen this often enough: >>>> >>>> -> Sock A makes a post >>>> --> Somebody B replies to that sock. >>>> ---> You respond to Somebody B, as Snit, but with language making >>>> it seem as if you were Sock A continuing the discussion. >>>> >>>> (IOW, you forgot to switch to the sock when replying). >>>> Invariably somebody busts you on it, but it's all crickets from >>>> you at that point, unless later downthread you make one of your >>>> pathetic "Everybody's Snit har har orange you glad i didn't say >>>> banana" whines. >>>> >>> One word: bullshit. >> >> Are you bad at math or just lying? > > I am noting you have NEVER seen what you claim to have seen. Maybe you think > you have... but no reason to think even that. In short: you are full of > shit. You are lying. It really is that simple. > >> I mean, that sentence alone was a lie even before it was finished. >> Then what about all this... > >>> Your claim is utter and complete bullshit. The ongoing joke of COLA is >>> everyone is Snit. This is just a fact. I do not think you or others are >>> stupid enough to really believe it. >>> >>> The fact is I do not use socks and as such there is no evidence I do. There >>> are idiots who post about screencasting and consistency and pretend to be me >>> to fool idiots... and then those who troll pretend to be stupid enough to >>> fall for it. >>> >>> I am giving you a compliment here: I do not think you are so stupid as to >>> actually fall for it. Are you saying you are? If so, well, I suppose I will >>> accept your word you are THAT stupid. > > Remember when you set up a task dealing with recipes and saving them as a > PDF. You accused me of cheating on that - OS X handled the task so well you > literally could not believe it was true. Peter Köhlmann joined you in that. > You both made false and unsupported accusations against ME, ones you could > not in any way support, based on your inability to believe OS X could handle > your hand-picked task as well as it did (not only doing what you asked for > but a LOT more in terms of speed, having smaller file sizes, allowing me to > select text and do searches, etc.). > All I remember about that was it turned out your "processing" speed was entirely related to your 50Mbps network connection vs my 8Mbps connection. When I mirrored the site locally and did the same processing, it completely stomped your ass. I guess we'll never know, since you were unable to mirror the site. I don't feel like reading all the rest of this blah, so I'll just snip it...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 14:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D34BC77F.7190D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #353095 |
On 5/1/16, 2:35 PM, in article fhjgd003.afa3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/1/16, 1:55 PM, in article fhjdoaefa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>>>>> Nope. Never. Remember the rules for figuring out if a post is from me: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1) Look to see if it says it is from "Snit" - if not it is not from me. >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> 2) If it says it is from Snit then you might want to check headers to >>>>>>>> see >>>>>>>> if someone is forging me. >> >> ... >>>>> Cry me a river. I've seen this often enough: >>>>> >>>>> -> Sock A makes a post >>>>> --> Somebody B replies to that sock. >>>>> ---> You respond to Somebody B, as Snit, but with language making >>>>> it seem as if you were Sock A continuing the discussion. >>>>> >>>>> (IOW, you forgot to switch to the sock when replying). >>>>> Invariably somebody busts you on it, but it's all crickets from >>>>> you at that point, unless later downthread you make one of your >>>>> pathetic "Everybody's Snit har har orange you glad i didn't say >>>>> banana" whines. >>>>> >>>> One word: bullshit. >>> >>> Are you bad at math or just lying? >> >> I am noting you have NEVER seen what you claim to have seen. Maybe you think >> you have... but no reason to think even that. In short: you are full of >> shit. You are lying. It really is that simple. >> >>> I mean, that sentence alone was a lie even before it was finished. >>> Then what about all this... >> >>>> Your claim is utter and complete bullshit. The ongoing joke of COLA is >>>> everyone is Snit. This is just a fact. I do not think you or others are >>>> stupid enough to really believe it. >>>> >>>> The fact is I do not use socks and as such there is no evidence I do. There >>>> are idiots who post about screencasting and consistency and pretend to be >>>> me >>>> to fool idiots... and then those who troll pretend to be stupid enough to >>>> fall for it. >>>> >>>> I am giving you a compliment here: I do not think you are so stupid as to >>>> actually fall for it. Are you saying you are? If so, well, I suppose I will >>>> accept your word you are THAT stupid. >> >> Remember when you set up a task dealing with recipes and saving them as a >> PDF. You accused me of cheating on that - OS X handled the task so well you >> literally could not believe it was true. Peter Köhlmann joined you in that. >> You both made false and unsupported accusations against ME, ones you could >> not in any way support, based on your inability to believe OS X could handle >> your hand-picked task as well as it did (not only doing what you asked for >> but a LOT more in terms of speed, having smaller file sizes, allowing me to >> select text and do searches, etc.). > > All I remember about that was it turned out your "processing" speed was > entirely related to your 50Mbps network connection vs my 8Mbps connection. So you do no remember you and Peter accusing me of lying and cheating? That has completely slipped you mind? Really? > When I mirrored the site locally and did the same processing, it completely > stomped your ass. I guess we'll never know, since you were unable to > mirror the site. I could use wget if I wanted to... heck, I even have a GUI wrapper for it. The claim I cannot do so is just silly... another lie from you. I also showed you and even highlighted all the timing for one of my solutions. The video I point to time and time again shows it: * Download as PDFs all the recipes from the homepage of allrecipes.com (Owl is the one who suggested this). I did several versions... here is one: <https://youtu.be/_J4PppWroWY>. Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never able to do on Linux. Worked so well that he and Peter Köhlmann insisted it must have been faked. Jump to the 1:00 mark and you can see all the details. Then I show the PDFs and how the text can be selected and all how I can do with it as I do with any text - look things up, etc. Worked great! Now you were doing yours with the command line and may have eventually found a faster solution... if I recall correctly that is what we decided. But yours created PDFs that were bigger and you could not do any of the lookups or the like I could do. But the bigger point here is you just assumed I would go against my own self-interest and fake it and Peter jumped in to agree. In that case I was able to do you the favor of proving you wrong. With your current accusation there is no way to prove you wrong, but your evidence is no stronger and makes no more sense. And now you say you do not even recall making your false accusations! Insane. My advice: Stick to tech. Come up with other tasks. Stop making false accusations you cannot back. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 14:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <t7WdnfrbK4oT5rvKnZ2dnUU7-W_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #353097 |
On 2016-05-01, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: // snip > I could use wget if I wanted to... heck, I even have a GUI wrapper for it. > The claim I cannot do so is just silly... another lie from you. > > I also showed you and even highlighted all the timing for one of my > solutions. The video I point to time and time again shows it: > > * Download as PDFs all the recipes from the homepage of allrecipes.com (Owl > is the one who suggested this). I did several versions... here is one: ><https://youtu.be/_J4PppWroWY>. Mine not only worked, but the PDF had > selectable text and allowed me to do quick searches on ingredients and the > like... something Owl was never able to do on Linux. Worked so well that he > and Peter Köhlmann insisted it must have been faked. > > Jump to the 1:00 mark and you can see all the details. Then I show the PDFs > and how the text can be selected and all how I can do with it as I do with > any text - look things up, etc. Worked great! > > Now you were doing yours with the command line and may have eventually found > a faster solution... if I recall correctly that is what we decided. But > yours created PDFs that were bigger and you could not do any of the lookups > or the like I could do. > > But the bigger point here is you just assumed I would go against my own > self-interest and fake it and Peter jumped in to agree. In that case I was > able to do you the favor of proving you wrong. With your current accusation > there is no way to prove you wrong, but your evidence is no stronger and > makes no more sense. > > And now you say you do not even recall making your false accusations! > Insane. > > My advice: Stick to tech. Come up with other tasks. Stop making false > accusations you cannot back. Isn't there a simple way to solve this problem? Why don't you, Snit, simply provide your script/method such that it can run on someone else's machine? If I write a bash shell script, I publish it so everyone can use it and give me feedback. I don't make a video of it, I just give the source code away and they can run it themselves. Same thing here, yes? Just publish the method so it can be duplicated by anyone else and thus confirmed. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web