Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243070 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-11 18:49 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-05-12 08:52 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 77 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 18:49 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 03:54 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 19:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 02:35 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 11:47 +0000
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:02 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 09:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:48 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:27 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:50 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:05 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:26 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 13:31 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:56 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:21 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:11 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:52 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:54 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:05 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 18:58 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:14 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:12 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:18 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:50 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 14:45 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:26 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:21 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:45 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:02 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:09 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:57 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:06 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 19:00 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:13 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:50 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:52 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:57 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:32 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 20:00 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 07:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:48 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:16 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 10:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 11:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 11:34 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 23:04 +0000
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:23 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 10:57 +0100
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 13:28 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 12:59 +0100
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 15:24 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:43 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:39 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:42 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:14 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:42 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:52 -0700
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-11 18:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations |
| Message-ID | <36c77eff-7c14-4829-90ca-03fdc8cd9162@googlegroups.com> |
http://www.tylervigen.com/correlation_project/correlation_images/us-spending-on-science-space-and-technology_suicides-by-hanging-strangulation-and-suffocation.png When you put funding into science and space you make people feel insignificant. This leads to violence. It is what Snit and other liberals want. Suffocate our souls until we suffocate ourselves. Another forum ruined by Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 http://prescottcomputerguy.com The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his website http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 03:54 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87zjin4v87.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #243070 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> writes: > http://www.tylervigen.com/correlation_project/correlation_images/us-spending-on-science-space-and-technology_suicides-by-hanging-strangulation-and-suffocation.png > > When you put funding into science and space you make people feel > insignificant. This leads to violence. It is what Snit and other > liberals want. Suffocate our souls until we suffocate ourselves. You seem confused. > > Another forum ruined by > Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 > http://prescottcomputerguy.com > The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his website > http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-11 19:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1bc25efe-b3d6-4155-aab3-c7152cf03353@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243074 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 1:54:48 AM UTC, Hadron wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > http://www.tylervigen.com/correlation_project/correlation_images/us-spending-on-science-space-and-technology_suicides-by-hanging-strangulation-and-suffocation.png > > > > > > When you put funding into science and space you make people feel > > > insignificant. This leads to violence. It is what Snit and other > > > liberals want. Suffocate our souls until we suffocate ourselves. > > > > You seem confused. Not at all. I know Snit is going to end his raping of COLA and you will continue to shill for him. > > > > > Another forum ruined by > > > Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 > > > http://prescottcomputerguy.com > > > The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his website > > > http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html > > > > -- > > "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." > > The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. > > PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS > > http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/ Another forum ruined by Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 http://prescottcomputerguy.com The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his website http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 02:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c32f6dd3-14b7-4583-842a-d9ff8f78dd27@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243075 |
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 7:29:44 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 12, 2014 1:54:48 AM UTC, Hadron wrote: > > > Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.tylervigen.com/correlation_project/correlation_images/us-spending-on-science-space-and-technology_suicides-by-hanging-strangulation-and-suffocation.png > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you put funding into science and space you make people feel > > > > > > > insignificant. This leads to violence. It is what Snit and other > > > > > > > liberals want. Suffocate our souls until we suffocate ourselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > You seem confused. > > > > Not at all. I know Snit is going to end his raping of COLA and you will continue to shill for him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another forum ruined by > > > > > > > Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 > > > > > > > http://prescottcomputerguy.com > > > > > > > The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his website > > > > > > > http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." > > > > > > The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. > > > > > > PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS > > > > > > http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/ > > > > Another forum ruined by > > Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 > > http://prescottcomputerguy.com > > The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his website > > http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of taking it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 11:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA32B4F4A75BE4tattoovampire@178.63.61.145> |
| In reply to | #243079 |
Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: > Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of > taking it? That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for years. -- Press any key to continue or any other key to quit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 14:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87siof2oj5.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #243080 |
Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> writes: > Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: > >> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of >> taking it? > > That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for > years. Don't be ridiculous. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF963C23.370E8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243082 |
On 5/12/14, 5:02 AM, in article 87siof2oj5.fsf@gmail.com, "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote: > Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> writes: > >> Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: >> >>> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of >>> taking it? >> >> That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for >> years. > > Don't be ridiculous. It is what he does. It is what he is. Whatever. Not getting involved in this soap opera. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 09:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b946d82b-e377-47cd-849c-4eebe76d96db@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243082 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 6:02:22 AM UTC-6, Hadron wrote: > Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> writes: > > > > > Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: > > > > > >> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of > > >> taking it? > > > > > > That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for > > > years. > > > > Don't be ridiculous. Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than anyone else. What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 12:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkqu0r$kt9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243142 |
On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. > > And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than anyone else. > > What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated). I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. -- Silver Slimer Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 10:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF965295.37118%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243151 |
On 5/12/14, 9:48 AM, in article lkqu0r$kt9$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<slvrslmr@strtml.cm> wrote:
> On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>
>> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other
>> gmail accounts.
>>
>> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to
>> wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous".
Ten years of this, Carroll... and, yes, you are "ridiculous". To an extreme.
This started in 2004 when you got mad about your then girlfriend obsessing
over me (heavily documented here: <http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot>. I
continued to respond to you for about 5 years, when you flipped out in 2009
and started contacting my employer with the stated goal to have me fired
(you spoke of doing so even if you had to twist arms):
<http://goo.gl/OHNryA>
<http://goo.gl/MZ6yCD>
<http://goo.gl/WaKKGq>
With that I stopped responding directly to you except for *one* chance I
gave you in 2011 when you were accusing *me* of running:
<http://goo.gl/racU64>.
You, Carroll, as predicted, ran (you always do when faced with facts):
<http://goo.gl/qHs5Xh>
You know you have no backing for any of your nonsense and have become, if
anything, more and more obsessive since I stopped responding to you.
You are truly a very, very sick man.
>> The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as
>> Steve Carroll is ridiculous.
Ridiculous but also shown to be true:
* The "forger" is psychic and knows when Carroll is going to start and
stop posting. Here are some examples:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/carroll-forger>
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/carroll-forger2>
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/carroll-forger3>
* Carroll, on seeing this, twists and lies to say it is merely a sign
of people posting at about the same time. Why would Carroll lie if
he is not hiding something?
* Carroll has done the same nonsense before with socks:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/stevedward>.
* Carroll repeatedly blamed me but then admitted he lied and "doubts"
it is me forging him... then went back to blaming me anyway.
* Carroll points to <https://www.torproject.org> which makes it
trivial to use multiple IP addresses with their Tor Browser.
* Carroll later denied that he even knew there was a Tor Browser.
Yes, this was after he pointed to the site where you can get it!
* Carroll lies about being able to use that software, claiming he has
"no idea how this can be done".
>> The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same
>> sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous.
Ridiculous but true. Sure.
>> Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the
>> forger(s) do.
You have been posting about my professional life for years. I have links
from 2005, above, proving it.
>> You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted,
>> anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done.
You deleted your one about Obama killing Steve Jobs... but others quoted it.
I can track that down. And you repeatedly call Obama the "dark one".
>> For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and
>> anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so
>> very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While
>> it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than
>> anyone else.
But elsewhere you said you doubted it was me. Get your story straight.
>> What does this all add up to?
You are an obsessive liar who had been stalking me for 10 years... as you
have repeatedly openly admitted to.
>> Either you are the forger
But above you blame me. Back and forth you go. You are lying.
>> or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your
>> real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from
>> reality where Snit is concerned.
Nope. You recently asked others to find examples of my lying.
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/u3C4zgRw8j4>
Posts by:
* chrisv
* DFS
* flatfish+++
* fretwizzin@gmail.com
* GreyCloud
* Nobody
* Sinister Midget
* Steve Carroll (fretwizzen@gmail.com account)
* Steve Carroll (fretwizzer@gmail.com account)
* Tattoo Vampire
Total count of lies from Snit quoted: ZERO.
>> All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total
>> fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has
>> had more than enough of, as they've stated).
>
> I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and
> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a
> result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts
> has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid
> points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly.
Ah, you got mad you could not refute a video about the NRA so now you are
playing in your own sandbox. How cute!
--
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 10:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <58a4414a-ec79-47c8-bf43-77c6f64f8ce6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243163 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:27:33 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/12/14, 9:48 AM, in article lkqu0r$kt9$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" > > <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> wrote: > > > > > On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > >> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other > > >> gmail accounts. > > >> > > >> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to > > >> wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". > > > > Ten years of this, Carroll... and, yes, you are "ridiculous". You've asked to be shown your "wrongs", I show them to you; you hate that because you're trying to sell the non-realistic idea that they don't exist, a thing everyone knows is BS. Virtually every word that comes off your keyboard in my direction, including all the forgeries, lies, etc., is based on your narcissistic rage. Any idiot can see these things, that you actually believe you've hidden it is what's "ridiculous". People can spot when a child is throwing a fit, the exact same thing applies here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 11:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <23d3f4d7-218b-4a9f-85a6-a3a6a84b708c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243163 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:27:33 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: (snip crap) > With that I stopped responding directly True... but it's not escaped my notice that even when you respond indirectly to "Steve Carroll", 99.9% of the time it's a response to a forgery and the same goes for "Hadron". Care to explain that? I didn't think so. I keep telling... people aren't as stupid as you need them to be, they just aren't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 16:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <p1zv2f3piian.1nwbznchxao34$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #243151 |
On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:48:27 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. >> >> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than anyone else. >> >> What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated). > > I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a > result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts > has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid > points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. I have them scored down so I can read them if I choose to. It's fairly obvious that they are all the same person. There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of others that escape my mind at the moment. Personally, I don't think the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. Why would someone follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade? Doesn't make sense. Once again, add up all the little pieces and judge for yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 13:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF967DB7.37178%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243221 |
On 5/12/14, 1:26 PM, in article p1zv2f3piian.1nwbznchxao34$.dlg@40tude.net, "flatfish+++" <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote: >> I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a >> result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts >> has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid >> points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. > > I have them scored down so I can read them if I choose to. > It's fairly obvious that they are all the same person. Likely correct - with the exception of me... but you added that just to troll me. > There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person > posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a > few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of > others that escape my mind at the moment. Personally, I don't think > the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. Why would someone > follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade? He is insane. > Doesn't make sense. > > Once again, add up all the little pieces and judge for yourself. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 14:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2b99d5d2-ca98-49b4-b801-a4d796a24fae@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243221 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 2:26:28 PM UTC-6, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:48:27 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > > > > > On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > >> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. > > >> > > >> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than anyone else. > > >> > > >> What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated). > > > > > > I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and > > > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a > > > result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts > > > has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid > > > points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. > > > > I have them scored down so I can read them if I choose to. > > It's fairly obvious that they are all the same person. > > > > There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person > posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a > few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of > others that escape my mind at the moment. LOL! Nice try ;) There are no such "errors" that "confirm" anything for anyone who looks only at reality... and that reality is: I'm posting using only fretwizzer. No one can find *anything* that is contrary to that fact because there isn't anything to find. > Personally, I don't think > the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. You're wrong... or purposefully lying. That even your co-trolls DFS and "Hadron" don't know when to believe you should tell you something about your posting history. > Why would someone > follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade? Why do you keep hounding Linux users for so long? > Doesn't make sense. It makes about as much sense as what you're doing. > Once again, add up all the little pieces and judge for yourself. Here are a few of the facts, as opposed to these unspoken "errors" you allege exist: The "fretwizzer" gmail address goes back to at least Apr. of 2010, I've proven this many times. All other gmail addresses that write posts using my name only go back as far as Oct. of 2012, I can find nothing going back further and I'm willing to bet no one else can, either. The person using the 'fretwizzer" address pointed you to the recording of his kids in one of the discussions you had with him about music... more than once. The person using "fretwizzer" pointed you to the Wordpress site that uses the theme Snit is using and asked you to comment there (which you haven't done... the forger did, though). Snit has admitted to forging posting IDs, including mine... and I've posted this admission, more than once. Snit has been trying to make me appear as racially bigoted and antigay for a decade, I've pointed to these lying posts many times Snit has been trying, *very hard*, to sell the idea that I'm "forging" myself Though his responses are purposefully indirect, notably, Snit doesn't generally respond to posts I write, he responds to the ones that are forgeries (as does "Hadron") - This makes sense to you? Any idiot that can read knows everything I just posted is fact.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 15:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <wpKdnbHBbbjv3uzOnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #243229 |
On 5/12/2014 3:01 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 12, 2014 2:26:28 PM UTC-6, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:48:27 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. >> >>>> >> >>>> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than anyone else. >> >>>> >> >>>> What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated). >> >>> >> >>> I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and >> >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a >> >>> result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts >> >>> has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid >> >>> points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. >> >> >> >> I have them scored down so I can read them if I choose to. >> >> It's fairly obvious that they are all the same person. >> >> >> >> There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person >> posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a >> few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of >> others that escape my mind at the moment. > > LOL! Nice try ;) > > There are no such "errors" that "confirm" anything for anyone who looks only at reality... and that reality is: I'm posting using only fretwizzer. No one can find *anything* that is contrary to that fact because there isn't anything to find. > >> Personally, I don't think >> the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. > > You're wrong... or purposefully lying. I doubt that he is lying... but more like using occams razor... the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. > That even your co-trolls DFS and "Hadron" don't know when to believe you should tell you something about your posting history. > >> Why would someone >> follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade? > > Why do you keep hounding Linux users for so long? > I'd say it is because they aren't telling the truth. She's gone over to the closed group and watched them tell just the opposite stories. So it is obvious she is just pointing out their hypocrisy, which is what I found out about last year. >> Doesn't make sense. > > It makes about as much sense as what you're doing. > >> Once again, add up all the little pieces and judge for yourself. > > Here are a few of the facts, as opposed to these unspoken "errors" you allege exist: > > The "fretwizzer" gmail address goes back to at least Apr. of 2010, I've proven this many times. > > All other gmail addresses that write posts using my name only go back as far as Oct. of 2012, I can find nothing going back further and I'm willing to bet no one else can, either. > > The person using the 'fretwizzer" address pointed you to the recording of his kids in one of the discussions you had with him about music... more than once. > > The person using "fretwizzer" pointed you to the Wordpress site that uses the theme Snit is using and asked you to comment there (which you haven't done... the forger did, though). > > Snit has admitted to forging posting IDs, including mine... and I've posted this admission, more than once. > > Snit has been trying to make me appear as racially bigoted and antigay for a decade, I've pointed to these lying posts many times > > Snit has been trying, *very hard*, to sell the idea that I'm "forging" myself > > Though his responses are purposefully indirect, notably, Snit doesn't generally respond to posts I write, he responds to the ones that are forgeries (as does "Hadron") - This makes sense to you? > > Any idiot that can read knows everything I just posted is fact. > Plus the fact that snit is a closet communist... and more likely the intolerant, politically correct communist in democrats wool. Snit has emotionally connected himself to a social like democratic party that uses no reason, just demonizes those that won't believe in their ways, which he has adopted. Bottom line? He's a traitor/communist. -- We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 15:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ad357209-b354-41c1-9068-083a573222ae@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243242 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 3:56:01 PM UTC-6, GreyCloud wrote: (snip) > I doubt that he is lying... but more like using occams razor... the > simplest explanation is usually the correct one. Well, flatfish claims to be a 'she' as of late so I'll go with that... she claims there are these "errors" but doesn't say what they are (troll tactic 101 in my opinion). > > Why do you keep hounding Linux users for so long? > > I'd say it is because they aren't telling the truth. I'd say that's debatable on a per case basis... as opposed to the constantly lying Snit. In any event, it's not like she's been a paragon of virtue herself ;) (snip) > Plus the fact that snit is a closet communist I'm not sure the closet parts fits, he's pretty open with that stuff. > ... and more likely the > intolerant, politically correct communist in democrats wool. > Snit has emotionally connected himself to a social like democratic party > that uses no reason, just demonizes those that won't believe in their > ways, which he has adopted. Bottom line? He's a traitor/communist. I separate Snit from everything else, he is what he is on his own merit. No one, no thing, no group deserves to be lumped in with the likes of him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 17:11 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <e6ydnbu4bsiUyOzOnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #243248 |
On 5/12/2014 4:21 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 12, 2014 3:56:01 PM UTC-6, GreyCloud wrote: > > (snip) > >> I doubt that he is lying... but more like using occams razor... the >> simplest explanation is usually the correct one. > > Well, flatfish claims to be a 'she' as of late so I'll go with that... she claims there are these "errors" but doesn't say what they are (troll tactic 101 in my opinion). > > Flatfish has mentioned being a woman before snit even shown up in here. >>> Why do you keep hounding Linux users for so long? >> >> I'd say it is because they aren't telling the truth. > > I'd say that's debatable on a per case basis... as opposed to the constantly lying Snit. In any event, it's not like she's been a paragon of virtue herself ;) > Nah... just poking the bees nest to watch all the hypocrites go into action. When I first was in here, I played the very same game... lied a lot about linux, when in fact linux back then wasn't really that good. I came back in to watch and noticed that the advocates have gotten nastier... just about everybody was quite nasty. I stayed out for another year. Came back in, and lo and behold there was snit doing his usual thing. I got whammied over using Windows 7, while Turdv gets a pass. > (snip) > >> Plus the fact that snit is a closet communist > > I'm not sure the closet parts fits, he's pretty open with that stuff. > It goes a bit deeper, but I think you can figure that part out. Eventually, his handlers will discard him like a used rubber. >> ... and more likely the >> intolerant, politically correct communist in democrats wool. >> Snit has emotionally connected himself to a social like democratic party >> that uses no reason, just demonizes those that won't believe in their >> ways, which he has adopted. Bottom line? He's a traitor/communist. > > I separate Snit from everything else, he is what he is on his own merit. > > No one, no thing, no group deserves to be lumped in with the likes of him. > I agree there. -- We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF96A4FD.371AB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243258 |
On 5/12/14, 4:11 PM, in article e6ydnbu4bsiUyOzOnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: ... > Flatfish has mentioned being a woman before snit even shown up in here. > >>>> Why do you keep hounding Linux users for so long? >>> >>> I'd say it is because they aren't telling the truth. >> >> I'd say that's debatable on a per case basis... as opposed to the constantly >> lying Snit. In any event, it's not like she's been a paragon of virtue >> herself ;) >> > > Nah... just poking the bees nest to watch all the hypocrites go into action. > When I first was in here, I played the very same game... lied a lot > about linux, when in fact linux back then wasn't really that good. > > I came back in to watch and noticed that the advocates have gotten > nastier... just about everybody was quite nasty. I stayed out for > another year. Came back in, and lo and behold there was snit doing his > usual thing. I got whammied over using Windows 7, while Turdv gets a pass. I will keep doing my "usual thing" of being honest and honorable and asking people to back up their claims. So be it. ... >> I separate Snit from everything else, he is what he is on his own merit. >> >> No one, no thing, no group deserves to be lumped in with the likes of him. >> > I agree there. There are many honest and honorable people who can use reason and logic. For those of you who this is a foreign concept I know it sounds bizarre - but it is not that uncommon. It is uncommon, though, for such people to stick around in cesspools like COLA, so in that way I am different. So be it. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 17:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <aa3e94d6-bb5d-4cd8-a1e6-6582dfb39191@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243258 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 5:11:03 PM UTC-6, GreyCloud wrote: > On 5/12/2014 4:21 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Monday, May 12, 2014 3:56:01 PM UTC-6, GreyCloud wrote: > > > > > > (snip) > > > > > >> I doubt that he is lying... but more like using occams razor... the > >> simplest explanation is usually the correct one. > > > Well, flatfish claims to be a 'she' as of late so I'll go with that... she claims there are these "errors" but doesn't say what they are (troll tactic 101 in my opinion). > > > > > Flatfish has mentioned being a woman before snit even shown up in here. I know. Why did you just use the term "he"? You think flatty is really a he, not a her? > >>> Why do you keep hounding Linux users for so long? > > >> I'd say it is because they aren't telling the truth. > > > I'd say that's debatable on a per case basis... as opposed to the constantly lying Snit. In any event, it's not like she's been a paragon of virtue herself ;) > Nah... just poking the bees nest to watch all the hypocrites go into action. You forget that I saw her in her own versions of action back then... I'm still seeing it. I suspect she knows that I'm not forging myself and that I'm the real Steve Carroll. I'm convinced that she looked at the page I created for her last week but she's got her agenda rolling and reality just gets in its way: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/qMfJ0aX7p0Q/x2-SxbpzogcJ > When I first was in here, I played the very same game... lied a lot > about linux, when in fact linux back then wasn't really that good. > > I came back in to watch and noticed that the advocates have gotten > nastier... just about everybody was quite nasty. I stayed out for > another year. Came back in, and lo and behold there was snit doing his > usual thing. I got whammied over using Windows 7, while Turdv gets a pass. Yeah, I saw. > > I'm not sure the closet parts fits, he's pretty open with that stuff. > > It goes a bit deeper, but I think you can figure that part out. > Eventually, his handlers will discard him like a used rubber. I think his "handlers" are probably bound by law to make sure he never sees the light of day again ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web