Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243242
| Date | 2014-05-12 15:56 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations |
| References | (5 earlier) <87siof2oj5.fsf@gmail.com> <b946d82b-e377-47cd-849c-4eebe76d96db@googlegroups.com> <lkqu0r$kt9$2@dont-email.me> <p1zv2f3piian.1nwbznchxao34$.dlg@40tude.net> <2b99d5d2-ca98-49b4-b801-a4d796a24fae@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <wpKdnbHBbbjv3uzOnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@bresnan.com> (permalink) |
On 5/12/2014 3:01 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 12, 2014 2:26:28 PM UTC-6, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:48:27 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. >> >>>> >> >>>> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than anyone else. >> >>>> >> >>>> What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated). >> >>> >> >>> I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and >> >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a >> >>> result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts >> >>> has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid >> >>> points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. >> >> >> >> I have them scored down so I can read them if I choose to. >> >> It's fairly obvious that they are all the same person. >> >> >> >> There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person >> posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a >> few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of >> others that escape my mind at the moment. > > LOL! Nice try ;) > > There are no such "errors" that "confirm" anything for anyone who looks only at reality... and that reality is: I'm posting using only fretwizzer. No one can find *anything* that is contrary to that fact because there isn't anything to find. > >> Personally, I don't think >> the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. > > You're wrong... or purposefully lying. I doubt that he is lying... but more like using occams razor... the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. > That even your co-trolls DFS and "Hadron" don't know when to believe you should tell you something about your posting history. > >> Why would someone >> follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade? > > Why do you keep hounding Linux users for so long? > I'd say it is because they aren't telling the truth. She's gone over to the closed group and watched them tell just the opposite stories. So it is obvious she is just pointing out their hypocrisy, which is what I found out about last year. >> Doesn't make sense. > > It makes about as much sense as what you're doing. > >> Once again, add up all the little pieces and judge for yourself. > > Here are a few of the facts, as opposed to these unspoken "errors" you allege exist: > > The "fretwizzer" gmail address goes back to at least Apr. of 2010, I've proven this many times. > > All other gmail addresses that write posts using my name only go back as far as Oct. of 2012, I can find nothing going back further and I'm willing to bet no one else can, either. > > The person using the 'fretwizzer" address pointed you to the recording of his kids in one of the discussions you had with him about music... more than once. > > The person using "fretwizzer" pointed you to the Wordpress site that uses the theme Snit is using and asked you to comment there (which you haven't done... the forger did, though). > > Snit has admitted to forging posting IDs, including mine... and I've posted this admission, more than once. > > Snit has been trying to make me appear as racially bigoted and antigay for a decade, I've pointed to these lying posts many times > > Snit has been trying, *very hard*, to sell the idea that I'm "forging" myself > > Though his responses are purposefully indirect, notably, Snit doesn't generally respond to posts I write, he responds to the ones that are forgeries (as does "Hadron") - This makes sense to you? > > Any idiot that can read knows everything I just posted is fact. > Plus the fact that snit is a closet communist... and more likely the intolerant, politically correct communist in democrats wool. Snit has emotionally connected himself to a social like democratic party that uses no reason, just demonizes those that won't believe in their ways, which he has adopted. Bottom line? He's a traitor/communist. -- We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 18:49 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 03:54 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 19:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 02:35 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 11:47 +0000
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:02 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 09:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:48 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:27 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:50 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:05 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:26 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 13:31 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:56 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:21 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:11 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:52 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:54 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:05 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 18:58 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:14 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:12 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:18 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:50 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 14:45 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:26 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:21 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:45 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:02 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:09 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:57 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:06 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 19:00 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:13 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:50 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:52 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:57 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:32 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 20:00 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 07:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:48 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:16 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 10:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 11:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 11:34 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 23:04 +0000
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:23 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 10:57 +0100
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 13:28 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 12:59 +0100
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 15:24 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:43 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:39 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:42 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:14 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:42 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:52 -0700
csiph-web