Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243163
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations |
| Date | 2014-05-12 10:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF965295.37118%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <c32f6dd3-14b7-4583-842a-d9ff8f78dd27@googlegroups.com> <XnsA32B4F4A75BE4tattoovampire@178.63.61.145> <87siof2oj5.fsf@gmail.com> <b946d82b-e377-47cd-849c-4eebe76d96db@googlegroups.com> <lkqu0r$kt9$2@dont-email.me> |
On 5/12/14, 9:48 AM, in article lkqu0r$kt9$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<slvrslmr@strtml.cm> wrote:
> On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>
>> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other
>> gmail accounts.
>>
>> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to
>> wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous".
Ten years of this, Carroll... and, yes, you are "ridiculous". To an extreme.
This started in 2004 when you got mad about your then girlfriend obsessing
over me (heavily documented here: <http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot>. I
continued to respond to you for about 5 years, when you flipped out in 2009
and started contacting my employer with the stated goal to have me fired
(you spoke of doing so even if you had to twist arms):
<http://goo.gl/OHNryA>
<http://goo.gl/MZ6yCD>
<http://goo.gl/WaKKGq>
With that I stopped responding directly to you except for *one* chance I
gave you in 2011 when you were accusing *me* of running:
<http://goo.gl/racU64>.
You, Carroll, as predicted, ran (you always do when faced with facts):
<http://goo.gl/qHs5Xh>
You know you have no backing for any of your nonsense and have become, if
anything, more and more obsessive since I stopped responding to you.
You are truly a very, very sick man.
>> The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as
>> Steve Carroll is ridiculous.
Ridiculous but also shown to be true:
* The "forger" is psychic and knows when Carroll is going to start and
stop posting. Here are some examples:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/carroll-forger>
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/carroll-forger2>
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/carroll-forger3>
* Carroll, on seeing this, twists and lies to say it is merely a sign
of people posting at about the same time. Why would Carroll lie if
he is not hiding something?
* Carroll has done the same nonsense before with socks:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/stevedward>.
* Carroll repeatedly blamed me but then admitted he lied and "doubts"
it is me forging him... then went back to blaming me anyway.
* Carroll points to <https://www.torproject.org> which makes it
trivial to use multiple IP addresses with their Tor Browser.
* Carroll later denied that he even knew there was a Tor Browser.
Yes, this was after he pointed to the site where you can get it!
* Carroll lies about being able to use that software, claiming he has
"no idea how this can be done".
>> The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same
>> sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous.
Ridiculous but true. Sure.
>> Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the
>> forger(s) do.
You have been posting about my professional life for years. I have links
from 2005, above, proving it.
>> You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted,
>> anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done.
You deleted your one about Obama killing Steve Jobs... but others quoted it.
I can track that down. And you repeatedly call Obama the "dark one".
>> For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and
>> anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so
>> very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While
>> it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than
>> anyone else.
But elsewhere you said you doubted it was me. Get your story straight.
>> What does this all add up to?
You are an obsessive liar who had been stalking me for 10 years... as you
have repeatedly openly admitted to.
>> Either you are the forger
But above you blame me. Back and forth you go. You are lying.
>> or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your
>> real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from
>> reality where Snit is concerned.
Nope. You recently asked others to find examples of my lying.
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/u3C4zgRw8j4>
Posts by:
* chrisv
* DFS
* flatfish+++
* fretwizzin@gmail.com
* GreyCloud
* Nobody
* Sinister Midget
* Steve Carroll (fretwizzen@gmail.com account)
* Steve Carroll (fretwizzer@gmail.com account)
* Tattoo Vampire
Total count of lies from Snit quoted: ZERO.
>> All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total
>> fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has
>> had more than enough of, as they've stated).
>
> I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and
> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a
> result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts
> has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid
> points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly.
Ah, you got mad you could not refute a video about the NRA so now you are
playing in your own sandbox. How cute!
--
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 18:49 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 03:54 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 19:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 02:35 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 11:47 +0000
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:02 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 09:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:48 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:27 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:50 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:05 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:26 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 13:31 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:56 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:21 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:11 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:52 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:54 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:05 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 18:58 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:14 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:12 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:18 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:50 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 14:45 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:26 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:21 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:45 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:02 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:09 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:57 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:06 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 19:00 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:13 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:50 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:52 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:57 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:32 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 20:00 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 07:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:48 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:16 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 10:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 11:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 11:34 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 23:04 +0000
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:23 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 10:57 +0100
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 13:28 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 12:59 +0100
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 15:24 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:43 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:39 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:42 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:14 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:42 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:52 -0700
csiph-web