Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #685306

Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech

From pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech
Date 2025-02-08 01:54 +0000
Organization Libtard Rehabilitation Program
Message-ID <vo6dga$3obi6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <LfbpP.881$Qf1.800@fx11.iad> <ch6dneLQUI82Ezj6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <4wopP.19268$dxRc.5067@fx13.iad> <vo5gva$3jkkc$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2025-02-07, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2025-02-07, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-02-06 11:40 p.m., MummyChunk wrote:
>>>> CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>> https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
>>>>
>>>> Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
>>>> is sad.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> CrudeSausage
>>>> Gab: @CrudeSausage
>>>> Telegram: @CrudeSausage
>>>> Unapologetic paleoconservative
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Care to share why you have your opinion?
>>> 
>>> This is a response to the post seen at:
>>> http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664
>>
>> Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than 
>> improving their product to a point that both are now looking like 
>> they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a 
>> desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and 
>> heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the 
>> people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among 
>> them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of 
>> conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest 
>> in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just 
>> use whatever works best.
>
> You keep saying that, but Gnome is an Open Source Project (and so is 
> Firefox) so they're not going to go "bankrupt." As for "improving their 
> product" the fact that I can still use a real version of uBlock Origin on 
> Firefox makes it superior to Chrome and its derivatives now that they've 
> moved to Manifest 3 and a more "controlled" environment. 
>
> You've got to quit reading "lunduke" if you're searching for objectivity — 
> he obviously has an anti-Linux ax to grind.
>

I've never liked Lunduke. To me he was an opportunists playing both
sides of the debate between Linux and other operating systems.
As I have not watched him in a few years maybe things have changed but in the
past he seemed to focus on minor things that maybe most Linux users would
not encounter or if they did, easy work around would exist.
He is interesting but not my cup of whisky.
I'm a MX Linux user running kde.
-- 
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-06 18:06 -0500
  Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 04:40 +0000
    Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:46 +0000
      Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 14:46 +0000
        Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 11:25 -0500
          Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 18:12 +0000
            Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 18:26 +0000
        Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 18:00 +0000
    Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:11 -0500
      Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:47 +0000
        Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 20:14 -0500
          Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 07:31 +0000
        Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-08 01:54 +0000
          Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 07:32 +0000
    Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 08:17 -0700
  Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:39 +0000
    Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:13 -0500
      Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:50 +0000
  Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:40 +0000
    Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:14 -0500
      Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:56 +0000

csiph-web