Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #685228
| Subject | Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| References | <LfbpP.881$Qf1.800@fx11.iad> <ch6dneLQUI82Ezj6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
| Message-ID | <4wopP.19268$dxRc.5067@fx13.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | usenet-news.net |
| Date | 2025-02-07 09:11 -0500 |
On 2025-02-06 11:40 p.m., MummyChunk wrote: >> CrudeSausage wrote: >> https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech >> >> Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly >> is sad. >> >> -- >> CrudeSausage >> Gab: @CrudeSausage >> Telegram: @CrudeSausage >> Unapologetic paleoconservative > > > Care to share why you have your opinion? > > This is a response to the post seen at: > http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664 Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than improving their product to a point that both are now looking like they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just use whatever works best. -- CrudeSausage Gab: @CrudeSausage Telegram: @CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-06 18:06 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 04:40 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:46 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 14:46 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 11:25 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 18:12 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 18:26 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 18:00 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:11 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:47 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 20:14 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 07:31 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-08 01:54 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 07:32 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 08:17 -0700
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:39 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:13 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:50 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:40 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:14 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:56 +0000
csiph-web