Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #685297
| Subject | Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| References | <LfbpP.881$Qf1.800@fx11.iad> <ch6dneLQUI82Ezj6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <4wopP.19268$dxRc.5067@fx13.iad> <vo5gva$3jkkc$2@dont-email.me> |
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
| Message-ID | <jeypP.71461$YsRf.7899@fx18.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | usenet-news.net |
| Date | 2025-02-07 20:14 -0500 |
On 2025-02-07 12:47 p.m., RonB wrote: > On 2025-02-07, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-02-06 11:40 p.m., MummyChunk wrote: >>>> CrudeSausage wrote: >>>> https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech >>>> >>>> Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly >>>> is sad. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> CrudeSausage >>>> Gab: @CrudeSausage >>>> Telegram: @CrudeSausage >>>> Unapologetic paleoconservative >>> >>> >>> Care to share why you have your opinion? >>> >>> This is a response to the post seen at: >>> http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664 >> >> Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than >> improving their product to a point that both are now looking like >> they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a >> desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and >> heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the >> people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among >> them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of >> conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest >> in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just >> use whatever works best. > > You keep saying that, but Gnome is an Open Source Project (and so is > Firefox) so they're not going to go "bankrupt." As for "improving their > product" the fact that I can still use a real version of uBlock Origin on > Firefox makes it superior to Chrome and its derivatives now that they've > moved to Manifest 3 and a more "controlled" environment. > > You've got to quit reading "lunduke" if you're searching for objectivity — > he obviously has an anti-Linux ax to grind. Actually, he's very much an advocate for Linux. Heck, he was on the openSUSE board of directors for a while and even worked on the LibreM from Purism. The guys is definitely not open-source, just anti-woke in open-source. -- CrudeSausage Gab: @CrudeSausage Telegram: @CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-06 18:06 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 04:40 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:46 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 14:46 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 11:25 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 18:12 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 18:26 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 18:00 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:11 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:47 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 20:14 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 07:31 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-08 01:54 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 07:32 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 08:17 -0700
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:39 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:13 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:50 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:40 +0000
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:14 -0500
Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:56 +0000
csiph-web