Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #685297

Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech

Subject Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
References <LfbpP.881$Qf1.800@fx11.iad> <ch6dneLQUI82Ezj6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <4wopP.19268$dxRc.5067@fx13.iad> <vo5gva$3jkkc$2@dont-email.me>
From CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
Message-ID <jeypP.71461$YsRf.7899@fx18.iad> (permalink)
Organization usenet-news.net
Date 2025-02-07 20:14 -0500

Show all headers | View raw


On 2025-02-07 12:47 p.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2025-02-07, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-02-06 11:40 p.m., MummyChunk wrote:
>>>> CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>> https://lunduke.substack.com/p/open-source-is-anti-free-speech
>>>>
>>>> Looks like the man has come to a similar realization as I have. It truly
>>>> is sad.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> CrudeSausage
>>>> Gab: @CrudeSausage
>>>> Telegram: @CrudeSausage
>>>> Unapologetic paleoconservative
>>>
>>>
>>> Care to share why you have your opinion?
>>>
>>> This is a response to the post seen at:
>>> http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664
>>
>> Well, GNOME and Mozilla are emphasizing on DIE practices rather than
>> improving their product to a point that both are now looking like
>> they're going to go bankrupt. Redhat and IBM have also both expressed a
>> desire to prioritize employment for anyone who isn't white and
>> heterosexual. Debian has moved in that direction as well and now the
>> people behind Arch are stating that right-wing ideas are unwelcome among
>> them. Elementary OS had already been pretty clear about their hatred of
>> conservatives for years. It seems that meritocracies are of no interest
>> in the development of Linux. Since that is becoming the case, I'll just
>> use whatever works best.
> 
> You keep saying that, but Gnome is an Open Source Project (and so is
> Firefox) so they're not going to go "bankrupt." As for "improving their
> product" the fact that I can still use a real version of uBlock Origin on
> Firefox makes it superior to Chrome and its derivatives now that they've
> moved to Manifest 3 and a more "controlled" environment.
> 
> You've got to quit reading "lunduke" if you're searching for objectivity —
> he obviously has an anti-Linux ax to grind.

Actually, he's very much an advocate for Linux. Heck, he was on the 
openSUSE board of directors for a while and even worked on the LibreM 
from Purism. The guys is definitely not open-source, just anti-woke in 
open-source.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-06 18:06 -0500
  Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 04:40 +0000
    Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:46 +0000
      Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 14:46 +0000
        Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 11:25 -0500
          Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-07 18:12 +0000
            Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 18:26 +0000
        Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 18:00 +0000
    Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:11 -0500
      Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:47 +0000
        Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 20:14 -0500
          Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 07:31 +0000
        Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-08 01:54 +0000
          Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 07:32 +0000
    Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 08:17 -0700
  Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:39 +0000
    Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:13 -0500
      Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:50 +0000
  Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 07:40 +0000
    Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-07 09:14 -0500
      Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:56 +0000

csiph-web