Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #343474 > unrolled thread

Roy Schestowitz Makes The List Of Internet Kooks.

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Roy Schestowitz Makes The List Of Internet Kooks. Marly Parlorr <lingdingfwah@teachers.org> - 2016-02-13 16:35 +0000
    More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 13:22 -0500
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 18:36 +0000
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 19:45 +0100
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 14:09 -0500
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 20:50 +0100
              Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:10 +0000
                Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-13 22:44 +0000
                  Re: Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:53 +0000
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:14 +0000
              Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:19 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:04 -0800
                  Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-15 09:54 -0500
                  Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-16 21:47 +0000
                    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:32 +0000
                    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 19:41 -0500
                      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:47 +0000
                        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 20:02 -0500
                          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:41 -0500
                    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-16 21:24 -0500
                      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-17 02:33 +0000
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:26 +0000
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-13 16:50 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:12 +0000
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:21 -0500
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 07:07 -0600
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-14 15:38 +0100
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:01 -0500
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 12:39 -0500
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 10:13 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:03 -0500
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:01 -0800
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Delgato" <delgato@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 16:05 +0100
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Mandingo" <mandingo@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 00:39 +0100
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 16:07 -0500

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#343789 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:24:37 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:04:07 -0800, kubuntuking wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom
>>> wrote:
>>>> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>> 
>>>> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>> >> 
>>>> >>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>>> >>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times
>>>> >>>> now and I suggest others try to help support him because he is
>>>> >>>> clearly being attacked for speaking the truth.
>>>> >>>> This thread is a prime example of that.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>>> >
>>>> > Congratulations, you failed the test.
>>>> > It was satirical prose and being weak minded you didn't have the
>>>> > courage to take a stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree
>>>> > with what I wrote.
>>>> 
>>>> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect a troll's
>>>> "satirical prose".
>>>> 
>>>> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or
>>>> "disagree or agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
>>> 
>>> Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your
>>> wonderfully silly  collection of "big words"?
>>> 
>>> How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.
>>> 
>>> My God. What a weenie.
>>
>> Aaaaand another doofus nymshift goes in the plonk bucket.
>>
>> How to tell it's doofus:
>>
>> * Complaints about vocabulary * "weenie"
> 
> The dolt named "Hadron" was fairly similar.  Most unappreciative of
> learning!
> 
> LOL:

I suppose that would depend upon the quality of the teacher.
I'd be interested in some examples.










-- 

OS X / Linux: What is a file?    <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
Mint KDE working with folders    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
Mint KDE creating files          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
Mint KDE help                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
Mint KDE general navigation      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?    <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
OS / Word Processor Comparison   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343764 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now
>>>>> and I suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly
>>>>> being attacked for speaking the truth.
>>>>> This thread is a prime example of that.
>>>>
>>>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>>> 
>>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>
>> Congratulations, you failed the test.
>> It was satirical prose and being weak minded you didn't have the courage 
>> to take a stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I 
>> wrote.
> 
> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect
> a troll's "satirical prose".
> 
> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or "disagree or
> agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
> 
> You sound like Flounder or the Dizum Dipshit, which does not redound to
> your credit, I would aver!  Hold your tongue, impious fish!
> 
> In any case, your protestations notwithstanding, it is my considered
> conviction that I actually passed a detection test, albeit not the
> test that you assert.  In the future, you should be cognizant of the
> stipulation that any post that discusses Roy is likely to be dismissed out
> of hand as the artifact of a feckless troll.
> 

douchebag

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343496 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

"Tronald Dump" <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote in message 
news:n9nt32$56h$1@dont-email.me...
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:22:14 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/
> Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz
>>
>> Why would I trust a k00k?
>>

Like the "k00k" who said that Rex is now Rexxie/Debbie... That type of kook?


> Roy Schestowitz has been fighting for freedom, spreading the word against
> corruption and promoting GNU/Linux for many years. It's because of his
> views and willingness to take on the corrupt organizations that he is
> attacked from all fronts.
>

That's why so many of us wear our Schestowitz tattoos with pride.

I was going to get one of these but went with the Schestowitz instead. Maybe 
it's just me but having "Psycho" tattooed on your forehead and a big "Nazi" 
on your neck might not be the best career move.

   "Police Arrest Stabbing Suspect With 'Psycho' Forehead Tattoo
   Charles White also has "Nazi" inked on his throat."
   http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/psycho-forehead-tattoo-stabbing-suspect_us_56b5aba8e4b08069c7a7706b


-- 
And why does Zeke think that taking Rex's name and converting to 
"Rexxie"would be an impossible act for someone other than "Rex"?  Is Zeke 
stupid, or a kook?

Anyway, I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that that page is yet another faked 
frame-up job intended to further Microsoft's "Evangelism is War" goals...

So who's the k00k?  Obviously, a person that would go to such trouble to try 
to appropriate someone else's persona, post foulness or craziness as if it 
were from that person, and then point everybody to that manufactured 
evidence.

Chris Ahlstrom. Far too dumb and stupid to recognize the facts right in 
front of his face.
Message-ID: <legq8a$32v$2@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343500 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:50:25 -0500, Ezekiel wrote:

> "Tronald Dump" <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote in message
> news:n9nt32$56h$1@dont-email.me...
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:22:14 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/
>> Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz
>>>
>>> Why would I trust a k00k?
>>>
>>>
> Like the "k00k" who said that Rex is now Rexxie/Debbie... That type of
> kook?
> 
> 
>> Roy Schestowitz has been fighting for freedom, spreading the word
>> against corruption and promoting GNU/Linux for many years. It's because
>> of his views and willingness to take on the corrupt organizations that
>> he is attacked from all fronts.
>>
>>
> That's why so many of us wear our Schestowitz tattoos with pride.
> 
> I was going to get one of these but went with the Schestowitz instead.
> Maybe it's just me but having "Psycho" tattooed on your forehead and a
> big "Nazi" on your neck might not be the best career move.
> 
>    "Police Arrest Stabbing Suspect With 'Psycho' Forehead Tattoo Charles
>    White also has "Nazi" inked on his throat."
>    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/psycho-forehead-tattoo-stabbing-
suspect_us_56b5aba8e4b08069c7a7706b

Well played.
It was satirical prose designed to weed out the kooks and losers.
You passed the test with flying colors.




-- 
Dreaming About My Wall

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343508 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:50:25 -0500, Ezekiel wrote:
>> "Tronald Dump" <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote in message

LOL.  What would Donald Trump call these two?

   "Losers"

-- 
The Least Perceptive Literary Critic
	The most important critic in our field of study is Lord Halifax.  A
most individual judge of poetry, he once invited Alexander Pope round to
give a public reading of his latest poem.
	Pope, the leading poet of his day, was greatly surprised when Lord
Halifax stopped him four or five times and said, "I beg your pardon, Mr.
Pope, but there is something in that passage that does not quite please me."
	Pope was rendered speechless, as this fine critic suggested sizeable
and unwise emendations to his latest masterpiece.  "Be so good as to mark
the place and consider at your leisure.  I'm sure you can give it a better
turn."
	After the reading, a good friend of Lord Halifax, a certain Dr.
Garth, took the stunned Pope to one side.  "There is no need to touch the
lines," he said.  "All you need do is leave them just as they are, call on
Lord Halifax two or three months hence, thank him for his kind observation
on those passages, and then read them to him as altered.  I have known him
much longer than you have, and will be answerable for the event."
	Pope took his advice, called on Lord Halifax and read the poem
exactly as it was before.  His unique critical faculties had lost none of
their edge.  "Ay", he commented, "now they are perfectly right.  Nothing can
be better."
		-- Stephen Pile, "The Book of Heroic Failures"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343684 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

Tronald Dump wrote:

> Ezekreep wrote:
>> 
>> I was going to get one of these but went with the Schestowitz instead.
>
>Well played.
>It was satirical prose designed to weed out the kooks and losers.
>You passed the test with flying colors.

Yet he thinks that there is "nothing to complain about" as long as
it's *possible* to avoid the market-leader's product.

Yeah, he's a "smart one" that Kreep.

Oh, and if you're unwilling to pony-up a significant amount of money
just to decline the market leader's product, you have "no principles".

Yeah, that's nothing to complain about.  A few zealots willing to pay
extra have a "big chance" of turning the tide of *that* market.

Sheesh.

-- 
"Why the hell would a person named Roy Schestowitz cut off his balls
for Linux?"  -  "Gary Stewart"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343531 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

Op 13-02-16 om 19:36 schreef Tronald Dump:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:22:14 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/
> Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz
>>
>> Why would I trust a k00k?
>>
>> And it's even worse than that!
>>
>>     http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/The-RationalWiki-Foundation/
> Albuquerque-New-Mexico-87106/The-RationalWiki-Foundation-RationalWiki-
> Rational-Wiki-RW-Rationalwikiorg-Rationalwi-1143383
>>
>>     The RationalWiki Foundation RationalWiki, Rational-Wiki, RW,
>>     Rationalwiki.org, Rationalwiki.com, Trent Toulouse A website with a
>>     history of engaging in "cyber-vandalism" by its own admission, now a
>>     registered nonprofit organization. Albuquerque New Mexico
>>
>> And the nail in "Marly"'s coffin:
>>
>>     RationalWiki is a wiki, like Wikipedia. Anyone can change the content
>>     of articles at RationalWiki.
>>
>> Yup.  My first instincts were correct... another plant job against Roy.
>>
>> Not that he doesn't go too far in some of his thinking, in my opinion.
>>
>> Anyway, I suppose we should sigh in relief that it wasn't another "cut
>> off my testicles for Linux" plant.
>
> Roy Schestowitz has been fighting for freedom, spreading the word against
> corruption and promoting GNU/Linux for many years. It's because of his
> views and willingness to take on the corrupt organizations that he is
> attacked from all fronts.
>
> Clearly he has made many enemies with deep pockets who will stop at
> nothing in order to protect their cash cows. It is well known that
> companies like Microsoft employ mercenaries to carry out their dirty work
> and discrediting someone like Roy who dares to accurately document and
> publicize what these corrupt companies are up to.
>
> Things like testicle removal and fake Wiki articles are spawned by these
> pay to hire soldiers of fortune.
>
> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now and I
> suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly being
> attacked for speaking the truth.
> This thread is a prime example of that.

I always *blindly* followed and supported Roy Schetstowitz, until I 
found out that he outright *lied* about Joe "Zonker" Brockmeier, former 
community leader of OpenSUSE.

Libtarts will be Libtards :-(


-- 
|_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin (alias ML2MST)
|_|_|0| Computer enthusiast and Amateur Musician
|0|0|0| http://osg33x.blogspot.com
         Ubuntu Xenial (Development Branch) 64-Bit Lowlatency

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343549 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:38:15 +0100, tinus61 wrote:

> Op 13-02-16 om 19:36 schreef Tronald Dump:
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:22:14 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/
>> Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz
>>>
>>> Why would I trust a k00k?
>>>
>>> And it's even worse than that!
>>>
>>>     http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/The-RationalWiki-Foundation/
>> Albuquerque-New-Mexico-87106/The-RationalWiki-Foundation-RationalWiki-
>> Rational-Wiki-RW-Rationalwikiorg-Rationalwi-1143383
>>>
>>>     The RationalWiki Foundation RationalWiki, Rational-Wiki, RW,
>>>     Rationalwiki.org, Rationalwiki.com, Trent Toulouse A website with a
>>>     history of engaging in "cyber-vandalism" by its own admission, now a
>>>     registered nonprofit organization. Albuquerque New Mexico
>>>
>>> And the nail in "Marly"'s coffin:
>>>
>>>     RationalWiki is a wiki, like Wikipedia. Anyone can change the content
>>>     of articles at RationalWiki.
>>>
>>> Yup.  My first instincts were correct... another plant job against Roy.
>>>
>>> Not that he doesn't go too far in some of his thinking, in my opinion.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I suppose we should sigh in relief that it wasn't another "cut
>>> off my testicles for Linux" plant.
>>
>> Roy Schestowitz has been fighting for freedom, spreading the word against
>> corruption and promoting GNU/Linux for many years. It's because of his
>> views and willingness to take on the corrupt organizations that he is
>> attacked from all fronts.
>>
>> Clearly he has made many enemies with deep pockets who will stop at
>> nothing in order to protect their cash cows. It is well known that
>> companies like Microsoft employ mercenaries to carry out their dirty work
>> and discrediting someone like Roy who dares to accurately document and
>> publicize what these corrupt companies are up to.
>>
>> Things like testicle removal and fake Wiki articles are spawned by these
>> pay to hire soldiers of fortune.
>>
>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now and I
>> suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly being
>> attacked for speaking the truth.
>> This thread is a prime example of that.
> 
> I always *blindly* followed and supported Roy Schetstowitz, until I 
> found out that he outright *lied* about Joe "Zonker" Brockmeier, former 
> community leader of OpenSUSE.
> 
> Libtarts will be Libtards :-(

Schestowitz has gone off the rails.
His site is nothing more than a very difficult to read den of paranoia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343556 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On 2016-02-14 12:01 PM, flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:38:15 +0100, tinus61 wrote:
>
>> Op 13-02-16 om 19:36 schreef Tronald Dump:
>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:22:14 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/
>>> Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz
>>>>
>>>> Why would I trust a k00k?
>>>>
>>>> And it's even worse than that!
>>>>
>>>>      http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/The-RationalWiki-Foundation/
>>> Albuquerque-New-Mexico-87106/The-RationalWiki-Foundation-RationalWiki-
>>> Rational-Wiki-RW-Rationalwikiorg-Rationalwi-1143383
>>>>
>>>>      The RationalWiki Foundation RationalWiki, Rational-Wiki, RW,
>>>>      Rationalwiki.org, Rationalwiki.com, Trent Toulouse A website with a
>>>>      history of engaging in "cyber-vandalism" by its own admission, now a
>>>>      registered nonprofit organization. Albuquerque New Mexico
>>>>
>>>> And the nail in "Marly"'s coffin:
>>>>
>>>>      RationalWiki is a wiki, like Wikipedia. Anyone can change the content
>>>>      of articles at RationalWiki.
>>>>
>>>> Yup.  My first instincts were correct... another plant job against Roy.
>>>>
>>>> Not that he doesn't go too far in some of his thinking, in my opinion.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I suppose we should sigh in relief that it wasn't another "cut
>>>> off my testicles for Linux" plant.
>>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz has been fighting for freedom, spreading the word against
>>> corruption and promoting GNU/Linux for many years. It's because of his
>>> views and willingness to take on the corrupt organizations that he is
>>> attacked from all fronts.
>>>
>>> Clearly he has made many enemies with deep pockets who will stop at
>>> nothing in order to protect their cash cows. It is well known that
>>> companies like Microsoft employ mercenaries to carry out their dirty work
>>> and discrediting someone like Roy who dares to accurately document and
>>> publicize what these corrupt companies are up to.
>>>
>>> Things like testicle removal and fake Wiki articles are spawned by these
>>> pay to hire soldiers of fortune.
>>>
>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now and I
>>> suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly being
>>> attacked for speaking the truth.
>>> This thread is a prime example of that.
>>
>> I always *blindly* followed and supported Roy Schetstowitz, until I
>> found out that he outright *lied* about Joe "Zonker" Brockmeier, former
>> community leader of OpenSUSE.
>>
>> Libtarts will be Libtards :-(
>
> Schestowitz has gone off the rails.
> His site is nothing more than a very difficult to read den of paranoia.

I'm sure that he sees himself as being an Alex Jones of the open-source 
world even though he's about as influential and important as one of the 
man's toilet flushes.


-- 
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Conservative Party of Canada, Mozilla & 
PETA supporter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343532 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On 2016-02-13 1:36 PM, Tronald Dump wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:22:14 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/
> Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz
>>
>> Why would I trust a k00k?
>>
>> And it's even worse than that!
>>
>>     http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/The-RationalWiki-Foundation/
> Albuquerque-New-Mexico-87106/The-RationalWiki-Foundation-RationalWiki-
> Rational-Wiki-RW-Rationalwikiorg-Rationalwi-1143383
>>
>>     The RationalWiki Foundation RationalWiki, Rational-Wiki, RW,
>>     Rationalwiki.org, Rationalwiki.com, Trent Toulouse A website with a
>>     history of engaging in "cyber-vandalism" by its own admission, now a
>>     registered nonprofit organization. Albuquerque New Mexico
>>
>> And the nail in "Marly"'s coffin:
>>
>>     RationalWiki is a wiki, like Wikipedia. Anyone can change the content
>>     of articles at RationalWiki.
>>
>> Yup.  My first instincts were correct... another plant job against Roy.
>>
>> Not that he doesn't go too far in some of his thinking, in my opinion.
>>
>> Anyway, I suppose we should sigh in relief that it wasn't another "cut
>> off my testicles for Linux" plant.
>
> Roy Schestowitz has been fighting for freedom, spreading the word against
> corruption and promoting GNU/Linux for many years. It's because of his
> views and willingness to take on the corrupt organizations that he is
> attacked from all fronts.

He is attacked because he is a moron, not because he is fighting for 
freedom. George Washington was fighting for freedom from the British but 
even he was able to find common ground with the enemy from time to time. 
"Doctor" Schestowitz thinks that even the janitor at Microsoft is the 
embodiment of pure evil.

> Clearly he has made many enemies with deep pockets who will stop at
> nothing in order to protect their cash cows. It is well known that
> companies like Microsoft employ mercenaries to carry out their dirty work
> and discrediting someone like Roy who dares to accurately document and
> publicize what these corrupt companies are up to.

Microsoft doesn't care about Roy Schestowitz because nobody else does 
either. If the guy had a million followers, chances are that they might 
notice. As it is, Roy has a few hundred like-minded idiots in his camp 
and he is a hypocrite even then as he is found on Twitter despite his 
claims that he is against proprietary code of all kinds. As for 
"accurately documenting," it would only be true if his articles could 
point to academic articles or something published in a widely-respected 
and still-credible news enterprise. Instead, he "proves" his statements 
by pointing to his own articles.

> Things like testicle removal and fake Wiki articles are spawned by these
> pay to hire soldiers of fortune.
>
> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now and I
> suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly being
> attacked for speaking the truth.
> This thread is a prime example of that.

I would absolutely love to support Roy if he were actually telling the 
truth. In fact, I say this right now: I will donate $20 a month to Roy 
and his repulsive site if he can start pointing to real articles rather 
than his own to prove his claims. I will give even more if he can add a 
supporter of Microsoft and Apple onto his radio show to make it more 
objective.


-- 
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Conservative Party of Canada, Mozilla & 
PETA supporter

"Fetuses are not people." - Richard Stallman, February 6th, 2016. 
Demonstrating why only the down-trodden, unwashed basement dwellers take 
him seriously.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343550 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:13:40 -0500, Slimer wrote:

> On 2016-02-13 1:36 PM, Tronald Dump wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:22:14 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/
>> Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz
>>>
>>> Why would I trust a k00k?
>>>
>>> And it's even worse than that!
>>>
>>>     http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/The-RationalWiki-Foundation/
>> Albuquerque-New-Mexico-87106/The-RationalWiki-Foundation-RationalWiki-
>> Rational-Wiki-RW-Rationalwikiorg-Rationalwi-1143383
>>>
>>>     The RationalWiki Foundation RationalWiki, Rational-Wiki, RW,
>>>     Rationalwiki.org, Rationalwiki.com, Trent Toulouse A website with a
>>>     history of engaging in "cyber-vandalism" by its own admission, now a
>>>     registered nonprofit organization. Albuquerque New Mexico
>>>
>>> And the nail in "Marly"'s coffin:
>>>
>>>     RationalWiki is a wiki, like Wikipedia. Anyone can change the content
>>>     of articles at RationalWiki.
>>>
>>> Yup.  My first instincts were correct... another plant job against Roy.
>>>
>>> Not that he doesn't go too far in some of his thinking, in my opinion.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I suppose we should sigh in relief that it wasn't another "cut
>>> off my testicles for Linux" plant.
>>
>> Roy Schestowitz has been fighting for freedom, spreading the word against
>> corruption and promoting GNU/Linux for many years. It's because of his
>> views and willingness to take on the corrupt organizations that he is
>> attacked from all fronts.
> 
> He is attacked because he is a moron, not because he is fighting for 
> freedom. George Washington was fighting for freedom from the British but 
> even he was able to find common ground with the enemy from time to time. 
> "Doctor" Schestowitz thinks that even the janitor at Microsoft is the 
> embodiment of pure evil.
> 
>> Clearly he has made many enemies with deep pockets who will stop at
>> nothing in order to protect their cash cows. It is well known that
>> companies like Microsoft employ mercenaries to carry out their dirty work
>> and discrediting someone like Roy who dares to accurately document and
>> publicize what these corrupt companies are up to.
> 
> Microsoft doesn't care about Roy Schestowitz because nobody else does 
> either. If the guy had a million followers, chances are that they might 
> notice. As it is, Roy has a few hundred like-minded idiots in his camp 
> and he is a hypocrite even then as he is found on Twitter despite his 
> claims that he is against proprietary code of all kinds. As for 
> "accurately documenting," it would only be true if his articles could 
> point to academic articles or something published in a widely-respected 
> and still-credible news enterprise. Instead, he "proves" his statements 
> by pointing to his own articles.
> 
>> Things like testicle removal and fake Wiki articles are spawned by these
>> pay to hire soldiers of fortune.
>>
>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now and I
>> suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly being
>> attacked for speaking the truth.
>> This thread is a prime example of that.
> 
> I would absolutely love to support Roy if he were actually telling the 
> truth. In fact, I say this right now: I will donate $20 a month to Roy 
> and his repulsive site if he can start pointing to real articles rather 
> than his own to prove his claims. I will give even more if he can add a 
> supporter of Microsoft and Apple onto his radio show to make it more 
> objective.

All true.
Schestowitz's site is long on words, accusations and implications but very
short on facts.

If you read his articles you will see stuff along the lines of "a little
birdie told me that ....". It's nothing more than a tech version of a
supermarket rag like The National Enquirer. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343602 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Saturday, February 13, 2016 at 7:25:10 PM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
> > http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz
> 
> Why would I trust a k00k?

Ugh why are you sucking up to a proven douche like Roy Liarwitz?

> 
> And it's even worse than that!
> 
>    http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/The-RationalWiki-Foundation/Albuquerque-New-Mexico-87106/The-RationalWiki-Foundation-RationalWiki-Rational-Wiki-RW-Rationalwikiorg-Rationalwi-1143383
> 
>    The RationalWiki Foundation RationalWiki, Rational-Wiki, RW,
>    Rationalwiki.org, Rationalwiki.com, Trent Toulouse A website with a
>    history of engaging in "cyber-vandalism" by its own admission, now a
>    registered nonprofit organization. Albuquerque New Mexico
> 
> And the nail in "Marly"'s coffin:
> 
>    RationalWiki is a wiki, like Wikipedia. Anyone can change the content of
>    articles at RationalWiki.
> 
> Yup.  My first instincts were correct... another plant job against Roy.

Yuck. You're so creepy.

> 
> Not that he doesn't go too far in some of his thinking, in my opinion.

You have no opinion. Roy's "opinions" are left on your tongue as you withdraw it from Roy's backside.

> 
> Anyway, I suppose we should sigh in relief that it wasn't another 
> "cut off my testicles for Linux" plant.

What is it with you and cutting off testicles?


> 
> -- 
> Q:	What happens when four WASPs find themselves in the same room?
> A:	A dinner party.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343618 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

<kubuntuking@gmail.com> said
> On Saturday, February 13, 2016 at 7:25:10 PM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>> > http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz
>> 
>> Why would I trust a k00k?
> 
> Ugh why are you sucking up to a proven douche like Roy Liarwitz?
> 

most certainly it's eager beaver seeking the attention he never got from father when he was a child.

Ahlstrom is a most obedient lap dog for Schestowitz. 

odd that Ahlstrom cries k00k so easily and so ofter. Yet he admires 7, homer and Liarwitz.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343665 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

"Delgato" <delgato@gmail.com> says
> 
> <kubuntuking@gmail.com> said
>> On Saturday, February 13, 2016 at 7:25:10 PM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>> > http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz
>>> 
>>> Why would I trust a k00k?
>> 
>> Ugh why are you sucking up to a proven douche like Roy Liarwitz?
>> 
> 
> most certainly it's eager beaver seeking the attention he never got from father when he was a child.
> 
> Ahlstrom is a most obedient lap dog for Schestowitz. 
> 
> odd that Ahlstrom cries k00k so easily and so ofter. Yet he admires 7, homer and Liarwitz.
> 

Definitely a +1

It's pathetic seeing a grown man try so hard to be liked by some anonymous usenet loser.

Ahlstrom is desperate to be accepted. He'll do anything to be one of the boys.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343656 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

kubuntuking@gmail.com wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

>

Go away, idiot.

-- 
Today is National Existential Ennui Awareness Day.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web