Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #453309

Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions

From	Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject	Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions
Date	2018-06-02 10:18 -0700
Message-ID	<fng1rmF697cU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(12 earlier) <20180601232911@news.eternal-september.org> <fneipoFs3e4U1@mid.individual.net> <20180602002117@news.eternal-september.org> <fneqqiFteu0U1@mid.individual.net> <op.zjzfxtdlu3fn8d@red.lan>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>> Roger Blake wrote:
>>> Cost is ridiculous when compared to similar-spec commodity hardware,
>>> but as I said what you're paying for is the ease of use for people who
>>> really have no knowledge of computers at all. I find it frustrating
>>> to deal with since it is so locked down. However my elderly neighbor,
>>> who is a WWII veteran to whom a computer seems like something out of
>>> Buck Rogers, loves the thing.
>>
>> Another feature of the WOW which is an all-in-one design 22" touchscreen
>> (2G ram, 32 G SSD, wireless kb/mouse) is their 'built-in' support
>> situation.  Free lifetime basic support and VIP support at $10/mo, which
>> basic support is toll free phone, email, and claims to be US based (that
>> may be the VIP v.)  as opposed to a language barrier phone center
>> somewhere in the world.
>>
>> The VIP support includes extras and remote access support.
> 
> I dunno about the US, but in the UK if I get an Indian I just say "I'd 
> like to speak to an English person please" and they put me through to one.
> 

The business of being able to provide sufficient quality telephone 
support is typically a very costly and difficult undertaking.  The 
typical scenario is that it is farmed out to call centers somewhere the 
support hourly wage is more affordable, such as India or the Philippines.

This target marketed audience of seniors, particularly those who would 
choose to buy such a WOW computer, would seem to me to be a particularly 
difficult one. "I don't know anything about computers and my faculties 
are somewhat impaired as I can't see very well (or hear very well, or 
remember very well, or handle a mouse very well)."

It is interesting that the WOW people decided to build their interface 
on the Tiny Core Linux base and other open source ware.  It seems that 
the hardware is very minimal except for what is spent on that 22" 
touchscreen, so the dollar distribution would be hardware-wise 
principally that monitor touchscreen and then the tech support.

I'm sure they would 'immediately' upgrade the users who needed more 
support to the $10/mo VIP (1st 30 d. free VIP), but that is still pretty 
cheap price.  Being able to give remote support helps a lot, but that 
requires functional connectivity and hardware performance.  If one of 
those weren't operating properly, I think the customer would need some 
kind of outside support.

The reviews on Amazon were more negative than positive.  There were 
worthwhile comments there from IT people who made suggestions about 
alternate ways to provide much better hardware, but I didn't find those 
suggestions satisfactory about how to achieve a 'foolproof' interface. 
There's the nut in this venture.

-- 
Mike Easter

Thread

Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-01 05:53 +0200
  Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 08:41 -0400
    Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 08:23 -0500
      Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions ooze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 10:12 -0400
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 07:29 -0700
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:05 -0700
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-01 08:16 -0700
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:27 -0700
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2018-06-01 16:59 -0500
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 15:06 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2018-06-01 19:02 -0500
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2018-06-02 01:09 +0200
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2018-06-01 19:24 -0500
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0500
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 11:36 -0400
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:01 -0700
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-06-01 13:14 -0500
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 17:15 -0400
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 15:19 -0700
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-01 23:44 +0100
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 18:57 -0400
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 16:03 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 19:24 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 16:27 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 16:54 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0500
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 05:23 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:20 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:25 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 16:31 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:35 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 16:43 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-03 14:59 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-03 15:12 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-03 17:35 +0200
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:19 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 14:23 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-03 19:00 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:17 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <nobody@haph.org> - 2018-06-03 16:42 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:49 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:50 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:02 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-03 14:59 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:20 -0500
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions SilverSlimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-08 11:11 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 08:29 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 10:38 -0500
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2018-06-08 18:40 +0200
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions SilverSlimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-08 13:03 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2018-06-08 12:20 -0500
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 11:21 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:31 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:14 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Knarf Gewtools <that@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-08 20:12 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions SilverSlimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-08 17:54 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2018-06-09 01:04 +0200
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Karen <karen.sandler@videoanimationshub.com> - 2018-06-09 16:10 +0000
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 16:00 -0700
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> - 2018-06-01 11:36 -0500
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 11:40 -0500
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit wants to repeal the 2A <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:51 -0700
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 17:03 -0400
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2018-06-02 00:12 +0200
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-01 22:23 +0000
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-01 18:02 +0000
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 14:14 -0400
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit wants to repeal the 2A <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 11:39 -0700
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-06-02 00:19 +0200
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-06-01 22:21 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-06-02 00:25 +0200
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-02 09:15 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-01 22:36 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 15:39 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-06-01 22:44 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 18:57 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 16:01 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 22:03 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 22:12 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Md" <mdhonda6@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 03:43 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 16:06 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2018-06-02 02:10 +0200
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2018-06-02 01:36 +0200
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 11:32 -0700
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-01 22:18 +0000
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 15:26 -0700
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <nobody@haph.org> - 2018-06-01 19:47 -0400
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 17:14 -0400
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 14:21 -0700
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2018-06-01 17:38 -0400
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 01:19 +0100
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 17:40 -0700
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-02 01:18 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:19 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-02 03:14 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:23 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-02 03:39 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:55 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 00:01 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 21:04 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:12 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 00:25 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:36 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:40 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:43 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 23:57 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 14:04 +0100
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-02 10:18 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 18:28 +0100
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:54 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2018-06-02 17:30 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 22:36 +0100
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-02 22:13 +0200
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 21:21 +0100
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:01 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:21 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0700
                Re: Off-Topic in the privacy group "Orland" <orland.tamlinson@aol.com> - 2018-06-03 02:41 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-03 03:23 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 20:45 +0100
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:12 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 21:19 +0100
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-03 03:29 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-03 18:52 +0100
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-03 21:20 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-04 00:18 +0200
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2018-06-12 23:22 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2018-06-14 00:29 +0200
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 00:01 -0400
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:15 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 21:36 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:40 +0000
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-03 03:08 +0200
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 20:48 -0700
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0500
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 14:05 +0100
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 01:18 +0100
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-02 01:15 +0000
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2018-06-02 04:56 +0200
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 14:08 +0100
                Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 06:13 -0700
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 14:09 +0100
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2018-06-01 18:00 -0700
    Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 06:27 -0700
    Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> - 2018-06-01 08:40 -0500
      Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 07:14 -0700
      Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-01 23:43 +0100
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2018-06-01 19:19 -0400
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 00:24 +0100
      Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2018-06-01 17:57 -0700
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 18:27 -0700
    Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 11:21 -0400
      Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 11:38 -0400
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 10:42 -0500
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:02 -0700
      Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 10:40 -0500
      Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:03 -0700
    Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2018-06-01 17:54 -0700
      Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <nobody@haph.org> - 2018-06-01 21:48 -0400
      Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-02 09:28 -0400
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 09:55 -0400
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 07:31 -0700
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-02 17:48 +0200
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 10:24 -0700
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:41 -0700
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Landon" <coordinarter@googlemail.com> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-02 22:38 -0400
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0700
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:42 -0400
        Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Landom" <coordinarter@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:57 +0000
          Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-02 23:14 -0400
            Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-06-02 23:46 -0400
              Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-03 09:44 -0400

csiph-web