Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #454461
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions |
| Date | 2018-06-08 12:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fo03spF8581U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <k4tkhd5s3erkq09m30qrs7bjusmlasblgf@4ax.com> <o47lhd96envucuetgm17op3ef25l34sd15@4ax.com> <ia8lhddnpf13gpa6dnkvsauj71hko9hi23@4ax.com> <endlhd57mvta3vkg22j3k72nsaiir94o95@4ax.com> <765314f4-a4b9-4cd8-991e-1f11a5586aa4@googlegroups.com> |
On 6/8/18 11:21 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 10:03:54 AM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Jun 2018 10:38:37 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> --
>>> 'I have noted before how the herd sees me as a god.' - the "Snit"
>>> thing
>>
>> Damn, our standards must have dropped to critical levels!
>
>
>
> John Gohde can't get anything else to work, either. Snit and Berners-Lee had their public farts and their errors.
More of one than the other! :)
> But one played it well and didn't do anything too publicly that could not be presented as stage magic. You're clueless! Rambling cretin.
>
> So, yeah, I buy into my own make believe world, fully knowing it is not real, because it makes me reconsider my program, improving it.
Great quote!
Steve Carroll:
-----
So, yeah, I buy into my own make believe world, fully knowing
it is not real, because it makes me reconsider my program,
improving it.
-----
I should start a list like I have for Peter with your comments.
> Having to tolerate the use of Mint it can hardly be called "free" when you include your time.
What is?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-01 05:53 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 08:41 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 08:23 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions ooze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 10:12 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 07:29 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:05 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-01 08:16 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:27 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2018-06-01 16:59 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2018-06-01 19:02 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2018-06-02 01:09 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2018-06-01 19:24 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 11:36 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:01 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2018-06-01 13:14 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 17:15 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 15:19 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-01 23:44 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 18:57 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 16:03 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 19:24 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 16:27 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 16:54 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 05:23 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:20 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:25 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 16:31 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:35 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 16:43 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-03 14:59 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-03 15:12 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-03 17:35 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:19 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 14:23 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-03 19:00 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:17 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <nobody@haph.org> - 2018-06-03 16:42 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:49 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:50 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:02 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-03 14:59 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:20 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions SilverSlimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-08 11:11 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 08:29 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 10:38 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2018-06-08 18:40 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions SilverSlimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-08 13:03 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2018-06-08 12:20 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 11:21 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:31 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:14 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Knarf Gewtools <that@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-06-08 20:12 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions SilverSlimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-08 17:54 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2018-06-09 01:04 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Karen <karen.sandler@videoanimationshub.com> - 2018-06-09 16:10 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 16:00 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> - 2018-06-01 11:36 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 11:40 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit wants to repeal the 2A <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:51 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 17:03 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2018-06-02 00:12 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-01 22:23 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-01 18:02 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 14:14 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit wants to repeal the 2A <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 11:39 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-06-02 00:19 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-06-01 22:21 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-06-02 00:25 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-02 09:15 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-01 22:36 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 15:39 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-06-01 22:44 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 18:57 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 16:01 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 22:03 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 22:12 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Md" <mdhonda6@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 03:43 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 16:06 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2018-06-02 02:10 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2018-06-02 01:36 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 11:32 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-01 22:18 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <nobody@haph.org> - 2018-06-01 19:47 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 17:14 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 14:21 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2018-06-01 17:38 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 01:19 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 17:40 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-02 01:18 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:19 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-02 03:14 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:23 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-02 03:39 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:55 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 00:01 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 21:04 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:12 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 00:25 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:36 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:40 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:43 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 23:57 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 14:04 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-02 10:18 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 18:28 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:54 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2018-06-02 17:30 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 22:36 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-02 22:13 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 21:21 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:01 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:21 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0700
Re: Off-Topic in the privacy group "Orland" <orland.tamlinson@aol.com> - 2018-06-03 02:41 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-03 03:23 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 20:45 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:12 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 21:19 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-03 03:29 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-03 18:52 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-03 21:20 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-04 00:18 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2018-06-12 23:22 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2018-06-14 00:29 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 00:01 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:15 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 21:36 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:40 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-03 03:08 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 20:48 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 14:05 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 01:18 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-06-02 01:15 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2018-06-02 04:56 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 14:08 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 06:13 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 14:09 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2018-06-01 18:00 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 06:27 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> - 2018-06-01 08:40 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 07:14 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-01 23:43 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2018-06-01 19:19 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" <nowhere@somewear.co.uk> - 2018-06-02 00:24 +0100
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2018-06-01 17:57 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 18:27 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 11:21 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 11:38 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 10:42 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:02 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 10:40 -0500
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:03 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2018-06-01 17:54 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <nobody@haph.org> - 2018-06-01 21:48 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-02 09:28 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 09:55 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 07:31 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-06-02 17:48 +0200
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 10:24 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:41 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Landon" <coordinarter@googlemail.com> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-02 22:38 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0700
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:42 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions "Landom" <coordinarter@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:57 +0000
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-02 23:14 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-06-02 23:46 -0400
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-03 09:44 -0400
csiph-web