Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #450846

Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG!

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG!
Date 2018-05-08 11:08 -0700
Message-ID <fle7ccFgu5kU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <szb90803ga.nuo4@rooftop.invalid> <pcs3nc02ns@news4.newsguy.com> <szb903ggv803.hu4@rooftop.invalid> <pcsnmo0acj@news4.newsguy.com> <szb80830ga.ghu@rooftop.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/8/18 10:56 AM, owl wrote:
> F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:25:10 +0000, owl wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> External vehicle barriers are cheaper.
>>>
>>> Attic filled with rolls of concertina wire.
>>>
>>> Sandbags in every room are effective and much cheaper.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  He apparently has never cohabited with
>> some stupid bitch.
>>
> 
> Those were my wife's ideas.
> 
> 
>> No dumb pussy in her right mind would ever put up with such
>> "additions."  My solutions, as per usual, are the correct ones.
>>
> 
> I'd rather spend the money on ammo.  The house's structural security
> only has to hold long enough for me to be alerted of the attempted
> breach.  After that, human security comes into play, and it's game
> over for the bad guys.
> 
Unless they have better equipment and training.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 09:19 -0700
  Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-05 16:22 +0000
    Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-05 18:49 +0000
      Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 19:50 +0000
        Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-06 06:13 +0000
        Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-06 12:12 +0000
          Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-06 12:57 +0000
          The jig is up, once the government gains physical access to your device. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-06 10:13 -0700
      Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-06 06:13 +0000
        Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-06 12:16 +0000
          Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 05:58 -0700
  Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-05 12:24 -0400
    Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 08:00 -0500
      Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-05-07 09:13 -0700
        Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-07 13:08 -0400
          Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 12:25 -0500
            Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:30 -0700
            Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-05-07 10:47 -0700
              Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-07 18:03 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-05-07 12:24 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:12 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-07 22:09 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 15:45 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-07 23:12 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 17:02 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-08 15:12 +0200
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-07 22:40 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-07 23:10 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-07 23:42 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 16:55 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 19:46 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 01:59 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 12:18 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 05:36 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:11 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:42 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 12:03 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 05:05 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 07:37 -0500
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 06:24 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 17:25 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 17:44 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 17:56 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:08 -0700
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 18:49 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 22:45 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-09 01:55 +0000
            Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-07 15:22 -0400
              Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 14:50 -0500
        Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 12:18 -0500
          Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:27 -0700
        Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 07:53 -0700
          Compared to SmartPhones, WinIntel is super safe. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 08:36 -0700
            Re: Compared to SmartPhones, WinIntel is super safe. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 13:47 -0400
          Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 17:11 +0000
            Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-08 18:21 +0000
              Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 18:40 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-08 18:50 +0000
                Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 12:59 -0700

csiph-web