Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #450785
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! |
| Date | 2018-05-07 17:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <flc7okF3f90U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <667cfaae-8fdb-41dc-9671-2998442d5be5@googlegroups.com> <szbi003ga.gho@rooftop.invalid> <b7bab71e-53be-4ca4-8c5c-c914d03076e0@googlegroups.com> <54967838-2ee6-4c6f-b2de-f599ce16bd4c@googlegroups.com> <pcqiqc02elb@news7.newsguy.com> |
On 5/7/18 3:09 PM, F. Russell wrote: > On Mon, 07 May 2018 13:12:56 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> when the context >> was "the former World Trade Center" >> > Hey bonehead. Hey numbnuts. The context was DESIGN, i.e. software > design, hardware design, building design, etc., etc., etc. > > The point is that no designer begins with the assumption that every > third person will be intent on criminally assaulting the final product. > Security, if it is considered at all, is only an extremely remote > concern. What makes you think this? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 09:19 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-05 16:22 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-05 18:49 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 19:50 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-06 06:13 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-06 12:12 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-06 12:57 +0000
The jig is up, once the government gains physical access to your device. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-06 10:13 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-06 06:13 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-06 12:16 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 05:58 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-05 12:24 -0400
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 08:00 -0500
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-05-07 09:13 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-07 13:08 -0400
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 12:25 -0500
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:30 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-05-07 10:47 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-07 18:03 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-05-07 12:24 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:12 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-07 22:09 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 15:45 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-07 23:12 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 17:02 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-08 15:12 +0200
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-07 22:40 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-07 23:10 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-07 23:42 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 16:55 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 19:46 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 01:59 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 12:18 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 05:36 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:11 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:42 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 12:03 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 05:05 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 07:37 -0500
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 06:24 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 17:25 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 17:44 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 17:56 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:08 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 18:49 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 22:45 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-09 01:55 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-07 15:22 -0400
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 14:50 -0500
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 12:18 -0500
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:27 -0700
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 07:53 -0700
Compared to SmartPhones, WinIntel is super safe. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 08:36 -0700
Re: Compared to SmartPhones, WinIntel is super safe. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 13:47 -0400
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 17:11 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-08 18:21 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-08 18:40 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-08 18:50 +0000
Re: INTEL: Eight new security flaws incl. Spectre-NG! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 12:59 -0700
csiph-web